基于情景分析的航空集群决策规则库构建方法

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2019.23737

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

基于情景分析的航空集群决策规则库构建方法

胡利平^1,2, 梁晓龙^1,2, 何吕龙^1,2, 张佳强^1,2, 任宝祥¹, 齐铎^1,2

1. 空军工程大学空管领航学院航空集群技术与作战运用实验室, 西安 710051;
2. 空军工程大学空管领航学院国家空管防相撞技术重点实验室, 西安 710051

收稿日期:2019-12-13 修回日期:2019-12-17 出版日期:2020-06-30 发布日期:2019-12-26
通讯作者: 胡利平 E-mail:452367076@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（61703427）；国防创新特区项目

Construction method of aviation swarm decision rule base based on scenario analysis

HU Liping^1,2, LIANG Xiaolong^1,2, HE Lyulong^1,2, ZHANG Jiaqiong^1,2, REN Baoxiang¹, QI Duo^1,2

1. Aviation Swarm Technology and Operational Application Laboratory, Air Traffic Control and Navigation College, Air Force Engineering University, Xi'an 710051, China;
2. National Key Laboratory of Air Traffic Collision Prevention, Air Traffic Control and Navigation College, Air Force Engineering University, Xi'an 710051, China

Received:2019-12-13 Revised:2019-12-17 Online:2020-06-30 Published:2019-12-26
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (61703427); China National Defense Innovation Special Zone Project

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对传统的规则学习算法很难解决顶层决策，以及现阶段航空集群作为一种新兴的作战样式，没有太多现成的数据和案例可供参考，暂不具备"从战争中学习战争"条件等难题，从战争设计的角度出发，探讨性地提出了一种基于情景分析的规则库构建方法。首先，从系统演化的外部触发条件和内部驱动机制出发，提出了基于事件触发-规则驱动的自主决策机制；然后，将航空集群决策规则拆分为事件、条件、动作3部分，并采用事件-条件-动作（ECA）描述机制进行规范化表达；最后，借鉴情景分析理论的思想，通过详细分析作战过程的逻辑关系、状态变迁，实现对象、事件、行为的关联，并以无人机自主察打任务规则提取为例进行了验证分析。

关键词: 航空集群, 情景分析, 自主决策, 规则提取, 决策规则库, 事件触发-规则驱动

Abstract: The traditional algorithm of rule learning is difficult to solve the problem of top-level decision-making. In addition, as a new type of combat, aviation swarm does not have sufficient labeled data and battle cases for reference at this stage, thus the condition for ‘learn to fight from the war’ is temporarily immature. To solve the above problems, this paper proposes a construction method of rule base based on the scenario analysis from the perspective of war design. Firstly, based on the external triggering conditions and internal driving mechanism of system evolution, an event-triggered and rule-driven autonomous decision-making mechanism is proposed. Secondly, the decision rules of aviation swarm are divided into event, condition and action and are expressed by the Event-Condition-Action (ECA) description mechanism. Finally, by adopting the idea of scenario analysis theory, the logic and state transition of the operational process are analyzed in detail, and the associations among objects, events, and behaviors are finally realized. Moreover, the rules extraction of autonomous reconnaissance and strike mission using UAV swarm is carried out to verify the proposed theory.

Key words: aviation swarm, scenario analysis, autonomous decision making, rule extraction, decision rule base, event-triggered and rule-driven

中图分类号:

V219

胡利平, 梁晓龙, 何吕龙, 张佳强, 任宝祥, 齐铎. 基于情景分析的航空集群决策规则库构建方法[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(S1): 723737-723737.

HU Liping, LIANG Xiaolong, HE Lyulong, ZHANG Jiaqiong, REN Baoxiang, QI Duo. Construction method of aviation swarm decision rule base based on scenario analysis[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(S1): 723737-723737.

参考文献 21

[1]	柏鹏, 梁晓龙, 王鹏, 等. 新型航空集群空中作战体系研究[J]. 空军工程大学学报(军事科学版), 2016, 16(2):1-4. BAI P, LIANG X L, WANG P, et al. Research on new air combat system of aviation swarms[J]. Journal of Air Force Engineering University (Military Science Edition), 2016, 16(2):1-4(in Chinese).
[2]	FORTUNY E J D, MARTENS D. Active learning-based pedagogical rule extraction[J]. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2015, 26(11):2664-2677.
[3]	POURPANAH F, LIM C P, SALEH J M. A hybrid model of fuzzy ARTMAP and genetic algorithm for data classification and rule extraction[J]. Expert Systems With Applications, 2016, 49:74-85.
[4]	MASHAYEKHI M, GRAS R. Rule extraction from decision trees ensembles:New algorithms based on heuristic search and sparse group lasso methods[J]. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 2017, 16(6):1707-1727.
[5]	KARIMI T, FORREST J Y L. Using grey incidence to analyze the energy audit reports and rough set for rule extraction[J]. Kybernetes, 2016, 45(7):1024-1035.
[6]	YANG H F, ZHANG J F, HU L H. Classification rule extraction based on the rough concept lattice[J]. Kybernetes, 2010, 39(8):1336-1343.
[7]	LI A, CHEN G. A new approach for rule extraction of expert system based on SVM[J]. Measurement, 2014, 47:715-723.
[8]	SHAHABI M, HASSANPOUR H, MASHAYEKHI H. Rule extraction for fatty liver detection using neural networks[J]. Neural Computing & Applications, 2017, 31(4):979-989.
[9]	刘晓伶, 卢涛. 基于情景分析的ECA规则提取方法研究[J]. 计算机工程, 2012, 38(22):154-158. LIU X L, LU T. Research on ECA rule extraction method based on scenario analysis[J]. Computer Engineering, 2012, 38(22):154-158(in Chinese).
[10]	PISHVAEE M S, FATHI M, JOLAI F. A fuzzy clustering-based method for scenario analysis in strategic planning:The case of an Asian pharmaceutical company[J]. South African Journal of Business Management, 2008, 39(3):21-31.
[11]	SANGHA K K, GERRITSEN R, JEREMY R S. Repurposing government expenditure for enhancing Indigenous well-being in Australia:A scenario analysis for a new paradigm[J]. Economic Analysis and Policy, 2019, 63:75-91.
[12]	WRIGHT G, CAIRNS G, BRIEN F A, et al. Scenario analysis to support decision making in addressing wicked problems:Pitfalls and potential[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2019, 278(1):3-19.
[13]	CLEMONS E K. Scenario analysis and managing strategic ambiguity:How to remember future events, before they actually occur![M]. Heidelberg:Springer, 2019:163-165.
[14]	梁晓龙, 何吕龙, 张佳强, 等. 航空集群构型控制及其演化方法[J]. 中国科学:技术科学, 2019, 49(3):277-287. LIANG X L, HE L L, ZHANG J Q, et al. Configuration control and evolutionary mechanism of aircraft swarm[J]. Scientia Sinica (Technologica), 2019, 49(3):277-287(in Chinese).
[15]	ISAZADEH A, PEDRYCZ W, MAHAN F. ECA rule learning in dynamic environments[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2014, 41(17):7847-7857.
[16]	毛琼, 李小民, 王正军. 基于规则的无人机编队队形构建与重构控制方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2019, 41(5):1118-1126. MAO Q, LI X M, WANG Z J. Formation and reformation control method for UAVs formation shape based on rules[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2019, 41(5):1118-1126(in Chinese).
[17]	REYNOLDS C W. Flocks, herds and schools:A distributed behavioral model[J]. Computer Graphics, 1987, 21(4):25-34.
[18]	MCCARTHY D R, DAYAL U. The architecture of an active database management system[C]//Proceedings of the 1989 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data. New York:ACM, 1989:215-224.
[19]	ZHOU Y L, HSU M. A theory for rule triggering systems[C]//International Conference on Extending Database Technology. Heidelberg:Springer, 1990:409-421.
[20]	金欣. 指挥控制智能化现状与发展[J]. 指挥信息系统与技术, 2017, 8(4):10-18. JIN X. Status and development of intelligent command and control[J]. Command Information System and Technology, 2017, 8(4):10-18.
[21]	SHI Z, WEI C A, FU P, et al. A parallel search strategy based on sparse representation for infrared target tracking[J]. Algorithms, 2015, 8(3):529-540.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

基于情景分析的航空集群决策规则库构建方法

Construction method of aviation swarm decision rule base based on scenario analysis

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 21

相关文章 5

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	周攀, 黄江涛, 章胜, 刘刚, 舒博文, 唐骥罡. 基于深度强化学习的智能空战决策与仿真[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(4): 126731-126731.
[2]	宋鑫康, 赵尚弘, 王翔. 支持差异化服务的航空信息网络切片策略[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(3): 325123-325123.
[3]	吕娜, 陈坤, 陈柯帆, 朱海峰, 潘武. 适应拓扑变化的拥塞最小化网络更新策略[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(7): 323661-323661.
[4]	吕娜, 刘创, 陈柯帆, 曹芳波. 一种面向航空集群的集中控制式网络部署方法[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(7): 321961-321961.
[5]	陈果;李成刚;王德友. 利用神经网络规则提取方法获取转静碰摩故障诊断知识[J]. 航空学报, 2008, 29(5): 1319-1325.