基于改进FRAM的民机系统安全性分析

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2020.24083

电子电气工程与控制

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

基于改进FRAM的民机系统安全性分析

李耀华, 巩子瑜

中国民航大学航空工程学院, 天津 300300

收稿日期:2020-04-13 修回日期:2020-06-01 发布日期:2020-08-07
通讯作者: 李耀华 E-mail:li_yaohua@sina.com
基金资助:
民机专项

Safety analysis of civil aircraft system based on improved FRAM

LI Yaohua, GONG Ziyu

College of Aviation Engineering, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China

Received:2020-04-13 Revised:2020-06-01 Published:2020-08-07
Supported by:
Major Project on Civil Aircraft

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 民机安全性分析的重要内容之一是系统运行过程分析，现有的运营安全性分析模型大多没有综合考虑人、飞机、运行环境等各类影响安全性的因素。本文综合考虑系统安全性分析功能间的时间、控制、资源、前提等影响，更加细致地分析影响系统安全运行的因素，建立了全面且规范化定量化安全性分析模型。运用功能可变性描述规则（RFV）、层次分析法（AHP）对功能共振分析法（FRAM）进行改进，建立民机系统安全性综合分析模型。使用模型还原143号班机安全运行所需条件，分析得出应重点防范的耦合变异与功能失效，且扩展了原事故调查报告结论，表明了该模型的可行性，提出的理论模型可为航空公司在运营系统安全性方面提供理论参考和技术支持。

关键词: 安全性分析, 功能共振分析法(FRAM), 功能可变性描述规则(RFV), 层次分析法(AHP), 民机系统

Abstract: Commercial safety analysis is one of the important components of system operation process analysis. However, the operation safety analysis of most existing models does not consider people, aircraft, operating environment and other influencing factors. Comprehensively considering the effects of system safety analysis functions such as time, control, resources, and premise, this article conducts a more detailed analysis of the factors affecting the safe operation of the system, and establishes a comprehensive and standardized quantitative safety analysis model. Using Rules describing Function Variability (RFV) and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), we improve the Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM), setting up a comprehensive commercial system safety analysis model. We employ the model to restore the required conditions for the safe operation of Flight 143, obtaining the conclusion that the coupling variation and functional failure should be mainly prevented. Additionally, the conclusions of the original accident investigation report are extended, demonstrating the feasibility of the model. The proposed theoretical model can provide theoretical reference and technical support for the safety of the operating system of airlines.

Key words: safety analysis, Functional Resonance Analysis Method(FRAM), Rules describing Function Variability(RFV), Analytical Hierarchy Process(AHP), civil aircraft system

中图分类号:

V271.1

李耀华, 巩子瑜. 基于改进FRAM的民机系统安全性分析[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(12): 324083-324083.

LI Yaohua, GONG Ziyu. Safety analysis of civil aircraft system based on improved FRAM[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(12): 324083-324083.

参考文献

[1] SAE. Safety assessment of transport airplanes in commercial service:SAE APR5150[S].USA:SAE, 2003.
[2] 陈磊, 焦健, 赵廷弟. 基于模型的复杂系统安全分析综述[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39(6):1287-1291. CHEN L, JIAO J, ZHAO T D. Review for model-based safety analysis of complex safety-critical system[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2017, 39(6):1287-1291(in Chinese).
[3] SAWARAGI T, HORIGUCHI Y, HINA A. Safety analysis of systemic accidents triggered by performance deviation[C]//International Joint International on Siceicase. Piscataway:IEEE Press, 2007.
[4] NANCY L. Engineering a safer world:Systems thinking applied to safety[M]. Boston:MIT Press, 2012.
[5] 李晓磊, 田瑾, 赵廷弟. 改进的区域安全性分析方法[J]. 航空学报, 2008, 29(3):622-626. LI X L, TIAN J, ZHAO T D. Improved zonal safety analysis method[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2008, 29(3):622-626(in Chinese).
[6] 郭媛媛,孙有朝,李龙彪.基于蒙特卡罗方法的民用飞机故障风险评估方法[J].航空学报,2017, 38(10):221126. GUO Y Y, SUN Y C, LI L B. Failure risk assessment method of civil aircraft based on Monte Carlo method[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2017, 38(10):221126(in Chinese).
[7] TAMURA N, MURAOKA D, YUGE T, et al. Availability analysis of a two-echelon repair model for systems comprising multiple items[J]. The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers, 2009, 92(7):1600-1607.
[8] NANCY L. A systems approach to risk management through leading safety indicators[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2015, 136:17-34.
[9] ABDULKHALEQ A, LAMMERING D, WAGNER S, et al. A systematic approach based on stpa for developing a dependable architecture for fully automated driving vehicles[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2017, 179(41):41-51.
[10] GESA P, ERIK H, JOAKIM D. Modelling vessel traffic service to understand resilience in everyday operations[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2015, 141:10-21.
[11] TAKAYUKI H, TETSUO S. Extended FRAM model based on cellular automaton to clarify complexity of socio-technical systems and improve their safety[J]. Safety Science,2020,123:104556.
[12] CLAY-WILLIAMS R, HOUNSGAARD J, HOLLNAGEL E. Where the rubber meets the road:using FRAM to align work-as-imagined with work-as-done when implementing clinical guidelines[J]. Implementation Science,2015,10:125.
[13] HOLLNAGEL E, LEONHARDT J, LICU T, et al. From Safety-I to Safety-Ⅱ:A white paper[M]. Belgium:Eurocontrol, 2013.
[14] HOLLNAGEL E. FRAM:The functional resonance analysis method:Modelling complex socio-technical systems[M]. Aldershot:Town Publishing Ltd, 2012.
[15] ROGIER W, KIP S, ERIK H. Functional modeling and constraint management in command and control:Two microworld studies[J]. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 2007, 40(16):456-461.
[16] TOFTGARD. Visualisering av FRAM[M]. Sweden:University of Linköping, 2010.
[17] TIAN J, WU J Y, YANG Q B, et al. FRAMA:A safety assessment approach based on functional resonance analysis method[J]. Safety Science, 2016, 85:41-52.
[18] 高扬, 徐佳迪, 武文涛, 等.基于FRAM-AHP法的公务航空飞行事故分析[J].安全与环境学报, 2019, 19(3):754-760. GAO Y, XU J D, WU W T, et al. Analysis for the accidents of business aviation flight based on the FRAM-AHP method[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment,2019,19(3):754-760(in Chinese).
[19] 贾宝惠, 于灵杰, 蔺越国,等. 基于AHP-SPA方法的民机修理级别确定综合分析模型[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(11):221130. JIA B H, YU L J, LIN Y G, et al. Comprehensive analy-sis model for determination of civil aircraft repair level based on AHP-SPA method[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2017, 38(11):221130(in Chinese).
[20] THOMAS L S, JENNIFER S S. An innovative orders-of-magnitude approach to AHP-based mutli-criteria decision making:Prioritizing divergent intangible humane acts[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2011, 214(3):703-715.
[21] ZHENG Z X, TIAN J, ZHAO T D. Refining operation guidelines with model-checking-aided FRAM to improve manufacturing processes:A case study for aeroengine blade forging[J]. Cognition, Technology & Work, 2016, 18(4):777-791.
[22] WANG W S, JIN J L, DING J, et al. A new approach to water resources system assessment:Set-pair analysis method[J]. Science in China Series E:Technological Science, 2009, 52(10):3017-3023.
[23] GEORGE H L. Final report of the Board of Inquiry investigating the circumstances of an accident involving the Air Canada Boeing 767 air-craft C-GAUN that effected an emergency landing at Gimli, Manitoba on the 23rd day of July, 1983[M]. Mississauga:Canadian Government Publishing Centre, 1985.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

基于改进FRAM的民机系统安全性分析

Safety analysis of civil aircraft system based on improved FRAM

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 9

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	黄领才. 纤维增强聚合物复合材料无损检测方法进展[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(5): 529697-529697.
[2]	荘露, 陆中, 宋海靖, 董力, 吴雨婷, 周伽. 基于故障注入模型的电传飞控系统安全性分析[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(9): 327329-327329.
[3]	胡莘婷, 吴宇. 面向城市飞行安全的无人机离散型多路径规划方法[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(6): 324383-324383.
[4]	赵长啸, 何锋, 李浩, 王鹏. 基于效能的先进战斗机航电系统动态重构方法[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(6): 523416-523416.
[5]	胡晓义, 王如平, 王鑫, 付永涛. 基于模型的复杂系统安全性和可靠性分析技术发展综述[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(6): 523436-523436.
[6]	张燕军, 孙有朝, 曾海军, 陆中, 王京娅. 转子非包容失效安全性的计算机辅助分析方法[J]. 航空学报, 2013, 34(2): 291-300.
[7]	巩磊, 张曙光, 刘晓锋, 邱天. 基于功能危险分析的涡扇发动机数字控制系统危险识别方法研究[J]. 航空学报, 2011, 32(12): 2194-2203.
[8]	李晓磊;田瑾;赵廷弟. 改进的区域安全性分析方法研究[J]. 航空学报, 2008, 29(3): 622-626.
[9]	韩松臣;裴成功;隋东;左凌. 平行区域导航航路安全性分析[J]. 航空学报, 2006, 27(6): 1023-1027.