开裂式方向舵在变前掠翼布局中的操纵性能研究

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2013.0133

Abstract

Abstract:

For the lateral and directional control of variable forward swept wing (VFSW) tailless configuration, a split rudder (SR) is designed in this paper. The disperse method of Navier-Stokes control equations with finite volume and shear stress transport (SST) turbulence model are employed to calculate the SR control characteristics of the orthogonal wing and forward swept wing in VFSW the control efficiency of SR is compared, and the flow field of SR is numerically analyzed. The computational results show that the case when the right SR actuates the angle of attack in the orthogonal wing has less effect on the yawing moment, while the rotary angle of SR has a remarkable impact on the yawing moment, which is propitious to yaw. In the forward swept wing configuration, the yawing moment tends to fluctuate with the increase of the angle of attack, but it appears steady in small angles of attack. The yawing function strengthens with the increase of the rotary angle. The right sideslip is stronger than left sideslip, but the opposite is true in yawing function. Comparatively, in the aspect of yawing, the orthogonal wing is better than the forward swept wing. The rolling and yawing are all coupled in both the orthogonal wing and forward swept wing configurations, but the coupling effect of the orthogonal wing is less than the forward swept wing.

Key words: variable forward swept wing, split rudder, numerical simulation, control characteristic, flow field

CLC Number:

V212.12⁺8

WANG Xu, YU Chong, SU Xinbing, CHEN Peng. Study of Control Characteristics for Split Rudder in Variable Forward Swept Wing Configuration[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2013.0133.

References

[1] Zhang B Q, Laschka B. On forward-swept wing's aerodynamic characteristics. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 1989, 7(3): 321-328. (in Chinese) 张彬乾, Laschka B. 前掠翼气动特性研究. 西北工业大学学报, 1989, 7(3): 321-328.
[2] Ye L, Zhang B Q. Control of separated flow at the root for forward swept wing. Science Technology and Engineering, 2008, 8(3): 836-839. (in Chinese) 叶露, 张彬乾. 前掠翼根部流动分离控制措施研究. 科学技术与工程, 2008, 8(3): 836-839.
[3] Wang J J, Zhao X, Wang S F, et al. Experimental investigation on longitudinal aerodynamic characteristics of canard-forward-swept wing configuration. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2004, 22(2): 237-244. (in Chinese) 王晋军, 赵霞, 王双峰, 等. 鸭翼-前掠翼气动布局纵向气动特性实验研究. 空气动力学学报, 2004, 22(2): 237-244.
[4] Zhan J X, Wang J J, Zhao X, et al. Investigation on the effects of the height of close canard wing on the aerodynamic characteristic of a forward-swept configuration. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2006, 20(2): 50-54. (in Chinese) 展京霞, 王晋军, 赵霞, 等. 近距鸭翼高度对鸭翼-前掠翼布局纵向气动特性影响的实验研究. 实验流体力学, 2006, 20(2): 50-54.
[5] Northrop Grumman Corporation. Aircraft with variable forward sweep wing: USA, US5984231. 1999-11-16.
[6] Hoiinouchi S. Variable forward swept wing supersonic aircraft having both low-boom characteristics and low-drag characteristics: USA, US Fresh Patent 20050230531. 2005-10-20.
[7] Liu W F, Wang X, Mi K. A New aerodynamic configuration of UAV with variable forward-swept wing. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2009, 30(5):832-836. (in Chinese) 刘文法, 王旭, 米康. 一种新的变前掠翼无人机气动布局概念研究. 航空学报, 2009, 30(5): 832-836.
[8] Liu W F, Wang X, Liu X. Aerodynamic characteristics and flow mechanism of theconfiguration with variable forward swept wing. Acta Aerodynamic Sinica, 2010, 28(5): 559-564. (in Chinese) 刘文法, 王旭, 刘雄. 变前掠翼布局气动特性及流动机理研究. 空气动力学学报, 2010, 28(5): 559-564.
[9] Wang X, Huang M, Ren Z J, al et. Comparision and analysis on the aerodynamic characteristics of forward swept and orthogonal wing configuration. Journal of Air Force Engineering University (Natural Science Edition), 2011, 12(4):1-4. (in Chinese) 王旭, 黄萌, 仁智静, 等. 前掠翼与平直翼布局气动特性的比较分析. 空军工程大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 12(4): 1-4.
[10] Zhang Z J, Li J, Li T, et al. Experimental investigation of split-rudder deflection on aerodynamic performance of tailless flying-wing aircraft. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2010, 24(3): 63-66.(in Chinese) 张子军, 黎军, 李天, 等. 开裂式方向舵对某无尾飞翼布局飞机气动特性影响的实验研究. 实验流体力学, 2010, 24(3): 63-66.
[11] Dorsett K M, Mehl D R. Innovative control effectors(ICE). WL-TR-96-3043, 1996.
[12] William J G. Innovative control effectors (configuration 101)dynamic wind tunnel test report rotary balance and force oscillation tests. AFRL-VA-WP-Tp-1998-3043, 1998.
[13] Ma S H, Wu C F, Chen H M. The application of drag rudder to flight control of tailless aircraft. Flight Dyna-mics, 2008, 26(2): 69-73. (in Chinese) 马松辉, 吴成富, 陈怀民. 阻力方向舵在无尾飞机飞行控制中的应用. 飞行力学, 2008, 26(2): 69-73.
[14] Chai X, Wang G L, Wu Z. Study on the control surface characteristics and flight control of the high sweepback flying wing UAV. Flight Dynamics, 2009, 27(6): 26-29.(in Chinese) 柴雪, 王钢林, 武哲. 大后掠飞翼布局无人机操纵面特性及控制研究. 飞行力学, 2009, 27(6): 26-29.
[15] Wang L, Wang L X, Jia Z R. Control features and application characteristics of split drag rudder utilized by flying wing. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2011, 32(8): 1392-1399. (in Chinese) 王磊, 王立新, 贾重任. 飞翼布局飞机开裂式方向舵的作用特性和使用特点. 航空学报, 2011, 32(8): 1392-1399.
[16] Wang Y Y, Zhang B Q, Shen D. Exploring combined capability of aerodynamic control surfaces of W-shaped tailless configuration. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2008, 26(6): 698-702.(in Chinese) 王元元, 张彬乾, 沈冬. W型无尾布局复合式气动舵面设计研究. 西北工业大学学报, 2008, 26(6): 698-702.
[17] Office of the Secretary of Defense. Unmanned aerial vehicles roadmap 2002-2027. ADA414908, 2002.
[18] Office of the Secretary of Defense. Unmanned aircraft systems roadmap 2005-2030. 05-S-1620, 2005.
[19] Fang B R. Aircraft aerodynamic configuration design. Beijing: Aviation Industry Press, 1997: 363-367. (in Chinese) 方宝瑞. 飞机气动布局设计. 北京: 航空工业出版社, 1997: 363-367.
[20] Yu C, Wang X, Dong F A, al et. The study of effect on y⁺ for precision of pneumatic parameters about foil. Journal of Air Force Engineering University (Natural Science Edition), 2012, 13(3):25-29. (in Chinese) 于冲, 王旭, 董福安, 等. y⁺值对翼型气动参数计算精度的影响研究. 空军工程大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 13(3): 25-29.

Study of Control Characteristics for Split Rudder in Variable Forward Swept Wing Configuration

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	WU Qiang, XU Haojun, WEI Yang, PEI Binbin, XUE Yuan. Aerodynamics/flight dynamics coupling characteristics of aircraft under icing conditions [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(8): 125566-125566.
[2]	QI Longzhou, ZHAO Kun, FENG Heying, ZHANG Junlong, QIN Chen. Influence of slotting on inclined plate at different impact distances on impact noise of supersonic jet [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(8): 125712-125712.
[3]	XIAHOU Tangfan, CHEN Jiangtao, SHAO Zhidong, WU Xiaojun, LIU Yu. Model validation metrics for CFD numerical simulation under aleatory and epistemic uncertainty [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(8): 25716-025716.
[4]	WANG Guoqian, LI Hansong, HAN Guofeng, LI Ruoqi, ZHANG Yan. Through-mask electrochemical machining technology of periodic reversing electrolyte flow [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(4): 525575-525575.
[5]	YANG Jiankai, GU Dongdong, GE Qing, TAN Chenchen, WEN Yu. Support layout and precise forming mechanism of aluminum alloy for laser additive manufacturing [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(4): 525331-525331.
[6]	LIU Jiahao, LI Gaohua, WANG Fuxin. Rotor-wing aerodynamic interference characteristics in conversion mode [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(12): 126097-126097.
[7]	JIANG Youxu, LI Jie, YANG Zhao. Data correction method of wind tunnel test for verification aircraft with laminar wing section [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526814-526814.
[8]	WANG Hao, ZHONG Min, HUA Jun, ZHONG Hai, YANG Tihao, WANG Meng, LEI Guodong. Simulation and experiment of natural laminar flow flight test wing glove [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526785-526785.
[9]	DUAN Junyi, TONG Fulin, LI Xinliang, LIU Hongwei. Decomposition of mean friction drag in compression-expansion turbulent boundary layer [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(1): 625915-625915.
[10]	SHEN Pengfei, LIU Pengxin, SUN Dong, YUAN Xianxu. Statistical characteristics of skin friction of shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction in hollow cylinder-flare configuration at Mach 6 [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(1): 626005-626005.
[11]	LIU Pengxin, YUAN Xianxu, LIANG Fei, LI Chen, SUN Dong. Quadrant decomposition analysis of fluctuations in high-temperature turbulent boundary layer with chemical non-equilibrium [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(S1): 726338-726338.
[12]	BAO Jun, WANG Yu, NIU Qian, ZHU Xidong, CHENG Jianjie. Influencing parameters and film flow mechanism of spray droplet impacting liquid film [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(S1): 726360-726360.
[13]	CHEN Chongpei, LIANG Jianhan, GUAN Qingdi, GAO Tianyun. Conservative compressible one-dimensional turbulence method and its application in supersonic scalar mixing layer [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(S1): 726364-726364.
[14]	LI Qing, TU Guohua, YU Zhaosheng, LIN Zhaowu, LI Tingting, YUAN Xianxu. Inertial particle transport in non-uniform accelerated flow [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(S1): 726390-726390.
[15]	WANG Xiao, CHENG Jianhui, SHEN Tianrong, XU Baocheng, MENG Xuan. Numerical simulation research of influence of wake flow field on inlet temperature field of carrier-based aircraft [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(8): 525795-525795.