铺层方式对CFRP⁃Al胶接接头疲劳行为的影响

Abstract

Abstract:

The finite element simulation model of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Plastics （CFRP）-aluminum single lap adhesive joint was established by Abaqus. The stacking sequences of CFRP laminate were set as ［0/90］_4s，［0/45/-45/90］_2s and ［45/-45］_4s. And the Cyclic Cohesive Zone Model （CCZM） was used to simulate the damage and evolution of the adhesive layer. The stiffness degradation， crack propagation and stress distribution of the joint were analyzed to investigate the effect of stacking sequence on the joint fatigue behavior. The experimental values of the joint fatigue life were compared with the simulated values to verify the validity of the model. The results show that from ［0/90］_4s to ［0/45/-45/90］_2s， then to ［45/-45］_4s， as the proportion of ±45° plies in CFRP laminates increases， the proportion of the joint damage accumulation stage to the total fatigue life gradually decreases and the proportion of the fatigue crack extension stage gradually increases. In addition， the joint stress mainly propagates through the fiber from the CFRP end to the aluminum end， and the stress concentration area is prone to occur at the intersection of ±45° plies， which destroys the uniformity of crack propagation rate， leading to the gradual increase in the crack growth rate difference between the middle region and the two sides of the joint with the increase of ±45° plies， and eventually the radian of the adhesive layer failure increases.

Key words: CFRP-Al, stacking sequence, stiffness degradation, crack propagation, stress distribution, finite element simulation

CLC Number:

V257

Tianchun ZOU, Yuezhang JU, Yuxi GUAN, Zegang LI, Hongcheng CHEN. Effect of stacking sequence on fatigue behavior of CFRP⁃Al joint[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(18): 428264-428264.

Figures/Tables 24

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Table 4

Table 5

Table 6

Fig.8

Table 7

Fig.9

Fig.10

Table 8

Fig.11

Fig.12

Fig.13

Table 9

Fig.14

Fig.15

References 36

1	宁莉，杨绍昌，冷悦，等.先进复合材料在飞机上的应用及其制造技术发展概述［J］.复合材料科学与工程，2020，316（5）：123-128.
	NING L， YANG S C， LENG Y， et al. Overview of the application of advance composite materials on aircraft and the development of its manufacturing technology ［J］. Science and Engineering of Composite Materials， 2020， 316（5）： 123-128 （in Chinese）.
2	KITANO A. Characteristics of carbon-fiber-reinforced plastics （CFRP） and associated challenges-focusing on carbon-fiber-reinforced thermosetting resins （CFRTS） for aircraft［J］. International Journal of Automation Technology， 2016， 10（3）： 300-309.
3	KGOETE F M， POPOOLA A P I， FAYOMI O S I. Advancement in the application of alloys and composites in the manufacture of aircraft component： A review［J］. Journal of Physics： Conference Series， 2019， 1378（3）： 032049.
4	BELLO I， ALOWAYED Y， ALBINMOUSA J， et al. Fatigue crack growth in laser-treated adhesively bonded composite joints： An experimental examination［J］. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives， 2021， 105： 102784.
5	CHOWDHURY N T， WANG J， CHIU W K， et al. Matrix failure in composite laminates under compressive loading［J］. Composites Part A： Applied Science and Manufacturing， 2016， 84： 103-113.
6	BUDHE S， BANEA M D， DE BARROS S， et al. An updated review of adhesively bonded joints in composite materials［J］. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives， 2017， 72： 30-42.
7	MARQUES A C， MOCANU A， TOMIĆ N Z， et al. Review on adhesives and surface treatments for structural applications： recent developments on sustainability and implementation for metal and composite substrates［J］. Materials （Basel， Switzerland）， 2020， 13（24）： 5590.
8	ALTIN KARATAŞ M， MOTORCU A R， GÖKKAYA H. Optimization of machining parameters for kerf angle and roundness error in abrasive water jet drilling of CFRP composites with different fiber orientation angles［J］.Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering， 2020， 42（4）： 1-27.
9	JIANG L X， XIAO S， DONG D W， et al. Experimental study of bonded， bolted， and hybrid braided CFRP joints with different stacking sequences and lapping patterns［J］. Thin-Walled Structures， 2022， 177： 109408.
10	KADIOGLU F， DEMIRAL M. Failure behaviour of the single lap joints of angle-plied composites under three point bending tests［J］. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology， 2020， 34（5）： 531-548.
11	OZEL A， YAZICI B， AKPINAR S， et al. A study on the strength of adhesively bonded joints with different adherends［J］. Composites Part B： Engineering， 2014， 62： 167-174.
12	MACHADO J.J.M， MARQUES E A S， BARBOSA A Q，et al. Effect of hygrothermal aging on the quasi-static behaviour of CFRP joints varying the overlap length［J］. Composite Structures， 2019， 214： 451-462.
13	FERNÁNDEZ-CAÑADAS L M， IVAÑEZ I， SANCHEZ-SAEZ S， et al. Effect of adhesive thickness and overlap on the behavior of composite single-lap joints［J］. Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures， 2021， 28（11）： 1111-1120.
14	CAI Y， AN X Z， ZOU Q C， et al. Mechanical properties and failure mechanisms of composite laminates with classical fabric stacking patterns［J］.Journal of Materials Science， 2021， 56（20）： 11814-11827.
15	卓宁生，付益战，胡昭. 运8系列飞机结构疲劳定寿总结［J］. 航空科学技术， 2006， 17（2）： 40-44.
	ZHUO N S， FU Y Z， HU Z. Summary of determination of structures fatigue life for Y8 aircraft series［J］. Aeronautical Science and Technology， 2006， 17（2）： 40-44 （in Chinese）.
16	JAVAID U， LING C， CARDIFF P. Mechanical performance of carbon-glass hybrid composite joints in quasi-static tension and tension-tension fatigue［J］. Engineering Failure Analysis， 2020， 116： 104730.
17	MENEGHETTI G， QUARESIMIN M， RICOTTA M. Damage mechanisms in composite bonded joints under fatigue loading［J］. Composites Part B： Engineering， 2012， 43（2）： 210-220.
18	SHIN K C， LEE J J. Effects of bond parameters on fatigue characteristics of a cocured double lap joint subjected to cyclic tensile loads［J］. The Journal of Adhesion， 2003， 79（6）： 581-596.
19	HEDAYATI R， KHOUZANI S G， JAHANBAKHSHI M. Investigation of debonding propagation in aluminum/composite joints under fatigue loading［J］. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology， 2015， 29（2）： 59-73.
20	HOLLAWAY L. Handbook of polymer composites for engineers［M］. Sawston： Woodhead Publishing Limited， 1994.
21	ZHAO T W， JIANG Y Y. Fatigue of 7075-T651 aluminum alloy［J］. International Journal of Fatigue， 2008， 30（5）： 834-849.
22	ANYFANTIS K N， TSOUVALIS N G. Loading and fracture response of CFRP-to-steel adhesively bonded joints with thick adherents—Part II： Numerical simulation［J］. Composite Structures， 2013， 96： 858-868.
23	中国汽车工程学会. 汽车用聚合物基复合材料胶接性能测试方法： TCSAE 171-2020 ［S］. 北京：中国汽车工程学会， 2020.
	China Society of Automotive Engineers. Test methods for mechanical properties of adhesively bonded joints for automotive polymer matrix composites：［S］. Beijing： China Society of Automotive Engineers， 2020 （in Chinese）.
24	ASTM International. Standard test method for lap shear adhesion for fiber reinforced plastic （FRP） bonding：［S］. West Conshohocken： ASTM International， 2001.
25	LIU X L， ZHENG G， LUO Q T， et al. Fatigue behavior of carbon fibre reinforced plastic and aluminum single-lap adhesive joints after the transverse pre-impact［J］. International Journal of Fatigue， 2021， 144： 105973.
26	倪向贵，李新亮，王秀喜. 疲劳裂纹扩展规律Paris公式的一般修正及应用［J］. 压力容器， 2006， 23（12）： 8-15， 19.
	NI X G， LI X L， WANG X X. General modification and application of the Paris law for fatigue crack propagation［J］. Pressure Vessel Technology， 2006， 23（12）：8-15， 19 （in Chinese）.
27	HE Z K， LUO Q T， LI Q， et al. Fatigue behavior of CFRP/Al adhesive joints—Failure mechanisms study using digital image correlation （DIC） technique［J］. Thin-Walled Structures， 2022， 174： 109075.
28	SARFARAZ R， VASSILOPOULOS A P， KELLER T. Experimental investigation of the fatigue behavior of adhesively-bonded pultruded GFRP joints under different load ratios［J］. International Journal of Fatigue， 2011， 33（11）： 1451-1460.
29	JIANG Z W， WAN S， FANG Z， et al. Experimental investigation of fatigue behavior for adhesively-bonded GFRP/steel joints［J］. Engineering Structures， 2020， 213： 110580.
30	PARIDA S K， PRADHAN A K. 3D finite element analysis of stress distributions and strain energy release rates for adhesive bonded flat composite lap shear joints having pre-existing delaminations［J］.Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology， 2014， 28（2）： 481-488.
31	袁野，金格格. 疲劳损伤模型研究［J］. 工程技术研究， 2017（11）： 133-134.
	YUAN Y， JIN G. Research of fatigue damage model［J］. Engineering and Technological Research， 2017（11）： 133-134 （in Chinese）.
32	郭源齐. 功率模块引线键合界面的疲劳断裂特性研究［D］. 杭州：浙江工业大学， 2017.
	GUO Y Q. Study on fatigue fracture characteristics of wire bonding interface of power module［D］. Hangzhou： Zhejiang University of Technology， 2017 （in Chinese）.
33	熊华锋. 复合材料疲劳分散性与强度分散性的关系［D］. 南京：南京航空航天大学， 2009.
	XIONG H F. Relationship between fatigue dispersion and strength dispersion of composites［D］. Nanjing： Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics， 2009 （in Chinese）.
34	邹田春，巨乐章，符记，等. CFRP-铝合金单搭接胶接接头疲劳寿命和失效模式［J］. 复合材料学报， 2022， 39（12）： 6078-6087.
	ZOU T C， JU Y Z， FU J， et al. Fatigue life and failure mode of CFRP-aluminum alloy single-lap adhesive joints［J］. Acta Materiae Compositae Sinica， 2022， 39（12）： 6078-6087 （in Chinese）.
35	DAVIDSON P， WAAS A M. The effects of defects on the compressive response of thick carbon composites： An experimental and computational study［J］. Composite Structures， 2017， 176： 582-596.
36	DEMIRAL M， KADIOGLU F. Failure behaviour of the adhesive layer and angle ply composite adherends in single lap joints： A numerical study［J］. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives， 2018， 87： 181-190.

参数	数值
纵向弹性模量E₁/MPa	121 000
纬向弹性模量E₂/MPa	8 600
剪切模量G₁₂/MPa	3 450
泊松比μ	0.301
密度ρ/（kg·m^-3）	1 570
纵向拉伸强度X_T/MPa	2 376
纵向压缩强度X_C/MPa	123
纬向拉伸强度Y_T/MPa	69
纬向压缩强度Y_C/MPa	9.82
面内剪切强度S/MPa	145

参数	数值
弹性模量E/MPa	71 700
泊松比μ	0.32
密度ρ/（kg·m^-3）	3 000

参数	数值
弹性模量E/MPa	1 850
剪切模量G/MPa	560
拉伸强度T_I/MPa	21.6
剪切强度T_II/MPa	17.9
法向断裂能G_IC/（N·mm^-1）	0.43
剪切断裂能G_IIC/（N·mm^-1）	4.70

i	ln ln［1/R（t）］	75%载荷水平（4.45 kN）		55%载荷水平（3.26 kN）		35%载荷水平（2.08 kN）		25%载荷水平（1.48 kN）
i	ln ln［1/R（t）］	t	ln t	t	ln t	t	ln t	t	ln t
1	-1.753	474	6.161	2 442	7.801	33 364	10.415	99 998	11.513
2	-0.717	638	6.458	3 283	8.097	68 903	11.140	179 375	12.097
3	-0.050	1 026	6.933	5 235	8.563	103 672	11.549	252 329	12.620
4	0.609	1 248	7.129	7 562	8.931	135 573	11.817	457 897	13.034

i	ln ln［1/R（t）］	75%载荷水平（3.30 kN）		55%载荷水平（2.42 kN）		45%载荷水平（1.98 kN）		35%载荷水平（1.54 kN）
i	ln ln［1/R（t）］	t	ln t	t	ln t	t	ln t	t	ln t
1	-1.753	3 706	8.218	4 072	8.312	15 661	9.659	30 780	10.335
2	-0.717	4 184	8.339	9 015	9.107	37 542	10.533	81 592	11.309
3	-0.050	6 464	8.774	10 837	9.291	52 921	10.877	215 581	12.281
4	0.609	10 801	9.287	20 441	9.925	103 162	11.544	258 906	12.574

Effect of stacking sequence on fatigue behavior of CFRP⁃Al joint

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 24

References 36

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

铺层方式	载荷水平		α	β	试验		仿真		相对误差/%
铺层方式	比例/%	数值/kN	α	β	平均疲劳寿命	lg N	疲劳寿命	lg N	相对误差/%
［0/90］_4s	75	4.45	2.25	975.56	864	2.94	950	2.98	1.4
	55	3.26	1.98	5 372.48	4 763	3.68	5 924	3.78	2.5
	35	2.08	1.64	100 859.46	90 269	4.96	94 050	4.97	0.3
	25	1.48	1.53	305 218.04	275 001	5.44	380 100	5.58	2.6
［0/45/-45/90］_2s	75	3.30	1.95	7 201.55	6 387	3.81	7 750	3.89	2.2
	55	2.42	1.50	12 750.60	11 515	4.06	16 360	4.21	3.8
	45	1.98	1.27	66 327.65	61 611	4.79	85 300	4.93	2.9
	35	1.54	1.01	151 856.77	154 392	5.19	214 600	5.33	2.7
［45/-45］_4s	75	2.64	1.80	1 869.33	1 662	3.22	2 165	3.34	3.5
	65	2.29	1.41	17 804.99	16 218	4.20	19 450	4.29	1.8
	55	1.94	1.06	126 157.07	123 734	5.09	156 060	5.19	1.9
	45	1.58	0.86	312 126.17	337 158	5.53	456 740	5.66	2.4

铺层方式	初始刚度/（N·mm^-1）
［0/90］_4s	9 509.01
［0/45/-45/90］_2s	8 069.37
［45/-45］_4s	3 918.38

[1]	Fangyi SHENG, Guolin YANG, Fantong MENG, Zhigang DONG, Renke KANG. Finite element simulation analysis in helical milling of countersunk hole [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(1): 428690-428690.
[2]	Jiangbo CHEN, Kai ZENG, Baoying XING, Hongshen ZHANG, Yanfang DING, Xiaocong HE. Aluminum alloy clinch-bonding with hot melt adhesive film and joint failure analysis [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(14): 428029-428029.
[3]	Xiangrong JING, Pan CHENG, Zhenbing LUO, Tianxiang GAO, Yan ZHOU, Xiong DENG. Ice breaking characteristics and crack propagation law of arc discharge plasma actuator [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 204-213.
[4]	ZHANG Ziyu, HAO Lin. Application of X-FEM in a phase-field model for crack propagation [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(9): 225976-225976.
[5]	SU Shaopu, CHANG Wenkui, CHEN Xianmin. Fatigue buckling test and analytical approach of aircraft typical panel structures [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(5): 225219-225219.
[6]	YANG Xiawei, PENG Chong, MA Tiejun, WEN Guodong, WANG Yanying, CHAI Xiaoxia, XU Yaxin, LI Wenya. Finite element analysis of fatigue crack growth of linear friction welded superalloy joints [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(2): 625004-625004.
[7]	CAO Zhenzhong, ZHANG Fan, ZHANG Dingguo, YU Yi. Containment of aero-engine casing with bolted flanges [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(9): 224563-224563.
[8]	ZOU Tianchun, LI Longhui, LIU Zhihao, FU Ji, JU Yuezhang. Effect of overlap length on strain distribution and failure law of CFRP-Al double lap joint [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(6): 224921-224921.
[9]	DUAN Jiatong, SUI Fucheng, LIU Hanhai, XIE Fang, OUYANG Tian, BAO Rui. Fatigue crack growth performance of thin-walled structure under bending load [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(5): 524326-524326.
[10]	XI Wei, LI Qiang, SHEN Peiliang, HE Rui, YANG Gang, LIU Shijie. Full life engineering analysis method for multiple site damage [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(5): 524328-524328.
[11]	ZHANG Min, TIAN Xitian, LI Bo. Shape control for press bend forming of integral panels [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(7): 623620-623620.
[12]	CHANG Qi, YANG Weixi, ZHAO Heng, MENG Yao, LIU Jun, GAO Heming. A multi-sensor based crack propagation monitoring research [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(2): 223336-223336.
[13]	WANG Cunxian, GAO Haomai, GONG Xu, SUO Tao, LI Yulong, TANG Zhongbin, XUE Pu, HOU Liang, LIN Jiajian. Impact responses of aeronautic riveting structures [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2019, 40(1): 522484-522484.
[14]	WU Song, ZANG Xu, LONG Xinjun, GUO Qiwei. Dynamic modeling and analysis of hanging modal test system [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2018, 39(S1): 722191-722191.
[15]	YANG Qiang, WEN Congcong, SUN Zhili, ZHANG Mengjun. Reliability analysis of fatigue life of aviation electrical connector contact parts [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2018, 39(10): 222123-222123.

i	ln ln［1/R（t）］	75%载荷水平（2.64 kN）		65%载荷水平（2.29 kN）		55%载荷水平（1.94 kN）		45%载荷水平（1.58 kN）
i	ln ln［1/R（t）］	t	ln t	t	ln t	t	ln t	t	ln t
1	-1.753	824	6.714	4 928	8.503	27 448	10.220	51 592	10.851
2	-0.717	1 015	6.923	10 119	9.222	55 589	10.926	120 667	11.701
3	-0.050	1 711	7.445	16 734	9.725	150 917	11.924	264 656	12.486
4	0.609	2 716	7.907	25 827	10.159	215 542	12.281	789 365	13.579

铺层方式	载荷水平		G_max/（J·m^-2）	da/dN
铺层方式	比例/%	数值/kN	G_max/（J·m^-2）	da/dN
［0/90］_4s	75	4.45	1 640	0.602
	55	3.26	860	0.091
	35	2.08	350	0.007
	25	1.48	177	0.001
［0/45/-45/90］_2s	75	3.30	1 027	0.153
	55	2.42	552	0.025
	45	1.98	370	0.008
	35	1.54	224	0.002
［45/-45］_4s	75	2.64	776	0.067
	65	2.29	584	0.029
	55	1.94	419	0.011
	45	1.58	278	0.003