全模颤振双索悬挂系统刚体模态频率研究

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2020.23761

Abstract

Abstract: In this paper, the influencing factors of the rigid body modal frequencies of two cables suspension systems for full-model flutter tests are studied. First, based on the rope parallel mechanism theory, the static model of the two cables suspension system is built. The static stiffness model of the system is then derived by introducing the weighting matrix. Second, the undamped oscillation equation of the two cables suspension system is established to analyze the changing laws of the modal frequencies of the system rigid body. Furthermore, a ground prototype of the system is established for the system modal frequency tests to study the influencing factors of the rigid body modal frequencies of the system and their changing rules. Finally, the above mathematical model is modified with reference to the experimental results. The results show that with the increase of the rope pretension force, the rigid body modal frequency of the system shows an upward trend, while the natural frequency at each order of the rigid body mode rises at different rates, with that of the translational mode being much less affected by the rope pretension force than that of the rotating mode, and that of the rolling mode being the largest and rising fast. In the translational mode, the natural frequency of the heave mode is larger than that of the lateral mode The positional relationship between the pulley and the mass center of the aircraft model affects the rate at which the natural frequencies of the support system pitch mode and yaw mode increase with the rope pretension force, though with different degrees of influence, while having almost no effect on the natural frequency of the rolling mode. The study has found that by controlling the pretension force of the suspension ropes and properly designing the installation positions of the pulleys on the fuselage, the rigid body modal frequencies of the two cables suspension system can be effectively reduced. Therefore, the results are instructive for the optimal design of the two cables suspension system.

Key words: full model flutter, wind tunnel tests, suspension systems, two cables suspension, natural frequencies

CLC Number:

WU Taihuan, LIN Qi, HE Shengjie, LIU Ting, GAO Zhongxin, WANG Xiaoguang. Rigid body modal frequencies of two cables suspension system for full-model flutter[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(9): 123761-123761.

References 23

[1]	杨希明,刘南,郭承鹏,等. 飞行器气动弹性风洞试验技术综述[J].空气动力学学报, 2018, 36(6):995-1008. YANG X M, LIU N, GUO C P, et al, A survey of aeroelastic wind tunnel test techonolgy of flight vechicles[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica, 2018, 36(6):995-1008(in Chinese).
[2]	李秋彦, 李刚, 魏洋天,等.先进战斗机气动弹性设计技术[J].航空学报, 2020, 41(6):523430. LI Q Y, LI G, WEI Y T, et al. Aeroelasticity design techniques for advanced fighter[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2020,41(6):523430(in Chinese).
[3]	SOLARI G. Wind actions and effects on structures[M]//Wind Science and Engineering. Springer, 2019:655-801.
[4]	XU W, XU M, AN X. Aerodynamic and aeroelastic analysis of flying wing with split drag-rudder[C]//Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Aerospace Technology, 2018:294-309.
[5]	杨超,黄超,吴志刚, 等. 气动伺服弹性研究的进展与挑战[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(4):1011-1033. YANG C, HUANG C, WU Z G, et al. Progress and challenges for aeroservoelasticity reseach[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(4):1011-1033(in Chinese).
[6]	郭东明,贾振元,杨睿,等. 大型风洞气动弹性试验模型/支撑制造、感知与控制的科学问题[J]. 中国科学基金, 2017, 31(5):428-431. GUO D M, JIA Z Y, YANG R, et al. Aeroelastic test model of large wind tunnel/Scientific issues of manufacturing, sensing and control[J]. Bulletin of National Natural Science Foundation of China, 2017, 31(5):428-431(in Chinese).
[7]	REED W H. Aeroelasticity matters:Some reflections on two decades of testing in the NASA Langley transonic dynamics tunnel[R]. Washington, D.C.:NASA, 1981.
[8]	BENNETT R M, FARMER M G, MOHR R L, et al. Wind-tunnel technique for determining stability derivatives from cable-mounted models[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1978, 15(5):304-310.
[9]	路波,杨兴华,罗建国,等. 跨声速风洞全模颤振试验悬浮支撑系统[J]. 实验流体力学, 2009, 23(3):90-94,103. LU B, YANG X H, LUO J G, et al. Floatig suspension system for full model flutter test in transonic wind tunnel[J]. Journal of Experiments in Fluid Mechanics, 2009, 23(3):90-94,103(in Chinese).
[10]	KEHOE M W. Aircraft flight flutter testing at the NASA Ames-Dryden Flight Research Facility[J]. AIAA Journal, 1988,10(6):14-25.
[11]	AGGARWAL R R. Aircraft vibration and flutter[M]. Springer,1956:56-60.
[12]	刘基海, 谷迎松,杨智春, 等. 支撑刚度对飞翼模型固有模态和体自由度颤振特性的影响[J]. 振动工程学报, 2018, 31(5):727-733. LIU J H, GU Y S, YANG Z C, et al. Influence of support stiffness on natural mode and body freedom flutter characteristics of a flying wing model[J]. Journal of Vibration Engineering, 2018, 31(5):727-733(in Chinese).
[13]	王大鹏, 蔡骏文.橡皮绳悬挂系统对细长体飞行器地面模态试验影响分析[J]. 战术导弹技术, 2016(6):26-32. WANG D P, CAI J W. Influence of elastic rope suspension system on slender vehicle modal test[J]. Tactical Missile Technology,2016(6):26-32(in Chinese).
[14]	ARSENAULT M. Stiffness analysis of a planar 2-DoF cable-suspended mechanism while considering cable mass[M]. Berlin:Springer, 2013:405-421.
[15]	BOLBOLI J, MA K, ABDOLLAHI F. Stiffness feasible workspace of cable-driven parallel robots with application to optimal design of a planar cable robot[J]. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 2019,114:19-28.
[16]	NOTASH L. Manipulator deflection for optimum tension of cable-driven robots with parameter variations[C]//Cable-Driven Parallel Robots, 2018:125-136.
[17]	TORRES M, SERGIO, AMIR K. Design optimization of a warehousing cable-based robot[C]//ASME 2014 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. New York:ASME, 2014.
[18]	FERRAVANTAL V. Dynamic analysis of high precision construction cable-driven parallel robots[J]. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2019,135:54-64.
[19]	WANG H, KINUGAWA J, KOSUGE K. Exact Kinematic modeling and identification of reconfigurable cable-driven robots with dual-Pulley cable guiding mechanisms[J]. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2019, 24(2):774-784.
[20]	JING W, QI Z, WANG G, et al. Hybrid modeling for dynamic analysis of cable-pulley systems with time-varying length cable and its application[J]. Journal of Sound & Vibration, 2017, 406:277-294.
[21]	QI Z, WANG J, WANG G, et al. An efficient model for dynamic analysis and simulation of cable-pulley systems with time-varying cable lengths[J]. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2017, 116:383-403.
[22]	GARRICK I E, REED Ⅲ W H. Historical development of aircraft flutter[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1981, 18(11):897-912.
[23]	曹树谦, 张文德, 萧龙翔. 振动结构模态分析:理论、实验与应用[M].天津:天津大学出版社, 2001:52-78. CAO S Q,ZHANG W D, XIAO L X. et al. Modal analysis of vibration structure[M]. Tianjin:Tianjin University Press, 2001:52-78(in Chinese).

Rigid body modal frequencies of two cables suspension system for full-model flutter

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References 23

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Jun SHU, Dongguang XU, Zhirong HAN, Si LI, Xiong HUANG. Hybrid wing design of icing wind tunnel supercooled large droplet icing test [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(1): 627182-627182.
[2]	ZENG Kaichun, KOU Xiping, YANG Xinghua, YU Li, ZHA Jun. Optimization of active vibration damping structure for transonic wind tunnel test model [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(2): 224944-224944.
[3]	LI Qian, WANG Yankui, JIA Yuhong. Roll oscillations over wing-body configuration with strake wings: Experiment [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526008-526008.
[4]	GAO Zhongxin, WANG Xiaoguang, WU Jun, LIN Qi. Hybrid force/pose control of wire-driven parallel suspension system based on stiffness optimization [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(7): 324373-324373.
[5]	CHEN Yin, GU Yunsong, SUN Zhijun, HUANG Zi. Aerodynamic perception from distributed pressure and free flight test [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(3): 124138-124138.
[6]	CEN Fei, LI Qing, LIU Zhitao, JIANG Yong, ZHANG Lei. Unsteady aerodynamics test and modeling of civil aircraft under extreme flight conditions [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(8): 123664-123664.
[7]	SHEN Lin, HUANG Da, WU Genxing, ZHAN Jingxia. Unsteady aerodynamic modeling for fighter configuration at high angles of attack [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(6): 523440-523440.
[8]	SUN Quanbing, SHI Zhiwei, GENG Xi, WANG Lishuang, ZHANG Weiyuan. Attitude control of flying wing aircraft without control surfaces based on active flow control [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(12): 124080-124080.
[9]	ZHAO Zhongliang, YANG Xiaojuan, JIANG Weimin, CHEN Jianzhong, WANG Junlan. Through-flow Simulation Method and Wind Tunnel Validation Technique for Hypersonic Vehicle [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2014, 35(11): 2932-2938.
[10]	Lü Zhiyong;Ma Shuwei. CONTROL OF SEPARATED FLOW OVER A STRAKE WING BY MOVING SURFACE [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 1996, 17(5): 2-6.
[11]	Zhang Qiwei;Chen Zhen. FORCES AND PITCHING MOMENT CORRECTION FOR HIGH ANGLE OF ATTACK TESTS IN HIGH SPEED WIND TUNNEL USING WALL SIGNATURE METHOD [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 1996, 17(3): 337-340.
[12]	Wang lve;Zhang Zhongan. CONTOUR DESIGN AND PRACTICE FOR A LOW RCS VEHICLE [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 1995, 16(6): 692-695.
[13]	Gong Weibin . TEST TECHNIQUE OF THE DYNAMIC DERIVATIVES DUE TO PLUNGING IN THE WIND TUNNEL [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 1995, 16(4): 90-93.
[14]	Deng Yanmin;Hu Jizhong. EXPERIMkNTAL RESEARCH OF THE CONFIGURATION OF WING-TIP DRAG REDUCING FOR LIOHT AIRCRAFT [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 1994, 15(8): 897-903.
[15]	Zou Congqing;Chen Guibin. RESEARCH ON DIGITAL ACTIVE FLUTTER SUPPRESSION [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 1994, 15(6): 647-651.