一种基于ROM模型的测试性指标论证方法

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2020.24717

电子电气工程与控制

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

一种基于ROM模型的测试性指标论证方法

杨鹏, 邱静, 刘冠军, 张勇

国防科技大学智能科学学院装备综合保障技术重点实验室, 长沙 410073

收稿日期:2020-09-04 修回日期:2020-09-24 发布日期:2020-10-16
通讯作者: 杨鹏 E-mail:nudtyp7894@163.com
基金资助:
装备预研项目（41403020101）；国家自然科学基金青年科学基金（51605482）

Testability index determination method based on ROM model

YANG Peng, QIU Jing, LIU Guanjun, ZHANG Yong

Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Integrated Logistics Support, School of Intelligence Science, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China

Received:2020-09-04 Revised:2020-09-24 Published:2020-10-16
Supported by:
Equipment Pre-research Project(41403020101); National Natural Science Foundation of China Youth Science Foundation (51605482)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对实践中缺乏理论性、可实施性强的测试性指标论证方法的现状，提出了一种基于可靠度、战备完好率与可维修度（ROM）模型的测试性指标论证方法。从战备完好率（O）、可靠度（R）、可维修度（M）关系式入手，将关系式中的可靠度和可维修度分别用平均故障间隔时间（MTBF）和平均修复时间（MTTR）替换，再建立MTBF和MTTR与故障诊断率、虚警率和机内测试（BIT）故障率的关系式并代入"ROM"关系式，得到战备完好率与测试性指标之间的关系式，建立待解指标与BIT数量之间的关系式，通过代入和消减参数得到战备完好率随BIT数量变化曲线，通过找到曲线极值点得到最佳BIT数量，进而得到最佳的测试性指标。在模型构建和指标求解过程中进行了较为充分的仿真分析，得到了大量与经验相符的规律性结论，为不同对象应用该方法进行参数设置时提供了较为充分的参考。最后应用本文方法对某光电一体化设备进行了指标论证，演示并验证了本文方法的有效性。

关键词: 测试性设计, 测试性指标, 故障诊断率, 虚警率, 机内测试(BIT)

Abstract: Aiming at the lack of theoretical and practical testability index demonstration method in practice, a novel method based on the ROM(operational readiness, reliability and maintainability) model is proposed. Starting from the relational expression of operational readiness (O), reliability (R) and maintainability (M), we establish the relations among Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF), Mean Time to Repair (MTTR) and fault diagnosis rate, false alarm rate and Built in Test (BIT) failure rate and substitute them into the "ROM" formula, obtaining the relation between the operational readiness and testability parameters. The relations between testability parameters and the number of BITs (number of BITs) are further established and substituted into the "ROM" formula to achieve the relation between operational readiness and number of BITs. The optimal number of BITs can be obtained from the curve of operational readiness and number of BITs, and the best testability index is derived subsequently. Considerable conclusions have been drawn from the simulation analysis of the availability curves, providing sufficient reference for different applications in setting parameters. Finally, photoelectric integrated equipment is used as a case to demonstrate the effectiveness of the ROM model and method.

Key words: design for testability, testability index, fault diagnosis rate, false alarm rate, Built in Test (BIT)

中图分类号:

TP806

杨鹏, 邱静, 刘冠军, 张勇. 一种基于ROM模型的测试性指标论证方法[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(12): 324717-324717.

YANG Peng, QIU Jing, LIU Guanjun, ZHANG Yong. Testability index determination method based on ROM model[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(12): 324717-324717.

参考文献

[1] 田仲, 石君友. 系统测试性设计分析与验证[M]. 北京:北京航空航天大学出版社, 2003:71-89. TIAN Z, SHI J Y. System testability design analysis and evaluation[M]. Beijing:Beihang University Press, 2003:71-89(in Chinese).
[2] 苏永定, 刘冠军, 邱静, 等. 系统测试性指标确定方法[J]. 测试技术学报, 2008, 22(5):401-405. SU Y D, LIU G J, QIU J, et al. Research on system testability index determination method[J]. Journal of Test and Measurement Technology, 2008, 22(5):401-405(in Chinese).
[3] 常春贺, 杨江平, 刘飞. 复杂装备系统测试性指标确定方法[J]. 装备指挥技术学院学报, 2011, 22(3):110-113. CHANG C H, YANG J P, LIU F. Research on a determination method for system testability index of complicated equipment[J]. Journal of the Academy of Equipment Command & Technology, 2011, 22(3):110-113(in Chinese).
[4] 谢宗仁, 吕建伟, 徐一帆, 等. 舰船装备总体测试性指标定量要求的确定方法[J]. 海军工程大学学报, 2017, 29(6):49-54. XIE Z R, LÜ J W, XU Y F, et al. Approaches of determining quantitative total testability indicators of warship equipment[J]. Journal of Naval University of Engineering, 2017, 29(6):49-54(in Chinese).
[5] 苏永定, 邱静, 杨鹏. 面向任务的导弹测试性需求分析与指标确定[J]. 国防科技大学学报, 2011, 33(2):125-129. SU Y D, QIU J, YANG P. Missile testability requirement analysis and index determination oriented to mission[J]. Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 2011, 33(2):125-129(in Chinese).
[6] LV J, XIE Z R, XU Y F. Quantitative relationship between readiness and availability of weapon system and its application[C]//Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Modeling, Simulation and Applied Mathematics. Paris:Atlantis Press, 2015:89-93.
[7] 张延生, 黄考利, 陈建辉, 等. 复杂装备测试性指标确定方法研究[J]. 军械工程学院学报, 2010, 22(6):7-10. ZHANG Y S, HUANG K L, CHEN J H. Research on determining TFOMs of complex equipment[J]. Journal of Ordnance Engineering College, 2010, 22(6):7-10(in Chinese).
[8] 吕晓明, 黄考利, 连光耀, 等. 复杂装备系统级测试性指标确定方法研究[J]. 计算机测量与控制, 2008, 16(3):357-359, 362. LV X M, HUANG K L, LIAN G Y, et al. Research on deciding testability figures of complicated equipment[J]. Computer Measurement & Control, 2008, 16(3):357-359, 362(in Chinese).
[9] VOROB'EV G V, PSHENICHNAYA K S, SOKOLOV O V, et al. Methodology of the system analysis of the influence of testability indicators on the usage efficiency of aircraft weapons systems[J]. Journal of Computer and Systems Sciences International, 2012, 51(5):663-680.
[10] 吕建伟, 谢宗仁, 徐一帆. 装备故障隔离模糊度要求值的确定和优化方法研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2016, 38(5):1208-1214. LÜ J W, XIE Z R, XU Y F. Requirement's determining and optimization on fault isolation's ambiguity group size of weapon system[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2016, 38(5):1208-1214(in Chinese).
[11] 钱彦岭, 邱静, 温熙森. 确定系统级测试性参数的广义随机Petri网模型[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2002, 24(5):4-7. QIAN Y L, QIU J, WEN X S. Generalized stochastic petri network for defining the system-level testability parameters and figure of merit[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2002, 24(5):4-7(in Chinese).
[12] 苏永定, 刘冠军, 邱静. 基于DSPN的多阶段任务系统测试性需求建模与分析[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2010, 30(7):1272-1278. SU Y D, LIU G J, QIU J. DSPN-based testability requirement modeling and analysis of phased-mission systems[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2010, 30(7):1272-1278(in Chinese).
[13] SU Y D, QIU J, LIU G J, et al. Modeling of testability requirement based on generalized stochastic petri nets[J]. Journal of China Ordnance, 2009, 5(1):60-64.
[14] 白力舸, 王华茂, 闫金栋. 基于DSPN的航天器系统级可测试性指标确定方法[J]. 航天器工程, 2013, 22(6):127-133. BAI L G, WANG H M, YAN J D. Spacecraft system testability figure requirement determination method based on DSPN[J]. Spacecraft Engineering, 2013, 22(6):127-133(in Chinese).
[15] 王小强, 韩斌. 基于GSPN的飞机测试性指标确定方法研究[J]. 计算机测量与控制, 2016, 24(4):13-15, 18. WANG X Q, HAN B. Research on determination method for testability index of aircraft based on GSPN[J]. Computer Measurement & Control, 2016, 24(4):13-15, 18(in Chinese).
[16] 翟禹尧, 史贤俊, 吕佳朋. 基于广义随机Petri网的导弹系统测试性建模与指标评估方法研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2019, 40(10):2070-2079. ZHAI Y Y, SHI X J, Lü J P. Research on evaluation method for testability index and modeling of missile system based on GSPN[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2019, 40(10):2070-2079(in Chinese).
[17] ZHAO J T, CHEN Z Q, LIU Z X. Modeling and analysis of colored petri net based on the semi-tensor product of matrices[J]. Science China Information Sciences, 2017, 61(1):1-16.
[18] WU X Y, YAN H, LI L R. Numerical method for reliability analysis of phased-mission system using Markov chains[J]. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 2012, 41(21):3960-3973.
[19] RAMOS G, SANCHEZ J L, TORRES A, et al. Power systems security evaluation using petri nets[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 2010, 25(1):316-322.
[20] 方欢, 方贤文, 王丽丽. Petri网在可靠性分析中的研究综述[J]. 计算机科学, 2014, 41(7):40-44. FANG H, FANG X W, WANG L L. Review of reliability analysis based on petri nets[J]. Computer Science, 2014, 41(7):40-44(in Chinese).
[21] 石健, 王少萍, 王康. 基于GSPN的机载液压作动系统可靠性模型[J]. 航空学报, 2011, 32(5):920-933. SHI J, WANG S P, WANG K. GSPN-based reliability model of aircraft hydraulic actuator system[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2011, 32(5):920-933(in Chinese).
[22] 李展, 单士华. 基于GSPN的舰载服务器系统可靠性建模及分析[J]. 火力与指挥控制, 2015, 40(5):57-60, 64. LI Z, SHAN S H. Modeling and analysis of reliability for shipboard server system by GSPN[J]. Fire Control & Command Control, 2015, 40(5):57-60, 64(in Chinese).
[23] 杨为民, 阮镰, 俞沼, 等. 可靠性·维修性·保障性总论[M]. 北京:国防工业出版社, 1995:20-24. YANG W M, RUAN L, YU Z, et al. Reliability, maintainability and supportability generalization[M]. Beijing:National Defense Industry Press, 1995:20-24(in Chinese).
[24] 杨鹏, 谢皓宇, 邱静. 一种基于二次分配的测试性指标分配方法[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(9):323070. YANG P, XIE H Y, QIU J. A testability index allocation method based on quadratic allocation[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2019, 40(9):323070(in Chinese).
[25] 邱静. 装备测试性建模与设计技术[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2015:183-188. QIU J, LIU G J, YANG P, et al. Equipment testability modeling and design[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2013:183-188(in Chinese).

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

一种基于ROM模型的测试性指标论证方法

Testability index determination method based on ROM model

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 6

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李天梅, 司小胜, 杨宗浩, 徐从启, 张琪. 考虑测试性设计缺陷修正延时的测试性增长模型建模与评价方法[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(9): 323079-323079.
[2]	吕克洪, 程先哲, 李华康, 张勇, 邱静, 刘冠军. 电子设备故障预测与健康管理技术发展新动态[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(11): 23285-023285.
[3]	韦北余, 朱岱寅, 吴迪. 基于杂波对消-自聚焦的多通道SAR-GMTI[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(5): 1585-1595.
[4]	简涛;何友;苏峰;曲长文;顾新锋. 非高斯杂波下自适应雷达目标检测新方法[J]. 航空学报, 2010, 31(3): 579-586.
[5]	代京;张平;李行善;于劲松. 航空机电系统测试性建模与分析新方法[J]. 航空学报, 2010, 31(2): 277-284.
[6]	张昆辉;朱兆达. 非相干Rice杂波中的恒虚警检测[J]. 航空学报, 1989, 10(2): 93-97.