首页 >

APU进/排气系统与本体性能的跨维度耦合仿真建模研究(飞行器飞发匹配技术专栏)

马双超1,王新尧2,李传鹏3,任恒英1,庞亮玮1   

  1. 1. 中航工业第一飞机设计研究院
    2. 南京航空航天大学
    3. 南京航空航天大学能源与动力学院
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-05 修回日期:2025-12-18 出版日期:2025-12-23 发布日期:2025-12-23
  • 通讯作者: 任恒英

Cross-Dimensional Coupling Simulation and Modeling Study on APU Intake/Exhaust System and Its Own Performance

  • Received:2025-09-05 Revised:2025-12-18 Online:2025-12-23 Published:2025-12-23

摘要: 现有的研究多采用零维仿真模型对辅助动力装置(Auxiliary Power Unit, APU)进行总体性能仿真,而忽略了不同工况下进/排气系统总压损失变化对APU总体性能的影响。为提高计算结果的准确性,基于完全耦合的维度缩放方法将高精度的三维计算流体力学(Computational Fluid Mechanics, CFD)计算模型与低精度的零维仿真模型相结合,建立了零维仿真模型(APU Zero-dimensional Steady Model, AZSM)与多精度仿真模型(APU Multi-dimensional Steady Model, AMSM),实现了APU进/排气系统与APU本体性能的一体化计算。基于上述方法,本文对典型工况点进行计算分析,与常用商用软件Gasturb的计算结果进行对比,进而分析高度和速度变化对各参数的影响。结果表明,工况点1下(地面静止状态)AZSM、AMSM的计算结果精度均提升了0.02%;工况点2下(三万英尺高空飞行状态)AZSM的计算结果精度提升了12.75%,AMSM计算结果精度提升了19.42%;工况点3下(四万英尺高空飞行状态)AZSM的计算结果精度提升了8.54%,AMSM的计算结果精度提升了24.271%,多维度仿真模型AMSM可更准确地计算不同工况下APU的总体性能参数。

关键词: 辅助动力装置, 进/排气系统, 维度缩放, 总体性能, 零维仿真模型, 多维度仿真模型

Abstract: Most existing studies employ zero-dimensional simulation models for the overall performance simulation of the Auxiliary Power Unit (APU), while ignoring the impact of total pressure loss changes in the intake/exhaust system on the overall performance of the APU under different operating conditions. To improve the accuracy of calculation results, a zero-dimensional simulation model AZSM (APU Zero-dimensional Steady Model) and a multi-fidelity simulation model AMSM (APU Multi-dimensional Steady Model) were established. These models were achieved by integrating a high-fidelity three-dimensional Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) flow field calculation model with a low-fidelity zero-dimensional simulation model via a fully coupled dimensional scaling method, enabling the integrated calculation of the performance of the APU intake/exhaust system and the APU itself. Based on the aforementioned method, this study conducts computational analysis on typical operating points, compares the results with those from the commonly used commercial software Gasturb, and further analyzes the impact of altitude and speed variations on various parameters. The results show that: at Operating Point 1 (ground static state), the calculation accuracy of both AZSM and AMSM increased by 0.02% compared with the results from Gasturb; at Operating Point 2 (flight state at 30,000 ft altitude), the calculation accuracy of AZSM increased by 12.75%, while that of AMSM increased by 19.42%; at Operating Point 3 (flight state at 40,000 ft altitude), the calculation accuracy of AZSM increased by 8.54%, and that of AMSM increased by 24.271%. These results confirm that the multi-dimensional simulation model AMSM can more accurately calculate the overall performance parameters of the APU under different operating conditions.

Key words: Auxiliary Power Unit, Intake/Exhaust System, Dimension Scaling, Overall Performance, Zero-Dimensional Simulation Model, Multi-dimensional Simulation Model