Fig.1

Guideline documents covering development and in-service/operational phases

Fig.2

Interaction between safety assessment and development processes

Fig.3

Safety assessment in system development

Fig.4

Avionics system architecture

Table 1

Comparison of onboard data bus［1］

Fig.5

Structure definition of ARINC 664 frame

Fig.6

Software architecture of partition operating system

Fig.7

Typical SOC architecture

Fig.8

IMA system hierarchy

Fig.9

Schematic diagram of information interaction relationship between DO⁃178 and ARP4754

Fig.10

Schematic diagram of relationship between system requirements and software development process in DO-178

Fig.11

Design disciplines related to interactive systems

Fig.12

Pilot’s eye field of view

Fig.13

Pilot-specific accessibility data

Fig.14

Avionics full system comprehensive test verification process

Fig.15

A320 antenna layout［7］

Fig.16

Schematic diagram of rod electrode test

Fig.17

Atmospheric neutron spectra measured by four aircrafts in different areas

Fig.18

Human-machine interface of CDS on A380 aircraft

Fig.19

CDS layout on B787 Aircraft

Fig.20

Comparison of visual flight and EFVS images

Fig.21

B787 IMA architecture

Fig.22

A350 top-level IMA architecture

Fig.23

Distributed complex IMA system

Fig.24

Corresponding relationship between IMA system breakdown structure and DO-297 certification tasks

Fig.25

Application of various PBN procedures in each phase of flight［42］

Fig.26

In 2011， implementation of ELSO in Atlanta allowing more dispatch of flights by reducing minimum divergence from 15° to 10°

Fig.27

Flight plan management module

Fig.28

Trajectory guidance module

Fig.29

Dual flight management system configuration

Fig.30

Typical radio navigation system architecture

Table 2

ISS configuration［60⁃61］

Fig.31

Typical ISS architecture （ARINC 768-A）

Fig.32

Atmospheric data detection technology based on laser molecular measurement principles

Fig.33

Architecture of onboard maintenance and health management system