疲劳裂纹扩展过程中的CTOD相关参量分析

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2022.26632

论文

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

疲劳裂纹扩展过程中的CTOD相关参量分析

王秋懿¹, 吴彦增^1,2, 鲍蕊¹

1. 北京航空航天大学航空科学与工程学院, 北京 100083;
2. 北京电子工程总体研究所, 北京 100854

收稿日期:2021-11-08 修回日期:2022-02-28 出版日期:2022-06-15 发布日期:2022-02-28
通讯作者: 鲍蕊,E-mail:rbao@buaa.edu.cn E-mail:rbao@buaa.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（12172022）

Analysis on CTOD corresponding parameters during fatigue crack growth

WANG Qiuyi¹, WU Yanzeng^1,2, BAO Rui¹

1. School of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100083, China;
2. Beijing Institute of Electronic System Engineering, Beijing 100854, China

Received:2021-11-08 Revised:2022-02-28 Online:2022-06-15 Published:2022-02-28
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (12172022)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以2524铝合金与激光熔化沉积TC11钛合金为试验对象，开展了不同载荷条件下的疲劳裂纹扩展试验，采用数字图像相关方法（DIC）对裂纹尖端张开位移（CTOD）进行了测量，研究了CTOD、CTOD变程、CTOD塑性分量、CTOD滞回环面积等参量在疲劳裂纹扩展过程中的变化规律，分析了上述参量与疲劳裂纹扩展速率的相关性，提出了一种以CTOD滞回环面积为主控参量的疲劳裂纹扩展速率模型。研究结果表明，CTOD滞回环面积和CTOD塑性分量与疲劳裂纹扩展速率间均存在明确的关联关系，可有效地表征疲劳裂纹扩展中塑性行为的影响；采用CTOD滞回环面积表征疲劳裂纹扩展速率在恒幅与变幅载荷下均具有适用性，且受测量偶然误差的影响更小，在应用中具有一定优势。

关键词: 疲劳裂纹扩展, CTOD滞回环面积, CTOD塑性分量, CTOD变程, 数字图像相关法

Abstract: Aluminum alloy 2524 and laser melting deposited TC11 titanium alloy were selected for the Fatigue Crack Growth (FCG) tests under different load conditions, Digital Image Correlation (DIC) method is adopted to obtain the Crack Tip Opening Displacement (CTOD) during FCG, the variations of CTOD, the range of CTOD, the plastic component of CTOD and the area of CTOD hysteresis loop in FCG are investigated. Meanwhile, the relationships between Fatigue Crack Growth Rate (FCGR) and these parameters are further analyzed, and a FCGR model based on the area of CTOD hysteresis loop is proposed. The results show that correspondences between the area of CTOD hysteresis loop and FCGR, as well as between the plastic component of CTOD and FCGR, are clearly revealed under different stress ratios and material orientations, which indicate these two mechanical parameters can effectively characterize the influence of plastic behavior in FCG. The results also indicate that the area of CTOD hysteresis loop is applicable for both constant amplitude and variable amplitude loading conditions, and less affected by accidental measurement errors, which has certain advantages in practical applications.

Key words: fatigue crack growth, area of CTOD hysteresis loop, plastic component of CTOD, range of CTOD, digital image correlation method

中图分类号:

V215.5

王秋懿, 吴彦增, 鲍蕊. 疲劳裂纹扩展过程中的CTOD相关参量分析[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(6): 526632-526632.

WANG Qiuyi, WU Yanzeng, BAO Rui. Analysis on CTOD corresponding parameters during fatigue crack growth[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(6): 526632-526632.

参考文献

[1] 中国人民解放军总装备部. 军用飞机结构完整性大纲:GJB 775A-2012[S]. 北京:中国人民解放军总装备部, 2012. General Equipment Department of People's Liberation Army of China. Military aircraft structural integrity program:GJB 775A-2012[S]. Beijing:General Equipment Department of People's Liberation Army of China, 2012(in Chinese).
[2] FORMAN R G, KEARNEY V E, ENGLE R M. Numerical analysis of crack propagation in cyclic-loaded structures[J]. Journal of Basic Engineering, 1967, 89(3):459-463.
[3] PRIDDLE E K. High cycle fatigue crack propagation under random and constant amplitude loadings[J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 1976, 4(2):89-117.
[4] 鲁嵩嵩. 激光熔化沉积TC11钛合金裂纹扩展行为研究[D]. 北京:北京航空航天大学,2017:25-33. LU S S. Study of fatigue crack growth behaviour in laser melting deposited Ti-6.5Al-3.5Mo-1.5Zr-0.3Si alloy[D]. Beijing:Beihang University, 2017:25-33(in Chinese).
[5] WANG K, BAO R, LIU D, et al. Plastic anisotropy of laser melting deposited Ti-5Al-5Mo-5V-1Cr-1Fe titanium alloy[J]. Materials Science and Engineering:A, 2019, 746:276-289.
[6] DOWLING N E, IYYER N S. Fatigue crack growth and closure at high cyclic strains[J]. Materials Science and Engineering, 1987, 96:99-107.
[7] PARK H B, KIM K M, LEE B W. Plastic zone size in fatigue cracking[J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 1996, 68(3):279-285.
[8] SHI K K, CAI L X, QI S, et al. A prediction model for fatigue crack growth using effective cyclic plastic zone and low cycle fatigue properties[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2016, 158:209-219.
[9] ZHENG X, CUI H, SU X, et al. Numerical modeling of fatigue crack propagation based on the theory of critical distances[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2013, 114:151-165.
[10] SHI Y W, SUN S Y, MURAKAWA H, et al. Finite element analysis on relationships between the J-integral and CTOD for stationary cracks in welded tensile specimens[J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 1998, 75(3):197-202.
[11] WELLS A A. The application of fracture mechanics to yielding materials[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1965, 285:34-45.
[12] RICE J R. A path independent integral and the approximate analysis of strain concentration by notches and cracks[J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 1968, 35(2):379-386.
[13] SAMADIAN K, HERTELÉ S, DE WAELE W. Measurement of CTOD along a surface crack by means of digital image correlation[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2019, 205:470-485.
[14] KAWABATA T, TAGAWA T, SAKIMOTO T, et al. Proposal for a new CTOD calculation formula[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2016, 159:16-34.
[15] WERNER K. The fatigue crack growth rate and crack opening displacement in 18G2A-steel under tension[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2012, 39:25-31.
[16] DONG Q, YANG P, XU G, et al. Mechanisms and modeling of low cycle fatigue crack propagation in a pressure vessel steel Q345[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2016, 89:2-10.
[17] ANTUNES F V, SERRANO S, BRANCO R, et al. Fatigue crack growth in the 2050-T8 aluminium alloy[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2018, 115:79-88.
[18] ANTUNES F V, BRANCO R, PRATES P A, et al. Fatigue crack growth modelling based on CTOD for the 7050-T6 alloy[J]. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 2017, 40(8):1309-1320.
[19] ANTUNES F V, FERREIRA M S C, BRANCO R, et al. Fatigue crack growth versus plastic CTOD in the 304L stainless steel[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2019, 214:487-503.
[20] WU Y Z, BAO R, ZHANG S Q. In-situ measurement of near-tip fatigue crack displacement variation in laser melting deposited Ti-6.5Al-3.5Mo-1.5Zr-0.3Si titanium alloy[J]. Procedia Structural Integrity, 2018, 13:890-895.
[21] 张婷. 2324-T39铝合金疲劳裂纹扩展行为研究[D]. 北京:北京航空航天大学,2016:60-62. ZHANG T. Study on the fatigue crack growth behaviour of 2324-T39 aluminum alloy[D]. Beijing:Beihang University, 2016:60-62(in Chinese).
[22] MADURO L P, BAPTISTA C A R P, TORRES M A S, et al. Modeling the growth of LT and TL-oriented fatigue cracks in longitudinally and transversely pre-strained Al₂₅₂₄-T3 alloy[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2011, 10:1214-1219.
[23] US Department of Defense. Military handbook:Metallic materials and elements for aerospace vehicle structures[M]. Washington, D.C.:US Department of Defense, 2003.
[24] ZHU Y Y, LIU D, TIAN X J, et al. Characterization of microstructure and mechanical properties of laser melting deposited Ti-6.5Al-3.5Mo-1.5Zr-0.3Si titanium alloy[J]. Materials & Design, 2014, 56:445-453.
[25] ASTM International. Standard test method for measurement of fatigue crack growth rates:ASTM E647-15[S]. West Conshohocken:ASTM International, 2015.
[26] VASCO-OLMO J M, DÍAZ F A, ANTUNES F V, et al. Characterisation of fatigue crack growth using digital image correlation measurements of plastic CTOD[J]. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2019, 101:332-341.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

疲劳裂纹扩展过程中的CTOD相关参量分析

Analysis on CTOD corresponding parameters during fatigue crack growth

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李晓阳, 陶昭, 张慰. 基于不确定微分方程的疲劳可靠性建模[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(8): 225820-225820.
[2]	邹正平, 张猛, 郎利辉. 基于三维数字图像相关法的管材胀形试验[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(12): 425989-425989.
[3]	段佳桐, 隋福成, 刘汉海, 解放, 欧阳天, 鲍蕊. 弯曲载荷下薄壁结构疲劳裂纹扩展性能[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(5): 524326-524326.
[4]	常琦, 杨维希, 赵恒, 孟瑶, 刘君, 高鹤明. 基于多传感器的裂纹扩展监测研究[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(2): 223336-223336.
[5]	张啸尘, 谢里阳, 张瑞金, 孟维迎, 李铭, 胡杰鑫. 预循环应力对材料断裂力学性能“锻炼”效应的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(10): 3074-3082.
[6]	袁慎芳, 张华, 邱雷, 杨伟博. 基于粒子滤波算法的疲劳裂纹扩展预测方法[J]. 航空学报, 2013, 34(12): 2740-2747.
[7]	刘建中, 叶笃毅, 张丽娜, 肖磊. 疲劳裂纹尖端残余应力场的深度-传感压痕测试与有限元分析[J]. 航空学报, 2012, 33(12): 2211-2220.
[8]	张国勇, 顾绍景, 郭万林, 于培师. 一种基于约束因子的超载迟滞模型[J]. 航空学报, 2011, 32(6): 1032-1039.
[9]	田秀云;孙智强. 2024-T42铝合金疲劳裂纹扩展曲线的拟合方法研究[J]. 航空学报, 2003, 24(2): 144-146.
[10]	王泓;鄢君辉;郑修麟. 有机玻璃疲劳裂纹扩展表达式及控制参量[J]. 航空学报, 2001, 22(1): 83-86.
[11]	郭万林;张田忠. 飞机谱载荷下裂纹扩展的三维约束效应[J]. 航空学报, 2000, 21(4): 294-298.
[12]	张宏;余承业. 激光冲击处理对铝合金疲劳扩展速率影响的研究[J]. 航空学报, 1999, 20(1): 62-64.
[13]	王永廉. 利用疲劳裂纹扩展速率估算断裂韧性[J]. 航空学报, 1997, 18(6): 728-731.
[14]	胡宏玖;李培宁;全其兴;雷月葆. 孔边裂纹塑性应变疲劳扩展试验研究[J]. 航空学报, 1997, 18(3): 277-281.
[15]	高雅丽;张诗捷;刘绍伦. 单峰过载下的疲劳裂纹扩展厚度效应研究[J]. 航空学报, 1997, 18(2): 153-156.