任务复杂度对自动化意识的影响

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2015.0166

电子与控制

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

任务复杂度对自动化意识的影响

刘鹏, 吕曦, 李志忠

清华大学工业工程系, 北京 100084

收稿日期:2014-11-04 修回日期:2015-06-01 出版日期:2015-11-15 发布日期:2015-06-04
通讯作者: 李志忠,Tel.:010-62773923,E-mail:zzli@tsinghua.edu.cn E-mail:zzli@tsinghua.edu.cn
作者简介:刘鹏,男,博士。主要研究方向:人因工程,人员可靠性分析,人员失误,人与自动化交互,任务复杂度。Tel:010-62793170,E-mail:pliutsinghua@gmail.com;吕曦,男,博士研究生。主要研究方向:人因工程,人员可靠性分析。Tel:010-62793170,E-mail:lvx12@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn;李志忠,男,博士,教授,博士生导师。主要研究方向:数字化工业系统的人因学问题,人员失误和可靠性,任务复杂度。Tel:010-62773923,E-mail:zzli@tsinghua.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(70931003);中国博士后科学基金(2015M570120)

Effect of task complexity on automation awareness

LIU Peng, LYU Xi, LI Zhizhong

Department of Industrial Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Received:2014-11-04 Revised:2015-06-01 Online:2015-11-15 Published:2015-06-04
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (70931003);China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2015M570120)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

现代飞机驾驶舱的高度自动化容易导致飞行员对自动化的自满和依赖,进而降低飞行员的自动化意识。自动化意识失效是飞机事故征候和事故的主要影响因素之一。通过研究任务复杂度对自动化意识的影响以及自动化意识失效的原因后发现,高复杂度任务下的自动化意识失效概率显著高于低复杂度任务,对自动化的注意力分配不足和自动化自满是高复杂度任务下自动化意识失效的两个主要原因。研究表明,在高负荷阶段,如果自动化失效,人难以在短期内发现自动化失效和作出有效响应。因此,增强自动化意识是维持航空安全的重要保障。

关键词: 复杂度, 人与自动化交互, 自动化意识, 自动化自满, 航空安全

Abstract:

High automation in modern cockpits easily leads to pilots' automation complacency and reliance and then impairs pilots' automation awareness. Failure of automation awareness is one of the major factors influencing aviation incidents and accidents. By investigating the effect of task complexity on automation awareness and the causes of failure of automation awareness, it shows that the possibility of failure of automation awareness in the high-complexity task is higher than that in the low-complexity task and that insufficient attention allocation and automation complacency are two major factors contributing to the failure of automation awareness. It implies that it is hard for human being to detect automation failures and make effective operations when automation fails under high-workload conditions. Consequently,enhancing automation awareness is important for maintaining aviation safety.

Key words: complexity, human-automation interaction, automation awareness, automation complacency, aviation safety

中图分类号:

刘鹏, 吕曦, 李志忠. 任务复杂度对自动化意识的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(11): 3678-3686.

LIU Peng, LYU Xi, LI Zhizhong. Effect of task complexity on automation awareness[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2015, 36(11): 3678-3686.

参考文献

[1] National Transportation Safety Board. Investigation of the Asiana airlines flight 214 landing accident at San Francisco international airport, California, July 6, 2013, DCA-13-MA-120[R]. Washington, D.C.:National Transportation Safety Board, 2013.
[2] National Transportation Safety Board. Crash of Asiana Flight 214 accident report summary[EB/OL]. (2014-06-24)[2014-07-24]. http://www.ntsb.gov/news/events/2014/asiana214/index.html.
[3] Sun R S, Liu H H. Autopilot and flight safety[J]. Industrial Engineering Journal, 1999, 2(2):40-44(in Chinese).孙瑞山,刘汉辉.自动驾驶与安全飞行[J].工业工程, 1999, 2(2):40-44.
[4] Sheridan T B. Human and automation:System design and research issues[M]. Hoboken, NJ:John Wiley & Sons,2002.
[5] Wei Z M, Zhuang D M, Wanyan X R, et al. A model for discrimination and prediction of mental workload of aircraft cockpit display interface[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2014, 27(5):1070-1077.
[6] Wiener E L. Human factors of advanced technology ("glass cockpit") transport aircraft, NASA-CR-177528[R]. Moffett Field, CA:NASA Ames Research Center,1989.
[7] Sarter N B, Woods D D, Billings C E. Automation surprises[C]//Salvendy G. Handbook of human factors & ergonomics. Hoboken, NJ:Wiley, 1997:1926-1943.
[8] Sarter N B, Woods D D. How in the world did we ever get into that mode? Mode error and awareness in supervisory control[J]. Human Factors, 1995, 37(1):5-19.
[9] Sarter N. Investigating mode errors on automated flight decks:Illustrating the problem-driven, cumulative, and interdisciplinary nature of human factors research[J]. Human Factors, 2008, 50(3):506-510.
[10] Woods D D, Roth E M, Stubler W F, et al. Navigating through large display networks in dynamic control applications[C]//Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA:Human Factors Society, 1990:396-399.
[11] Parasuraman R, Manzey D H. Complacency and bias in human use of automation:An attentional integration[J]. Human Factors, 2010, 52(3):381-410.
[12] Parasuraman R, Riley V. Humans and automation:Use, misuse, disuse, abuse[J]. Human Factors, 1997, 39(2):230-253.
[13] Endsley M R. Automation and situation awareness[C]//Parasuraman R, Mouloua M. Automation and human performance:Theory and applications. Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum, 1996:163-181.
[14] Bainbridge L. Ironies of automation[J]. Automatica, 1983,19(6):775-779.
[15] Sarter N B, Mumaw R J, Wickens C D. Pilots' monitoring strategies and performance on automated flight decks:An empirical study combining behavioral and eye-tracking data[J]. Human Factors, 2007, 49(3):347-357.
[16] Xu W. Psychological studies of human-automation interactions in automated cockpits[J]. Psychological Science, 2003, 26(3):523-524(in Chinese).许为.自动化飞机驾驶舱中人-自动化系统交互作用的心理学研究[J].心理科学, 2003, 26(3):523-524.
[17] Chen J, Li Q. Cockpit automation and human factors[J]. Journal of Civil Aviation Flight University of China, 2011, 22(2):36-39(in Chinese).陈俊,李倩.驾驶舱自动化与人的因素[J].中国民航飞行学院学报, 2011, 22(2):36-39.
[18] He Q, Zhang L Y. Human factors problems in cockpit automation[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 1999, 20(Sup.):60-63(in Chinese).贺青,张林英.座舱自动化中人的因素[J].航空学报, 1999, 20(Sup.):60-63.
[19] Miller W D. The U.S. Air Force-developed adaptation of the multi-attribute task battery for the assessment of human operator workload and strategic behavior, AFRL-RH-WP-TR-2010-0133[R]. Wright-Patterson AFB, OH:Air Force Research Laboratory, 2010.
[20] Comstock J R, Arnegard R J. The multi-attribute task battery for human operator workload and strategic behavior research, NASA-TM-104174[R]. Washington, D.C.:NASALangley Research Center, 1992.
[21] Parasuraman R, Molloy R, Mouloua M, et al. Monitoring of automated systems[C]//Parasuraman R, Mouloua M. Automation and human performance:Theory and applications. Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1996:91-115.
[22] Wickens C D, Hollands J G, Banbury S, et al. Engineering psychology and human performance[M]. 4th ed. Boston, MA:Pearson Education, 2013.
[23] Yang J Z, Rantanen E M, Zhang K. The impact of traffic complexity factors on air traffic controller mental workload and situation awareness[J]. Psychological Science, 2010, 33(2):368-371(in Chinese).杨家忠, Rantanen E M,张侃.交通复杂度因素对空中交通管制员脑力负荷与情境意识的影响[J].心理科学, 2010, 33(2):368-371.
[24] Liu P, Li Z. Comparison of task complexity measures for emergency operating procedures:Convergent validity and predictive validity[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2014, 121:289-293.
[25] Gertman D, Blackman H, Marble J, et al. The SPAR-H human reliability analysis method, NUREG/CR-6883[R]. Washington, D.C.:U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2005.
[26] Molloy R, Parasuraman R. Monitoring an automated system for a single failure:Vigilance and task complexity effects[J]. Human Factors, 1996, 38(2):311-322.
[27] Dehais F, Peysakhovich V, Scannella S, et al. "Automation surprise" in aviation:Real-time solutions[C]//Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing System. New York, NY:ACM, 2015:2525-2534.
[28] Simons D J, Levin D T. Change blindness[J]. Trends in Cognitive Science, 1997, 1(7):261-267.
[29] Jensen M S, Yao R, Street W N, et al. Change blindness and inattentional blindness[J]. Cognitive Science, 2011, 2(5):529-546.
[30] Wickens C D, Hooey B L, Gore B F, et al. Identifying black swans in NextGen:Predicting human performance in off-nominal conditions[J]. Human Factors, 2009, 51(5):638-651.
[31] Dehais F, Causse M, Vachon F, et al. Failure to detect critical auditory alerts in the cockpit:Evidence for inattentional deafness[J]. Human Factors, 2014, 56(4):631-644.
[32] Manly T, Robertson I H, Galloway M, et al. The absent mind:Further investigations of sustained attention to response[J]. Neuropsychologia, 1999, 37(6):661-670.
[33] Helton W S, Warm J S. Signal salience and the mindlessness theory of vigilance[J]. Acta Psychologica, 2008, 129(2):18-25.
[34] Funk K, Lyall B, Wilson J, et al. Flight deck automation issues[J]. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 1999, 9(2):109-123.
[35] Moray N, Inagaki T. Attention and complacency[J]. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 2000, 1(4):354-365.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

任务复杂度对自动化意识的影响

Effect of task complexity on automation awareness

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 13

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘秋雨, 蒋彦雯, 范红旗, 连红飞. 集成先验的低复杂度Nyström-MUSIC方法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(22): 629226-629226.
[2]	张澄安, 李保国, 王翔, 徐强. 低复杂度雷达嵌入式通信波形设计方法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(1): 326471-326471.
[3]	张瞩熹, 朱熙, 朱少川, 张明远, 杜文博. 基于核主成分分析的空域复杂度无监督评估[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(8): 322969-322969.
[4]	陈璐, 毕大平, 潘继飞. 平滑重构稀疏贝叶斯学习测向算法[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(6): 322087-322087.
[5]	周舟, 郭基联, 周义蛟, 沈安慰. PLS-SEM在装备成本估算核心参数中的应用[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(3): 221705-221705.
[6]	郭中州, 何志强, 赵文文, 陈伟芳. 高效非结构网格变形与流场插值方法[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(12): 122411-122411.
[7]	张书瑞, 马晓峰, 盛卫星, 韩玉兵. 频率不变宽带波束形成权重系数的稀疏优化[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(7): 320794-320794.
[8]	宋青平, 刘荣科. 一种用于深空自主无线电的码速率估计算法[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(7): 2301-2309.
[9]	段瑞枫, 刘荣科, 周游, 王闰昕, 侯毅. 一种低复杂度的极低信噪比高动态信号载波粗捕获算法[J]. 航空学报, 2013, 34(3): 662-669.
[10]	贾志刚, 王荣桥, 胡殿印. 流固耦合在涡轮多学科优化设计中的应用[J]. 航空学报, 2013, 34(12): 2777-2784.
[11]	苏抗;周建江. 有限姿控能力的低RCS微小卫星姿态实时规划[J]. 航空学报, 2010, 31(9): 1841-1848.
[12]	顾菁华;;龚文斌;余金培;. 星载DBF接收天线误差校正算法[J]. 航空学报, 2009, 30(11): 2149-2155.
[13]	金勇;黄建国;张立杰. 宽带信号近似最大似然方位估计快速算法[J]. 航空学报, 2008, 29(5): 1264-1268.