频域最小二乘辨识方法的参数约束条件选取

电子与自动控制

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

频域最小二乘辨识方法的参数约束条件选取

唐炜, 乔倩, 史忠科

西北工业大学自动化学院, 陕西西安 710129

收稿日期:2012-05-02 修回日期:2012-07-09 出版日期:2012-12-25 发布日期:2012-12-24
通讯作者: 唐炜 E-mail:tangwei@nwpu.edu.cn
作者简介:唐炜男, 博士, 副教授, 硕士生导师。主要研究方向: 系统辨识与建模、主动控制及信号处理、线性系统理论。Tel: 029-88431365 E-mail: tangwei@nwpu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(50905140);国家自然科学基金重点项目(61134004);高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金(20096102120039);西北工业大学研究生创业种子基金(Z2012114)

On the Choice of Parameter Constraint for Frequency-domain Least Squares Identification

TANG Wei, QIAO Qian, SHI Zhongke

College of Automation, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710129, China

Received:2012-05-02 Revised:2012-07-09 Online:2012-12-25 Published:2012-12-24
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (50905140); Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (61134004); Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (20096102120039);Graduate Starting Seed Fund of Northwestern Polytechnical University(Z2012114)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

近年来,频域最小二乘(LS)辨识方法因其较小的计算量和较高的辨识精度,在模态分析尤其是飞机颤振模态分析中得到了广泛关注。在实际应用中为提高辨识精度,通常采用过拟合方法进行系统辨识,然而过高的模型阶次会引入多余的数学极点,导致稳态图中虚假模态的出现,进而影响真实模态的识别。为此,针对多输入多输出系统辨识问题,研究了两种典型参数约束条件对频域最小二乘辨识方法的不同影响,通过理论分析和数学推导解释了约束条件和虚假数学极点稳定性之间的关系。研究结果表明:适当选取约束条件有助于区分真实和虚假模态,是获得清晰稳态图的关键。最后,采用仿真算例和颤振实测数据验证了本文的结论。

关键词: 频域最小二乘辨识, 颤振, 模态分析, 参数约束, 稳态图

Abstract:

In recent years, the frequency-domain least squares (LS) identification, because of its less computation and higher identification precision, has received considerable attentions in the field of modal analysis, especially the aircraft flutter modal analysis. In the practical application, the over-fitting method is usually used for system identification to improve identification precision. However, higher model order will introduce extra mathematical poles and lead to spurious mode in stabilization diagram. This seriously effects the identification of true (physical) mode. For this reason, two typical parameter constraints are investigated for multiple-input and multi-output system LS identification. Theoretical analysis and mathematical derivation are given to explain the relation between parameter constraint and stability of mathematical poles. The work of this paper shows that the right constraint choice is helpful to distinguish the true and spurious modes, which is the key to obtain a clear stabilization diagram. Finally, a numerical simulation and real flutter test measurements are used to validate the conclusions drawn from the paper.

Key words: frequency-domain least squares identification, flutter, modal analysis, parameter constraint, stabilization diagram

中图分类号:

V217
TP273

唐炜, 乔倩, 史忠科. 频域最小二乘辨识方法的参数约束条件选取[J]. 航空学报, 2012, 33(12): 2253-2260.

TANG Wei, QIAO Qian, SHI Zhongke. On the Choice of Parameter Constraint for Frequency-domain Least Squares Identification[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2012, 33(12): 2253-2260.

参考文献

[1] Brenner J M, Lind C R, Voracek F D. Overview of recent flight flutter testing research at NASA dryden. AIAA-97-1023, 1997.

[2] Kehoe W M. A historical overview of flight flutter testing. NASA CR 4720, 1995.

[3] Cooper J E. Parameter estimation methods for flight flutter testing. AGARD CP-566, 1995.

[4] Tang W, Shi Z K. Subspace identification in frequency-domain applied to aircraft flutter modal parameter identification. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2007, 28(5): 1175-1180. (in Chinese) 唐炜, 史忠科.飞机颤振模态参数的频域子空间辨识.航空学报, 2007, 28(5): 1175-1180.

[5] Guillaume P, Pintelon R, Schoukens J. Description of a parametric maximum likelihood estimator in the frequency domain for multi-input, multi-output systems and its application to flight flutter analysis. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 1990, 4(5): 405-416.

[6] van der Auweraer H, Guillaume P, Verboven P, et al. Application of a fast-stabilizing frequency domain parameter estimation method. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 2001, 123: 651-658.

[7] Peeters B, van der Auweraer H, Guillaume P, et al. The polymax frequency-domain method: a new standard for modal parameter estimation? Shock and Vibration, 2004, 11: 395-409.

[8] Sun X H, Zhang L M, Wang T. Modal parameter identification based on left matrix fraction description. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2010, 31(1): 125-130. (in Chinese) 孙鑫晖,张令弥,王彤.基于左矩阵分式模型的模态参数识别方法. 航空学报, 2010, 31(1): 125-130.

[9] van der Auweraer H, Peeters B. Discriminating physical poles from mathematical poles in high order systems:use and automation of the stabilization diagram. Proceedings of 21st IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference. Corno, Italy: IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Society, 2004: 2193-2198.

[10] Guillaume P, Verboven P, Vanlanduit S, et al. A poly-reference implementation of the least-squares complex frequency domain-estimator. Proceedings of the 21st International Modal Analysis Conference. Kissimmee Florida:Society for Experimental Mechanics, 2003.

[11] Kumaresan R. On the zeros of the linear prediction-error filter for deterministic signals. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing, 1983, 31(1): 217-220.

[12] Kumaresan R, Tufs D W. Estimating parameters of exponentially damped sinusoids and pole-zero modeling in noise. Speech and Signal Processing, 1982, 30 (6): 833-840.

[13] Cauberghe B, Guillaume P, Verboven P, et al. On the influence of the parameter constraint on the stability of the poles and the discrimination capabilities of the stabilisation diagrams. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2005, 19: 989-1014.

[14] Cauberghe B. Applied frequency-domain system identification in the field of experimental and operational modal analysis. Brussel:Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vrije University, 2004.

[15] Zheng D Z. Linear system theory. 2nd ed. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2002: 441. (in Chinese) 郑大钟.线性系统理论.2版.北京:清华大学出版社, 2002: 441.

[16] Pintelon R, Schoukens J. System identification: a frequency domain approach. Piscataway: IEEE Press, 2001: 155.

[17] Campbell S L, Meyer C D. Generalized inverses of linear transformations. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2008: 28-29.

[18] Overschee P V, Moor De B. Subspace identification for linear systems: theory, implementation, applications. Netherland, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996: 155.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

频域最小二乘辨识方法的参数约束条件选取

On the Choice of Parameter Constraint for Frequency-domain Least Squares Identification

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王昕江, 刘子强, 郭力, 付志超, 吕计男. 基于功能原理的颤振模态参与度分析方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(1): 224920-224920.
[2]	廖文和, 郑侃, 孙连军, 董松, 张磊. 大型复杂构件机器人加工稳定性研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(1): 26061-026061.
[3]	沈恩楠, 郭同庆, 吴江鹏, 胡家亮, 张桂江. 高超声速全动翼面全时域耦合分析方法及应用[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(8): 525773-525773.
[4]	陈志强, 刘战合, 苗楠, 冯伟. 基于增量学习的非定常气动力参数化降阶模型[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(7): 125103-125103.
[5]	雷鹏轩, 余立, 陈德华, 吕彬彬. 飞行控制律对体自由度颤振特性影响试验[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(6): 124378-124378.
[6]	谢丹, 冀春秀, 景兴建. 高超声速典型弹道下的壁板热气动弹性动力学分析[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(11): 524843-524843.
[7]	吴太欢, 林麒, 何升杰, 柳汀, 高忠信, 王晓光. 全模颤振双索悬挂系统刚体模态频率研究[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(9): 123761-123761.
[8]	李秋彦, 李刚, 魏洋天, 冉玉国, 吴波, 谭光辉, 李焱, 陈识, 雷博淇, 徐钦炜. 先进战斗机气动弹性设计综述[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(6): 523430-523430.
[9]	赵振军, 闫昱, 曾开春, 赵治华. 全模颤振风洞试验三索悬挂系统多体动力学分析[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(11): 123934-123934.
[10]	郑文涛, 蒋永松, 赵航, 潘若痴, 赵勇. 风扇出口导向叶片低噪声设计Ⅱ:数值验证[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(10): 122956-122956.
[11]	温卓群, 王鹏飞, 张雁, 蒋艳芬. 面向大尺度结构的力学超材料减振技术[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(S1): 721651-721651.
[12]	欧阳小穗, 刘毅. 高速流场中变刚度复合材料层合板颤振分析[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(3): 221539-221539.
[13]	王昌瑞, 康仁科, 鲍岩, 朱祥龙, 董志刚, 郭东明. 飞机蒙皮镜像铣加工稳定性分析[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(11): 422109-422121.
[14]	刘南, 郭承鹏, 白俊强. 基于高阶谐波平衡的跨声速颤振高效预测方法[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(10): 121989-121989.
[15]	王梓伊, 张伟伟. 适用于参数可调结构的非定常气动力降阶建模方法[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(6): 220829-220829.