陈海鹏,喻海川,顾祥玉,王鑫蔚,张啸九
收稿日期:2025-06-30
修回日期:2025-11-14
出版日期:2025-11-20
发布日期:2025-11-20
通讯作者:
顾祥玉
基金资助:
Received:2025-06-30
Revised:2025-11-14
Online:2025-11-20
Published:2025-11-20
Contact:
xiangyu gu
摘要: 变构型飞行器根据飞行任务在线改变气动外形,可在宽飞行包线内保持优异气动性能,成为当前航空航天领域的研究热点。针对变构型飞行器气动外形设计面临的设计空间扩展与不同设计点差异化设计需求,本文发展了一种面向多任务的跨域变构型飞行器气动外形设计方法,采用在线与离线两类设计变量参数化气动外形,构建满足多任务设计需求的内外双层优化方法,在实现全剖面性能提升的同时获取各设计点最优构型。将优化方法应用于某可变后掠跨域飞行器,以翼面后掠角与飞行器型面分别作为在线与离线设计变量,针对起降和高速飞行剖面开展了气动外形优化。结果表明气动外形在Ma=0.4升力系数提升55.03%,Ma=6与Ma=10升阻比分别提升1.69%和1.68%,压心变化在2%以内,验证了优化方法的有效性。
中图分类号:
陈海鹏 喻海川 顾祥玉 王鑫蔚 张啸九. 面向在线变形的跨域变构型飞行器气动设计方法研究[J]. 航空学报, doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2025.32490.
| [1]BARBARINO S, BILGEN O, AJAJ R M, et al.A review of morphing aircraft[J].Journal of intelligent material systems and structures, 2011, 22(9):823-877[2]CHU LL, LI Q, GU F, et al.Design,modeling,and control of morphing aircraft: A review[J].Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2022, 35(5):220-246[3]陈树生, 贾苜梁, 刘衍旭, 等.变体飞行器变形方式及气动布局设计关键技术研究进展[J].航空学报, 2024, 45(06):629595-629595[4]Kulfan B M.Universal parametric geometry representation method[J].Journal of aircraft, 2008, 45(1):142-158[5]Sederberg T W, Parry S R.Free-form deformation of solid geometric models[C]. Proceedings of the 13th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques. 1986: 151-160.[6]Piegl L, Tiller W.The NURBS book[M]. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.[7]Sheng C, Allen C B.Efficient mesh deformation using radial basis functions on unstructured meshes[J].AIAA journal, 2013, 51(3):707-720[8]Selim M M, Koomullil R P.Mesh deformation approaches–a survey[J].Journal of Physical Mathematics, 2016, 7(2):1-9[9]Zhong Z, Rong M A, Lei H E, et al.An efficient large-scale mesh deformation method based on MPIOpenMP hybrid parallel radial basis function interpolation[J].Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2020, 33(5):1392-1404[10]Gu X, Ciampa P D, Nagel B.An automated CFD analysis workflow in overall aircraft design applications[J].CEAS Aeronautical Journal, 2018, 9:3-13[11]You K K, Ha J H, Lee S C.An Automated Aerodynamic Analysis System in Missile Based on Open-Source Software[J].International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences, 2023, 24(3):592-605[12]Jameson A.Aerodynamic design via control theory[J].Journal of scientific computing, 1988, 3:233-260[13]Dwight R P, Brezillon J.Effect of approximations of the discrete adjoint on gradient-based optimization[J].AIAA journal, 2006, 44(12):3022-3031[14]Kenway G K W, Mader C A, He P, et al.Effective adjoint approaches for computational fluid dynamics[J].Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2019, 110:-[15]陈海昕, 邓凯文, 李润泽.机器学习技术在气动优化中的应用[J].航空学报, 2019, 40(01):52-68[16]Han Z H, Zimmermann, G?rtz S.Alternative cokriging method for variable-fidelity surrogate modeling[J].AIAA journal, 2012, 50(5):1205-1210[17]Gu X, Ciampa P D, Nagel B.High fidelity aerodynamic optimization in distributed overall aircraft design[C]. 17th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference. 2016: 3508-3523.[18]Brooks T R, Kenway G K W, Martins J R R A.Benchmark aerostructural models for the study of transonic aircraft wings[J].AIAA Journal, 2018, 56(7):2840-2855[19]PHOENIX A A, MAXWELL J R, ROGERS R E.Mach 5–35 Morphing Waverider Accuracy and Aerodynamic Performance Evaluation[J].Journal of Aircraft, 2019, 56(5):2047-2061[20]PHOENIX A A, ROGERS R E, MAXWELL J R, et al.Mach five to ten morphing waverider: control point study[J].Journal of Aircraft, 2019, 56(2):493-504[21]PHOENIX A A, MAXWELL J R, ROGERS R E.Mach 5–35 morphing waverider accuracy and aerodynamic performance evaluation[J].Journal of Aircraft, 2019, 56(5):2047-2061[22]DAI P, YAN B, HUANG W, et al.Design and aerodynamic performance analysis of a variable-sweep-wing morphing waverider[J].Aerospace Science and Technology, 2020, 98:-[23]ZHAO Z, HUANG W, YAN B, et al.Design and high speed aerodynamic performance analysis of vortex lift waverider with a wide-speed range[J].Acta Astronautica, 2018, 151:848-863[24]武宇飞, 龙腾, 史人赫, 等.跨域变体飞行器气动力热非层次多模型融合降阶方法[J].航空学报, 2023, 44(21):528259-528259[25]FINCHAM J H S, FRISWELL M I.Aerodynamic optimisation of a camber morphing aerofoil[J].Aerospace Science and technology, 2015, 43:245-255[26]WOODS B K S, FRISWELL M I.Preliminary investigation of a fishbone active camber concept[C]. Smart materials, adaptive structures and intelligent systems. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2012, 45103: 555-563.[27]DEXL F, HAUFFE A, WOLF K.Multidisciplinary multi-objective design optimization of an active morphing wing section[J].[Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2020, 62:2423-2440[28]LIU B, LIANG H, HAN Z H, et al.Surrogate-based aerodynamic shape optimization of a morphing wing considering a wide Mach-number range[J].[J].Aerospace Science and Technology, 2022, 124:-[29]陈树生, 冯聪, 张兆康, 等.基于全局梯度优化方法的宽速域乘波-机翼布局气动设计[J].航空学报, 2024, 45(06):140-154[30]DEB K, PRATAP A, AGARWAL S, et al.A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II[J].IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2001, 6(2):182-197[31]ROE P L.Approximate Riemann solvers,parameter vectors,and difference schemes[J].Journal of Computational Physics, 1981, 43(2):357-372[32]CHEN R F, WANG Z J.Fast block lower-upper symetric Guass-Seidel scheme for arbitrary grid[J].AIAA Journal, 2000, 38(12):2238-2245[33]VENKATAKRISHNAN.On the accuracy of limiters and convergence to steady state solutions[C]. 31st Aero-space Sciences Meeting. Reston: AIAA, 1993:[34]KERMANI M, PLETT E.Modified entropy correction formula for the Roe scheme[C]. 39th Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Reston: AIAA, 2001.[35]MENTER F R.Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications[J].AIAA Journal, 1994, 32(8):1598-1605[36]SEDERBERG T W, PARRY S R.Free-form deformation of solid geometric models[C]. Proceedings of the 13th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques. 1986: 151-160.[37]WITTEVEEN J, BIJL H.Explicit mesh deformation using inverse distance weighting interpolation[M]. 19th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics. 2009: 3996.[38]SEEGER M.Gaussian processes for machine learning[J].International journal of neural systems, 2004, 14(02):69-106[39]KRIGE D G.A statistical approach to some basic mine valuation problems on the Witwatersrand[J].Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 1951, 52(6):119-139[40]Morris M D, Mitchell T J.Exploratory designs for computational experiments[J].Journal of statistical planning and inference, 1995, 43(3):381-402 |
| [1] | 黄江涛 周琳 陈宪 赵轲 高宜胜 张文琦 何成军 刘刚 高正红. 飞行器气动布局多学科伴随优化系统PADJ-X研究进展[J]. 航空学报, 0, (): 1-0. |
| [2] | 廖振荣, 李军府, 赵博文, 张明, 谢露, 韩忠华, 艾梦琪. 基于工程的超声速民机宽速域机翼设计[J]. 航空学报, 2025, 46(20): 531915-531915. |
| [3] | 郑可风, 宋文萍, 聂晗, 丁玉临, 乔建领, 陈晴, 王奕衡, 宋科, 张科施. 考虑全机声爆特性的超声速自然层流机翼设计方法[J]. 航空学报, 2025, 46(20): 531214-531214. |
| [4] | 贡天宇, 单程军, 易理哲, 龙垚松, 成忠涛. 发动机几何参数对超声速民机声爆特性的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2025, 46(20): 531592-531592. |
| [5] | 张力文, 韩忠华, 张科施, 宋科, 宋文萍. 面向超声速民机近/中场声爆传播的空间推进高精度数值模拟方法[J]. 航空学报, 2025, 46(20): 531935-531935. |
| [6] | 李祚泰, 陈树生, 金世轶, 高正红, 周卫国. 基于声爆高效预测的超声速民机优化设计与数据挖掘[J]. 航空学报, 2025, 46(20): 531920-531920. |
| [7] | 陈晴, 韩忠华, 张科施, 乔建领, 丁玉临, 宋文萍. 一种面向超声速民机低声爆布局的全声爆毯优化设计方法[J]. 航空学报, 2025, 46(20): 531909-531909. |
| [8] | 关山月, 田正雨, 谢文佳, 付黔粤, 褚雨航, 朱家俊. 高超声速再入钝头体飞行走廊等离子体化学反应分析[J]. 航空学报, 2025, 46(18): 131735-131735. |
| [9] | 张耀冰 李明 张健 周乃春 龚小权. 适用于非结构混合网格的改进线隐式BLU-SGS迭代算法[J]. 航空学报, 0, (): 1-0. |
| [10] | 马铁林 景彪 蒋崇文 乔南璇 付竟成 向锦武. 跨速域乘波体组合变体机翼布局及其任务能力评估[J]. 航空学报, 0, (): 0-0. |
| [11] | 查君培, 陈保, 吴飞, 李伟鹏. 超声速单/双矩形喷流气动噪声数值研究[J]. 航空学报, 2025, 46(14): 131447-131447. |
| [12] | 段佳昕 刘愿 高亮杰 钱战森. 展向多参数可变的新型宽速域乘波体设计方法-重大问题专栏[J]. 航空学报, 0, (): 0-0. |
| [13] | 张毅锋, 王新光, 郭雷涛, 徐洋, 陈琦. 尖锥高速边界层转捩动态气动特性测量及分析[J]. 航空学报, 2025, 46(12): 131430-131430. |
| [14] | 崔凯 王泽森 肖尧 田中伟 李广利 常思源. 宽速域高压捕获翼气动构型及其跨声速气动特性研究-重大问题专栏[J]. 航空学报, 0, (): 0-0. |
| [15] | 李辰 孙东 刘朋欣 郭启龙 袁先旭. 等离子体激励超声速湍流边界层的直接数值模拟-2025增刊[J]. 航空学报, 0, (): 0-0. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
版权所有 © 航空学报编辑部
版权所有 © 2011航空学报杂志社
主管单位:中国科学技术协会 主办单位:中国航空学会 北京航空航天大学

