基于退化失效与突发失效竞争的导弹剩余寿命预测

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2015.0224

固体力学与飞行器总体设计

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

基于退化失效与突发失效竞争的导弹剩余寿命预测

王浩伟, 奚文骏, 冯玉光

海军航空工程学院兵器科学与技术系, 烟台 264000

收稿日期:2015-05-11 修回日期:2015-08-10 出版日期:2016-04-15 发布日期:2015-08-18
通讯作者: 王浩伟,Tel.:0535-6635061 E-mail:wyg2010123@126.com E-mail:wyg2010123@126.com
作者简介:王浩伟,男,博士,讲师。主要研究方向:装备可靠性评估与寿命预测,加速试验技术。Tel:0535-6635061 E-mail:wyg2010123@126.com;奚文骏,男,博士,副教授。主要研究方向:导弹综合保障理论与技术。E-mail:usb20@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(61273058)

Remaining life prediction based on competing risks of degradation failure and traumatic failure for missiles

WANG Haowei, XI Wenjun, FENG Yuguang

Department of Ordnance Science and Technology, Naval Aeronautical and Astronautical University, Yantai 264000, China

Received:2015-05-11 Revised:2015-08-10 Online:2016-04-15 Published:2015-08-18
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (61273058)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了提高导弹剩余寿命预测结果的准确性,本文综合利用导弹的性能退化数据和突发失效时间数据,提出了基于退化失效和突发失效竞争的剩余寿命预测方法。在引入状态空间模型评估出整弹退化程度的基础上,采用Gamma过程建立退化失效模型;在假定突发失效概率与整弹性能退化程度相关的前提下,采用Weibull分布建立突发失效模型;进而建立退化失效与突发失效竞争模式下的导弹可靠度模型。案例应用证明了所提方法的有效性,对准确预测导弹剩余寿命,有效开展视情维修具有一定的工程价值。

关键词: 剩余寿命, 退化失效, 突发失效, 竞争模式, 状态空间模型

Abstract:

In order to improve the accuracy of remaining life prediction for missiles, a prediction method, which is based on competing risks of degradation failure and traumatic failure, with the comprehensive utilization of the degradation data and failure time data of missile, is proposed. A condition space model is used to evaluate the degradation rate of the whole missile and then Gamma process is utilized to establish the degradation failure model. Assuming that the probability of traumatic failure depends on the degradation rate of the whole missile, Weibull distribution is used to establish the traumatic failure model. Finally the reliability model based on competing risks is set up. The application to a case validates the effectiveness of the proposed method. This study is of engineering value for accurately predicting the remaining life of missiles and performing condition-based maintenance.

Key words: remaining life, degradation failure, traumatic failure, competing mode, condition space model

中图分类号:

王浩伟, 奚文骏, 冯玉光. 基于退化失效与突发失效竞争的导弹剩余寿命预测[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(4): 1240-1248.

WANG Haowei, XI Wenjun, FENG Yuguang. Remaining life prediction based on competing risks of degradation failure and traumatic failure for missiles[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2016, 37(4): 1240-1248.

参考文献

[1] LIAO L X, FELIX K. Review of hybrid prognostics approaches for remaining useful life prediction of engineered systems, and an application to battery life prediction[J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2014, 63(1):191-207.
[2] SI X S, WANG W B, HU C H, et al. Remaining useful life estimation-A review on the statistical data driven approaches[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2011, 213:1-14.
[3] 张小丽, 陈雪峰, 李兵, 等. 机械重大装备寿命预测综述[J]. 机械工程学报, 2011, 47(11):100-116. ZHANG X L, CHEN X F, LI B, et al. Review of life prediction for mechanical major equipments[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2011, 47(11):100-116(in Chinese).
[4] RAMASSO E, GOURIVEAU R. Remaining useful life estimation by classification of predictions based on neuro-fuzzy system and theory of belief functions[J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2014, 63(2):555-566.
[5] LOUTAS T H, ROULIAS D, GEORGOULAS G. Remaining useful life estimation in rolling bearings utilizing data-driven probabilistic e-support vectors regression[J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2013, 62(4):821-832.
[6] LIAO L X. Discovering prognostic features using genetic programming in remaining useful life prediction[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electrics, 2014, 61(5):2464-2472.
[7] HUANG W, ASKIN R G. Reliability analysis of electronic devices with multiple competing failure modes involving performance aging degradation[J]. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 2003, 19:241-254.
[8] 谭源源, 张春华, 陈循. 竞争失效场合步进应力加速试验统计分析[J]. 航空学报, 2011, 32(3):429-437. TAN Y Y, ZHANG C H, CHEN X. Analysis of step stress accelerated testing with competing failure modes[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2011, 32(3):429-437(in Chinese).
[9] 张祥坡, 尚建忠, 陈循, 等. 三参数Weibull分布竞争失效场合加速寿命试验统计分析[J]. 兵工学报, 2013, 34(12):1603-1610. ZHANG X P, SHANG J Z, CHEN X, et al. Statistical inference of accelerated life test with competing failures based on three-parameter Weibull distribution[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2013, 34(12):1603-1610(in Chinese).
[10] 罗湘勇, 黄小凯. 基于多机理竞争退化的导弹贮存可靠性分析[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2013, 39(5):701-705. LUO X Y, HUANG X K. Storage reliability analysis of missile based on multi-mechanism competition degradation model[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2013, 39(5):701-705(in Chinese).
[11] LUO W, ZHANG C H, CHEN X, et al. Accelerated reliability demonstration under competing failure modes[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2015, 136:75-84.
[12] PAN Z Q, BALAKRISHNAN N, SUN Q, et al. Bivariate degradation analysis of products based on Wiener processes and Copulas[J]. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 2013, 83(7):1316-1329.
[13] 张建勋, 胡昌华, 周志杰, 等. 多退化变量下基于Copula函数的陀螺仪剩余寿命预测方法[J]. 航空学报, 2014, 35(4):1111-1121. ZHANG J X, HU C H, ZHOU Z J, et al. Multiple degradation variables modeling for remaining useful life estimation of gyros based on Copula function[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2014, 35(4):1111-1121(in Chinese).
[14] 张永进, 孙有朝, 陆中. 基于Copula函数的单冷贮备串联结构可靠性分析[J]. 航空学报, 2014, 35(8):2207-2216. ZHANG Y J, SUN Y C, LU Z. Copula function-based reliability analysis of a series system with a single cold standby unit[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2014, 35(8):2207-2216(in Chinese).
[15] WANG X L, BALAKRISHNAN N, GUO B, et al. Residual life estimation based on bivariate non-stationary Gamma degradation process[J]. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 2015, 85(2):405-421.
[16] 赵建印, 刘芳, 奚文骏. 退化失效与突发失效共存下产品可靠性模型与评估方法研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2011, 32(9):1136-1139. ZHAO J Y, LIU F, XI W J. Reliability model and evaluation method of products in competing failure modes[J]. Acta Armamentarii, 2011, 32(9):1136-1139(in Chinese).
[17] YE Z S, TANG L C, XU H Y. A distribution-based systems reliability model under extreme shocks and natural degradation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2011, 60(1):246-256.
[18] JIANG L, FENG Q, COIT D W. Reliability and maintenance modeling for dependent competing failure processes with shifting failure thresholds[J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2012, 61(4):932-948.
[19] 王华伟, 高军, 吴海桥. 基于竞争失效的航空发动机剩余寿命预测[J]. 机械工程学报, 2014, 50(6):197-204. WANG H W, GAO J, WU H Q. Residual remaining life prediction based on competing failures for aircraft engines[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2014, 50(6):197-204(in Chinese).
[20] WANG Y, PHAM H. Modeling the dependent competing risks with multiple degradation processes and random shock using time-varying Copulas[J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2012, 61(1):13-22.
[21] ZHANG X P, SHANG J Z, CHEN X, et al. Statistical inference of accelerated life testing with dependent competing failures based on Copula theory[J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2014, 63(3):764-778.
[22] 徐廷学. 基于定期检测的导弹贮存可靠性研究[J]. 弹箭与制导学报, 2008, 28(1):248-250. XU T X. Study on storage reliability based on periodical test for missile[J]. Journal of Projectiles, Rockets, Missile and Guidance, 2008, 28(1):248-250(in Chinese).
[23] 王浩伟, 徐廷学, 赵建忠. 融合加速退化和现场实测退化数据的剩余寿命预测方法[J]. 航空学报, 2014, 35(12):3350-3357. WANG H W, XU T X, ZHAO J Z. Residual life prediction method fusing accelerated degradation and field degradation data[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2014, 35(12):3350-3357(in Chinese).
[24] 孙闯, 何正嘉, 张周锁, 等. 基于状态信息的航空发动机运行可靠性评估[J]. 机械工程学报, 2013, 49(6):30-37. SUN C, HE Z J, ZHANG Z S, et al. Operating reliability assessment for aero-engine based on condition monitoring information[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2013, 49(6):30-37(in Chinese).
[25] WANG H W, XU T X, MI Q L. Lifetime prediction based on Gamma processes from accelerated degradation data[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2015, 28(1):172-179.
[26] WANG X, XU D. An inverse Gaussian process model for degradation data[J]. Technometrics, 2010, 52(2):188-197.
[27] NTZOUFRAS I. Bayesian modeling using WinBUGS[M]. New York:John Wiley & Sons, 2009.
[28] RIGAT F, MIRA A. Parallel hierarchical sampling:A general-purpose interacting Markov chains Monte Carlo algorithm[J]. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 2012, 56(6):1450-1467.
[29] CHERNICK M R. Bootstrap methods:A guide for practitioners and researchers[M]. New York:John Wiley & Sons, 2011.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

基于退化失效与突发失效竞争的导弹剩余寿命预测

Remaining life prediction based on competing risks of degradation failure and traumatic failure for missiles

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	董青, 郑建飞, 胡昌华, 余铜辉, 牟含笑. 考虑随机冲击影响的自适应Wiener过程剩余寿命预测方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 225914-225914.
[2]	张晟斐, 李天梅, 胡昌华, 杜党波, 司小胜. 基于深度卷积生成对抗网络的缺失数据生成方法及其在剩余寿命预测中的应用[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 225708-225708.
[3]	牟含笑, 郑建飞, 胡昌华, 赵瑞星, 董青. 基于CDBN与BiLSTM的多元退化设备剩余寿命预测[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(7): 325403-325403.
[4]	薛小锋, 田晶, 何树铭, 冯蕴雯. 多传感器监测飞机部件非线性退化评估[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(5): 524342-524342.
[5]	任子强, 司小胜, 胡昌华, 王玺. 融合多传感器数据的发动机剩余寿命预测方法[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(12): 223312-223312.
[6]	王浩伟, 滕克难, 李军亮. 随机环境应力冲击下基于多参数相关退化的导弹部件寿命预测[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(11): 3404-3412.
[7]	冯磊, 王宏力, 司小胜, 杨晓君, 王标标. 基于半随机滤波-期望最大化算法的剩余寿命在线预测[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(2): 555-563.
[8]	刘君强, 谢吉伟, 左洪福, 张马兰. 基于随机Wiener过程的航空发动机剩余寿命预测[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(2): 564-574.
[9]	白鑫, 谢里阳. 平稳随机载荷历程下的疲劳裂纹扩展规律预测[J]. 航空学报, 2014, 35(9): 2500-2505.
[10]	张建勋, 胡昌华, 周志杰, 司小胜, 杜党波. 多退化变量下基于Copula函数的陀螺仪剩余寿命预测方法[J]. 航空学报, 2014, 35(4): 1111-1121.
[11]	王浩伟, 徐廷学, 赵建忠. 融合加速退化和现场实测退化数据的剩余寿命预测方法[J]. 航空学报, 2014, 35(12): 3350-3357.
[12]	陈雄姿, 于劲松, 唐荻音, 王英勋. 基于贝叶斯LS-SVR的锂电池剩余寿命概率性预测[J]. 航空学报, 2013, 34(9): 2219-2229.
[13]	尚永爽, 李文海, 刘长捷, 盛沛. 部分可观测信息条件下装备剩余寿命预测 [J]. 航空学报, 2012, (5): 848-854.
[14]	张磊;李行善;于劲松;廖灿星. 基于混合系统粒子滤波和二元估计的故障预测算法[J]. 航空学报, 2009, 30(7): 1277-1283.
[15]	张磊;李行善;于劲松;代京. 一种基于高斯混合模型粒子滤波的故障预测算法[J]. 航空学报, 2009, 30(2): 319-324.