C/C复合材料的压缩强度分布与可靠性评估

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2019.22853

固体力学与飞行器总体设计

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

C/C复合材料的压缩强度分布与可靠性评估

李湘郡^1,2, 李彦斌^1,3, 郭飞^1,2, 吴邵庆^1,2

1. 东南大学空天机械动力学研究所, 南京 211189;
2. 东南大学土木工程学院, 南京 211189;
3. 东南大学机械工程学院, 南京 211189

收稿日期:2018-12-13 修回日期:2019-02-15 出版日期:2019-08-15 发布日期:2019-04-17
通讯作者: 吴邵庆 E-mail:cesqwu@seu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（11802059）；江苏省自然科学基金（BK20170656，BK20180062）；江苏省"六大人才高峰"项目（KTHY-005）

Compression strength distribution and reliability assessment of C/C composites

LI Xiangjun^1,2, LI Yanbin^1,3, GUO Fei^1,2, WU Shaoqing^1,2

1. Institute of Aerospace Machinery and Dynamics, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China;
2. School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China;
3. School of Mechanical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China

Received:2018-12-13 Revised:2019-02-15 Online:2019-08-15 Published:2019-04-17
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (11802059); Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20170656,BK20180062); Six Talents Peaks Project in Jiangsu Province (KTHY-005)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对碳/碳（C/C）复合材料力学性能离散的特点，开展穿刺C/C复合材料压缩强度分布与可靠性评估研究。首先通过残差分析确定用于强度分布分析的样本数量，然后通过线性回归分析获得两参数Weibull分布、正态分布及对数正态分布模型的参数，进而探究穿刺C/C复合材料的压缩强度分布规律，最后通过Kolmogorov-Smirnov检验、Anderson-Darling检验和极大似然方法对3种强度分布模型进行拟合优度检验。结果表明：用于获得穿刺C/C复合材料压缩强度分布的最少样本数量应不少于30；Weibull分布、正态分布和对数正态分布模型均可表征穿刺C/C复合材料的压缩强度分布，其中Weibull分布的拟合优度最高；基于强度分布模型可得到不同可靠度所对应的穿刺C/C复合材料的设计强度参考值。

关键词: C/C复合材料, 压缩强度, 可靠性评估, 残差分析, 拟合优度检验

Abstract: Considering the discrete characteristics of Carbon/Carbon (C/C) composites, the compression strength distribution and reliability assessment of punctured C/C composites is studied. Firstly, the number of samples used for intensity distribution analysis is determined by residual analysis. Then the parameters of the two-parameter Weibull distribution, normal distribution, and lognormal distribution models are obtained by linear regression analysis. And then the distribution of compressive strength of punctured C/C composites is studied. Finally, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, the Anderson-Darling test, and the maximum likelihood method are used to test the goodness of the fit of the three distribution models. The results show that the minimum number of samples used to obtain the compressive strength distribution of punctured C/C composites should be no less than 30 and the Weibull distribution, normal distribution, and lognormal distribution models can all characterize the distribution of compressive strength of punctured C/C composites. The Weibull distribution has the highest goodness of fit. And based on the intensity distribution model, the reference values of designing punctured C/C composites with different reliabilities can be evaluated.

Key words: C/C composites, compressive strength, reliability assessment, residual analysis, goodness-of-fit test

中图分类号:

V250.2

李湘郡, 李彦斌, 郭飞, 吴邵庆. C/C复合材料的压缩强度分布与可靠性评估[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(8): 222853-222853.

LI Xiangjun, LI Yanbin, GUO Fei, WU Shaoqing. Compression strength distribution and reliability assessment of C/C composites[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2019, 40(8): 222853-222853.

参考文献 22

[1]	李辉,张立同,曾庆丰,等. 2D C/SiC复合材料的可靠性评价[J]. 复合材料学报, 2007, 24(4):95-100. LI H, ZHANG L T, ZENG Q F, et al. Reliability analysis of 2D C/SiC composite[J]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, 2007, 24(4):95-100(in Chinese).
[2]	周亚东, 费庆国,吴邵庆,等. C/SiC材料疲劳试验加载频率的数值研究[J]. 振动工程学报, 2016, 29(6):985-991. ZHOU Y D, FEI Q G, WU S Q, et al. Numerical investigation of the loading frequency for fatigue test of C/SiC materials[J]. Journal of Vibration Engineering, 2016, 29(6):985-991(in Chinese).
[3]	CHEN S F, FEI Q G, JIANG D, et al. Determination of thermo-elastic parameters for dynamical modeling of 2.5D C/SiC braided composites[J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2018, 32(1):231-243.
[4]	CALARD V, LAMON J. A probabilistic-statistical approach to the ultimate failure of ceramic-matrix composites-Part I:Experimental investigation of 2D woven SiC/SiC composites[J]. Composites Science & Technology, 2002, 62(3):385-393.
[5]	CALARD V, LAMON J. A probabilistic-statistical approach to the ultimate failure of ceramic-matrix composites-Part Ⅱ:Macroscopic model[J]. Composites Science & Technology, 2002, 62(3):395-399.
[6]	LU C, DANZER R, FISCHER F D. Fracture statistics of brittle materials:Weibull or normal distribution[J]. Physical Review E, 2002, 65(6):067102.
[7]	郭飞, 费庆国,李彦斌,等. 基于Weibull模型的C/C销钉剪切强度分布及本构关系[J/OL]. 复合材料学报, (2018-04-13)[2018-12-10]. https://doi.org/10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20180412.001. GUO F, FEI Q G, LI Y B, et al. Shear strength distribution and constitutive model of C/C composite pins based on Weibull model[J/OL]. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica, (2018-04-13)[2018-12-10]. https://doi.org/10.13801/j.cnki.fhclxb.20180412.001(in Chinese).
[8]	BASU B, TIWARI D, KUNDU D, et al. Is Weibull distribution the most appropriate statistical strength distribution for brittle materials?[J]. Ceramics International, 2009, 35(1):237-246.
[9]	严科飞, 张程煜,乔生儒,等. C/C复合材料室温面内剪切强度分布[J]. 机械强度, 2012, 34(6):912-915. YAN K F, ZHANG C Y, QIAO S R, et al. Statistical distribution of in-plane shear strength of C/C composite at room temperature[J]. Journal of Mechanical Strength, 2012, 34(6):912-915(in Chinese).
[10]	DEY A K, KUNDU D. Discriminating among the log-normal, weibull, and generalized exponential distributions[J]. IEEE Transactionson Reliability, 2009, 58(3):416-424.
[11]	DANZER R. Some notes on the correlation between fracture and defect statistics:Are Weibull statistics valid for very small specimens?[J]. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 2006, 26(15):3043-3049.
[12]	PAI S S, GYEKENYESI J P. Calculation of Weibull strength parameters and Batdorf flow-density constants for volume-and surface-flaw-induced fracture in ceramics:NASA-TM-100890[R]. Washington, D.C.:NASA,1988.
[13]	XU Y, CHENG L, ZHANG L, et al. Optimization of sample number for Weibull function of brittle materials strength[J]. Ceramics International, 2001, 27(2):239-241.
[14]	DANZER R, LUBE T, SUPANCIC P. Monte Carlo simulations of strength distributions of brittle materials:Type of distribution, specimen and sample size[J]. Zeitschrift fur Metallkunde, 2001, 92(7):773-783.
[15]	NOHUT S. Influence of sample size on strength distribution of advanced ceramics[J]. Ceramics International, 2014, 40(3):4285-4295.
[16]	费庆国, 张令弥,李爱群,等. 基于不同残差的动态有限元模型修正的比较研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2005, 24(4):24-26. FEI Q G, ZHANG L M, LI A Q, et al. Evaluation of FE model updating using four kinds of residues[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2005, 24(4):24-26(in Chinese).
[17]	孙岩, 刘勇琼,廖英强. 针刺C/C复合材料剪切性能[J]. 宇航材料工艺, 2012, 42(3):91-95. SUN Y, LIU Y Q, LIAO Y Q. Shear properties of needled felt carbon/carbon composites[J]. Aerospace Materials & Technology, 2012, 42(3):91-95(in Chinese).
[18]	潘晋波, 崔万继,王富强,等. 针刺C/C复合材料层间剪切强度的研究[C]//第17届全国复合材料学术会议, 2012:927-930. PAN J B, CUI W J, WANG F Q, et al. Investigation on interlaminar shear strength of needled Carbon/Carbon composites[C]//17th National Conference on Composite Materials, 2012:927-930(in Chinese).
[19]	HATTA H, GOTO K, AOKI T. Strengths of C/C composites under tensile, shear, and compressive loading:Role of interfacial shear strength[J]. Composites Science & Technology, 2005, 65(15):2550-2562.
[20]	赵卫, 乔玲,韩晓林,等. C/C-SiC复合材料的表面烧蚀模型及数值模拟[J]. 东南大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 41(2):365-369. ZHAO W, QIAO L, HAN X L, et al. Surface ablation model and numerical simulation of C/C-SiC composites[J]. Journal of Southeast University(Natural Science Edition), 2011,41(2):365-369(in Chinese).
[21]	COX D R. Further results on tests of separate families of hypotheses[J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B:Methodological, 1962, 24(2):406-424.
[22]	JACQUELIN J. A reliable algorithm for the exact median rank function[J]. IEEE Transactions on Electrical Insulation, 1993, 28(2):168-171.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

C/C复合材料的压缩强度分布与可靠性评估

Compression strength distribution and reliability assessment of C/C composites

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 22

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张伟, 王彬文, 樊俊铃, 詹绍正, 焦婷, 杨宇. 基于多模式超声成像的CFRP冲击损伤无损表征与冲击后压缩强度预测[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(1): 426635-426635.
[2]	赵可汗, 刘多, 朱海涛, 陈斌, 胡胜鹏, 宋晓国. 钎焊温度对C/C/AgCuTi+C_f/TC4接头组织及力学性能的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(4): 525007-525007.
[3]	刘鹏, 郭亚洲, 赵振强, 邢军, 张超. 二维三轴编织复合材料压缩失效行为的细观有限元模拟[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(7): 222865-222865.
[4]	兑红娜, 王勇军, 董江, 刘小冬. 基于飞行参数的飞机结构载荷最优回归模型[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(11): 222158-222167.
[5]	钱超, 张子剑, 李大伟. 平台式惯性导航系统在线可靠性评估技术[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(9): 321259-321259.
[6]	谭勇洋, 燕瑛, 李欣, 郭方亮. 针刺C/C复合材料拉伸强度及渐进失效数值预测[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(12): 3734-3741.
[7]	沈裕峰, 李勇, 还大军, 王鑫. 低速冲击对K-cor夹层结构力学性能的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(12): 3853-3863.
[8]	张向阳, 李勇, 褚奇奕, 肖军, 董晓阳. Z-pin点阵分布对层合板面内压缩性能的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2014, 35(1): 195-202.
[9]	张国龙, 蔡金燕, 梁玉英, 潘刚, 李伟. 电子装备多应力加速退化试验技术及可靠性评估方法研究[J]. 航空学报, 2013, 34(12): 2815-2822.
[10]	李逸仙, 齐乐华, 宋永善, 李贺军, 张卫红. 基于四分之一象限光强法热解碳消光角的计算机测量方法 [J]. 航空学报, 2012, (5): 949-955.
[11]	刘冬欢;郑小平;黄拳章;姚福印;刘应护. C/C复合材料与高温合金GH600之间高温接触热阻的试验研究[J]. 航空学报, 2010, 31(11): 2189-2194.
[12]	李勇;肖军;谭永刚;原永虎;党旭丹. X-cor夹层结构压缩性能研究[J]. 航空学报, 2009, 30(3): 557-561.
[13]	林晓秋;李克智;李贺军;兰逢涛. 表面改性C/C复合材料与LAS玻璃陶瓷的连接[J]. 航空学报, 2009, 30(2): 380-384.
[14]	尹晓伟;钱文学;谢里阳. 系统可靠性的贝叶斯网络评估方法[J]. 航空学报, 2008, 30(6): 1482-1489.
[15]	杨军;申丽娟;黄金;赵宇. 利用相似产品信息的电子产品可靠性Bayes综合评估[J]. 航空学报, 2008, 30(6): 1550-1553.