基于几何代数理论的转子堆叠装配多目标优化

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2020.24197

论文

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

基于几何代数理论的转子堆叠装配多目标优化

涂建波, 李震, 葛浩田, 刘亮, 刘洪慧

大连理工大学机械工程学院, 大连 116024

收稿日期:2020-05-07 修回日期:2020-06-20 发布日期:2020-10-16
通讯作者: 李震 E-mail:lizhen@dlut.edu.cn
基金资助:
兴辽英才计划（XLYC1808016）；中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金（DUT19LAB17）

Multi-objective optimization of rotor-stack assembly based on geometric algebra theory

TU Jianbo, LI Zhen, GE Haotian, LIU Liang, LIU Honghui

College of Mechanical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China

Received:2020-05-07 Revised:2020-06-20 Published:2020-10-16
Supported by:
LiaoNing Revitalization Talents Program (XLYC1808016);The Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (DUT19LAB17)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在航空发动机多级转子装配过程中，优化的转子堆叠装配方案对提高转子装配质量及安全运行有着重要的意义。为了提高转子安装相位优化效率和装配质量，基于几何代数理论并结合多目标优化方法提出了一种高效求解最优堆叠装配方案的方法。首先，对几何代数和齐次矩阵的计算效率进行对比验证，并基于几何代数理论改进多级转子堆叠装配误差传递模型；其次，针对航空发动机转子安装相位角度的装配要求，建立转子同心度和初始不平衡量的多目标优化模型；最后，采用非支配排序遗传算法求解该堆叠装配多目标优化问题，获得符合工艺要求的最优装配方案。算例结果表明，优化后的转子装配方案比随机装配方案同心度降低65.10%，初始不平衡量降低97.88%。

关键词: 几何代数, 转子堆叠, 不平衡量, 同心度, 优化, 装配

Abstract: In the assembly process of aero-engine multi-stage rotors, the optimized rotor stacking assembly plan is of particular significance in improving the rotor assembly quality and safe operation. To enhance the optimization efficiency of rotor installation phase and assembly quality, a method for efficient solution of the optimal stacking assembly scheme is proposed based on the geometric algebra theory combined with the multi-objective optimization method. The computational efficiency of the geometric algebra and homogeneous matrix is first compared and verified, and the multi-stage rotor stack assembly error propagation model improved based on the geometric algebra theory. Secondly, according to the assembly requirements of the aero-engine rotor installation phase angle, a multi-objective optimization model of rotor concentricity and initial unbalance is established. The non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II is finally used to solve the multi-objective optimization problem of the stack assembly, obtaining the optimal assembly scheme that satisfies the process requirements. Results show that the concentricity of the rotor and the initial unbalance are reduced by 65.10% and 97.88%, respectively, compared with the random assembly scheme.

Key words: geometric algebra, rotor stacking, unbalance, concentricity, optimization, assembly

中图分类号:

V263.2

涂建波, 李震, 葛浩田, 刘亮, 刘洪慧. 基于几何代数理论的转子堆叠装配多目标优化[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(10): 524197-524197.

TU Jianbo, LI Zhen, GE Haotian, LIU Liang, LIU Honghui. Multi-objective optimization of rotor-stack assembly based on geometric algebra theory[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(10): 524197-524197.

参考文献

[1] 刘君, 吴法勇, 王娟. 航空发动机转子装配优化技术[J]. 航空发动机, 2014, 40(3):75-78. LIU J, WU F Y, WANG J. Optimization technique of aeroengine rotor assembly[J]. Aeroengine, 2014, 40(3):75-78(in Chinese).
[2] HUSSAIN T, YANG Z, POPOV A A, et al. Straight-build assembly optimization:A method to minimize stage-by-stage eccentricity error in the assembly of axisymmetric rigid components (two-dimensional case study)[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 2011, 133(3):031014.
[3] YANG Z, HUSSAIN T, POPOV A A, et al. Novel optimization technique for variation propagation control in an aero-engine assembly[J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B:Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 2011, 225(1):100-111.
[4] MARZIALE M, POLINI W. A review of two models for tolerance analysis of an assembly:Vector loop and matrix[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2009, 43(11-12):1106-1123.
[5] YANG Z, POPOV A A, MCWILLIAM S. Variation propagation control in mechanical assembly of cylindrical components[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 2012, 31(2):162-176.
[6] WHITNEY D E, GILBERT O L, JASTRZEBSKI M. Representation of geometric variations using matrix transforms for statistical tolerance analysis in assemblies[J]. Research in Engineering Design, 1994, 6(4):191-210.
[7] ZHANG Z Q, ZHANG Z J, JIN X, et al. A novel modelling method of geometric errors for precision assembly[J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2018, 94(1-4):1139-1160.
[8] MANTRIPRAGADA R, WHITNEY D E. Modeling and controlling variation propagation in mechanical assemblies using state transition models[J]. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 1999, 15(1):124-140.
[9] 曹茂国. 多级盘结构转子的工艺装配优化设计方法[J]. 航空发动机, 1994,20(3):48-52. CAO M G. Process assembly optimization design method of multi-disk structure rotor[J]. Journal of Aeroengine, 1994,20(3):48-52(in Chinese)..
[10] 李立新, 艾延廷, 王志, 等. 基于遗传算法的多级盘转子平衡方案优化设计[J]. 振动、测试与诊断, 2008, 28(2):139-142, 182. LI L X, AI Y T, WANG Z, et al. Optimum design for balance in multi-disk rotor installation based on genetic algorithm[J]. Journal of Vibration, Measurement & Diagnosis, 2008, 28(2):139-142, 182(in Chinese).
[11] 琚奕鹏, 吴法勇, 金彬, 等. 基于转子跳动和初始不平衡量优化的多级盘转子结构装配工艺[J]. 航空发动机, 2018, 44(6):83-90. JU Y P, WU F Y, JIN B, et al. Structure assembly technique of multi-stage disc rotor based on rotor runout and unbalance optimization[J]. Aeroengine, 2018, 44(6):83-90(in Chinese).
[12] 李洪波. 共形几何代数:几何代数的新理论和计算框架[J]. 计算机辅助设计与图形学学报, 2005, 17(11):2383-2393. LI H B. Conformal geometric algebra:A new framework for computational geometry[J]. Journal of Computer-Aided Design & Computer Graphics, 2005, 17(11):2383-2393(in Chinese).
[13] FU Z T, YANG W, YANG Z. Solution of inverse kinematics for 6R robot manipulators with offset wrist based on geometric algebra[J]. Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics, 2013, 5(3):310081-310087.
[14] HUO X M, SUN T, SONG Y M. A geometric algebra approach to determine motion/constraint, mobility and singularity of parallel mechanism[J]. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2017, 116:273-293.
[15] LI Q C, CHAI X X, XIANG J N. Mobility analysis of limited-degrees-of-freedom parallel mechanisms in the framework of geometric algebra[J]. Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics, 2016, 8(4):041005.
[16] SELIG J M. Clifford algebra of points, lines and planes[J]. Robotica, 2000, 18(5):545-556.
[17] 李洪波. Clifford代数与几何定理机器证明[J]. 世界科技研究与发展, 2001, 23(3):41-47. LI H B. Clifford algebra and automated geometric theorem proving[J]. World Sci-Tech R & D, 2001, 23(3):41-47(in Chinese).
[18] CRILLY T. Geometric algebra for physicists[J]. The Mathematical Gazette, 2005, 89(514):180-181.
[19] CAI M, YANG J X, WU Z T. Mathematical model of cylindrical form tolerance[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A, 2004, 5(7):890-895.
[20] CHEN G Y, LI J H. A diversity ranking based evolutionary algorithm for multi-objective and many-objective optimization[J]. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 2019, 48:274-287.
[21] DEB K, PRATAP A, AGARWAL S, et al. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm:NSGA-II[J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2002, 6(2):182-197.
[22] 李泽林. 基于轴向预载的转子装配方法研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学, 2018:10-11. LI Z L. Research on rotor assembly method based on axial compression[D]. Harbin:Harbin Institute of Technology, 2018:10-11(in Chinese).

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

基于几何代数理论的转子堆叠装配多目标优化

Multi-objective optimization of rotor-stack assembly based on geometric algebra theory

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	唐永兴, 朱战霞, 张红文, 罗建军, 袁建平. 机器人运动规划方法综述[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(2): 26495-026495.
[2]	张晨, 张皓. 基于月球借力的低能DRO入轨策略[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(2): 326507-326507.
[3]	蒋平, 屈秉男, 丁华泽, 马润泽, 何为. 基于改进粒子群的时差测向最优阵列布局[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(2): 326502-326502.
[4]	郭琪磊, 桑为民, 牛俊杰, 袁烨. 复杂气象条件下考虑结冰风险的无人机飞行策略[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(1): 627518-627518.
[5]	梁超, 杨力, 潘成胜, 戚耀文. 卫星网络动态资源图多QoS约束路由算法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(1): 326422-326422.
[6]	李昊歌, 杨华, 杨雨欣, 陈伟芳. 高超声速升力体迎风面精细化降热优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S2): 124-137.
[7]	邹子缘, 陈琪锋. 基于决策树搜索的空间飞行器集群对抗目标分配方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S1): 726910-726910.
[8]	韩凯, 董日昌, 邵丰伟, 龚文斌, 常家超. 基于改进遗传算法的导航卫星星间链路网络动态拓扑优化技术[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 326095-326095.
[9]	孙刚, 彭双, 陈浩, 伍江江, 李军. 面向测控数传资源一体化场景的卫星地面站资源多目标优化方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 326114-326114.
[10]	梁宽, 付莉莉, 张晓鹏, 罗阳军. 基于材料场级数展开的结构动力学拓扑优化[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 226002-226002.
[11]	张烁, 刘治汶. 航空发动机轴承故障结构化贝叶斯稀疏表示[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 625056-625056.
[12]	罗佳杰, 宋文滨. 层流机翼及其增升装置嵌套协同优化方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 125377-125377.
[13]	郑帅, 王子涵, 赵浩然, 杨朋涛, 洪军. 基于差分进化算法的飞机油量传感器布局优化方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 125809-125809.
[14]	陆传雨, 陆铭慧, 刘浩宇, 徐喜浩. 基于改进式SL0算法的超声混叠信号分离[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(7): 425419-425419.
[15]	李春鹏, 张铁军, 钱战森, 刘铁中. 多用途无人机模块化布局气动设计[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(7): 125411-125411.