民机驾驶舱显示触控系统人机工效综合评价

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2020.24053

机载系统与电子系统专栏

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

民机驾驶舱显示触控系统人机工效综合评价

董磊^1,2,3, 向晨阳^2,3, 赵长啸^1,2,3, 党香俊^1,2,3, 史春蕾^1,2,3

1. 中国民航大学民航航空器适航审定技术重点实验室, 天津 300300;
2. 中国民航大学天津市民用航空器适航与维修重点实验室, 天津 300300;
3. 中国民航大学适航学院, 天津 300300

收稿日期:2020-04-03 修回日期:2020-05-18 出版日期:2021-06-15 发布日期:1900-01-01
通讯作者: 赵长啸 E-mail:zhaochangxiao@yeah.net
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金-民航联合基金（U1933106）；航空科学基金（20185167017）；中央高校基本科研业务费（3122019167）

Comprehensive evaluation of ergonomics of civil aircraft cockpit display touch control system

DONG Lei^1,2,3, XIANG Chenyang^2,3, ZHAO Changxiao^1,2,3, DANG Xiangjun^1,2,3, SHI Chunlei^1,2,3

1. Key Laboratory of Civil Aircraft Airworthiness Technology, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China;
2. Civil Aircraft Airworthiness and Repair Key Laboratory of Tianjin, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China;
3. School of Airworthiness, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China

Received:2020-04-03 Revised:2020-05-18 Online:2021-06-15 Published:1900-01-01
Supported by:
Joint Found of the National Natural Science Foundation of China and the Civil Aviation Administration of China(U1933106);Aeronautical Science Foundation of China(20185167017);the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (3122019167)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 未来民机驾驶舱将广泛采用触控技术，但目前尚未形成针对民机驾驶舱显示触控系统的人机工效评价体系与评价方法。针对上述问题，首先梳理民机驾驶舱显示触控系统相关的现行标准与规范，结合适航规章中人为因素考察项，提出民机驾驶舱显示触控系统人机工效评价指标体系。其次，考虑到评价指标的模糊性与灰色性，基于灰色关联分析，对传统模糊层次综合评价算法从数据集结处理和指标权重确定两个方向进行改进，通过构造专家信度系数修正秩次矩阵，实现专家认知特性的定量描述，建立民机驾驶舱显示触控系统人机工效综合评价模型。最后，结合ACROSS项目下的民机驾驶舱显示触控系统人机工效评价试验案例，分析驾驶舱显示触控系统配置策略对系统人机工效的影响，验证了评价体系与评价方法的适用性和合理性。

关键词: 触控显示屏, 人机工效, 民机驾驶舱, 模糊综合评价, 灰色关联分析

Abstract: Touch control technology will be extensively applied in civil aircraft cockpits in the future; however, no ergonomic evaluation system and evaluation method for the display touch system of civil aircraft cockpits exist currently. Aiming at this problem, we first sort out the current standards and norms related to the touch control system of civil aircraft cockpit displays, and propose the man-machine ergonomic evaluation index system of civil aircraft cockpit display touch control systems in combination with the human factor investigation items in airworthiness regulations. Secondly, considering the fuzziness and grayness of the evaluation indexes, we improve the traditional fuzzy hierarchy comprehensive evaluation algorithm from two directions of data aggregation processing and index weight determination based on the gray correlation analysis. The expert reliability coefficient modified rank matrix is constructed to realize the quantitative description of expert cognitive characteristics, and the man-machine ergonomic comprehensive evaluation model of civil aircraft cockpit display touch control systems is established. Finally, combined with the ergonomic evaluation test cases of civil aircraft cockpit displays and touch systems under the project ACROSS, the influence of the configuration strategy of cockpit displays and touch systems on the ergonomic efficiency of the system is analyzed, and the applicability and rationality of the evaluation system and evaluation method are verified.

Key words: touchscreen, ergonomics, civil cockpits, fuzzy hierarchy comprehensive evaluation, gray correlation

中图分类号:

V243.6

董磊, 向晨阳, 赵长啸, 党香俊, 史春蕾. 民机驾驶舱显示触控系统人机工效综合评价[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(6): 624053-624053.

DONG Lei, XIANG Chenyang, ZHAO Changxiao, DANG Xiangjun, SHI Chunlei. Comprehensive evaluation of ergonomics of civil aircraft cockpit display touch control system[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(6): 624053-624053.

参考文献

[1] VAN ZON N C M, BORST C, POOL D M, et al. Touchscreens for aircraft navigation tasks:Comparing accuracy and throughput of three flight deck interfaces using fitts' law[J]. Human Factors, 2020, 62(6):897-908.
[2] COUTTS L V, PLANT K L, SMITH M, et al. Future technology on the flight deck:assessing the use of touchscreens in vibration environments[J]. Ergonomics, 2019, 62(2):286-304.
[3] AVSAR H, FISCHER J E, RODDEN T. Mixed method approach in designing flight decks with touch screens:a framework[C]//2016 IEEE/AIAA 35th Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Piscataway:IEEE Press, 2016:1-10.
[4] ROUWHORST W, VERHOEVEN R, SUIJKERBUIJK M, et al. Use of touch screen display applications for aircraft flight control[C]//2017 IEEE/AIAA 36th Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Piscataway:IEEE Press, 2017:1-10.
[5] AVSAR H, FISCHER J, RODDEN T. Target size guidelines for interactive displays on the flight deck[C]//2015 IEEE/AIAA 34th Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Piscataway:IEEE Press, 2015:3C4-1-3C4-15.
[6] ORPHANIDES A K, NAM C S. Touchscreen interfaces in context:A systematic review of research into touchscreens across settings, populations, and implementations[J]. Applied Ergonomics, 2017, 61:116-143.
[7] SAE. Touch interactive display systems:Human factors considerations, system design and performance gui-delines:SAE ARP60494[S]. Warrendale:SAE Inter-national, 2019.
[8] KAMINANI S. Human computer interaction issues with touch screen interfaces in the flight deck[C]//2011 IEEE/AIAA 30th Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Piscataway:IEEE Press, 2011:6B4-1-6B4-7.
[9] COCKBURN A, AHLSTRÖM D, GUTWIN C. Understanding performance in touch selections:Tap, drag and radial pointing drag with finger, stylus and mouse[J]. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 2012, 70(3):218-233.
[10] GAUCI J. Design and evaluation of a touch screen concept for pilot interaction with avionic systems[C]//2015 IEEE/AIAA 34th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC). Piscataway:IEEE Press, 2015:1-32.
[11] FAA. Advisory Circular:Controls for flight deck systems:AC 20-175[S]. Washington, D.C.:Federal Aviation Administration, 2011.
[12] FAA. Advisory circular:Installed systems and equipment for use by the flightcrew document information:AC 25.13021[S]. Washington, D.C.:Federal Aviation Administration, 2013.
[13] CHO J, LEE J. Development of a new technology product evaluation model for assessing commercialization opportunities using Delphi method and fuzzy AHP approach[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2013, 40(13):5314-5330.
[14] 夏春艳. 核电厂主控室人机界面评价方法研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工程大学, 2010. XIA C Y. Study on human-machine interface evaluation method for main control room of nuclear power plant[D]. Harbin:Harbin Engineering University, 2010(in Chinese).
[15] WANG X L, ZHANG J, ZENG R, et al. Analysis of the application of touch screen in civil aircraft cockpit[M]//Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering. Singapore:Springer Singapore, 2019:2439-2451.
[16] 董大勇, 俞金海, 李宝峰, 等. 民机驾驶舱人为因素适航符合性验证技术[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(1):310-316. DONG D Y, YU J H, LI B F, et al. Airworthiness compliance certification technology of civil aircraft flight deck human factor[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(1):310-316(in Chinese).
[17] SAE. Minimum performance standard for airborne multipurpose electronic displays:SAE AS8034C[S]. Warrendale:SAE International, 2018.
[18] STROUD K, PICKETT L, TILLMAN B. NASA human integration design handbook (HIDH):Revitalization of space-related human factors, environmental, and habit-ability data and design guidance[R]. Houston:NASA Johnson Space Center, 2008.
[19] WATKINS C B, NILSON C, TAYLOR S, et al. Development of touchscreen displays for the gulfstream g500 and g600 symmetry^TM flight deck[C]//2018 IEEE/AIAA 37th Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Piscataway:IEEE Press, 2018:1-10.
[20] AHLSTROM V. Human factors design standard:DOT/FAA/HF-STD-001B[S]. Washington, D.C.:Federal Aviation Administration,2016.
[21] FAA. Advisory Circular:electronic flight displays document information:AC 25-11B[S]. Washington, D.C.:Federal Aviation Administration, 2014.
[22] SAE. Electronic displays:SAE ARP4102/7[S]. Warr-endale:SAE International, 2007.
[23] SAE. Flight deck panels, controls, and displays:SAE ARP4102[S]. Warrendale:SAE International, 2007.
[24] RTCA. DO-160G Change 1, Environmental conditions and test procedures for airborne equipment[S]. Washington, D.C.:Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics, 2014.
[25] FAA. Airborne multipurpose electronic displays:TSO-C113a[S]. Washington, D.C.:Federal Aviation Administration, 2012.
[26] DOD M S. Design criteria standard human engineering MIL-STD-1472G[S]. Washington, D.C.:Department of Defense, 2012.
[27] FAA. Advisory Circular:Guidelines for the certification, airworthiness, and operational use of electronic flight bags:AC 120-76D[S]. Washington, D.C.:Federal Aviation Administration, 2017.
[28] YEH M, JO Y J, DONOVAN C, et al. Human factors considerations in the design and evaluation of flight deck displays and controls:No. DOT-VNTSC-FAA-13-09[R]. Cambridge:John A. Volpe National Transpo-rtation Systems Center (US), 2013.
[29] ISO. Ergonomics of human-system interaction-Part 910:Framework for tactile and haptic interaction:ISO 9241-910[S]. Geneva:International Organization for Stand-ardization, 2011.
[30] ISO. Ergonomics of human-system Interaction-Part 920:Guidance on tactile and haptic interactions:ISO 9241-920[S]. Geneva:International Organization for Standardization, 2009.
[31] RTCA. Software considerations in airborne systems and equipment certification:DO-178C[S]. Washington, D.C.:Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics, 2012.
[32] RTCA. Design assurance guidance for airbo-rne electronic hardware:DO-254[S]. Washington, D.C.:Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics, 2000.
[33] 王黎静, 向维, 何雪丽, 等. 机组工作负荷评价新方法及其应用[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2012, 38(7):915-919,940. WANG L J, XIANG W, HE X L, et al. New method to evaluate crew workload and application[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2012, 38(7):915-919,940(in Chinese).
[34] 李银霞, 袁修干, 杨春信, 等. 歼击机座舱工效学综合评价指标体系的建立[J]. 航空学报, 2005, 26(2):148-152. LI Y X, YUAN X G, YANG C X, et al. Building of the index system for fighter cockpit ergonomics comprehensive evaluation[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2005, 26(2):148-152(in Chinese).
[35] 邓丽, 余隋怀. 基于Fuzzy AHP的司钻控制房人机界面评价[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2014, 50(4):231-235. DENG L, YU S H. Human-machine interface evaluation of driller control room based on fuzzy AHP[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2014, 50(4):231-235(in Chinese).
[36] LIMA F R Jr, OSIRO L, CARPINETTI L C R. A comparison between fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2014, 21:194-209.
[37] 刘昕, 余隋怀, 王淑侠, 等. 基于Delphi排序改进的AHP-Fuzzy人机布局虚拟评价[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2015, 51(3):24-30. LIU X, YU S H, WANG S X, et al. Virtual assessment of ergonomic layout based on AHP-fuzzy improved by Delphi sequence[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2015, 51(3):24-30(in Chinese).
[38] 刘启越. 民用飞机驾驶舱人机工效评价方法研究[D]. 南京:南京航空航天大学, 2013. LIU Q Y. Research on evaluation method of the cockpit ergonomics for civil aircraft[D]. Nanjing:Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2013(in Chinese).

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

民机驾驶舱显示触控系统人机工效综合评价

Comprehensive evaluation of ergonomics of civil aircraft cockpit display touch control system

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 4

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	周琛, 尚柏林, 宋笔锋, 科尔沁, 王耀祖. 基于作战环的航空武器装备体系贡献率评估[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(2): 224958-224958.
[2]	朱超, 孔旭, 胡成威, 唐自新, 李德伦, 王友渔, 王康. 空间机械臂维修性系统设计与评价体系的构建[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(1): 524002-524002.
[3]	金灿灿, 左洪福, 张营, 白芳. 基于BBN的航空公司风险评估技术研究[J]. 航空学报, 2013, 34(3): 588-596.
[4]	王立刚;袁修干. 基于工效学的控制面板计算机辅助设计[J]. 航空学报, 1999, 20(S1): 46-47.