顺轨拦截模式剩余飞行时间估计方法

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2015.0107

电子与控制

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

顺轨拦截模式剩余飞行时间估计方法

李辕¹, 闫梁², 赵继广³, 陈景鹏²

1. 装备学院研究生院, 北京 101416;
2. 装备学院航天装备系, 北京 101416;
3. 装备学院科研部, 北京 101416

收稿日期:2014-05-04 修回日期:2015-04-20 出版日期:2015-09-15 发布日期:2015-05-12
通讯作者: 闫梁男, 博士, 工程师。主要研究方向: 航天任务分析与设计。 Tel: 010-66364196 E-mail: yanliangbj@163.com E-mail:yanliangbj@163.com
作者简介:李辕男, 博士研究生。主要研究方向: 航天任务分析与设计。 Tel: 010-66364196 E-mail: Bartholomew_lee@hotmail.com;赵继广男, 博士, 教授, 博士生导师。主要研究方向: 航天装备总体。 Tel: 010-66364366 E-mail: haofangshi@163.com
基金资助:
国家"863"计划

Method of time-to-go estimation for head-pursuit interception mode

LI Yuan¹, YAN Liang², ZHAO Jiguang³, CHEN Jingpeng²

1. Department of Postgraduate, Academy of Equipment, Beijing 101416, China;
2. Department of Spaceflight Equipment, Academy of Equipment, Beijing 101416, China;
3. Department of Scientific Research, Academy of Equipment, Beijing 101416, China

Received:2014-05-04 Revised:2015-04-20 Online:2015-09-15 Published:2015-05-12
Supported by:
National High-tech Research and Development Program of China

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

匹配顺轨和逆轨拦截模式的估计方法是精确计算剩余飞行时间(TGO)的必要条件,适用于逆轨拦截模式的TGO估计方法并不适于顺轨拦截模式。为此,针对顺轨拦截模式,分别提出了拦截机动/非机动目标的TGO估计方法。通过对线性制导方程的变形求解出了拦截弹的飞行弧长,并根据预测的碰撞点位置求得了TGO估计的解析式。该求解方法通用性强,适用于弹道成型制导律的TGO估计。以负比例(RPN)和扩展RPN(ARPN)为制导框架,与经典方法进行对比,所提出的TGO估计方法精确度高,能够有效提高导弹的制导性能。

关键词: 导弹, 目标跟踪, 制导律, 剩余飞行时间估计, 顺轨拦截, 机动目标

Abstract:

The estimation method suiting head-on and head-pursuit interception mode is the necessary condition of accurate time-to-go (TGO) calculation, and the method of TGO estimation is appropriate for head-on engagement but not for head-pursuit engagement. Therefore, the methods of TGO estimation for the interception of nonmaneuvering and maneuvering targets are proposed in head-pursuit interception mode. Through transforming the linear guidance equation, the flight arc of interceptor is solved; according to the predicted position of impact point, the analytic expressions of TGO estimation are obtained. The idea of TGO method has wide versatility and can be used in TGO estimation of trajectory shaping guidance. Simulations are carried out with classical method for verifying its validity based on retro-proportional-navigation (RPN) and augment RPN (ARPN). Compared with the classical method, it is demonstrated that the proposed TGO estimation method has high accuracy and is able to improve the guidance performance effectively for missile.

Key words: missiles, target tracking, guidance law, time-to-go estimation, head-pursuit interception, maneuvering targets

中图分类号:

李辕, 闫梁, 赵继广, 陈景鹏. 顺轨拦截模式剩余飞行时间估计方法[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(9): 3082-3091.

LI Yuan, YAN Liang, ZHAO Jiguang, CHEN Jingpeng. Method of time-to-go estimation for head-pursuit interception mode[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2015, 36(9): 3082-3091.

参考文献

[1] Adler F P. Missile guidance by three-dimensional proportional navigation[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 1956, 27(5): 500-507.
[2] Yang C D, Yang C C. Analytical solution of three-dimensional realistic true proportional navigation[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 1996, 19(3): 569-577.
[3] Riggs T L, Jr. Linear optimal guidance for short range air-to-air missiles[C]//Proceedings of National Aerospace and Electronics Conference NAECON'79. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press, 1979: 757-764.
[4] Jeon I, Lee J, Tahk M. Impact-time-control guidance law for anti-ship missiles[J]. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2006, 14(2): 260-266.
[5] Dhananjay N, Ghose D. Accurate time-to-go estimation for proportional navigation guidance[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2014, 37(4): 1378-1383.
[6] Tahk M J, Ryoo C K, Cho H. Recursive time-to-go estimation for homing guidance missiles[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2002, 38(1): 13-24.
[7] Zhang Y A, Ma G X. Time-to-go estimation algorithm for the proportional navigation guidance law with a large lead angle[J]. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2013,34(11): 1409-1414 (in Chinese). 张友安, 马国欣. 大前置角下比例导引律的剩余时间估计算法[J]. 哈尔滨工程大学学报, 2013, 34(11): 1409-1414.
[8] Ma G X, Zhang Y A, Li J. Guidance law with multiple constraints and seeker field-of -view limit and the time-to-go estimation[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2014, 36(8): 1609-1613 (in Chinese). 马国欣, 张友安, 李君. 带导引头视场限制的多约束导引律及剩余时间估计[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2014, 36(8): 1609-1613.
[9] Liu P, Sun R, Li W. Homing guidance law with falling angle and flying time control[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2014, 21(1): 55-61.
[10] Ryoo C K, Cho H, Tahk M J. Optimal guidance laws with terminal impact angle constraint[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2005, 28(4): 724-732.
[11] Kim T H, Lee C H, Tahk M J. Time-to-go polynomial guidance with trajectory modulation for observability enhancement[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2013, 49(1): 55-73.
[12] Prasanna H M, Ghose D. Retro-proportional-navigation: A new guidance law for interception of high-speed targets[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2012, 35(2): 377-386.
[13] Shima T. Intercept-angle guidance[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2011, 34(2): 484-492.
[14] Tal S, Golan O M. Head pursuit guidance[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2007, 30(5): 1437-1444.
[15] Zarchan P. Tactical and strategic missile guidance[M]. 37rd ed. Reston: AIAA, 2002: 15.
[16] Siouris G M. Missile guidance and control systems[M]. Berlin: Springer, 2004: 195-196.
[17] Ben-Asher J Z, Farber N, Levinson S. New proportional navigation law for ground-to-air systems[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2003, 26(5): 822-825.
[18] Byung S K, Jang G L, Hyung S H. Biased PNG law for impact with angular constraint[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 1998, 34(1): 277-288.
[19] Akhil G, Ghose D. Biased PN based impact angle constrained guidance using a nonlinear engagement model[C]//Proceedings of 2012 American Control Conference (ACC).Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press, 2012: 950-955.
[20] Yuan P, Chern J. Ideal proportional navigation[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 1992, 15(5): 1161-1165.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

顺轨拦截模式剩余飞行时间估计方法

Method of time-to-go estimation for head-pursuit interception mode

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	薛远亮, 金国栋, 谭力宁, 许剑锟. 基于多尺度融合的自适应无人机目标跟踪算法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(1): 326107-326107.
[2]	陈博, 岳凯, 王如生, 胡明南. 基于学习策略的多速率多传感器融合定位方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S1): 726904-726904.
[3]	胡艳艳, 张莉, 夏辉, 张乃文, 鄢镕易. 不完全信息下基于微分对策的机动目标协同捕获[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S1): 726905-726905.
[4]	陈林秀, 杨翔宇, 张航, 赵佳佳, 郝明瑞. 基于主动雷达/红外信息融合的复合制导方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S1): 727058-727058.
[5]	于江龙, 董希旺, 李清东, 吕金虎, 任章. 拦截机动目标的分布式协同围捕制导方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(9): 325817-325817.
[6]	刘芳, 孙亚楠. 基于自适应融合网络的无人机目标跟踪算法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(7): 325522-325522.
[7]	熊伟, 朱洪峰, 崔亚奇. 在线学习的循环自适应机动目标跟踪算法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(5): 325250-325250.
[8]	王因翰, 范世鹏, 吴广, 王江, 何绍溟. 基于GRU的敌方拦截弹制导律快速辨识方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(2): 325024-325024.
[9]	樊会涛, 闫俊. 空战体系的演变及发展趋势[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(10): 527397-527397.
[10]	王亚宁, 王辉, 林德福, 袁亦方. 基于虚拟视角约束的机动目标拦截制导方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(1): 324799-324799.
[11]	靳标, 邝晓飞, 彭宇, 张贞凯. 基于合作博弈的组网雷达分布式功率分配方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(1): 324776-324776.
[12]	何华锋, 王依繁, 何耀民, 苏敬, 韩晓斐. 导弹武器系统时间同步网的综合性能评估方法[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(6): 324564-324564.
[13]	胡伟杰, 黄增辉, 刘学军, 吕宏强. 基于自动核构造高斯过程的导弹气动性能预测[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(4): 524093-524093.
[14]	乔殿峰, 梁彦, 张会霞, 赵鹏蛟. 具有自动回溯的机动目标航迹精细化分段识别[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(4): 524744-524744.
[15]	卢新来, 杜子亮, 许赟. 航空人工智能概念与应用发展综述[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(4): 525150-525150.