基于STPA-TOPAZ的低空无人机冲突解脱安全性分析

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2021.25354

电子电气工程与控制

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

基于STPA-TOPAZ的低空无人机冲突解脱安全性分析

张宏宏^1,2,3, 甘旭升^1,2, 孙静娟^1,2, 赵顾颢^1,2, 韩宝华^1,2

1. 空军工程大学空管领航学院, 西安 710051;
2. 国家空管防相撞技术重点实验室, 西安 710051;
3. 中国人民解放军 31664部队, 格尔木 816000

收稿日期:2021-02-01 修回日期:2021-06-21 发布日期:2021-06-18
通讯作者: 甘旭升,E-mail:ganxusheng123@163.com E-mail:ganxusheng123@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(61601497);陕西省自然科学基础研究计划(2022JM-412);空军工程大学校长基金(XZJ2020005)

Analysis of low altitude UAV conflict resolution safety based on STPA-TOPAZ

ZHANG Honghong^1,2,3, GAN Xusheng^1,2, SUN Jingjuan^1,2, ZHAO Guhao^1,2, HAN Baohua^1,2

1. Air Traffic Control and Navigation College, Air Force Engineering University, Xi'an 710051, China;
2. National Key Laboratory of Air Traffic Collision Prevention, Xi'an 710051, China;
3. Unit 31664 of PLA, Golmud 816000, China

Received:2021-02-01 Revised:2021-06-21 Published:2021-06-18
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (61601497); Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi Province (2022JM-412);The President Foundation of Air Force Engineering University (XZJ2020005)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为防止低空无人机(UAV)冲突解脱过程中发生危险接近或事故,将该过程的安全问题转化为控制问题,提出基于STPA-TOPAZ的低空无人机冲突解脱安全性分析方法。首先基于系统理论的事故模型和过程(STAMP),构建冲突解脱系统中的安全控制结构。然后利用系统理论过程分析(STPA)根据系统运行的上下文信息确定系统级事故和危险,识别出冲突解脱过程中的不安全控制行为,并分析产生不安全控制行为的关键致因。最后利用TOPAZ方法定量描述致因因素对系统安全的影响程度,找到制约系统安全的瓶颈。仿真结果表明了STPA-TOPAZ方法的有效性与优越性。

关键词: 无人机, 冲突解脱, 系统理论过程分析, TOPAZ, 安全评估

Abstract: To prevent the occurrence of dangerous approaches or accidents in the low-altitude UAV conflict resolution process, the security problem in the process was transformed into the control problem, and a conflict resolution security analysis method for the low altitude UAV was proposed based on STPA-TOPAZ. Firstly, based on Syster-Theoretic Accident Modeling and Processes (STAMP), the security control structure in the conflict resolution system is constructed. Then System-Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA) is used to determine system-level accidents and hazards based on the context information of system operation, identify the unsafe control behaviors in the process of conflict resolution, and analyze the key causes of unsafe control behaviors. Finally, the Traffic Organization and Perturbation Analyzer (TOPAZ) method is used to quantitatively describe the influence degree of the causal factors on system security, and identify the security bottleneck that restricts the system. The simulation results show the effectiveness and superiority of the STPA-TOPAZ method.

Key words: UAV, conflict resolution, system-theoretic process analysis, TOPAZ, safety assessmenthttp

中图分类号:

V279
P624.8

张宏宏, 甘旭升, 孙静娟, 赵顾颢, 韩宝华. 基于STPA-TOPAZ的低空无人机冲突解脱安全性分析[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(7): 325354.

ZHANG Honghong, GAN Xusheng, SUN Jingjuan, ZHAO Guhao, HAN Baohua. Analysis of low altitude UAV conflict resolution safety based on STPA-TOPAZ[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(7): 325354.

参考文献

[1] 全权,李刚,柏艺琴,等.低空无人机交通管理概览与建议[J].航空学报, 2020, 41(1):023238. QUAN Q, LI G, BAI Y Q, et al. Low altitude UAV traffic management:an introductory overview and proposal[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2020, 41(1):023238(in Chinese).
[2] THIBBOTUWAWA A, BOCEWICZ G, NIELSEN P, et al. Unmanned aerial vehicle routing problems:a literature review[J]. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10(13):4504.
[3] LIU Y L, DAI H N, WANG Q, et al. Unmanned aerial vehicle for internet of everything:opportunities and challenges[J]. Computer Communications, 2020, 155:66-83.
[4] HUANG S N, TEO R S H, TAN K K. Collision avoidance of multi unmanned aerial vehicles:a review[J]. Annual Reviews in Control, 2019, 48:147-164.
[5] PURBA J H, SONY TJAHYANI D T, WIDODO S, et al. Fuzzy probability based event tree analysis for calculating core damage frequency in nuclear power plant probabilistic safety assessment[J]. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 2020, 125:103376.
[6] MARES R E, NAGY M, RADU I. Using the event tree analysis in the investigation of a work accident[J]. MATEC Web of Conferences, 2020, 305:00088.
[7] JONG J C, LAI Y C R, YOUNG C C, et al. Application of fault tree analysis and Swiss cheese model to the overspeed derailment of puyuma train in Yilan, Taiwan[J]. Transportation Research Record:Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2020, 2674(5):33-46.
[8] GUO X Y, MENG B, LIU Y W, et al. A human error mechanism for pilot based on fault tree analysis and Bayesian network[J]. Journal of Intelligent&Fuzzy Systems, 2020, 38(6):6863-6871.
[9] FAN C H, ZHU Y, LI W, et al. Consensus building in linguistic failure mode and effect analysis:a perspective based on prospect theory[J]. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 2020, 36(7):2521-2546.
[10] CARMAN A L, VANDERPOOL R C, STRADTMAN L R, et al. Standardizing a federally qualified health center's preventive care processes:use of failure modes and effects analysis[J]. Health Care Management Review, 2020, 45(3):228-231.
[11] 王瑛,孙贇,李超.基于IDAC-STPA模型的战机飞行安全性分析与评价[J].系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(5):1056-1062. WANG Y, SUN Y, LI C. Aircraft flight safety analysis and evaluation based on IDAC-STPA model[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41(5):1056-1062(in Chinese).
[12] 王晴昊,胡剑波,姚登凯. STPA在进近着陆飞行安全分析中的研究及应用[J].系统工程理论与实践, 2018, 38(10):2703-2712. WANG Q H, HU J B, YAO D K. Research and application of STPA to flight safety analysis in approach and landing[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory&Practice, 2018, 38(10):2703-2712(in Chinese).
[13] YOUSEFI A, RODRIGUEZ HERNANDEZ M. Using a system theory based method (STAMP) for hazard analysis in process industry[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2019, 61:305-324.
[14] LEE S H, SHIN S M, HWANG J S, et al. Operational vulnerability identification procedure for nuclear facilities using STAMP/STPA[J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8:166034-166046.
[15] TARAFDAR P, BOSE I. Systems theoretic process analysis of information security:the case of aadhaar[J]. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 2019, 29(3):209-222.
[16] DE SOUZA N P, DE AZEVEDO CASTRO CéSAR C, DE MELO BEZERRA J, et al. Extending STPA with STRIDE to identify cybersecurity loss scenarios[J]. Journal of Information Security and Applications, 2020, 55:102620.
[17] CHAAL M, VALDEZ BANDA O A, GLOMSRUD J A, et al. A framework to model the STPA hierarchical control structure of an autonomous ship[J]. Safety Science, 2020, 132:104939.
[18] UDDIN M I, AWAL Z I. Systems-theoretic approach to safety of inland passenger ship operation in Bangladesh[J]. Safety Science, 2020, 126:104629.
[19] LEVESON N. A new accident model for engineering safer systems[J]. Safety Science, 2004, 42(4):237-270.
[20] 胡剑波,李俊,郑磊,等.复杂系统安全性建模、分析、控制与仿真研究[J].火力与指挥控制, 2018, 43(7):1-9, 13. HU J B, LI J, ZHENG L, et al. Research summary on safety model, analysis, control and simulate for complex systems[J]. Fire Control&Command Control, 2018, 43(7):1-9, 13(in Chinese).
[21] STROEVE S H, BLOM H A P,(BERT) BAKKER G J. Systemic accident risk assessment in air traffic by Monte Carlo simulation[J]. Safety Science, 2009, 47(2):238-249.
[22] BOSSE T, BLOM H A P, STROEVE S H, et al. An integrated multi-agent model for modelling hazards within air traffic management[C]//2013 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence (WI) and Intelligent Agent Technologies (IAT). Piscataway:IEEE Press, 2013:179-186.
[23] 刘炳琪,胡剑波,刘畅,等.飞机差动刹车纠偏过程的STAMP/STPA安全性分析[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2020, 52(4):66-73. LIU B Q, HU J B, LIU C, et al. STAMP/STPA safety analysis of aircraft differential braking correction process[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2020, 52(4):66-73(in Chinese).
[24] 谷志鸣,高文明,魏潇龙,等.基于TOPAZ的无人机冲突解脱安全评估技术[J].安全与环境学报, 2016, 16(5):51-56. GU Z M, GAO W M, WEI X L, et al. Safety assessment technology of UAV conflict resolution based on the TOPAZ method[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2016, 16(5):51-56(in Chinese).
[25] 吴立尧,韩维,张勇,等.有人/无人机编队指挥控制系统结构设计[J].系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42(8):1826-1834. WU L Y, HAN W, ZHANG Y, et al. Structure design of command and control system for manned/unmanned aerial vehicles formation[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42(8):1826-1834(in Chinese).
[26] 全权.多旋翼飞行器设计与控制[M].北京:电子工业出版社, 2018:107-125. QUAN Q. Design and control of multi-rotor aircraft[M]. Beijing:Electronics Industry Press, 2018:107-125(in Chinese).
[27] SARIM M, RADMANESH M, DECHERING M, et al. Distributed detect-and-avoid for multiple unmanned aerial vehicles in national air space[J]. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 2019, 141(7):071014.
[28] 张宏宏,甘旭升,李双峰,等.复杂低空环境下考虑区域风险评估的无人机航路规划[J].仪器仪表学报,2021,42(01):257-266. ZHANG H H, GAN X S, LI S F, et al. UAV route planning considering regional risk assessment under complex low altitude environment[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 2021,42(01):257-266(in Chinese).
[29] DURAND N. Constant speed optimal reciprocal collision avoidance[J]. Transportation Research Part C:Emerging Technologies, 2018, 96:366-379.
[30] BAREISS D, VAN DEN BERG J. Generalized reciprocal collision avoidance[J]. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 2015, 34(12):1501-1514.
[31] LI Y M, DU W B, YANG P, et al. A satisficing conflict resolution approach for multiple UAVs[J]. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2019, 6(2):1866-1878.
[32] PAPPAS G J, TOMLIN C, SASTRY S S. Conflict resolution for multi-agent hybrid systems[J]. Proceedings of 35th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 1996, 2:1184-1189.
[33] LIU H X, LIU F, ZHANG X J, et al. Aircraft conflict resolution method based on hybrid ant colony optimization and artificial potential field[J]. Science China Information Sciences, 2018, 61(12):1-3.
[34] SALEHI V, VEITCH B, SMITH D. Modeling complex socio-technical systems using the FRAM:a literature review[J]. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing&Service Industries, 2021, 31(1):118-142.
[35] 李耀华,巩子瑜.基于改进FRAM的民机系统安全性分析[J].航空学报, 2020, 41(12):324083. LI Y H, GONG Z Y. Safety analysis of civil aircraft system based on improved FRAM[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2020, 41(12):324083(in Chinese).
[36] CHOI J Y, BYEON S H. HAZOP methodology based on the health, safety, and environment engineering[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2020, 17(9):3236.
[37] WIE,CKOL-RYK A, KRZEMIEN'A, ZAWARTKA P, et al. Risk assessment of sewage sludge granulation process using HAZOP study[J]. Process Safety Progress, 2020, 39(1):e12089.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

基于STPA-TOPAZ的低空无人机冲突解脱安全性分析

Analysis of low altitude UAV conflict resolution safety based on STPA-TOPAZ

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王海峰, 刘坤澎, 江泓鑫, 杜晨曦. 螺旋桨多设计点气动优化方法和变桨距角策略[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(9): 528831-528831.
[2]	赵春晖, 刘安萌, 吕洋, 潘泉. 无人机韧性自主定位技术综述[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(8): 28839-028839.
[3]	张薇, 何若俊. 面向物联网数据收集的无人机自主路径规划[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(8): 329054-329054-1.
[4]	王传云, 苏阳, 王琳霖, 王田, 王静静, 高骞. 面向反制无人机集群的多目标连续鲁棒跟踪算法[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(7): 329017-329017.
[5]	赵靖, 宋丹. 无人机GNSS/IMU组合导航系统完好性监测方法[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(7): 328943-328943.
[6]	尹洪玉, 吴宇, 梁天骄. 固定翼无人机巡逻覆盖协同路径规划方法[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(6): 328944-328944.
[7]	安朝, 霍贵玺, 孟杨, 谢长川, 杨超. 翼尖铰接组合式无人机气动建模方法及布局参数影响[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(6): 629587-629587.
[8]	罗旭东, 吴一全, 陈金林. 无人机航拍影像目标检测与语义分割的深度学习方法研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(6): 28822-028822.
[9]	李广佳, 王红波, 张凯, 仪志胜. 临近空间太阳能无人机增升减阻技术综述[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(5): 529644-529644.
[10]	蔡云鹏, 周大鹏, 丁江川. 具有防撞安全约束的无人机集群智能协同控制[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(5): 529683-529683.
[11]	王祝, 张梦通, 张振鹏, 徐广通. 基于多指标动态优先级的无人机协同路径规划[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(4): 328816-328816.
[12]	郑高杰, 何小明, 李东坡, 谭慧俊, 汪昆, 吴祯龙, 王德鹏. 尾部推进无人机双90°偏折进气道/蜗壳耦合流动特性[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(4): 128782-128782.
[13]	姚远, 戴雨可, 徐一鸣. 考虑不确定性的太阳能无人机总体参数设计[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(17): 529856-529856.
[14]	刘双喜, 林泽淮, 刘伟, 闫斌斌, 黄伟. 基于INDI的倾转旋翼无人机过渡模式控制方案[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(17): 529685-529685.
[15]	王海峰. 高性能协同作战无人机的发展与思考[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(17): 530304-530304.