基于传递函数特征的机械结构故障诊断方法新进展

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2021.24845

综述

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

基于传递函数特征的机械结构故障诊断方法新进展

李全坤^1,2, 景兴建²

1. 西北工业大学动力与能源学院, 西安 710129;
2. 香港理工大学机械工程系, 香港 999077

收稿日期:2020-10-08 修回日期:2020-12-05 发布日期:2021-06-08
通讯作者: 景兴建 E-mail:xingjian.jing@polyu.edu.hk
基金资助:
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金（3102020OQD705）；香港研究资助局优配研究金（15206717）

Recent advances of fault diagnosis methods based on transmissibility function for mechanical structures

LI Quankun^1,2, JING Xingjian²

1. School of Power and Energy, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710129, China;
2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong 999077, China

Received:2020-10-08 Revised:2020-12-05 Published:2021-06-08
Supported by:
The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (3102020OQD705); The General Research Fund (GRF) Project of Hong Kong Research Grants Council (RGC) (15206717)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 故障诊断对估计机械结构的健康状态非常重要，诊断方法一直以来也是研究的热点问题。与其他故障诊断方法相比，基于传递函数的故障诊断方法操作简单，提供的故障特征和指示因子也更加灵敏有效。根据所利用的线性传递函数或非线性传递函数的类型不同、基于传递函数的故障诊断方法目前大概有4类，即一般线性方法、一般非线性方法、基于广义频响函数（GFRF）方法和基于二阶输出频谱（SOOS）方法。本文旨在对各种基于传递函数的故障诊断方法研究进展进行梳理，通过带阻尼弹簧单元的多自由度模型解释各种方法的基本原理和操作流程，通过具体的仿卫星结构中螺栓松动故障实验比较各种方法的优缺点，探讨现有故障指示因子灵敏度的提高方式及现有方法在其他复杂机械结构中的运用前景。

关键词: 线性故障, 非线性故障, 传递函数, 故障识别, 故障定位

Abstract: The importance of fault diagnosis to health monitoring of mechanical structures draws extensive attention from researchers to diagnosis methods. Transmissibility function based methods, compared with other diagnosis methods, are much simpler and provide more sensitive and effective damage features and indexes. According to different transmissibility functions adopted, either linear or nonlinear, transmissibility function based methods can be classified into four categories:general linear methods, general nonlinear methods, methods based on Generalized Frequency Response Function (GFRF) and methods based on the Second Order Output Spectrum (SOOS). The main purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive review on recent advances of fault diagnosis methods based on linear and nonlinear transmissibility functions, explain their basic principles and procedures through nonlinear multiple degrees of freedom models, demonstrate their merits and demerits with experimental results on a bolted satellite-like structure, and discuss their improvement in sensitivity of related damage indicators and potential applications to some complex structures.

Key words: linear faults, nonlinear faults, transmissibility functions, fault detection, fault location

中图分类号:

李全坤, 景兴建. 基于传递函数特征的机械结构故障诊断方法新进展[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(11): 524845-524845.

LI Quankun, JING Xingjian. Recent advances of fault diagnosis methods based on transmissibility function for mechanical structures[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(11): 524845-524845.

参考文献

[1] BICKFORD J. Handbook of bolts and bolted joints[M]. Boca Raton:CRC Press, 1998.
[2] BICKFORD J H. Introduction to the design and behaviour of bolted joints:Nongasketed joints[M]. Boca Raton:CRC press, 2007.
[3] 王燕, 刘正平. 设备裂纹故障监测和诊断技术应用[J]. 煤矿机械, 2008, 29(12):210-212. WANG Y, LIU Z P. Summarization of application of device crack fault observation and diagnosis technology[J]. Coal Mine Machinery, 2008, 29(12):210-212(in Chinese).
[4] 王新波, 付成勇, 王鑫伟. 某型飞机发动机舱供压导管漏油故障分析[J]. 航空维修与工程, 2017(2):86-87. WANG X B, FU C Y, WANG X W. Failure analysis on oil leakage of pressure vessel for a certain type of aero-engine[J]. Aviation Maintenance & Engineering, 2017(2):86-87(in Chinese).
[5] 张敬芬, 赵德有. 工程结构裂纹损伤振动诊断的发展现状和展望[J]. 振动与冲击, 2002(4):21, 22-26. ZHANG J F, ZHAO D Y. Summary review of vibration-based crack diagnosis technique for engineering structures[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2002(4):21, 22-26(in Chinese).
[6] GILLICH G R, AMAN A T, ABDEL W M, et al. Detection of multiple cracks using an energy method applied to the concept of equivalent healthy beam[M]//Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Singapore:Springer Singapore, 2019:63-78.
[7] 朱宏平, 余璟, 张俊兵. 结构损伤动力检测与健康监测研究现状与展望[J]. 工程力学, 2011, 28(2):1-11, 17. ZHU H P, YU J, ZHANG J B. A summary review and advantages of vibration-based damage identification methods in structural health monitoring[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2011, 28(2):1-11, 17(in Chinese).
[8] BALAGEAS D, FRITZEN C P, GEMES A. Structural health monitoring[M]. London:ISTE, 2006.
[9] RYTTER A. Vibrational based inspection of civil engineering structures[D]. Aalborg:Aalborg University, 1993.
[10] Los Alamos National Laboratory. Linear and nonlinear methods for detecting cracks in beams[R]. New Mexico:Los Alamos National Laboratory, 1995.
[11] KRAWCZUK M, OSTACHOWICZ W. Damage indicators for diagnostic of fatigue cracks in structures by vibration measurements-a survey[J]. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 1996, 34(2):307-326.
[12] Los Alamos National Laboratory. Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics:A literature review[R]. New Mexico:Los Alamos National Laboratory, 1996.
[13] FARRAR C R, DOEBLING S W, NIX D A. Vibration-based structural damage identification[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A:Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2001, 359(1778):131-149.
[14] CARDEN E P, FANNING P. Vibration based condition monitoring:A review[J]. Structural Health Monitoring, 2004, 3(4):355-377.
[15] NIKRAVESH S M Y, GOUDARZI M. A review paper on looseness detection methods in bolted structures[J]. Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures, 2017, 14(12):2153-2176.
[16] MOTTERSHEAD J E. On the zeros of structural frequency response functions and their sensitivities[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 1998, 12(5):591-597.
[17] JOHSON T J. Analysis of dynamic transmissibility as a feature for structural health monitoring[D]. West Lafayette:Purdue University, 2001.
[18] CHESNÉ S, DERAEMAEKER A. Damage localization using transmissibility functions:A critical review[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2013, 38(2):569-584.
[19] ZHAO X Y. New methods for structural health monitoring and damage localization[D]. Sheffield:University of Sheffield, 2015.
[20] YAN W J, ZHAO M Y, SUN Q, et al. Transmissibility-based system identification for structural health Monitoring:Fundamentals, approaches, and applications[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2019, 117:453-482.
[21] CHEN Q, CHAN Y W, WORDEN K, et al. Structural fault detection using neural networks trained on transmissibility functions[C]//Presented at the proceedings of the International Conference on Vibration Engineering, 1994:456-646.
[22] WORDEN K. Structural fault detection using a novelty measure[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1997, 201(1):85-101.
[23] CHEN Q, CHAN Y W, WORDEN K. Structural fault diagnosis and isolation using neural networks based on response-only data[J]. Computers & Structures, 2003, 81(22-23):2165-2172.
[24] WORDEN K, MANSON G, FIELLER N R J. Damage detection using outlier analysis[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2000, 229(3):647-667.
[25] PAPATHEOU E, MANSON G, BARTHORPE R J, et al. The use of pseudo-faults for novelty detection in SHM[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2010, 329(12):2349-2366.
[26] BU N, ICHIKI M, UENO N, et al. A flexible piezoelectric film sensor for fault diagnosis of pipe systems[C]//IECON 2007-33rd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society. Piscataway:IEEE Press, 2007:2181-2186.
[27] YANG W X, LANG Z Q, TIAN W Y. Condition monitoring and damage location of wind turbine blades by frequency response transmissibility analysis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2015, 62(10):6558-6564.
[28] ZHOU Y L, WAHAB M A, PERERA R. Damage detection by transmissibility conception in beam-like structures[C]//Presented at the 4th International Conference on Fracture Fatigue and Wear, 2015, 254-259.
[29] MAIA N M M, ALMEIDA R A B, URGUEIRA A P V, et al. Damage detection and quantification using transmissibility[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2011, 25(7):2475-2483.
[30] ZHANG L, LANG Z Q, PAPAELIAS M. Generalized transmissibility damage indicator with application to wind turbine component condition monitoring[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2016, 63(10):6347-6359.
[31] LIU W, EWINS D. Transmissibility properties of MDOF systems[C]//Presented at the proceedings of SPIE-The International Society for Optical Engineering, 1998.
[32] ZHU D P, YI X H, WANG Y. A local excitation and measurement approach for decentralized damage detection using transmissibility functions[J]. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 2016, 23(3):487-502.
[33] ZHU D P, YI X H, WANG Y, et al. A mobile sensing system for structural health monitoring:design and validation[J]. Smart Materials and Structures, 2010, 19(5):055011.
[34] SAMPAIO R P C, MAIA N M M, RIBEÍRO A M R, et al. Transmissibility techniques for damage detection[J]. Proceedings of the International Modal Analysis Conference-IMAC, 2001, 2:1524-1527.
[35] LI J, HAO H, XIA Y, et al. Damage detection of shear connectors in bridge structures with transmissibility in frequency domain[J]. International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics, 2014, 14(2):1350061.
[36] FENG L, YI X H, ZHU D P, et al. Damage detection of metro tunnel structure through transmissibility function and cross correlation analysis using local excitation and measurement[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2015, 60-61:59-74.
[37] KONG X, CAI C S, KONG B. Damage detection based on transmissibility of a vehicle and bridge coupled system[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2015, 141(1):04014102.
[38] SCHULZ M J. Health monitoring of composite material structures using a vibrometry technique:NAG8-1247[R].Washington,D.C.:NASA, 1998.
[39] SCHULZ M J, PAI P F, INMAN D J. Health monitoring and active control of composite structures using piezoceramic patches[J]. Composites Part B:Engineering, 1999, 30(7):713-725.
[40] ZHOU Y L, FIGUEIREDO E, MAIA N, et al. Damage detection in structures using a transmissibility-based Mahalanobis distance[J]. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 2015, 22(10):1209-1222.
[41] REN T Q, HUI M L, LIANG J S, et al. Structural state detection using transmissibility and non-negative matrix factorization[J]. International Journal of Signal Processing, Image Processing and Pattern Recognition, 2015, 8(11):309-318.
[42] ZHOU Y L, MAIA N M, WAHAB M A. Damage detection using transmissibility compressed by principal component analysis enhanced with distance measure[J]. Journal of Vibration and Control, 2018, 24(10):2001-2019.
[43] ZHOU Y L, CAO H Y, LIU Q M, et al. Output-based structural damage detection by using correlation analysis together with transmissibility[J]. Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2017, 10(8):866.
[44] ZHOU Y L, PERERA R. Damage localization via transmissibility power mode shape[C]//Presented at the 5th European-American Workshop on Reliability of NDE, 2013.
[45] SCHULZ M J, NASER A S, PAI P F, et al. Detecting Structural damage using transmittance functions[J]. Materials Science, 1997, 638-644.
[46] ZHANG H, SCHULZ M J, NASER A, et al. Structural health monitoring using transmittance functions[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 1999, 13(5):765-787.
[47] ZHOU Y L, FIGUEIREDO E, MAIA N, et al. Damage detection and quantification using transmissibility coherence analysis[J]. Shock and Vibration, 2015, 2015:1-16.
[48] ZHOU Y L, MAIA N M M, SAMPAIO R P C, et al. Structural damage detection using transmissibility together with hierarchical clustering analysis and similarity measure[J]. Structural Health Monitoring, 2017, 16(6):711-731.
[49] LUO J, LIU G, HUANG Z M. Damage detection for shear structures based on wavelet spectral transmissibility matrices under nonstationary stochastic excitation[J]. Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 2017, 24(1):e1862.
[50] JOHNSON T J, ADAMS D E. Transmissibility as a differential indicator of structural damage[J]. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, 2002, 124(4):634-641.
[51] BROWN R L, ADAMS D E. Equilibrium point damage prognosis models for structural health monitoring[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2003, 262(3):591-611.
[52] JOHNSON T J, BROWN R L, ADAMS D E, et al. Distributed structural health monitoring with a smart sensor array[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2004, 18(3):555-572.
[53] JOHNSON T J, ADAMS D E. Rolling tire diagnostic experiments for identifying incipient bead damage using time, frequency, and phase plane analysis[C]//SAE Technical Paper Series. 400 Commonwealth Drive. Warrendale:SAE International, 2006.
[54] HAROON M, ADAMS D E. Development of component-level damage evolution models for mechanical prognosis[J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 2008, 75(2):021017.
[55] LI X Z, YUE X B, HUANG W. Crack localization using transmissibility of operational deflection shape and its application in cantilever beam[J]. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 2018, 6(11):2352-2361.
[56] PENG Z K, LANG Z Q, BILLINGS S A. Non-linear output frequency response functions of MDOF systems with multiple non-linear components[J]. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, 2007, 42(7):941-958.
[57] CHU F L, PENG Z K, LANG Z Q. An effective method for locating nonlinear components in periodic structures[J]. Journal of Physics:Conference Series, 2008, 96:012016.
[58] LANG Z Q, PENG Z K. A novel approach for nonlinearity detection in vibrating systems[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2008, 314(3-5):603-615.
[59] 陈民铀, 孙峰, 翟进乾, 等. 基于非线性频率响应函数的输电线路故障在线监测方法[J]. 重庆大学学报, 2010, 33(1):54-60. CHEN M Y, SUN F, ZHAI J Q, et al. The on-line monitoring method of power transmission line fault based non-linear frequency response function[J]. Journal of Chongqing University, 2010, 33(1):54-60(in Chinese).
[60] LANG Z Q, PARK G, FARRAR C R, et al. Transmissibility of non-linear output frequency response functions with application in detection and location of damage in MDOF structural systems[J]. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, 2011, 46(6):841-853.
[61] LI Z Z, ZHAO D Z, LIU J R. Location of crack faults of hydraulic pipelines based on nonlinear output frequency response function[C]//20158th International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation (ICICTA). Piscataway:IEEE Press, 2015:522-525.
[62] ZHAO X Y, LANG Z Q, PARK G, et al. A new transmissibility analysis method for detection and location of damage via nonlinear features in MDOF structural systems[J]. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2015, 20(4):1933-1947.
[63] JING X J. Truncation order and its effect in a class of nonlinear systems[J]. Automatica, 2012, 48(11):2978-2985.
[64] JING X J. Nonlinear characteristic output spectrum for nonlinear analysis and design[J]. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2014, 19(1):171-183.
[65] JING X J, LI Q K. A nonlinear decomposition and regulation method for nonlinearity characterization[J]. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2016, 83(3):1355-1377.
[66] LI Q K, JING X J. A second-order output spectrum approach for fault detection of bolt loosening in a satellite-like structure with a sensor chain[J]. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2017, 89(1):587-606.
[67] LI Q K, JING X J. Fault diagnosis of bolt loosening in structures with a novel second-order output spectrum-based method[J]. Structural Health Monitoring, 2020, 19(1):123-141.
[68] LI Q K, JING X J. A novel second-order output spectrum based local tuning method for locating bolt-loosening faults[J]. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2021, 147:107104.
[69] LI Q K, JING X J, GUO Y Q. The second-order output spectrum-based method for fault localization in ring type structures[J]. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2019, 98(3):1935-1955.
[70] LI Q K, JING X J. A systematic second-order output spectrum based method for fault diagnosis with a local tuning approach[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2020, 475:115283.
[71] THOMSON W T, DAHLEH M D. Theory of vibration with applications[M].New York:Pearson Education Inc., 1998.
[72] MAIA N M M, SILVA J. Theoretical and experimental modal analysis[M]. Hertfordshire:Research Studies Press LTD, 1997.
[73] LI X, ZHANG Y W, DING H, et al. Integration of a nonlinear energy sink and a piezoelectric energy harvester[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2017, 38(7):1019-1030.
[74] YAO H L, CAO Y B, WANG Y W, et al. A tri-stable nonlinear energy sink with piecewise stiffness[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2019, 463:114971.
[75] XUE J R, ZHANG Y W, DING H, et al. Vibration reduction evaluation of a linear system with a nonlinear energy sink under a harmonic and random excitation[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2020, 41(1):1-14.
[76] WIENER N. Nonlinear problems in random theory[M]. Cambridge:John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1958.
[77] SCHETZEN M. The Volterra and Wiener theories of nonlinear systems[M]. Hoboken:John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1980.
[78] RUG W J. Nonlinear system theory[M]. Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press, 1981.
[79] JING X J, LANG Z Q. Frequency domain analysis and design of nonlinear systems based on Volterra series expansion[M]. Cham:Springer International Publishing, 2015.
[80] ZHANG Y W, XU K F, ZANG J, et al. Dynamic design of a nonlinear energy sink with NiTiNOL-steel wire ropes based on nonlinear output frequency response functions[J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2019, 40(12):1791-1804.
[81] WANG H, JING X J. Vibration signal-based fault diagnosis in complex structures:A beam-like structure approach[J]. Structural Health Monitoring, 2018, 17(3):472-493.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

基于传递函数特征的机械结构故障诊断方法新进展

Recent advances of fault diagnosis methods based on transmissibility function for mechanical structures

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	朱清玉, 韩清凯, 王维民, 江志农. 航空发动机多支撑附件系统振动传递路径分析[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(4): 628303-628303.
[2]	李帅, 李启行, 谌璨, 方志法, 王维民. 融合柔性基础传递函数的转子系统建模方法及验证[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(3): 229250-229250.
[3]	石怀涛, 刘子濛, 白晓天, 马辉. 全陶瓷轴承外圈裂纹位置识别方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 625481-625481.
[4]	程月华, 江文建, 杨浩, 薛琪, 廖鹤. 基于深度森林的卫星ACS执行机构与传感器故障识别[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(S1): 723778-723778.
[5]	张书刚, 郭迎清, 冯健朋. 航空发动机在线综合诊断结构设计及仿真验证[J]. 航空学报, 2014, 35(2): 381-390.
[6]	张强;张晓林;常啸鸣. 用于卫星导航多星故障识别的新方法[J]. 航空学报, 2008, 29(5): 1239-1244.
[7]	李恩奇;李道奎;唐国金;雷勇军. 基于传递函数方法的局部覆盖环状CLD圆柱壳动力学分析[J]. 航空学报, 2007, 28(6): 1487-1493.
[8]	袁宏杰;李传日. 正弦加随机振动控制技术的研究[J]. 航空学报, 2000, 21(4): 383-384.
[9]	顾启泰;刘学斌. Levy 方法的改进[J]. 航空学报, 1997, 18(6): 735-738.
[10]	陈新;王德石;陈新度;周济;余俊. 广义结构结合部参数辨识公式及算法[J]. 航空学报, 1994, 15(11): 1321-1326.
[11]	姜兴渭;潘光平;董彩凤;王飞. 动态数据处理与振动分析系统（DVAS）[J]. 航空学报, 1990, 11(7): 415-415.
[12]	杨一栋;高莉新. 飞机直接力控制模态综合及转换[J]. 航空学报, 1987, 8(9): 503-512.
[13]	彭普生. 模拟式大气仪动态响应数字仿真[J]. 航空学报, 1987, 8(8): 382-390.
[14]	邹丛青;陈桂彬. 飞机的伺服-气动弹性稳定性[J]. 航空学报, 1987, 8(3): 200-205.
[15]	刘锐琛. 飞机地面滑行动力响应分析[J]. 航空学报, 1987, 8(12): 601-610.