考虑承载面最大位移约束的结构拓扑优化方法

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2019.23577

固体力学与飞行器总体设计

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

考虑承载面最大位移约束的结构拓扑优化方法

龙凯¹, 陈卓¹, 谷春璐¹, 王选²

1. 华北电力大学新能源电力系统国家重点实验室, 北京 102206;
2. 合肥工业大学土木与水利工程学院, 合肥 230009

收稿日期:2019-10-14 修回日期:2019-11-11 出版日期:2020-07-15 发布日期:2019-12-12
通讯作者: 龙凯 E-mail:longkai1978@163.com
基金资助:
北京市自然科学基金（2182067）；中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金（2018ZD09，JZ2019HGBZ0127）

Structural topology optimization method with maximum displacement constraint on load-bearing surface

LONG Kai¹, CHEN Zhuo¹, GU Chunlu¹, WANG Xuan²

1. State Key Laboratory for Alternate Electrical Power System with Renewable Energy Sources, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China;
2. College of Civil Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China

Received:2019-10-14 Revised:2019-11-11 Online:2020-07-15 Published:2019-12-12
Supported by:
Natural Science Foundation of Beijing (2182067); Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(2018ZD09, JZ2019HGBZ0127)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在实际工程问题中，存在着一类承受分布力载荷作用的工程结构。为了实现此类结构的刚度设计要求，提出限制承载面变形的拓扑优化设计新模型。模型采用KS包络函数对承载面节点位移进行凝聚化处理，并推导了相应的伴随方程和敏度表达式。遵循独立连续映射法建模方式，采用一阶和二阶泰勒展开分别得到约束函数和目标函数的显式表达式。由此将优化问题转换为一系列标准二次规划子问题，采用序列二次规划算法进行高效、稳健求解。通过二维、三维数值算例验证了提出模型的可行性和有效性。结果表明，所提出的列式和相应的优化求解算法能有效控制结构局部区域的最大变形量。

关键词: 拓扑优化, 连续体结构, 最大位移约束, 独立连续映射法, 序列二次规划

Abstract: In practical engineering problems, there exists a class of engineering structures sustaining distributed force. To satisfy the requirement of the stiffness design for this kind of structure, a new topological design formulation is proposed to restrict the deflection on the load-bearing surface. The KS aggregation function is applied to integrate a mass of the displacement constraints on load-bearing surface into one single constraint. The corresponding adjoin equation and sensitivity expressions are conducted. Following the construction of the independent continuous mapping method, the explicit expressions of the objective function and constraint function are obtained by first-order and second-order Taylor expansion. Consequently, the optimization problem is transformed into a series of standard quadratic programs, which can be solved efficiently and robustly using the sequential quadratic programming. The feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method are then verified by 2D and 3D numerical examples. The optimized results clearly demonstrate that the proposed formulation and corresponding optimization algorithm can effectively control the maximum deflection of local region.

Key words: topology optimization, continuum structure, maximum displacement constraint, independent continuous mapping method, sequential quadratic programming

中图分类号:

龙凯, 陈卓, 谷春璐, 王选. 考虑承载面最大位移约束的结构拓扑优化方法[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(7): 223577-223577.

LONG Kai, CHEN Zhuo, GU Chunlu, WANG Xuan. Structural topology optimization method with maximum displacement constraint on load-bearing surface[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(7): 223577-223577.

参考文献 25

[1]	MAUTE K, SIGMUND O. Topology optimization approaches[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2013, 48(6):1-25.
[2]	DEATON J D, GRANDHI R V. A survey of structural and multidisciplinary continuum topology optimization:Post 2000[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2014, 49(1):1-38.
[3]	ZHU J, ZHANG W, XIA L. Topology optimization in aircraft and aerospace structures[J]. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 2016, 23(4):595-622.
[4]	RONG J H, YI J H. A structural topological optimization method for multi-displacement constraints and any initial topology configuration[J]. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2010, 26(5):735-744.
[5]	俞燎宏, 荣见华, 唐承铁, 等. 基于可行域调整的多相材料结构拓扑优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(9):222023. YU L H, RONG J H, TANG C T, et al. Multi-phase material structural topology optimization design based on feasible domain adjustment[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2018, 39(9):222023(in Chinese).
[6]	HUANG X, XIE Y M. Evolutionary topology optimization of continuum structures with an additional displacement constraint[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2010, 40(1-6):409-416.
[7]	ZUO Z H, XIE Y M. Evolutionary topology optimization of continuum structures with a global displacement control[J]. Computer Aided Design, 2014, 56:58-67.
[8]	QIAO H T, LIU S. Topology optimization by minimizing the geometric average displacement[J]. Engineering Optimization 2013, 45(1):1-18.
[9]	LI D, KIM I Y. Multi-material topology optimization for practical lightweight design[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2018, 58(3):1081-1094.
[10]	LONG K, WANG X, GU X. Local optimum in multi-material topology optimization and solution by reciprocal variables[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2018, 57(3):1283-1295.
[11]	ZHU J, LI Y, ZHANG W, et al. Shape preserving design with structural topology optimization[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2016, 53:893-906.
[12]	LI Y, ZHU J, ZHANG W, et al. Structural topology optimization for directional deformation behavior design with orthotropic artificial weak element method[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2018, 57(3):1251-1266.
[13]	LI Y, ZHU J, WANG F, et al. Shape preserving design of geometrically nonlinear structures using topology optimization[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2019, 59(4):1033-1051.
[14]	CASTRO M S, SILVA O M, LENZI A, et al. Shape preserving design of vibrating structures using topology optimization[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2018, 58(3):1109-1119.
[15]	隋允康. 建模变换优化-结构综合方法新进展[M]. 大连:大连理工大学出版社,1996. SUI Y K. Modelling, transformation and optimization-new developments of structural synthesis method[M]. Dalian:Dalian University of Technology Press, 1996(in Chinese).
[16]	隋允康,叶红玲. 连续体结构拓扑优化的ICM方法[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2013. SUI Y K, YE H L. Continuum topology optimization methods ICM[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2013(in Chinese).
[17]	SIGMUND O. A 99 line topology optimization code written in Matlab[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2001, 21(2):120-127.
[18]	FLEURY C, BRAIBANT V. Structural optimization:A new dual method using mixed variables[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1986, 23:409-428.
[19]	SVANBERG K. The method of moving asymptotes-a new method for structural optimization[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1987, 24:359-373.
[20]	BRUYNEEL M, DUYSINX P, FLEURY C. A family of MMA approximations for structural optimization[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2002, 24(4):263-276.
[21]	CHENG G D, GUO X. ε-relaxed approach in structural topology optimization[J]. Structural Optimization, 1997, 13(4):258-266.
[22]	DUYSINX P, BENDSE M P. Topology optimization of continuum structures with local stress constraints[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1998, 43(8):1453-1478.
[23]	YANG D, LIU H, ZHANG W, et al. Stress-constrained topology optimization based on maximum stress measures[J]. Computers and Structures, 2018, 198:23-29.
[24]	LONG K, WANG X, LIU H. Stress-constrained topol ogy optimization of continuum structures subjected to harmonic force excitation using sequential quadratic programming[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2019, 59(5):1747-1759.
[25]	龙凯,谷先广, 王选. 基于多相材料的连续体结构动态轻量化设计方法[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(10):221022. LONG K, GU X G, WANG X. Lightweight design method for continuum structure under vibration using multiphase materials[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2017, 38(10):221022(in Chinese).

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

考虑承载面最大位移约束的结构拓扑优化方法

Structural topology optimization method with maximum displacement constraint on load-bearing surface

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 25

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	梁宽, 付莉莉, 张晓鹏, 罗阳军. 基于材料场级数展开的结构动力学拓扑优化[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 226002-226002.
[2]	韩凯, 董日昌, 邵丰伟, 龚文斌, 常家超. 基于改进遗传算法的导航卫星星间链路网络动态拓扑优化技术[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 326095-326095.
[3]	郭文杰, 朱继宏, 罗利龙, 常亮. 考虑组件保形约束的多组件结构系统布局优化[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(5): 225225-225225.
[4]	闫浩, 吴晓明. 载荷敏度抑制下涡轮盘拓扑优化及结构演化[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(5): 225295-225295.
[5]	岳波, 许英杰, 徐宁鑫, 张卫红. 热压罐成型框架式模具结构拓扑优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(3): 425141-425141.
[6]	李增聪, 陈燕, 李红庆, 田阔, 王刚, 高峰, 王博. 面向集中力扩散的回转曲面加筋拓扑优化方法[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(9): 224616-224616.
[7]	倪维宇, 张横, 姚胜卫. 考虑阻尼性能的复合结构多尺度拓扑优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(3): 224807-224807.
[8]	俞燎宏, 荣见华, 唐承铁, 李方义. 基于可行域调整的多相材料结构拓扑优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(9): 222023-222039.
[9]	王志刚, 杨宇, 段世慧. 基于参数化分析的柔性后缘优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(S1): 721562-721562.
[10]	严旭飞, 陈仁良. 倾转旋翼机动态倾转过渡过程的操纵策略优化[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(7): 520865-520865.
[11]	龙凯, 谷先广, 王选. 基于多相材料的连续体结构动态轻量化设计方法[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(10): 221022-221022.
[12]	于大腾, 王华, 孙福煜. 考虑潜在威胁区的航天器最优规避机动策略[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(1): 320202-320202.
[13]	李汪颖, 杨雄伟, 李跃明. 多孔材料夹层结构声辐射特性的两尺度拓扑优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(4): 1196-1206.
[14]	贾娇, 龙凯, 程伟. 稳态热传导下基于多相材料的一体化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(4): 1218-1227.
[15]	朱继宏, 郭文杰, 张卫红, 何飞. 多组件结构系统布局拓扑优化中处理组件干涉约束的惩罚函数方法[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(12): 3721-3733.