飞机连接结构防护涂层老化损伤量化评估方法

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2016.0187

固体力学与飞行器总体设计

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

飞机连接结构防护涂层老化损伤量化评估方法

唐扬刚¹, 贺小帆¹, 刘文珽¹, 李玉海²

1. 北京航空航天大学航空科学与工程学院, 北京 100083;
2. 中国航空工业集团公司, 北京 100022

收稿日期:2016-03-11 修回日期:2016-06-12 出版日期:2017-01-15 发布日期:2016-07-06
通讯作者: 贺小帆,E-mail:xfhe@buaa.edu.cn E-mail:xfhe@buaa.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家级项目；复杂工程系统多学科不确定性数值计算和优化理论方法及其应用(1143002)

Quantitative method for evaluating aging damage of protective coatings of aircraft joint structures

TANG Yanggang¹, HE Xiaofan¹, LIU Wenting¹, LI Yuhai²

1. School of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100083, China;
2. Aviation Industry Corporation of China, Beijing 100022, China

Received:2016-03-11 Revised:2016-06-12 Online:2017-01-15 Published:2016-07-06
Supported by:
National Level Project; Research on Uncertain Multidiscriplinary Numerical Computation and Optimization Theory and Method of Complex Engineering Systems and its Applications (1143002)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

飞机连接结构防护涂层体系的老化过程具有多属性、模糊性和动态性的特点，综合量化评估防护涂层体系老化损伤程度对保障飞机连接结构的功能和使用安全具有重要作用。本文分析了现阶段的涂层老化损伤评级方法，提出了用等级描述老化损伤程度的量化评估技术途径，建立了基于模糊综合评判的量化评估方法。在国标、ISO和ASTM标准给出的单项评级方法的基础上提出了适用于飞机连接结构防护涂层体系老化损伤的单项评级方法，确定了因素集和评价集。采用专家打分法统计得到了各因素的权重分配，确定了权重集。选用正态分布隶属函数来确定评价矩阵，给出了隶属函数参数的计算方法和结果，建立了评价矩阵的确定方法。进行了某型飞机机翼上下表面连接部位模拟试件的加速腐蚀试验，采用本文提出的量化评估方法对防护涂层体系的老化损伤进行了评估，确定了老化损伤等级，评估结果与试验结果相符，与腐蚀动力学规律一致，从而验证了本文提出的方法。

关键词: 防护涂层, 老化损伤, 量化评估, 模糊综合评判, 加速腐蚀试验

Abstract:

As the failure of protective coating system of aircraft structures is multiple attributed, fuzzy and dynamical, evaluating the aging damage of the system quantitatively and comprehensively plays an important role in ensuring the function and safety of aircraft structures. This paper analyzes the current methods for rating the aging damage of protective coatings, and proposes a technical approach to describe the level of aging damage. A quantitative evaluation method based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation is developed. On the basis of the standards of GB, ISO and ASTM, the rating method for individual aging damage index of the protective coating system in aircraft joint structures is provided. The factor set and evaluation sets are determined. The weight set is determined by calculating the weight distribution of each factor with expert scoring method. To establish the evaluation matrix, the normal distribution membership function is used, and the calculation method and results of membership function parameters are then given. To verify the method, the accelerated corrosion tests of specimens which simulate the joint structures of the upper and lower surfaces of the wing are carried out, and the aging damage is then evaluated by the quantitative evaluation method above. The evaluation results are consistent with the test results and the corrosion dynamic pattern, proving the rationality of the method proposed.

Key words: protective coatings, aging damage, quantitative evaluation, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, accelerated corrosion tests

中图分类号:

V215.7

唐扬刚, 贺小帆, 刘文珽, 李玉海. 飞机连接结构防护涂层老化损伤量化评估方法[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(1): 220217-220217.

TANG Yanggang, HE Xiaofan, LIU Wenting, LI Yuhai. Quantitative method for evaluating aging damage of protective coatings of aircraft joint structures[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2017, 38(1): 220217-220217.

参考文献

[1] RUSSO S, SHARP P K, DHAMARI R, et al. The influence of the environment and corrosion on the structural integrity of aircraft materials[J]. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 2009, 32(6):464-472.
[2] 张腾, 何宇廷, 高潮, 等. 长期大气腐蚀对2A12-T4铝合金结构疲劳性能的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(7):2444-2456. ZHANG T, HE Y T, GAO C, et al. Effect of long-term atmospheric corrosion on fatigue behavior of 2A12-T4 aluminum structures[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Asrtonautica Sinica, 2015, 36(7):2444-2456(in Chinese).
[3] LINCOLN J W. Corrosion and fatigue:Safety issue or economic issue[C]//RTO AVT Workshop on "Fatigue in Presence of Corrosion". Corfu:RTO MP, 1998:1-3.
[4] DONG Y, ZHOU Q. Relationship between ion transport and the failure behavior of epoxy resin coatings[J]. Corrosion Science, 2014, 78:22-28.
[5] LIU Y, WANG J, LIU L, et al. Study of the failure mechanism of an epoxy coating system under high hydrostatic pressure[J]. Corrosion Science, 2013, 74:59-70.
[6] 黄领才, 刘慧丛, 谷岸, 等. 沿海环境下服役飞机铝合金零件的表面涂层破坏与腐蚀[J]. 航空学报, 2009, 30(6):1144-1149. HUANG L C, LIU H C, GU A, et al. Failure and corrosion of coating on aluminum alloy serving in coastal environment[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Asrtonautica Sinica, 2009, 30(6):1144-1149(in Chinese).
[7] SCHACHINGER E D, BRAIDT R, STRAU? B, et al. EIS study of blister formation on coated galvanised steel in oxidising alkaline solutions[J]. Corrosion Science, 2015, 96:6-13.
[8] DANG D N, PERAUDEAU B, COHENDOZ S, et al. Effect of mechanical stresses on epoxy coating ageing approached by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy measurements[J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2014, 124:80-89.
[9] AKBARINEZHAD E, BAHREMANDI M, FARIDI H R, et al. Another approach for ranking and evaluating organic paint coatings via electrochemical impedance spectroscopy[J]. Corrosion Science, 2009, 51(2):356-363.
[10] MAHDAVIAN M, ATTAR M M. Another approach in analysis of paint coatings with EIS measurement:Phase angle at high frequencies[J]. Corrosion Science, 2006, 48(12):4152-4157.
[11] 胡喜艳. 涂层防护体系加速腐蚀失效机制研究[D]. 北京:北京化工大学, 2015:38-47. HU X Y. The research of the accelerate corrosion failure mechanism of organic coating protection system[D]. Beijing:Beijing University of Chemical Technology, 2015:38-47(in Chinese).
[12] 中国国家标准化管理委员会. GB/T 1766-2008色漆和清漆涂层老化的评级方法[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社, 2008. Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China. GB/T 1766-2008 Paints and varnishes-Rating schemes of degradation of coats[S]. Beijing:Standards Press of China, 2008(in Chinese).
[13] ISO 4628:2003 Paints and varnishes-Evaluation of degradation of coatings-Designation of quantity and size of defects, and of intensity of uniform changes in appearance[S]. Switzerland:International Organization for Standardization, 2003.
[14] ASTM D610-12 Standard practice of evaluation degree of rusting on painted steel surfaces[S]. West Conshohocken, PA:ASTM, 2012.
[15] ASTM. Standard test method for evaluation of painted or coated specimens subjected to corrosive environments:ASTM D1654-08[S]. West Conshohocken, PA:ASTM, 2008.
[16] ASTM. Standard test method for evaluating degree of blistering of paints:ASTM D714-09[S]. West Conshohocken, PA:ASTM, 2009.
[17] ASTM D4214-15. Standard test methods for evaluating the degree of chalking of exterior paint films[S]. West Conshohocken, PA:ASTM, 2015.
[18] LIU Y, FANG P, BIAN D, et al. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation for the motion performance of autonomous underwater vehicles[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2014, 88:568-577.
[19] LING X, WU S. Using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation in decision making for satellite mobile communication systems[C]//22nd AIAA International Communications Satellite Systems Conference & Exhibit. Reston:AIAA, 2004:1-6.
[20] 徐肖豪, 黄宝军. 终端区飞机排序的模糊综合评判方法研究[J]. 航空学报, 2001, 22(3):259-261. XU X H, HUANG B J. Study of fuzzy integrated judge method applied to the aircraft sequencing in the terminal area[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Asrtonautica Sinica, 2001, 22(3):259-261(in Chinese).
[21] 陈群志. 腐蚀环境下飞机结构日历寿命技术体系研究[D]. 北京:北京航空航天大学, 1999:41-54. CHEN Q Z. Research of calendar life of aircraft structure under corrosive environment[D]. Beijing:Beihang University, 1999:41-54(in Chinese).
[22] 潘波, 姜同敏. 基于故障树的飞机结构腐蚀损伤模糊综合评判[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2012, 38(1):39-42. PAN B, JIANG T M. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of corrosion damage of aircraft structures based on fault tree[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2012, 38(1):39-42(in Chinese).
[23] 刘文珽, 李玉海. 飞机结构日历寿命体系评定技术[M]. 北京:航空工业出版社, 2004:64-66. LIU W T, LI Y H. Evaluation method of calendar life system of aircraft structures[M]. Beijing:Aviation Industry Press, 2004:64-66(in Chinese).
[24] 国防科学技术工业委员会. 军用飞机结构完整性大纲飞机要求:GJB 775.1-89[S]. 北京:国防科学技术工业委员会, 1989. Commission of Science, Technology and Industry for National Defense. Military aircraft structural integrity program airplane requirements:GJB 775.1-89[S]. Beijing:Commission of Science, Technology and Industry for National Defense, 1989(in Chinese).
[25] MIL-STD-1530C (USAF) Aircraft structural integrity program[S]. Washington, D.C.:Department of Defense of USA, 2005.
[26] JSSG-2006 Joint service specification guide aircraft structures[S]. Washington, D.C.:Department of Defense of USA, 2006.
[27] 刘文珽, 贺小帆. 飞机结构腐蚀/老化控制与日历延寿技术[M]. 北京:国防工业出版社, 2010:53-55. LIU W T, HE X F. Technology of corrosion/aging control and prolonging the calendar life of aircraft structures[M]. Beijing:National Defend Industry Press, 2010:53-55(in Chinese).
[28] 谢季坚, 刘承平. 模糊数学方法及其应用[M]. 3版. 武汉:华中科技大学出版社, 2006:162-179. XIE J J, LIU C P. Fuzzy mathematics method and it's application[M]. 3rd ed. Wuhan:Huazhong University of Science and Technology Press, 2006:162-179(in Chinese).
[29] ZADEH L A. Fuzzy sets[J]. Information and Control, 1965, 8(3):338-353.
[30] 刘文珽, 李玉海, 陈群志, 等. 飞机结构腐蚀部位涂层加速试验环境谱研究[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2002, 28(1):109-112. LIU W T, LI Y H, CHEN Q Z, et al. Accelerated corrosion environmental spectrums for testing surface coating of critical areas of flight aircraft structures[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2002, 28(1):109-112(in Chinese).

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

飞机连接结构防护涂层老化损伤量化评估方法

Quantitative method for evaluating aging damage of protective coatings of aircraft joint structures

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 9

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	崔建国, 林泽力, 吕瑞, 蒋丽英, 齐义文. 基于模糊灰色聚类和组合赋权法的飞机健康状态综合评估方法[J]. 航空学报, 2014, 35(3): 764-772.
[2]	魏嘉利, 贾云峰, 谢树果, 吴藻菡. 航空电子系统电磁环境复杂度量化评估方法[J]. 航空学报, 2014, 35(2): 487-496.
[3]	张虎, 原赛男, 周春根, 沙江波, 赵新青, 贾丽娜. Nb-Si金属间化合物基超高温合金研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 2014, 35(10): 2756-2766.
[4]	张福泽;叶序彬;宋钧;郭洪全;阎勇. 飞机日历寿命试验的介质成分确定和加速方法[J]. 航空学报, 2008, 29(4): 873-879.
[5]	耿端阳;左洪福;常士基. 基于D-S证据融合的民机维修性模糊综合评判[J]. 航空学报, 2006, 27(3): 423-426.
[6]	朱立群;李敏伟;刘慧丛;赵波. 高强度钢表面镀锌、镉层加速腐蚀试验研究[J]. 航空学报, 2006, 27(2): 341-346.
[7]	徐肖豪;黄宝军. 终端区飞机排序的模糊综合评判方法研究[J]. 航空学报, 2001, 22(3): 259-261.
[8]	孙红;孙锐. 模糊综合评判法在信息技术对传统产业贡献的综合效果评价中的应用[J]. 航空学报, 1998, 19(5): 578-580.
[9]	蒋冬滨. 飞机结构关键危险部位加速腐蚀试验环境谱研究[J]. 航空学报, 1998, 19(4): 434-438.