飞机复杂装配部件三维数字化综合测量与评估方法

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2013.0047

材料工程与机械制造

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

飞机复杂装配部件三维数字化综合测量与评估方法

刘胜兰¹, 罗志光², 谭高山^1,3, 叶南¹, 张丽艳¹

1. 南京航空航天大学机电学院, 江苏南京 210016;
2. 沈阳飞机工业(集团)有限公司制造工程部, 辽宁沈阳 110850;
3. 安徽工业大学数理学院, 安徽马鞍山 243002

收稿日期:2012-03-14 修回日期:2012-06-27 出版日期:2013-02-25 发布日期:2012-07-17
通讯作者: 张丽艳 E-mail:zhangly@nuaa.edu.cn
作者简介:刘胜兰,女,博士,副教授。主要研究方向:数字化设计与制造、光学测量、逆向工程。Tel:025-84892570,E-mail:meesliu@nuaa.edu.cn;张丽艳,女,博士,教授,博士生导师。主要研究方向:数字化设计与制造、柔性三维测量、CAD/CAM、计算机图形图像处理。Tel:025-84892004,E-mail:zhangly@nuaa.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(50875130, 50875126)

3D Measurement and Quality Evaluation for Complex Aircraft Assemblies

LIU Shenglan¹, LUO Zhiguang², TAN Gaoshan^1,3, YE Nan¹, ZHANG Liyan¹

1. College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China;
2. Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Shenyang Aircraft Corporation, Shenyang 110850, China;
3. School of Mathematics and Physics, Anhui University of Technology, Ma’anshan 243002, China

Received:2012-03-14 Revised:2012-06-27 Online:2013-02-25 Published:2012-07-17
Contact: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2013.0047 E-mail:zhangly@nuaa.edu.cn
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (50875130, 50875126) *Corresponding author. Tel.: 025-84892004 E-mail: zhangly@nuaa.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

飞机复杂装配部件的全尺寸数字化综合测量与评估,能为飞机制造质量的持续提升提供重要的数据基础。测量工作要求在没有专用测量工装、不影响后续装配工序、受现场环境限制的情况下进行,具有被测对象外形复杂、存在自身遮挡、各部位测量数据要求不同、数据拼合及模型配准困难等难点。本文提出一种综合采用离散目标点摄影测量、结构光面扫描测量和手持式光笔接触测量的现场测量方案,以相互兼容的视觉目标靶点为不同测量方法之间数据定位融合的桥梁,实现了复杂装配部件的全尺寸现场测量。为使测量数据与CAD数模有高可靠性、高精度的配准,研究了配准点集的约束强度度量指标,以及配准误差的定量分析方法,在此基础上提出了配准约束强度优选参考值和临界阈值,可以有效指导飞机装配部件的现场数字化综合测量和质量评估。运用提出的综合测量方法和配准点选取准则,对某型飞机前机身进行了现场实际测量和数据分析,为复杂装配部件几何精度综合评估提供了有效方法和数据依据。

关键词: 数字化测量, 飞机装配, 视觉靶点, 数据配准, 配准点

Abstract:

The 3D measurement and evaluation of aircraft assemblies can provide critical data in the manufacturing process for quality enhancement. It is a complicated task to measure a complex aircraft structure during manufacturing with the requirements of no auxiliary equipment for the measurement, no influence on the assembly process, and numerous other restrictions at the site. Difficulties in the task include measure the object in various ways, realize data alignment with low accumulation error, and get data from obstructed areas. In this paper, we propose an integrated metrology approach which combines photogrammetry, structure light scanning and optical tracking measurement with a handheld probe. The data from the three types of optical measurement is unified into one coordinate system by using some designated reference points. In order to achieve high accuracy in aligning the measurement data with the CAD model, the principles for choosing the registration points are proposed based on the theory of sensitivity analysis. To demonstrate the validity of our method, an aircraft fore fuselage is measured, and the data registration using our proposed principles is performed, which shows that our method is valid and it produces accurate results for the in-process quality evaluation of complex aircraft assemblies.

Key words: digital metrology, aircraft assembly, visual reference point, data registration, registration point

中图分类号:

V262.4

刘胜兰, 罗志光, 谭高山, 叶南, 张丽艳. 飞机复杂装配部件三维数字化综合测量与评估方法[J]. 航空学报, 2013, 34(2): 409-418.

LIU Shenglan, LUO Zhiguang, TAN Gaoshan, YE Nan, ZHANG Liyan. 3D Measurement and Quality Evaluation for Complex Aircraft Assemblies[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2013, 34(2): 409-418.

参考文献

[1] Estler W T, Edmundson K L, Peggs G N, et al. Large-scale metrology—an update. Annals of the CIRP, 2002, 51(2):587-609.
[2] Peggs G N, Maropoulos P G, Hughes E B, et al. Recent developments in large-scale dimensional metrology. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 2009, 223 (6):571-595.
[3] Maropoulos P G, Guo Y, Jamshidi J, et al. Large volume metrology process models: a framework for integrating measurement with assembly planning. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 2008, 57 (1): 477-480.
[4] Yu Y, Tao J, Fan Y Q. Assembly technology and process of Boeing 787 jet. Aeronautical Manufacturing Technology, 2009(14): 44-47. (in Chinese) 于勇, 陶剑, 范玉青. 波音787飞机装配技术及其装配过程. 航空制造技术, 2009(14): 44-47.
[5] Jamshidi J, Kayani A, Iravani1 P, et al. Manufacturing and assembly automation by integrated metrology systems for aircraft wing fabrication. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 2009, 224 (1): 25-36.
[6] Zheng J D, Zhang L Y, Zhou L, et al. 3D target location with one single hand-held CCD camera. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2007, 28(6):1521-1526. (in Chinese) 郑建冬, 张丽艳, 周玲, 等. 基于单数码相机自由拍摄的空间点定位. 航空学报, 2007, 28(6): 1521-1526.
[7] Zheng J D, Zhang L Y, Du X Y. Accurate 3D target positioning in close range photogrammetry with implicit image correction. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2009, 22(6):649-657.
[8] Valkenburg R J, McIvor A M. Accurate 3D measurement using a structured light system. Image and Vision Computing, 1998, 16(2): 99-110.
[9] Zhang H, Zhang L Y, Wang H T, et al. Surface measurement based on instantaneous random illumination. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2009, 22(3):316-324.
[10] Zhang Y Y, Zhang LY, Yang B W. Portable coordinate measurement system based on binocular stereo vision. Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 2010, 31(7): 1613-1619. (in Chinese) 张元元, 张丽艳, 杨博文. 基于双目立体视觉的无线柔性坐标测量系统. 仪器仪表学报, 2010, 31(7): 1613-1619.
[11] Rusinkiewicz S,Levoy M. Efficient variants of the ICP algorithm. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on 3D Digital Imaging and Modeling,2001: 145-152.
[12] Menq C H, Yau H T, Lai G Y. Automated precision measurement of surface profile in CAD-directed inspection. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 1992, 8(2): 268-278.
[13] Simon D A. Fast and accurate shape-based registration. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University, 1996.
[14] Cheng Y Y, Zhang D H, Bu K, et al. Model registration control point set selection for turbine blade shape inspection. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2009, 45(11): 240-246.(in Chinese) 程云勇, 张定华,卜昆, 等. 涡轮叶片形状检测中的模型配准控制点集选取. 机械工程学报,2009, 45(11): 240-246.
[15] Besl P,McKay N. A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Transactions on PAMI, 1992, 14(2):239-256.
[16] Nahvi A,Hollerbach J. The noise amplification index for optimal pose selection in robot calibration. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1996: 647-654.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

飞机复杂装配部件三维数字化综合测量与评估方法

3D Measurement and Quality Evaluation for Complex Aircraft Assemblies

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	何晓煦, 雷沛, 潘登, 杨阳, 李现坤, 邓珍波. 基于PSO与WSVD的飞机部件位姿拟合方法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(7): 427162-427162.
[2]	杨应科, 李东升, 沈立恒, 李汝鹏, 翟雨农. 大型复合材料机身壁板多机器人协同装配调姿控形方法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(14): 428006-428006.
[3]	荆涛, 田锡天. 基于蒙特卡洛-自适应差分进化算法的飞机容差分配多目标优化方法[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(3): 425278-425278.
[4]	冯亚洲, 任军学, 刘战锋, 韩晓兰. 复杂薄壁构件自适应加工工艺几何模型重构[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(10): 524820-524820.
[5]	石循磊, 张继文, 刘顺涛, 陈恳. 基于Kriging模型插值的孔位修正策略[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(9): 423499-423499.
[6]	石章虎, 何晓煦, 曾德标, 雷沛. 基于误差相似性的移动机器人定位误差补偿[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(11): 424105-424105.
[7]	陈文亮, 潘国威, 王珉. 基于力位协同控制的大飞机机身壁板装配调姿方法[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(2): 522403-522403.
[8]	潘国威, 陈文亮, 王珉. 应用于飞机装配的并联机构技术发展综述[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(1): 522572-522572.
[9]	何晓煦, 田威, 曾远帆, 廖文和, 向勇. 面向飞机装配的机器人定位误差和残差补偿[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(4): 420538-420538.
[10]	韩锋, 田威, 廖文和, 张旋, 王丽峰. 基于并联机构的轻型自主爬行钻铆系统法向调姿算法[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(6): 2083-2090.
[11]	靳江艳, 黄翔, 卢鹄, 李泷杲. 飞机设计域向工装域映射机理研究[J]. 航空学报, 2012, 33(12): 2330-2337.
[12]	曲巍崴, 董辉跃, 柯映林. 机器人辅助飞机装配制孔中位姿精度补偿技术[J]. 航空学报, 2011, 32(10): 1951-1960.
[13]	郑国磊;李文杰;王自军. 某大型飞机舱门框工艺标准数字模型[J]. 航空学报, 2010, 31(8): 1674-1679.
[14]	刘楚辉;李江雄;董辉跃;王青;柯映林. 飞机机身-机翼接头精加工条件评价技术[J]. 航空学报, 2010, 31(6): 1272-1279.
[15]	郑国磊;朱心雄;许德;万世明. 飞机装配型架中骨架的数字化设计原理及实现[J]. 航空学报, 2005, 26(2): 229-233.