民用飞机高原风场进近驾驶行为变化对失控趋势的影响

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2015.0087

流体力学与飞行力学

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

民用飞机高原风场进近驾驶行为变化对失控趋势的影响

韩国玺¹, 张曙光¹, 李志涛²

1. 北京航空航天大学交通科学与工程学院, 北京 100191;
2. 中国兵器工业导航与控制技术研究所, 北京 100089

收稿日期:2014-12-19 修回日期:2015-01-04 出版日期:2015-06-15 发布日期:2015-04-21
通讯作者: 张曙光Tel.:010-82315237 E-mail: gnahz@buaa.edu.cn E-mail:gnahz@buaa.edu.cn
作者简介:韩国玺男, 博士研究生。主要研究方向: 飞行力学。 E-mail: 307214201@163.com;张曙光女, 博士, 教授, 博士生导师。主要研究方向: 飞行力学与飞行控制, 适航技术。 Tel: 010-82315237 E-mail: gnahz@buaa.edu.cn;李志涛男, 工程师。主要研究方向: 飞行控制。 E-mail: feiji251@sina.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(60832012)

Influence on loss of control trend by pilot behavior changes during highland wind-field approach

HAN Guoxi¹, ZHANG Shuguang¹, LI Zhitao²

1. School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China;
2. China Ordnance Navigation and Control Technology Research Institute, Beijing 100089, China

Received:2014-12-19 Revised:2015-01-04 Online:2015-06-15 Published:2015-04-21
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (60832012)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

高原机场运行安全性是颇具中国特色的飞行安全研究领域。在高原机场终端区,飞机的飞行性能下降,如果遭遇大风等不利天气条件,不安全事件的发生概率增加,其中飞行失控(LoC)是重要的潜在威胁类型。为了分析风场飞行的失控机理并研究高原环境中驾驶员生理变化对LoC趋势的影响,对高原机场终端区驾驶员的操纵行为进行参数化表征,模拟了高原环境对于驾驶行为的可能影响,并结合高原特征风场模型,通过数值仿真分析穿越风场飞行时失控风险的变化趋势。仿真结果表明:危险的山谷风和突风是导致LoC的重要诱因,高原环境中驾驶员生理心理的恶化也会增加LoC的危险,不合适的增益、过大的延迟和滞后都会导致飞机的失控。如果能够对驾驶员进行有针对性的训练,降低应对风扰动出现时的操纵增益波动,并保持适当紧张状态以尽量降低操纵延迟,将有利于应对风扰动,并保持完成飞行任务的能力。

关键词: 飞行失控, 高原机场, 驾驶员, 紊流, 生理变化

Abstract:

The operation of highland airport flight safety is a research field with conspicuous Chinese characteristics. In the highland airport terminal area, the performance of the aircraft reduces. The probability of unsafe events and accidents increases, when encountering heavy winds and other adverse weather conditions. Loss of control (LoC) is one of the important conditions. To analyze the mechanism of flying out of control in wind-field and research the effect of plateau environmental behavior changes on LoC trend, we present parametric characterization of the pilot's manipulation of operation in highland airport terminal area and then simulate the potential impacts on pilot's behavior at high altitude. Binding a typical pattern highland wind-field, we analyze the risk of LoC when flying through wind by numerical simulation. The results show that dangerous valley winds and gusts are chief incitements causing uncontrolled flight. The pilot's physiological and psychological deterioration has a significant impact on the risk of LoC. Also, inappropriate gain, excessive delay and lag lead to the aircraft out of control. If we can provide targeted training for pilots, reduce the response gain to dangerous wind pattern and maintain proper tension to minimize control delay, it will help to deal with the wind disturbance and maintain the ability of completing a mission.

Key words: loss of control, highland airport, pilot, turbulence, physiological changes

中图分类号:

韩国玺, 张曙光, 李志涛. 民用飞机高原风场进近驾驶行为变化对失控趋势的影响[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(6): 1775-1787.

HAN Guoxi, ZHANG Shuguang, LI Zhitao. Influence on loss of control trend by pilot behavior changes during highland wind-field approach[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2015, 36(6): 1775-1787.

参考文献

[1] Chen X Y, Chen D C. Advantages of running of implementing RNP / RNAV on altitude airports and airlines[J]. Journal of Civil Aviation Flight University of China, 2007, 18(4): 20-23 (in Chinese). 陈湘燕, 陈东程. 高原机场及航线实施RNP/RNAV运行优势探讨[J]. 中国民航飞行学院学报, 2007, 18(4): 20-23.
[2] Civil Aviation Administration of China. AC-121-21. Management regulations of aviation carrier highland airport operation[S]. Beijing: Civil Aviation Administration of China, 2007 (in Chinese). 中国民用航空总局. AC-121-21. 航空承运人高原机场运行管理规定[S]. 北京: 中国民用航空局, 2007.
[3] CAAC/Boeing. High and hot operations seminar [EB/OL]. (2007-07-24)[2014-11-15]. http://www.caa-c.gov.cn/dev/fbs/HKYYR/.
[4] Mou Y B. Plateau aviation weather character and plateau aviation weather service guarantee[J]. Journal of Sichuan Meteorology, 2007, 27(2): 26-31 (in Chinese). 牟艳彬. 高原航空天气特征和高原航空气象服务保障[J]. 四川气象, 2007, 27(2):26-31.
[5] Wu Y A, Chen N M, Zhang H B. Application of neurobehavioral core test battery on efficiency of army work at high altitude[J]. Journal of High Altitude Medicine, 1998, 8(2): 21-24 (in Chinese). 吴佑安, 陈宁荣, 张洪兵. 行为功能测试在高原部队军事作业工效评价中的应用[J]. 高原医学杂志, 1998, 8(2):21-24.
[6] Lambregts A A, Nesemeier G, Wilborn J E, et al. Aircraft accident prevention: loss-of-control analysis, AIAA-2009-6256[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2009.
[7] Boeing Commercial Airplane Group Airplane Safety Engineering. Statistical summary of commercial jet airplane accidents-worldwide operations 1959-2012[R]. Seattle, W A: Boeing, 2013.
[8] Belcastro C M, Foster J V. Aircraft loss-of-control accident analysis, AIAA-2010-8004[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2010.
[9] Conner K J, Feyereisen T, Morgan J, et al. Cockpit displays and annunciation to help reduce the loss of control (LoC) or lack of control (LAC) accident risks, AIAA-2012-4763[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2012.
[10] Wilborn J E, Foster J V. Defining commercial transport loss-of-control: a quantitative approach, AIAA-2004-4811[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2004.
[11] Xu P Z. Complex weather and flight meteorological service at plateau airport[J]. Air Traffic Management, 2004(5):36-40 (in Chinese). 许培贞. 高原机场的复杂天气与飞行气象服务[J]. 空中交通管理, 2004(5):36-40.
[12] Xu H, Wu J. Feature of local loop flow at plateau airport and its impact on flight[C]//Proceedings of Fifth Cross-Strait Aviation Meteorology and Flight Safety Conference. Taipei: China Aviation Meteorological Institute, 2010:27-33 (in Chinese). 徐海, 吴娟. 高原机场的局地环流特征及其对飞行的影响[C]//第五屆海峽兩岸航空氣象與飛行安全研討會論文集. 台北:中華航空氣象協會, 2010: 27-33.
[13] Nesthus T E, Rush L L, Wreggit S S. Effects of mild hypoxia on pilot performance at general aviation altitudes, DOT/FAA/AM-97/9[R]. Oklahoma City: FAA Civil Aeromedical Institute, 1997.
[14] Shi F Z, Wang Y, Bao H D, et al. Impact on the ability of the pilot to visually track identify acute mild hypoxia[J]. Journal of Navy Medicine, 2008, 29(1): 7-9 (in Chinese). 时粉周, 王珏, 包海德, 等. 急性轻度缺氧对飞行员视觉跟踪辨认能力的影响[J]. 海军医学杂志, 2008, 29(1): 7-9.
[15] Zhong M, Ning Z Z, Shi K, et al. A study of mental-physical capacity under simulated high altitude hpox-ia[J]. Journal of Preventive Medicine of Chinese People's Liberation Army, 1997, 15(2): 87-89 (in Chinese). 钟敏, 宁竹之, 石凯, 等. 模拟高原低氧环境下脑-体工作能力研究[J]. 解放军预防医学杂志,1997, 15(2): 87-89.
[16] Wan Z L, Li X Y, Fu C, et al. The effects of acute hypobaric hypoxia on human perceptual performance[J]. Chinese Journal of Aerospace Medicine, 1999, 10(3): 167-169 (in Chinese). 万自立, 李学义, 傅川, 等. 急性低压缺氧对人的感知觉能力的影响[J]. 中华航空航天医学杂志, 1999, 10(3): 167-169.
[17] Thomas N E, Ladonna R L, Steven W S. Effects of mild hypoxia on pilot performances at general aviation altitudes, ADA324719[R]. Washington, D. C.: Federal Aviation Administration Washington Dc Office of Aviation Medicine, 1997.
[18] Zaal P M T, Pool D M, Chu Q P, et al. Modeling human multichannel perception and control using linear time-invariant[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2009, 32(4):1089-1102.
[19] Nieuwenhuizen F M, Zaal P M T, Mulder M, et al. A new multi-channel pilot model identification method for use in assessment of simulator fidelity, AIAA-2006-6629[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2006.
[20] Hu Z F. Man-machine systems and flying qualities[M]. Beijing: Beihang University Press, 1994: 21 (in Chinese). 胡兆丰. 人机系统和飞行品质[M]. 北京: 北京航空航天大学出版社, 1994: 21.
[21] Xu Z X, Qu X J. A simulation comparative study on the structural pilot model and mcruer pilot model[J]. Flight Dynamics, 1997, 15(4): 1-6 (in Chinese). 徐仲祥, 屈香菊. 结构驾驶员模型与McRuer模型的仿真研究[J]. 飞行力学, 1997, 15(4): 1-6.
[22] Tan W Q, Qu X J, Wang W J. Comparison of neural network model and frequency domain quasi-linear model for human pilots[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2003, 24(6): 481-485 (in Chinese). 谭文倩, 屈香菊, 王维军. 驾驶员神经网络模型与频域拟线性模型的比较研究[J]. 航空学报, 2003, 24(6): 481-485.
[23] Tan W Q, Efremov A V, Qu X J. Identification of pilot neural network model in pitch tracking[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2010, 31(9):1708-1714 (in Chinese). 谭文倩, Efremov A V, 屈香菊. 俯仰跟踪任务中的驾驶员神经网络模型辨识[J]. 航空学报, 2010, 31(9): 1708-1714.
[24] Liu Z Q, Yuan X G, Liu W, et al. Quantitative measuring method of pilots' attention allocation[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2006, 32(15): 518-539 (in Chinese). 柳忠起, 袁修干, 刘伟, 等.飞行员注意力分配的定量测量方法[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2006, 32(15): 518-539.
[25] Duan L, Li A G, Ma Y. Research for wind shear and turbulence detection of jiuhuang airport[J]. Journal of Civil Aviation Flight University of China, 2010, 21(2): 6-10 (in Chinese). 段炼, 李爱国, 马艳. 九黄机场风切变与湍流探测研究[J]. 中国民航飞行学院学报, 2010, 21(2): 6-10.
[26] Jin C J, Xiao Y L. The flight principles of atmospheric disturbances[M]. Beijing: National Defense Industry Press, 1993: 53-65 (in Chinese). 金长江, 肖业伦. 大气扰动中的飞行原理[M]. 北京: 国防工业出版社, 1993: 53-65.
[27] Oscar L U. Low-altitude turbulence model for estimating gust loads on aircraft[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 1966, 2(1): 41-47.
[28] Houbolt J C. Atmospheric turbulence[J]. AIAA Journal, 1973, 11(4): 421-437.
[29] Federal Aviation Administration. Part 25-Airworthiness standards: Transport category airplanes[S]. Washington, D. C.: Federal Aviation Administration, 2014.
[30] Ge Z H, Xu H J, Meng J. Vector space modeling of flight loss-of-control and its application[J]. Flight Dynamics, 2008, 26(3): 18-21 (in Chinese). 葛志浩, 徐浩军, 孟捷. 飞行失控的向量空间建模与应用研究[J]. 飞行力学, 2008, 26(3): 18-21.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

民用飞机高原风场进近驾驶行为变化对失控趋势的影响

Influence on loss of control trend by pilot behavior changes during highland wind-field approach

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	吉洪蕾, 苏俊杰, 陈仁良, 孔卫红. 适于直升机飞行仿真的高原大气紊流模型[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(7): 126564-126564.
[2]	许舒婷, 谭文倩, 孙立国, 屈香菊. 主动侧杆引导下的Ⅱ型驾驶员诱发振荡抑制[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(8): 121861-121861.
[3]	吉洪蕾, 陈仁良, 李攀. 用于直升机在大气紊流中的旋翼状态反馈控制[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(5): 120541-120541.
[4]	郑黎明, 杏建军, 陈子昂, 王祎, 于洋. Dryden型大气紊流对平流层飞艇能量最优轨迹影响[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(1): 120180-120180.
[5]	刘嘉, 向锦武, 张颖, 孙阳, 肖楚琬. 自适应飞机驾驶员最优控制模型研究及应用[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(4): 1127-1138.
[6]	刘海良, 王立新. 基于数字虚拟飞行的民用飞机纵向地面操稳特性评估[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(5): 1432-1441.
[7]	聂雪媛, 杨国伟. 基于CFD降阶模型的阵风减缓主动控制研究[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(4): 1103-1111.
[8]	吉洪蕾, 陈仁良, 李攀. 适用于直升机飞行力学分析的三维空间大气紊流模型[J]. 航空学报, 2014, 35(7): 1825-1835.
[9]	曹启蒙, 李颖晖, 徐浩军. 基于线性矩阵不等式的电传飞机人机闭环系统稳定域[J]. 航空学报, 2013, 34(1): 19-27.
[10]	孟捷;徐浩军;张建康. Ⅱ型PIO反馈与前馈抑制系统对比[J]. 航空学报, 2010, 31(9): 1701-1707.
[11]	谭文倩;A.V. Efremov;屈香菊. 俯仰跟踪任务中的驾驶员神经网络模型辨识[J]. 航空学报, 2010, 31(9): 1708-1714.
[12]	郭同庆;董璐;陆志良. 跨声速机翼抖振初始迎角N-S方程定常计算分析[J]. 航空学报, 2008, 29(4): 840-844.
[13]	屈香菊;王娜. 民机乘坐品质的概率指标及算法[J]. 航空学报, 2007, 28(6): 1323-1326.
[14]	刘学强;伍贻兆. 用DES数值模拟具有横向喷流的紊流流场[J]. 航空学报, 2004, 25(3): 209-213.
[15]	谭文倩;屈香菊;王维军. 驾驶员神经网络模型与频域拟线性模型的比较研究[J]. 航空学报, 2003, 24(6): 481-485.