基于MFBD的多级多层系统修复性维修过程建模与仿真

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2013.0282

Abstract

Abstract:

Due to the increased complexity of the equipment and the uncertainty of the maintenance process, simulation based on a conceptual model is generally used to analyze a complex repairable system’s corrective maintenance (CM) process. On the basis of building a maintenance process concept model, the modeling method via a stochastic maintenance function block diagram (MFBD) is presented. Testability characteristics are considered in the model and the simulation model can describe multi-indenture multi-echelon (MIME) system corrective maintenance, in which complicated hierarchy and logical relationship between the process are concentrated. Subsequently, a calculating simulation method of mean repair time of complex repairable system is given according to simulation objects status, which changed in the processes of system maintenance influenced by resources queueing, and finally, a simulation application case of complicated repairable system is constructed to illustrate the simulation, and correctness and applicability of the model is confirmed through the sensitivity analysis by ajusting the influenced factors such as testability design parameters.

Key words: maintenance function block diagram (MFBD), multi-indenture multi-echelon system, corrective maintenance, modeling, simulation, mean wait time

CLC Number:

V215.7

WANG Kai, GUO Linhan, GAO Bocheng, WANG Naichao. Corrective Maintenance Process Modeling and Simulation of Multi-indenture Multi-echelon Systems Based on MFBD[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2013, 34(7): 1646-1653.

References

[1] Guo L H, Wang K, Wang Y, et al. Multi-indenture multi-echelon spare part supply chain requirement modeling and simulation. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2010, 16(10): 2038-2043. (in Chinese) 郭霖瀚, 王恺, 王严, 等. 多级多层备件供应链需求建模与仿真. 计算机集成制造, 2010, 16(10): 2038-2043.

[2] Robinson S. Discrete-event simulation: from the pioneers to the present, what next? Journal of Operational Research Society, 2005, 56(6): 619-629.

[3] Jiang H, Dong Y S, Luo J Z. Research on Petri net based modeling and analyzing methods for workflow process. Journal of Southeast University: English Edition, 2000, 16(2): 66-73.

[4] Huang D P, Cao J P, Song J S, et al. Process-modeling in virtual maintenance based on Petri net. Ordnance Industry Automation, 2011, 30(1): 41-43. (in Chinese) 黄东坡, 曹继平, 宋建社, 等. 基于Petri网的虚拟维修过程建模. 兵工自动化, 2011, 30(1): 41-43.

[5] Zapata C J, Silva S C, Gonzalez H I, et al. Modeling the repair process of a power distribution system. Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition, 2008: 1-7.

[6] Javier F. Predicting availability functions in time-dependent complex systems with SAEDES simulation algorithms. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2008, 93(11):1761-1771.

[7] Blanchard B S, Fabrycky W J. System engineering and analysis. 3rd ed. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2002: 644-673.

[8] Nie C L, Zhu X D, He Y D. Maintenance flow diagram based maintenance time simulation. Computer Simulation, 2004, 22(3): 41-47.(in Chinese) 聂成龙, 朱小东, 何应德. 基于维修流程框图的维修时间仿真研究. 计算机仿真, 2004, 22(3): 41-47.

[9] Mattila V, Virtanen K, Raivio T. A simulation model for aircraft maintenance in an uncertain operational environment. 17th European Simulation Multiconference, 2003.

[10] Richard C. Modeling aircraft repair turntime simulation supports maintenance marketing efforts. Journal of Air Transport Management, 1995, 2(1): 25-32.

[11] Cassel R A, Pidd M. Distributed discrete event simulation using the three-phase approach and Java. Simulation Practice and Theory, 2001, 8(6): 491-507.

[12] Balaban H S, Brigantic R T, Wright S A, et al. A simulation approach to estimating aircraft mission capable rates for the United States Air Force. Winter Simulation Conference, 2000: 1035-1042.

[13] Duffuaa S O, Ben-Daya M, Al-Sultan K S, et al. A generic conceptual simulation model for maintenance systems. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 2001, 7(3): 207-219.

[14] Marseguerra M, Zio E. Optimizing maintenance and repair policies via a combination of genetic algorithms and Monte Carlo simulation. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2000, 68(1): 69-83.

[15] Chen E J, Lee Y M, Selikson P L. A simulation study of logistics activities in a chemical plant. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 2002, 10(3): 235-245.

Corrective Maintenance Process Modeling and Simulation of Multi-indenture Multi-echelon Systems Based on MFBD

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Lizhi SHENG, Wei ZHENG, Tong SU, Dapeng ZHANG, Yidi WANG, Xianghui YANG, Neng XU, Zhize LI. Ground test bench for X-ray pulsar navigation dynamic simulation [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(3): 526656-526656.
[2]	Jinsheng LIU, Bo WANG, Juan SONG, Wencong WANG, Jingjing LI, Zhenhua XU. Estimation of space radiation background of Wolter‑I X‑ray pulsar detector [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(3): 526599-526599.
[3]	Fangcheng SHI, Zhenxun GAO, Yuyan TIAN, Chongwen JIANG, Tiantian WANG, Chun-Hian LEE. Large eddy simulation of ideally expanded supersonic jet noise [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(2): 626266-626266.
[4]	Binbin ZHAO, Heng ZHANG, Jie LI. Review of numerical simulation on complex separated flow of iced airfoil [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(1): 627211-627211.
[5]	WANG Xiaoyue, WANG Xun, WANG Yongzhen, FEI Teng, LIU Dawei. Evaluation method for combat effectiveness of task-based simulated UAV swarm system [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S1): 726937-726937.
[6]	LIU Chuang, YU Xiaojun, ZHANG Ting, ZHU Haokun. Research status and trend of key technologies for simulation test of unmanned swarm equipment [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S1): 726919-726919.
[7]	XIAHOU Tangfan, CHEN Jiangtao, SHAO Zhidong, WU Xiaojun, LIU Yu. Model validation metrics for CFD numerical simulation under aleatory and epistemic uncertainty [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(8): 25716-025716.
[8]	WU Huisong, LIN Qi, LIU Ting, LIU Zhen, SHI Lu, WANG Xiaoguang. Wire-driven parallel suspension mechanism of virtual flight test model in wind tunnel [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(8): 125758-125758.
[9]	LUO Jiajie, SONG Wenbin. Nested collaborative optimization of laminar wing and its high-lift devices [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(8): 125377-125377.
[10]	YU Yuxi, ZHANG Weibin, SUN Yi, CONG Minghui, ZHU Jian, SONG Jingyuan. Simulation analysis of deformation behavior and resilience of Ni-based alloy canted coil spring for dynamic seal [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(7): 425527-425527.
[11]	JI Honglei, SU Junjie, CHEN Renliang, KONG Weihong. Highland atmospheric turbulence model for helicopter flight simulation [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(7): 126564-126564.
[12]	WANG Binwen, NIE Xiaohua, WAN Chunhua, WU Cunli. Research and application of virtual test technology for static strength of full scale aircraft structure [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(6): 526273-526273.
[13]	GUO Qiong, LIU Wei, PEI Lianjie, GUO Junhao. Static and fatigue test technology for full-scale composite fuselage barrels [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(6): 525816-525816.
[14]	SUN Qin, LI Hongxu, WANG Yuzhi, ZHOU Liping, ZHANG Yingchao. Resilient UAV swarm modeling and solving based on multi-domain collaborative method [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(5): 325340-325340.
[15]	WANG Jiaming, LI Zhigang, LIANG Fangzheng, LIU Wanting, LIAO Jiu, CHEN Fangyu, LI Meng, SHAO Teli. Design, simulation and theoretical study on novel cored octagon honeycomb for helicopter crashworthiness [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(5): 225244-225244.