吸气式旋转爆震发动机进气段流动特性

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2024.30732

Abstract

Abstract:

The influence of unsteady pulsating high pressure in the air-breathing rotating detonation engine combustor on the flow characteristics of inlet is analyzed to guide the design of the inlet. The temporal-spatial characteristics of the pressure in the outlet section of inlet were considered， and the propagation process and flow characteristics of the moving shock wave in the inlet were simulated by adopting the three-dimensional unsteady numerical simulation method. The shape characteristics， propagation velocity， pressure and other key parameters of the moving shock wave were analyzed， and the flow loss and the influence of the angular frequency， peak and time-average values of the pulsating back pressure on the flow characteristics were obtained. It was found that the moving shock wave led to the flow characteristics of low-pressure airflow pressurization and deceleration and high-pressure airflow decompression and acceleration in the inlet. Compared with the steady back pressure condition， the influence boundary of pulsating back pressure was more upstream. The higher the angular frequency， the longer the circumferential length， the narrower the width of the oscillation region， the more times the flow passed through the shock wave； however， the average total pressure loss of the outlet at different angular frequencies basically remained unchanged. When the angular frequency and the time average pressure ratio were respectively kept constant at 12 000 rad/s and 19.1 and the pressure peak value ranged from 0.5 to 1 Mpa， the average total pressure loss of the outlet varied from 43% to 46%. When the angular frequency and peak pressure ratio were respectively kept constant at 12 000 rad/s and 49.5 and the time-average pressure increased from 0.22 to 0.32 MPa， the average total pressure loss of the outlet decreased from 52% to 40%. Compared with the steady back pressure condition， the total pressure loss was 2% to 8% larger. The results show that the unsteady pulsating back pressure leads to the big differences between the flow characteristics of the air-breathing rotating detonation engine inlet and the traditional engine inlet. In the inlet of air-breathing rotating detonation engine， the flow loss is larger， and the influence boundary of shock wave is closer to the upstream.

Key words: air-breathing mode, unsteady flow, pulsating back pressure, inlet, moving shock wave, flow loss

CLC Number:

V235.21

Dong LI, Yining ZHANG, Wenhui LING, Guozhu LIANG, Hao MENG. Inlet flow characteristics analysis of air-breathing rotating detonation engine[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2025, 46(2): 130732.

Figures/Tables 27

Fig.1

Table 1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Fig.9

Fig.10

Fig.11

Fig.12

Fig.13

Fig.14

Fig.15

Fig.16

Table 2

Fig.17

Fig.18

Table 3

Fig.19

Fig.20

Table 4

Fig.21

Fig.22

Table 5

References 28

1	徐灿，马虎，李健，等. 旋转爆震发动机火焰与压力波传播特性［J］. 航空学报， 2017， 38（10）： 121226.
	XU C， MA H， LI J， et al. Propagation property of flame and pressure wave in rotating detonation engine［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinca， 2017， 38（10）： 121226 （in Chinese）.
2	GEORGE A ST， RANDALL S， ANAND V， et al. Characterization of initiator dynamics in a rotating detonation combustor［J］. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science， 2016， 72： 171-181.
3	LU F K， BRAUN E M. Rotating detonation wave propulsion： Experimental challenges， modeling， and engine concepts［J］. Journal of Propulsion and Power， 2014， 30（5）： 1125-1142.
4	KATTA V R， CHO K Y， HOKE J L， et al. Effect of increasing channel width on the structure of rotating detonation wave［J］. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute， 2019， 37（3）： 3575-3583.
5	赵明皓，王可，王致程，等. 燃烧室构型对旋转爆震波传播特性的影响［J］. 航空学报， 2022， 43（5）： 125372.
	ZHAO M H， WANG K， WANG Z C， et al. Effect of combustor configurations on propagation characteristics of rotating detonation waves［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2022， 43（5）： 125372 （in Chinese）.
6	ISHIHARA K， NISHIMURA J， GOTO K， et al. Study on a long-time operation towards rotating detonation rocket engine flight demonstration［C］‍∥Proceedings of the 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Reston： AIAA， 2017.
7	WEN H C， WANG B. Experimental study of perforated-wall rotating detonation combustors［J］. Combustion and Flame， 2020， 213： 52-62.
8	WANG Y H， LE J L. A hollow combustor that intensifies rotating detonation［J］. Aerospace Science and Technology， 2019， 85： 113-124.
9	RANKIN B A， RICHARDSON D R， CASWELL A W， et al. Chemiluminescence imaging of an optically accessible non-premixed rotating detonation engine［J］. Combustion and Flame， 2017， 176： 12-22.
10	ZHDAN S A， RYBNIKOV A I. Continuous detonation in a supersonic flow of a hydrogen-oxygen mixture［J］. Combustion， Explosion， and Shock Waves， 2014， 50（5）： 556-567.
11	徐雪阳，卓长飞，武晓松，等. 非预混喷注对旋转爆震发动机影响的数值研究［J］. 航空学报， 2016， 37（4）： 1184-1195.
	XU X Y， ZHUO C F， WU X S， et al. Numerical simulation of injection schemes with separate supply of fuel and oxidizer effects on rotating detonation engine［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2016， 37（4）： 1184-1195 （in Chinese）.
12	贾冰岳，张义宁，潘虎，等. 液态碳氢燃料旋转爆震发动机起爆过程试验研究［J］. 推进技术， 2021， 42（4）： 906-914.
	JIA B Y， ZHANG Y N， PAN H， et al. Experimental study on initiation process of liquid hydrocarbon rotary detonation engine［J］. Journal of Propulsion Technology， 2021， 42（4）： 906-914 （in Chinese）.
13	熊冰，王振国，范晓樯，等. 隔离段内正激波串受迫振荡特性研究［J］. 推进技术， 2017， 38（1）： 1-7.
	XIONG B， WANG Z G， FAN X Q， et al. Characteristics of forced normal shock-train oscillation in isolator［J］. Journal of Propulsion Technology， 2017， 38（1）： 1-7 （in Chinese）.
14	CAI J H， ZHOU J， LIU S J， et al. Effects of dynamic backpressure on shock train motions in straight isolator［J］. Acta Astronautica， 2017， 141： 237-247.
15	SU W Y， JI Y X， CHEN Y. Effects of dynamic backpressure on pseudoshock oscillations in scramjet inlet-isolator［J］. Journal of Propulsion and Power， 2016， 32（2）： 516-528.
16	GEERTS J， YU K. Experimental characterization of isolator shock train propagation［C］‍∥Proceedings of the 18th AIAA/3AF International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference. Reston： AIAA， 2012.
17	GEERTS J S， YU K H. Shock train/boundary-layer interaction in rectangular isolators［J］. AIAA Journal， 2016， 54（11）： 3450-3464.
18	曹学斌，张堃元. 超燃冲压发动机隔离段非对称来流下激波串受迫振荡流动研究［J］. 空气动力学学报， 2011， 29（2）： 135-141.
	CAO X B， ZHANG K Y. Experimental study of forced shock train in isolator under asymmetric incoming flow［J］. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica， 2011， 29（2）： 135-141 （in Chinese）.
19	CAO X B， ZHANG K Y. Experimental study of forced shock train oscillation in isolator under asymmetric in incoming flow［J］. Transactions of Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics， 2011， 28（1）： 73-80.
20	BRUCE P J K， BABINSKY H. Unsteady shock wave dynamics［J］. Journal of Fluid Mechanics， 2008， 603： 463-473.
21	BRUCE P J K， BABINSKY H， TARTINVILLE B， et al. Experimental and numerical study of oscillating transonic shock waves in ducts［J］. AIAA Journal， 2011， 49（8）： 1710-1720.
22	王丁喜，严传俊. 脉冲爆震发动机进气道气动性能的数值研究［J］. 力学学报， 2005， 37（6）： 777-782.
	WANG D X， YAN C J. Numerical study of the dynamics performance of an inlet for pulse detonation engines［J］. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics， 2005， 37（6）： 777-782 （in Chinese）.
23	郭凯欣，翁春生，武郁文. 连续旋转爆轰发动机隔离段流场数值模拟研究［J］. 弹道学报， 2019， 31（2）： 35-41， 59.
	GUO K X， WENG C S， WU Y W. Numerical investigation of flow field in continuous rotating detonation engine isolator［J］. Journal of Ballistics， 2019， 31（2）： 35-41， 59 （in Chinese）.
24	王卫星，张仁涛，李宥晨，等. 典型工况下旋转爆震发动机进气道流动特性研究［J］. 推进技术， 2021， 42（4）： 931-940.
	WANG W X， ZHANG R T， LI Y C， et al. Flow characteristics of rotating detonation engine inlet under typical operating condition［J］. Journal of Propulsion Technology， 2021， 42（4）： 931-940 （in Chinese）.
25	王超，刘卫东，刘世杰，等. 吸气式连续旋转爆震与来流相互作用［J］.航空学报， 2016， 37（5）： 1411-1418.
	WANG C， LIU W D， LIU S J， et al. Interaction of air-breathing continuous rotating detonation with inflow［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2016， 37（5）： 1411-1418 （in Chinese）.
26	FROLOV S M， ZVEGINTSEV V I， IVANOV V S， et al. Hydrogen-fueled detonation ramjet model： Wind tunnel tests at approach air stream Mach number 5.7 and stagnation temperature 1500K［J］. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy， 2018， 43（15）： 7515-7524.
27	LI D， LIANG G Z， ZHANG Y N， et al. Numerical investigation of the effect of inlet total pressure on H₂/air non-premixed rotating detonation combustor［C］∥20th IBCAST. Pakistan： IBCAST， 2023.
28	王超. 吸气式连续旋转爆震波自持传播机制研究［D］. 长沙：国防科技大学， 2016： 44-65.
	WANG C. Study on self-sustaining propagation mechanism of air-breathing continuous rotating detonation wave［D］. Changsha： National University of Defense Technology， 2016： 44-65 （in Chinese）.

流线	总压损失/%
流线	第1次激波作用	第2次激波作用	第3次激波作用	第4次激波作用	第5次激波作用	第6次激波作用	出口
1	-20.42	-16.47	-4.96	-3.96	-3.1	×	-48.9
2	-18.51	-17.86	-5.07	-4.02	-3.08	×	-48.5
3	-16.73	-18.84	-5.27	-4.12	-3.04	×	-48.0
4	-15.74	-19.49	-5.33	-4.18	-3.04	×	-47.8
5	-15.15	-19.82	-5.38	-4.26	-3.05	×	-47.6
6	-15.07	-20.06	-5.33	-4.27	-3.09	×	-47.8
7	-13.85	-20.46	-5.48	-4.35	-3.22	×	-47.4
8	-12.97	-20.9	-5.57	-4.38	-3.43	×	-47.2
9	-11.96	-21.31	-5.86	-4.4	-3.64	×	-47.2
10	-9.68	-23.01	-6.25	-4.44	-3.82	15.7	-31.5
11	-9.74	-22.59	-6.59	-4.45	-4.01	10.7	-36.7
12	-31.45	-7.11	-4.48	-4.17	5.99	×	-41.2
13	-31.05	-7.44	-4.46	-4.23	2.23	×	-44.9
14	-30.31	-7.66	-4.5	-4.23	-0.23	×	-46.9
15	-29.61	-8.36	-4.49	-4.14	-1.62	×	-48.2
16	-28.34	-9.56	-4.54	-4.07	-2.2	×	-48.7
17	-26.62	-11.13	-4.61	-3.97	-2.62	×	-49.0
18	-24.58	-12.89	-4.71	-3.93	-2.92	×	-49.0
19	-1.83	-35.42	-4.79	-3.93	-3.06	×	-49.0
20	-20.46	-16.42	-4.95	-3.97	-3.1	×	-48.9
平均值							-46.2
定常出口边界 p_out/p₀=19.1							-41.3

流线	总压损失/%
流线	ω=8 000 rad/s	ω=12 000 rad/s	ω=16 000 rad/s	ω=20 000 rad/s
平均值	-46.02	-46.23	-45.36	-45.21
1	-50.02	-48.91	-44.89	-46.97
2	-49.68	-48.53	-46.95	-47.31
3	-49.56	-48.01	-47.7	-47.5
4	-49.17	-47.79	-48.04	-47.01
5	-44.35	-47.65	-48.04	-47.19
6	-19.97	-47.82	-47.85	-46.93
7	-27.6	-47.36	-47.57	-47.14
8	-33.99	-47.25	-47.48	-46.94
9	-40.14	-47.17	-47.55	-46.98
10	-45.48	-31.52	-47.62	-46.97
11	-49.26	-36.65	-47.1	-46.93
12	-51.19	-41.22	-47.34	-46.24
13	-51.61	-44.94	-47.02	-33.3
14	-52.07	-46.92	-46.98	-37.2
15	-51.64	-48.22	-46.96	-40.81
16	-51.71	-48.71	-44.27	-43.71
17	-51.23	-48.97	-31.53	-45.22
18	-51.06	-49.03	-36.33	-46.19
19	-50.69	-49.03	-41.14	-46.66
20	-50	-48.9	-44.83	-46.97

流线	总压损失/%
流线	p_max/p₀=35.4	p_max/p₀=49.5	p_max/p₀=70.7
平均值	-43.1	-46.23	-44.58
1	-45.11	-48.91	-45.91
2	-46.56	-48.53	-31.94
3	-47.48	-48.01	-35.72
4	-48.27	-47.79	-39.56
5	-49.02	-47.65	-43.05
6	-49.11	-47.82	-45
7	-49.74	-47.36	-46.46
8	-49.8	-47.25	-46.78
9	-50.11	-47.17	-46.87
10	-50.11	-31.52	-46.92
11	-48.7	-36.65	-46.7
12	-31.31	-41.22	-46.58
13	-22.98	-44.94	-46.76
14	-30.07	-46.92	-46.64
15	-35.37	-48.22	-46.28
16	-37.98	-48.71	-46.42
17	-39.68	-48.97	-46.25
18	-42.17	-49.03	-45.98
19	-43.4	-49.03	-45.91
20	-45.06	-48.9	-45.91

流线	总压损失/%
流线	p_ave/p₀=15.6	p_ave/p₀=19.1	p_ave/p₀=22.6
1	-53.25	-48.91	-43.74
2	-53	-48.53	-43.74
3	-52.95	-48.01	-43.72
4	-53.06	-47.79	-35.33
5	-40.28	-47.65	-20.89
6	-46.95	-47.82	-25.61
7	-51.39	-47.36	-30.39
8	-53.12	-47.25	-35.21
9	-53.33	-47.17	-38.93
10	-53.17	-31.52	-41.51
11	-53.21	-36.65	-43.31
12	-53.2	-41.22	-44.12
13	-53.45	-44.94	-44.32
14	-53.66	-46.92	-44.47
15	-53.38	-48.22	-44.37
16	-53.73	-48.71	-44.3
17	-53.7	-48.97	-44.17
18	-53.53	-49.03	-43.83
19	-53.28	-49.03	-43.96
20	-53.24	-48.9	-43.76
平均值	-52.24	-46.23	-39.98
定常反压p_out/p₀=15.6			-50.11
定常反压p_out/p₀=22.6			-32.02

[1]	Fei XUE, Yuqi QIN, Wendong LIU, Yangang WANG. Experiments on stall initial disturbance characteristics of contra-rotating compressor with distorted inflow [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2025, 46(2): 130474-130474.
[2]	Luoyu RAO, Tao ZHANG, Chongguang SHI, Chengxiang ZHU, Yancheng YOU. Effects of sideslip angle on shock wave interference structure of V-shaped blunt leading edge [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2025, 46(2): 130681-130681.
[3]	Shaoqiang HAN, Wenping SONG, Zhonghua HAN, Jianhua XU. High-accuracy numerical-simulation of unsteady flow over high-speed coaxial rigid rotors [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(9): 529064-529064.
[4]	Gaojie ZHENG, Xiaoming HE, Dongpo LI, Huijun TAN, Kun WANG, Zhenlong WU, Depeng WANG. Double 90° deflection inlet/volute coupling flow characteristics of tail-powered unmanned aerial vehicle [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(4): 128782-128782.
[5]	Bing WAN, Jun CHEN, Hanchen BAI. Full flow path performance design method for wide range scramjet based on equivalent thermodynamic process [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(4): 128757-128757.
[6]	Yu ZHU, Jianhui CHENG, Cheng CHEN, Hexia HUANG, Huijun TAN. Mechanism of Bump inlet stable working at supersonic speed [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(24): 130408-130408.
[7]	Zhihao ZHU, Xiuming SUI, Jian PU, Long HAO, Wei ZHAO, Qingjun ZHAO. Aerodynamic load of multistage vaneless counterrotating turbine under wake/shock rotor/rotor interactions [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(24): 630582-630582.
[8]	Xingdong LUO, Zihao HOU, Keming WU, Zhen SHEN, Shenrong ZHANG. Separation safety analysis for Stargazer using electromagnetic propulsion system [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(24): 630481-630481.
[9]	Yunxiang FAN, Huanan AI, Mingzhen WANG, Kai CAO, Xuejun LIU, Hongqiang LYU. Unsteady hydrodynamic load reconstruction of seaplane based on deep learning [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(20): 129882-129882.
[10]	Yifan WANG, Haoying CHEN, Haibo ZHANG. Inlet/engine matching of adaptive cycle engine for cruise mission [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(2): 128637-128637.
[11]	Songbai WANG, Yuyang HAO, Yadong WU, Yong CHEN, Huawei YU, Lin DU. Research progress on rotating instability of aeroengine compressor [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(16): 29851-029851.
[12]	Junyang YU, Wenguang FU, Peng SUN, Tao ZHANG, Chunxue WANG, Wei ZHAO. Design and stabilization mechanism of non-axisymmetric fans under inlet distortion conditions [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(16): 129725-129725.
[13]	Binjie MOU, Jinsong JIANG, Kun YANG, Huanbing FU, Dehong MENG, Wei JIN. Acoustic fatigue design method for fighter inlet structure [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(14): 229603-229603.
[14]	Ziyun WANG, Hang YU, Yue ZHANG, Huijun TAN, Yi JIN, Xin LI. Research progress on key issues of adjustable inlet system for aerospace vehicles [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(11): 529440-529440.
[15]	Kailing ZHANG, Siyi LI, Yi DUAN, Chao YAN. Uncertainty quantification of parameters in SST turbulence model for inlet simulation [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(S2): 729429-729429.

Inlet flow characteristics analysis of air-breathing rotating detonation engine

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 27

References 28

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments