ARJ21飞机尾涡在侧风条件下的近地演化数值模拟

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2021.25043

Abstract

Abstract: Wake separation is crucial to the security of aircraft landing, and is also an important factor of improving airport efficiency. The characteristics of near-field evolution of wake vortices is the foundation of the design of wake separation system. Therefore, it is of great practical significance to investigate the near-field evolution of wake vortices of domestic aircraft. In the present study, the effect of crosswind on the near-field evolution of wake vortices of ARJ21 plane, initialized by the lift-drag model, is analyzed by using the large eddy simulation based on adaptive mesh. The numerical results show that the evolution of the upstream vortex and downstream vortex is asymmetric. The downstream vortex decays more rapidly and translates farther than the upstream vortex, and the wake vortices decay more rapidly as the cross-wind gets stronger. In addition, the security of the following plane after ARJ21 is also analyzed based on the numerical results of the ARJ21 plane. It is found that the heavy plane is not affected by the wake vortices of ARJ21, whereas the medium-sized and light planes require adequate wake separation according to the weather condition.

Key words: ARJ21 plane, wake vortex, near-field evolution, crosswind, large eddy simulation, adaptive mesh

CLC Number:

V211

ZHANG Junduo, ZUO Qinghai, LIN Mengda, HUANG Weixi, PAN Weijun, CUI Guixiang. Numerical simulation on near-field evolution of wake vortices of ARJ21 plane with crosswind[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(5): 125043-125043.

References

[1] 赵旭东, 贾荣珍. ARJ21飞机工程模拟器关键技术研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2009, 21(21):6856-6858, 6864. ZHAO X D, JIA R Z. Study on key technology of ARJ21 aircraft engineering simulator[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2009, 21(21):6856-6858, 6864(in Chinese).
[2] 谢佼. 国产飞机ARJ21已累计安全飞行超10000小时:运送旅客近32万人次[N]. 人民日报, 2019-04-03(1). XIE J. The domestic ARJ21 aircraft has accumulated more than 10,000 hours of safe flight[N]. People's Daily, 2019-04-03(1) (in Chinese).
[3] 余建斌, 沈文敏, 刘潺. ARJ21国产商用飞机运营客户增至7家[N]. 人民日报, 2020-11-11(1). YU J B, SHEN W M, LIU C. The number of ARJ21 domestic commercial aircraft operating customers increased to 7[N]. People's Daily, 2020-11-11(1) (in Chinese).
[4] LIU F, LIU X Z, MOU M J, et al. Safety assessment of approximate segregated parallel operation on closely spaced parallel runways[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2019, 32(2):463-476.
[5] PERRY R, HINTON D, STUEVER R, et al. NASA wake vortex research for aircraft spacing[C]//35th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston:AIAA, 1997.
[6] O'CONNOR C J, RUTISHAUSER D K. Enhanced airport capacity through safe, dynamic reductions in aircraft separation:NASA's Aircraft Vortex Spacing System (AVOSS):2001-211052[R]. Washington, D.C.:NASA, 2001.
[7] HOLZÄPFEL F, GERZ T, FRECH M, et al. The wake vortex prediction and monitoring system WSVBS part I:Design[J]. Air Traffic Control Quarterly, 2009, 17(4):301-322.
[8] GERZ T, HOLZÄPFEL F, FRECH M, et al. The wake vortex prediction and monitoring system WSVBS part II:Performance and ATC integration at Frankfurt airport[J]. Air Traffic Control Quarterly, 2009, 17(4):323-346.
[9] MATAYOSHI N. Dynamic wake vortex separation according to weather conditions[C]//2013 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference. Reston:AIAA, 2013.
[10] MATAYOSHI N, YOSHIKAWA E. Dynamic wake vortex separation combining with AMAN/DMAN concept[C]//15th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference. Reston:AIAA, 2015.
[11] 林孟达, 崔桂香, 张兆顺, 等. 飞机尾涡演变及快速预测的大涡模拟研究[J]. 力学学报, 2017, 49(6):1185-1200. LIN M D, CUI G X, ZHANG Z S, et al. Large eddy simulation on the evolution and the fast-time prediction of aircraft wake vortices[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2017, 49(6):1185-1200(in Chinese).
[12] BURNHAM D C, HALLOCK J N. Chicago monostatic acoustic vortex sensing system:Volume IV, Wake vortex decay:DOT/FAA/RD-79-103 IV[R]. Washington, D.C.:Department of Transportation, 1982.
[13] 鲍锋, 刘锦生, 朱睿, 等. 飞机尾涡系Rayleigh-Ludwieg不稳定性实验研究[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(7):2166-2176. BAO F, LIU J S, ZHU R, et al. Experimental study on Rayleigh-Ludwieg instability of aircraft wake vortex[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(7):2166-2176(in Chinese).
[14] 邱思逸, 程泽鹏, 向阳, 等. 基于线性稳定性分析的翼尖涡摇摆机制[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(8):122712. QIU S Y, CHENG Z P, XIANG Y, et al. Mechanism of wingtip vortex wandering based on linear stability analysis[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2019, 40(8):122712(in Chinese).
[15] CHENG Z P, QIU S Y, XIANG Y, et al. Instability characteristics of a co-rotating wingtip vortex pair based on bi-global linear stability analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2021, 34(5):1-16.
[16] ROBINS R E, DELISI D P, GREENE G C. Algorithm for prediction of trailing vortex evolution[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2001, 38(5):911-917.
[17] 林孟达. 飞机尾涡演化特性与安全预测的大涡模拟研究[D]. 北京:清华大学, 2016:1-83. LIN M D. Study on aircraft wake vortex evolution and safety prediction by large eddy simulation[D]. Beijing:Tsinghua University, 2016:1-83(in Chinese).
[18] ZHENG Z C, ASH R L. Study of aircraft wake vortex behavior near the ground[J]. AIAA Journal, 1996, 34(3):580-589.
[19] HOLZÄPFEL F, STEEN M. Aircraft wake-vortex evolution in ground proximity:Analysis and parameterization[J]. AIAA Journal, 2007, 45(1):218-227.
[20] PROCTOR F, HAMILTON D, HAN J. Wake vortex transport and decay in ground effect-Vortex linking with the ground[C]//38th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston:AIAA, 2000.
[21] PROCTOR F. Numerical study of a long-lived, isolated wake vortex in ground effect[C]//6th AIAA Atmospheric and Space Environments Conference. Reston:AIAA, 2014.
[22] LIN M D, HUANG W X, ZHANG Z S, et al. Numerical study of aircraft wake vortex evolution near ground in stable atmospheric boundary layer[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2017, 30(6):1866-1876.
[23] ZHANG J D, ZUO Q H, LIN M D, et al. Evolution of vortices in the wake of an ARJ21 airplane:Application of the lift-drag model[J]. Theoretical and Applied Mechanics Letters, 2020, 10(6):419-428.
[24] MENEVEAU C, LUND T S, CABOT W H. A Lagrangian dynamic subgrid-scale model of turbulence[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1996, 319:353.
[25] HOLZÄPFEL F, GERZ T, BAUMANN R. The turbulent decay of trailing vortex pairs in stably stratified environments[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2001, 5(2):95-108.
[26] HENNEMANN I, HOLZÄPFEL F. Large-eddy simulation of aircraft wake vortex deformation and topology[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G:Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 2011, 225(12):1336-1350.
[27] MISAKA T, HOLZÄPFEL F, GERZ T. Large-eddy simulation of aircraft wake evolution from roll-up until vortex decay[J]. AIAA Journal, 2015, 53(9):2646-2670.
[28] LIN M D, CUI G X, ZHANG Z S. Large eddy simulation of aircraft wake vortex with self-adaptive grid method[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2016, 37(10):1289-1304.
[29] GNOFFO P A. A finite-volume, adaptive grid algorithm applied to planetary entry flowfields[J]. AIAA Journal, 1983, 21(9):1249-1254.
[30] LIN M D, CUI G X, ZHANG Z S. A new vortex sheet model for simulating aircraft wake vortex evolution[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2017, 30(4):1315-1326.
[31] KEYE S. Fluid-structure coupled analysis of a transport aircraft and flight-test validation[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2011, 48(2):381-390.
[32] 吴子牛, 王兵, 周睿, 等. 空气动力学[M]. 北京:清华大学出版社, 2007. WU Z N, WANG B, ZHOU R, et al. Aerodynamics[M]. Beijing:Tsinghua University Press, 2007(in Chinese).
[33] KROO I. Drag due to lift:concepts for prediction and reduction[J]. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 2001, 33(1):587-617.
[34] 赵鸣. 大气边界层动力学[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社, 2006. ZHAO M. Dynamics of atmospheric boundary layer[M]. Beijing:Higher Education Press, 2006(in Chinese).
[35] JARRAUD M. Guide to meteorological instruments and methods of observation (WMO-NO.8)[R]. Geneva World Meteorological Organization, 2008.
[36] HAN J, ARYA S P, SHAOHUA S, et al. An estimation of turbulent kinetic energy and energy dissipation rate based on atmospheric boundary layer similarity theory:NASA CR-2000-210298[R]. Washington,D.C.:2000.
[37] ARYA S P. Atmospheric boundary layer and its parameterizationwind climate in cities[M]. Amsterdam:Springer, 1995.
[38] ROGALLO R S. Numerical experiments in homogeneous turbulence:NASA TM-8131[R]. Washington, D.C.:NASA, 1981.
[39] BECHARA W, BAILLY C, LAFON P, et al. Stochastic approach to noise modeling for free turbulent flows[J]. AIAA Journal, 1994, 32(3):455-463.
[40] JEONG J, HUSSAIN F. On the identification of a vortex[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1995, 285:69-94.
[41] ROBINS R E, DELISI D P, GREENE G C. Algorithm for prediction of trailing vortex evolution[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2001, 38(5):911-917.
[42] HOLZÄPFEL F. Probabilistic two-phase wake vortex decay and transport model[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2003, 40(2):323-331.
[43] CROW S C. Stability theory for a pair of trailing vortices[J]. AIAA Journal, 1970, 8(12):2172-2179.
[44] MISAKA T, HOLZÄPFEL F, HENNEMANN I, et al. Vortex bursting and tracer transport of a counter-rotating vortex pair[J]. Physics of Fluids, 2012, 24(2):025104.
[45] STEPHAN A, HOLZÄPFEL F, MISAKA T. Aircraft wake-vortex decay in ground proximity-physical mechanisms and artificial enhancement[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2013, 50(4):1250-1260.
[46] SCHWARZ C W, HAHN K U. Full-flight simulator study for wake vortex hazard area investigation[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2006, 10(2):136-143.
[47] LANG S, TITTSWORTH J, BRYANT W, et al. Progress on an ICAO wake turbulence Re-categorization effort[C]//AIAA Atmospheric and Space Environments Conference. Reston:AIAA, 2010.

Numerical simulation on near-field evolution of wake vortices of ARJ21 plane with crosswind

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Hongwei QIAO, Jianhan LIANG, Lin ZHANG, Mingbo SUN, Yuqiao CHEN. Research progress of probability density function approach in supersonic combustion [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(8): 28802-028802.
[2]	Yuming ZHANG, Yuting DAI, Guangjing HUANG, Chao YANG, Shujie JIANG. Gust alleviation and aeroacoustic characteristics of flexible morphing trailing edge airfoil [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(10): 129219-129219.
[3]	Zhe LIU, Xige ZHANG, Changzhu WEI, Naigang CUI. High-precision adaptive convex programming for reentry trajectories of suborbital vehicles [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(S2): 729430-729430.
[4]	Qingdi GUAN, Jianhan LIANG, Lin ZHANG, Wenwu CHEN, Yuqiao CHEN. Probability density function method in general curvilinear coordinate system and its application in supersonic combustion [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(4): 126677-126677.
[5]	Fangcheng SHI, Zhenxun GAO, Yuyan TIAN, Chongwen JIANG, Tiantian WANG, Chun-Hian LEE. Large eddy simulation of ideally expanded supersonic jet noise [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(2): 626266-626266.
[6]	Yang ZHANG, Jiaqi LUO, Xian ZENG. Elliptic flow noise by improved ghost⁃cell immersed boundary method [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(19): 128418-128418.
[7]	Yukun SUN, Long WANG, Tongguang WANG, Yaoru QIAN, Quanwei ZHENG. Aerodynamic characteristics and crosswind counteraction of isolated tail rotor in crosswind environment [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(10): 127454-127454.
[8]	Binbin ZHAO, Heng ZHANG, Jie LI. Review of numerical simulation on complex separated flow of iced airfoil [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(1): 627211-627211.
[9]	XIE Chenyue, WANG Jianchun, WAN Minping, CHEN Shiyi. Artificial neural network model for large-eddy simulation of compressible turbulence [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(9): 625723-625723.
[10]	LIU Yuanqiang, WANG Yanbing, XIANG Song, WANG Mengqi. Noise characteristics of propellers with different blade tips for electric aircraft [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(3): 624567-624567.
[11]	WANG Fang, WANG Yudong, JIANG Shengli, CHEN Jun, TANG Jun, XU Huasheng, LI Xiangyuan, XING Jingwen, GAO Dongshuo, JIN Jie. Development and testing of AECSC-JASMIN turbulent combustion simulation software [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(12): 625003-625003.
[12]	WANG Kai, LEI Fanpei, YANG Anlong, YANG Baoe, ZHOU Lixin. Numerical simulation of spray and mixing process of impingement between sheet and jet in pintle injector element [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(9): 123802-123802.
[13]	ZHU Zhibin, SHANG Qing, BAI Peng, LIU Qiang. Evolution of laminar separation phenomenon on low Reynolds number airfoil at different Reynolds numbers [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2019, 40(5): 122528-122528.
[14]	ZHANG Hongjun, ZHU Zhibin, SHANG Qing, LIU Zhiyong, SHEN Qing. Large eddy simulation of hypersonic inlet boundary layer transition triggered by zig-zag trip [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2019, 40(10): 122930-122930.
[15]	ZHANG Yang, MA Zhenhai, ZOU Jianfeng, ZHENG Yao, XIE Jiahua. A high-order large eddy simulation for shock and flame interaction [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2018, 39(10): 122298-122298.