航空学报 > 2023, Vol. 44 Issue (21): 528537-528537   doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2023.28537

新型航空金属丝网声衬掠流特性实验研究

廖峻锋1, 景晓东1, 邱祥海1(), 翟勇磊2, 岳喜山2, 马双超3, 杜林1, 孙晓峰1   

  1. 1.北京航空航天大学 流体与声学工程实验室,北京  100191
    2.中国航空制造技术研究院,北京  100024
    3.航空工业第一飞机设计研究院,西安  710089
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-09 修回日期:2023-04-02 接受日期:2023-05-08 出版日期:2023-11-15 发布日期:2023-05-12
  • 通讯作者: 邱祥海 E-mail:xh.qiu@buaa.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(2021YFB3703900);国家自然科学基金(52206039);中国博士后创新人才支持计划(BX2021026);中国博士后面上基金(2021M700323);国家科技重大项目(2017-II-0008-0022);中国燃气轮机工程科学中心项目(P2022-A-II-003-001)

Experimental study on grazing flow characteristics of a new aeronautical wire mesh acoustic liner

Junfeng LIAO1, Xiaodong JING1, Xianghai QIU1(), Yonglei ZHAI2, Xishan YUE2, Shuangchao MA3, Lin DU1, Xiaofeng SUN1   

  1. 1.Fluid and Acoustic Engineering Laboratory,Beihang University,Beijing  100191,China
    2.AVIC Manufacturing Technology Institute,Beijing  100024,China
    3.AVIC the First Aircraft Institute,Xi’an  710089,China
  • Received:2023-02-09 Revised:2023-04-02 Accepted:2023-05-08 Online:2023-11-15 Published:2023-05-12
  • Contact: Xianghai QIU E-mail:xh.qiu@buaa.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    National Key Research and Development Program of China(2021YFB3703900);National Natural Science Foundation of China(52206039);National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talents(BX2021026);China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(2021M700323);National Science and Technology Major Project(2017-II-0008-0022);Project of Science Center for Gas Turbine Project of China(P2022-A-II-003-001)

摘要:

提出了一种新型航空线性声衬结构——烧结金属丝网声衬,并在流管实验台上采用直接提取法对传统穿孔板声衬、金属丝网穿孔板声衬及该声衬分别开展掠流实验。实验采用了一个合适的入射声压级以排除高声强效应干扰。实验结果表明:传统穿孔板声衬的低频掠流声阻随掠流速度增加而升高,高频掠流声抗随着掠流速度增加而下降;金属丝网穿孔板声衬也存在这一趋势,但变化幅度有所减弱;而烧结金属丝网声衬因其去掉了传统穿孔板结构,采用烧结金属丝网作为声衬面板,提高了黏性声阻,从而使其掠流声阻抗在测试范围内基本不随掠流速度变化,相较于其他两种声衬对掠流具有更好的线性,更加符合航发外涵后传降噪最优声阻抗的变化趋势。

关键词: 烧结金属丝网声衬, 穿孔板声衬, 声学流管实验台, 直接提取法, 线性声衬, 掠流声阻抗

Abstract:

The sintered wire mesh liner, as a new aeronautical linear liner, is proposed. A grazing flow experiment is conducted on a flow duct set up using the straightforward method, which adopts an appropriate incident sound pressure level to exclude the high sound intensity effect, and a conventional perforated liner, a wire mesh perforated liner, and a sintered wire mesh liner are tested. This experiment shows that, for the conventional perforated liner, the grazing flow acoustic resistance at low frequencies and the grazing flow acoustic reactance at high frequencies exhibit significant increase and decreases as the flow velocity increases, respectively. As for the wire mesh perforated liner, this trends suppressed to some extent but still exists. However, the sintered wire mesh liner, which departs from the traditional perforated plate structure and uses sintered wire mesh as its liner panel, enhances its viscous acoustic resistance. As a result, both the resistance and reactance due to the grazing flow effect change very little within the tested flow velocity range. This liner offers superior linearity in response to grazing flow and is more consistent with the trend of the optimal acoustic impedance for aeroengine bypass backward noises.

Key words: sintered wire mesh liner, perforated liner, acoustic flow duct setup, straightforward method, linear liner, grazing flow acoustic impedance

中图分类号: