基于自适应采样的高超声速飞行器气动热全局快速预示

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2022.27391

Abstract

Abstract:

High-fidelity aerothermodynamics analysis models in the thermal protection system of the hypersonic vehicles significantly increase the computational budget of engineering design， drawing extensive attention on data-driven based rapid prediction methods. This paper proposes a batch adaptive sampling method based on fuzzy clustering to improve the global prediction accuracy with the limited computational budget of high fidelity models. The sampling influence domain is constructed by clustering and hypersphere segmentation with the distribution characteristics of the prediction error， considering both the key sampling domain with larger errors and global exploration. The sampling refused domain is developed by the local error scoring coefficient weighted to reduce the redundancy of newly added samples. The method adds new samples in the comprehensively determined key sampling space to improve the sampling quality based on the maxmin criterion， thereby rapidly improving the global accuracy of the prediction models. The comparison results show that the proposed method outperforms One-Shot， APSFC and CV-Voronoi in terms of reducing the sampling scale required and accelerating prediction accuracy improvement. The rapid prediction results of the HTV-2 typed vehicle aerothermodynamics demonstrate the practicality and effectiveness of the proposed method in engineering practices.

Key words: adaptive sampling, fuzzy clustering, rapid prediction, hypersonic, aerothermodynamics

CLC Number:

V221

Guotao YANG, Zhenjiang YUE, Li LIU. Rapid prediction of global hypersonic vehicle aerothermodynamics based on adaptive sampling[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(6): 127391-127391.

Figures/Tables 30

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Table 1

Results comparison of One-Shot， CV-Voronoi， APSFC and FCHSW

测试函数	One-Shot	CV-Voronoi	APSFC	FCHSW
TG	27.7 $±$ 1.5	27.3 $±$ 2.1	30.5 $±$ 2.4	27.2 $±$ 2.1
ES	41.2 $±$ 7.1	26.8 $±$ 2.3	50.0 $±$ 11.6	26.5 $±$ 2.3
PK	54.3 $±$ 4.8	43.9 $±$ 6.2	57.9 $±$ 8.8	41.8 $±$ 4.3
AK	163.2 $±$ 8.3	165.8 $±$ 12.2	226.4 $±$ 45.1	132.4 $±$ 9.5
GP	36.4 $±$ 2.5	40.4 $±$ 4.1	40.4 $±$ 5.8	36.3 $±$ 3.3
MZ	303.3 $±$ 13.9	289.9 $±$ 27.1	417.6 $±$ 93.5	227.6 $±$ 15.7
HT	157.9 $±$ 9.9	132.6 $±$ 13.7	193.0 $±$ 49.7	132.1 $±$ 10.3
CH	132.9 $±$ 11.9	126.9 $±$ 9.8	150.6 $±$ 14.7	125.0 $±$ 10.3
DP	280.8 $±$ 31.8	283.2 $±$ 20.2	288.6 $±$ 33.1	279.0 $±$ 19.8

Table 1

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Table 2

Fig. 8

Table 3

Results comparison of influential domain

测试函数	超立方体影响域	超球体影响域
TG	27.9 $±$ 2.2	27.2 $±$ 2.1
ES	29.5 $±$ 5.9	26.5 $±$ 2.3
PK	48.4 $±$ 7.4	41.8 $±$ 4.3
AK	150.9 $±$ 17.1	132.4 $±$ 9.5
GP	40.4 $±$ 6.2	36.3 $±$ 3.3
MZ	230.7 $±$ 16.7	227.6 $±$ 15.7
HT	132.4 $±$ 8.7	132.1 $±$ 10.3
CH	129.8 $±$ 15.4	125.0 $±$ 10.3
DP	296.6 $±$ 22.0	279.0 $±$ 19.8

Table 3

Fig. 9

Table 4

Summary of test results about number of new samples per round

测试函数	$n a d d = n v$	$n a d d = 2 n v$	$n a d d = 3 n v$	$n a d d = 4 n v$	$n a d d = 5 n v$
TG	27.2 $±$ 2.1	29.8 $±$ 2.8	30.8 $±$ 2.9	31.6 $±$ 3.7	32.2 $±$ 4.2
ES	26.5 $±$ 2.3	27.9 $±$ 3.0	30.9 $±$ 4.6	33.0 $±$ 4.5	36.6 $±$ 5.2
PK	41.8 $±$ 4.3	44.0 $±$ 5.1	43.7 $±$ 5.9	45.8 $±$ 5.2	48.3 $±$ 4.8
AK	132.4 $±$ 9.5	133.9 $±$ 7.0	134.5 $±$ 9.0	134.3 $±$ 7.0	137.9 $±$ 8.7
GP	36.3 $±$ 3.3	39.0 $±$ 4.1	40.5 $±$ 5.5	41.8 $±$ 4.6	43.9 $±$ 5.3
MZ	227.6 $±$ 15.7	229.4 $±$ 15.0	229.2 $±$ 14.3	231.7 $±$ 12.9	235.6 $±$ 17.6
HT	132.1 $±$ 10.3	140.7 $±$ 7.7	138.1 $±$ 9.5	139.4 $±$ 8.3	141.4 $±$ 8.7
CH	125.0 $±$ 10.3	132.8 $±$ 13.8	128.7 $±$ 13.6	135.6 $±$ 14.8	134.8 $±$ 14.7
DP	279.0 $±$ 19.8	287.9 $±$ 22.1	297.9 $±$ 23.7	301.9 $±$ 22.5	297.6 $±$ 23.3

Table 4

Table 5

Summary of test results about fluctuation coefficient

测试函数	$μ = 1$	$μ = 1.2$	$μ = 1.5$	$μ = 2$	$μ = 2.5$	$μ = 3$	$μ = 5$
TG	26.8 $±$ 1.8	26.5 $±$ 1.8	27.0 $±$ 2.1	27.2 $±$ 2.1	28.3 $±$ 2.3	28.6 $±$ 2.3	29.1 $±$ 2.0
ES	38.8 $±$ 7.6	34.4 $±$ 7.3	30.5 $±$ 5.9	26.5 $±$ 2.3	26.8 $±$ 2.5	28.4 $±$ 4.8	30.6 $±$ 5.7
PK	44.8 $±$ 5.7	43.5 $±$ 5.0	42.3 $±$ 4.8	41.8 $±$ 4.3	41.8 $±$ 4.6	42.7 $±$ 4.6	46.8 $±$ 5.7
AK	130.4 $±$ 7.8	129.6 $±$ 7.6	131.3 $±$ 6.3	132.4 $±$ 9.5	141.2 $±$ 10.2	143.5 $±$ 9.7	156.7 $±$ 11.8
GP	35.8 $±$ 2.8	35.3 $±$ 2.3	36.2 $±$ 3.6	36.3 $±$ 3.3	37.2 $±$ 3.7	37.1 $±$ 3.2	40.6 $±$ 3.9
MZ	232.7 $±$ 14.7	233.4 $±$ 11.5	229.4 $±$ 14.2	227.6 $±$ 15.7	232.2 $±$ 18.0	233.7 $±$ 17.9	244.7 $±$ 17.3
HT	147.1 $±$ 10.2	142.3 $±$ 8.7	137.7 $±$ 9.4	132.1 $±$ 10.3	133.0 $±$ 9.4	136.1 $±$ 10.0	136.6 $±$ 11.3
CH	134.6 $±$ 17.1	129.7 $±$ 15.6	131.0 $±$ 14.6	125.0 $±$ 10.3	123.6 $±$ 15.0	127.9 $±$ 14.4	126.7 $±$ 15.5
DP	287.1 $±$ 25.2	293.9 $±$ 32.2	292.4 $±$ 25.4	279.0 $±$ 19.8	283.9 $±$ 23.1	288.8 $±$ 24.2	288.5 $±$ 23.5

Table 5

Fig. 10

Fig. 11

Table 6

Design space of flight parameters

参数	参数空间
马赫数Ma	$5.0 ~ 20.0$
飞行攻角α/（°）	$0 ~ 20$
飞行高度H/km	$30 ~ 60$

Table 6

Fig. 12

Fig. 13

Fig. 14

Table 7

Results comparison of 10 test cases using RPM

测试工况	Ma	α/（°）	H/km	驻点热流/（ $k W · m - 2$ ）		驻点误差/%	整体误差/%
测试工况	Ma	α/（°）	H/km	RPM	CFD	驻点误差/%	整体误差/%
Test1	5.0	8.9	43.3	207.8	215.3	3.6	6.9
Test2	6.7	17.8	53.3	291.1	299.6	2.9	5.0
Test3	8.3	2.2	56.7	475.5	455.5	4.2	7.1
Test4	10.0	15.6	33.3	3 661.9	3 698.7	1.0	5.0
Test5	11.7	0.0	36.7	4 703.2	4 679.3	0.5	4.8
Test6	13.3	11.1	60.0	1 525.8	1 519.6	0.4	2.6
Test7	15.0	20.0	46.7	5 312.3	5 287.0	0.5	4.9
Test8	16.7	6.7	30.0	22 447.9	22 863.0	1.9	5.1
Test9	18.3	4.4	50.0	8 062.7	8 054.3	0.1	3.3
Test10	20.0	13.3	40.0	18 983.5	19 233.9	1.3	3.4

Table 7

Fig. 15

Fig. 16

Fig. A1

Fig. A2

Fig. A3

Fig. A4

Fig. A5

Fig. A6

Fig. A7

References 34

1	黄伟，罗世彬，王振国. 临近空间高超声速飞行器关键技术及展望［J］. 宇航学报， 2010， 31（5）： 1259-1265.
	HUANG W， LUO S B， WANG Z G. Key techniques and prospect of near-space hypersonic vehicle［J］. Journal of Astronautics， 2010， 31（5）： 1259-1265 （in Chinese）.
2	彭治雨，石义雷，龚红明，等. 高超声速气动热预测技术及发展趋势［J］. 航空学报， 2015， 36（1）： 325-345.
	PENG Z Y， SHI Y L， GONG H M， et al. Hypersonic aeroheating prediction technique and its trend of development［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2015， 36（1）： 325-345 （in Chinese）.
3	喻成璋，刘卫华. 高超声速飞行器气动热预测技术研究进展［J］. 航空科学技术， 2021， 32（2）： 14-21.
	YU C Z， LIU W H. Research status of aeroheating prediction technology for hypersionic aircraft［J］. Aeronautical Science ＆ Technology， 2021， 32（2）： 14-21 （in Chinese）.
4	杨恺，高效伟. 高超声速气动热环境工程算法［J］. 导弹与航天运载技术， 2010（4）： 19-23.
	YANG K， GAO X W. Engineering algorithm for aeroheating environment of hypersonic aircrafts［J］. Missiles and Space Vehicles， 2010（4）： 19-23 （in Chinese）.
5	DOWELL E H. Eigenmode analysis in unsteady aerodynamics-reduced-order models［J］. AIAA Journal， 1996， 34（8）： 1578-1583.
6	YONDO R， ANDRéS E， VALERO E. A review on design of experiments and surrogate models in aircraft real-time and many-query aerodynamic analyses［J］. Progress in Aerospace Sciences， 2018， 96： 23-61.
7	陈海昕，邓凯文，李润泽. 机器学习技术在气动优化中的应用［J］. 航空学报， 2019， 40（1）： 522480.
	CHEN H X， DENG K W， LI R Z. Utilization of machine learning technology in aerodynamic optimization［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2019， 40（1）： 522480 （in Chinese）.
8	YAN X X， HAN J L， ZHANG B， et al. Model reduction of aerothermodynamic for hypersonic aerothermoelasticity based on POD and Chebyshev method［J］. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers， Part G： Journal of Aerospace Engineering， 2019， 233（10）： 3734-3748.
9	张智超，高太元，张磊，等. 基于径向基神经网络的气动热预测代理模型［J］. 航空学报， 2021， 42（4）： 524167.
	ZHANG Z C， GAO T Y， ZHANG L， et al. Aeroheating agent model based on radial basis function neural network［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2021， 42（4）： 524167 （in Chinese）.
10	GARUD S S， KARIMI I A， KRAFT M. Design of computer experiments： A review［J］. Computers & Chemical Engineering， 2017， 106： 71-95.
11	FORRESTER A I J， SOBESTER A， KEANE A J. Engineering design via surrogate modelling： A practical guide［M］. New York： John Wiley & Sons， 2008： 13-29.
12	CROMBECQ K， GORISSEN D， DESCHRIJVER D， et al. A novel hybrid sequential design strategy for global surrogate modeling of computer experiments［J］. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing， 2011， 33（4）： 1948-1974.
13	LIU H T， ONG Y S， CAI J F. A survey of adaptive sampling for global metamodeling in support of simulation-based complex engineering design［J］. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization， 2018， 57（1）： 393-416.
14	FORRESTER A I J， KEANE A J. Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization［J］. Progress in Aerospace Sciences， 2009， 45（1-3）： 50-79.
15	李春娜，张阳康. 一种适用于气动优化的高效自适应全局优化方法［J］. 航空学报， 2020， 41（5）： 623352.
	LI C N， ZHANG Y K. An efficient adaptive global optimization method suitable for aerodynamic optimization［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2020， 41（5）： 623352 （in Chinese）.
16	韩忠华，许晨舟，乔建领，等. 基于代理模型的高效全局气动优化设计方法研究进展［J］. 航空学报， 2020， 41（5）： 623344.
	HAN Z H， XU C Z， QIAO J L， et al. Recent progress of efficient global aerodynamic shape optimization using surrogate-based approach［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2020， 41（5）： 623344 （in Chinese）.
17	SIMPSON T W， MAUERY T M， KORTE J J， et al. Kriging models for global approximation in simulation-based multidisciplinary design optimization［J］. AIAA Journal， 2001， 39（12）： 2233-2241.
18	LIU H T， XU S L， MA Y， et al. An adaptive Bayesian sequential sampling approach for global metamodeling［J］. Journal of Mechanical Design， 2016， 138（1）： 011404.
19	XIONG Y， CHEN W， APLEY D， et al. A non-stationary covariance-based Kriging method for metamodelling in engineering design［J］. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering， 2007， 71（6）： 733-756.
20	YAO W， CHEN X Q， LUO W C. A gradient-based sequential radial basis function neural network modeling method［J］. Neural Computing and Applications， 2009， 18（5）： 477-484.
21	FARHANG-MEHR A， AZARM S. Bayesian meta-modelling of engineering design simulations： A sequential approach with adaptation to irregularities in the response behaviour［J］. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering， 2005， 62（15）： 2104-2126.
22	TURNER C J， CRAWFORD R H， CAMPBELL M I. Multidimensional sequential sampling for NURBs-based metamodel development［J］. Engineering With Computers， 2007， 23（3）： 155-174.
23	LI G Z， AUTE V， AZARM S. An accumulative error based adaptive design of experiments for offline metamodeling［J］. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization， 2010， 40（1）： 137-155.
24	AUTE V， SALEH K， ABDELAZIZ O， et al. Cross-validation based single response adaptive design of experiments for Kriging metamodeling of deterministic computer simulations［J］. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization， 2013， 48（3）： 581-605.
25	CHEN X， LIU L， ZHOU S， et al. Adding-point strategy for reduced-order hypersonic aerothermodynamics modeling based on fuzzy clustering［J］. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering， 2016， 29（5）： 983-991.
26	XU S L， LIU H T， WANG X F， et al. A robust error-pursuing sequential sampling approach for global metamodeling based on voronoi diagram and cross validation［J］. Journal of Mechanical Design， 2014， 136（7）： 69-74.
27	KAMINSKY A L， WANG Y， PANT K， et al. Adaptive sampling techniques for surrogate modeling to create high-dimension aerodynamic loading response surfaces［C］∥ 2018 Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Reston： AIAA， 2018.
28	JOHNSON M E， MOORE L M， YLVISAKER D. Minimax and maximin distance designs［J］. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference， 1990， 26（2）： 131-148.
29	BEZDEK J C. Pattern recognition with fuzzy objective function algorithms［M］. New York： Springer Science & Business Media， 2013： 1-7.
30	ROUSSEEUW P J. Silhouettes： A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis［J］. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics， 1987， 20： 53-65.
31	OLIVER M A. A tutorial guide to geostatistics： Computing and modelling variograms and Kriging［J］. CATENA， 2014， 113： 56-69.
32	韩忠华. Kriging模型及代理优化算法研究进展［J］. 航空学报， 2016， 37（11）： 3197-3225.
	HAN Z H. Kriging surrogate model and its application to design optimization： A review of recent progress［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2016， 37（11）： 3197-3225 （in Chinese）.
33	甄华萍，蒋崇文. 高超声速技术验证飞行器HTV-2综述［J］. 飞航导弹， 2013（6）： 7-13.
	ZHEN H P， JIANG C W. Overview of hypersonic technology verification vehicle HTV-2［J］. Aerodynamic Missile Journal， 2013（6）： 7-13 （in Chinese）.
34	SHI J T， ZHANG L， JIANG B S， et al. Aerodynamic force and heating optimization of HTV-2 typed vehicle［C］∥ 21st AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonics Technologies Conference. Reston： AIAA， 2017.

测试函数	CV-Voronoi		APSFC		FCHSW
测试函数	建模次数	训练时间/s	建模次数	训练时间/s	建模次数	训练时间/s
TG	335.0±59.7	1.4±0.2	209.7±37.1	0.5±0.2	153.3±31.1	0.8±0.2
ES	320.0±62.8	1.3±0.2	633.9±314.4	1.3±0.8	147.8±33.4	0.6±0.2
PK	952.0±297.7	3.1±0.9	833.8±267.1	1.7±0.6	399.5±83.7	1.5±0.3
AK	13 850.1±2 054.2	50.3±12.6	13 284.7±5 809.0	77.1±82.5	4 880.1±1 099.4	18.3±9.3
GP	792.2±173.2	2.7±0.6	393.0±120.9	0.8±0.2	313.7±65.5	1.3±0.3
MZ	42 466.6±7 781.3	539.8±20.7	45 708.1±23 123.0	1 346.5±113.4	14 624.6±2 448.4	114.8±23.0
HT	8 831.3±1 885.8	52.2±15.9	6 542.3±3 395.1	67.9±67.9	2 862.4±436.4	19.8±4.2
CH	7 953.6±1 255.7	66.7±13.5	2 778.5±546.8	18.1±6.4	1 683.7±272.5	22.7±14.7
DP	39 985.3±5 723.6	1 201.9±360.3	7 030.8±1 527.0	127.8±54.8	6 870.2±956.5	353.4±73.8

[1]	Hongkang LIU, Jianqiang CHEN, Xinghao XIANG, Yatian ZHAO. Transition prediction for HIAD with different Reynolds numbers by improved k-ω-γtransition model [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(6): 126868-126868.
[2]	Chongli MA, Jingyuan LIU. Effect of grid strategy on numerical simulation results of aerothermal heating loads over hypersonic blunt bodies [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(5): 126710-126710.
[3]	Ziyi WANG, Weiwei ZHANG, Lei LIU, Xiaofeng YANG. Reduced order aerothermoelastic framework suitable for complex flow [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(4): 126807-126807.
[4]	Chaoyu LIU, Feng QU, Di SUN, Chuanzhen LIU, Zhansen QIAN, Junqiang BAI. Discretized adjoint based aerodynamic optimization design for hypersonic osculating-cone waverider [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(4): 126664-126664.
[5]	Rong HAN, Wei LIU, Xiaoliang YANG. Dynamic drag reduction mechanism of self-aligned aerodisks on hypersonic aircraft [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(4): 126633-126633.
[6]	Qilei GUO, Weimin SANG, Junjie NIU, Ye YUAN. UAV flight strategy considering icing risk under complex meteorological conditions [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(1): 627518-627518.
[7]	Haoge LI, Hua YANG, Yuxin YANG, Weifang CHEN. Refinement optimization design for heat reduction on windward surface of hypersonic lifting body [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 124-137.
[8]	Dong WU, Hong YANG, Wenfeng ZHAO, Yue LUO. High temperature strain measurement of hypersonic aircraft carbon-based composite material structures [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 160-169.
[9]	Chunsheng NIE, Ye YUAN, Wei MA, Zhanwei CAO, Mingxing YU. Effect of active ejection gas parameters on thermal environment of plate and air rudder [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 170-179.
[10]	Zhengxue MA, Zhenbing LUO, Aihong ZHAO, Yan ZHOU, Wei XIE, Qiang LIU, Yinxin ZHU, Wenqiang PENG. Reverse jet characteristics of plasma synthetic jet in hypersonic flow field [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 192-203.
[11]	Zhikun SUN, Zhiwei SHI, Weilin ZHANG, Zheng LI, Qijie SUN. Effect of plasma actuator on lift-drag characteristics of high-speed airfoil [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 23-39.
[12]	Weizhuo HUA, Ling GAO, Ge CHEN, Yiwen LI, Geng GONG, Yantao WANG, Biao WEI. Experimental magneto-hydrodynamic system based on plasma torch [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 1-7.
[13]	Yifeng HUANG, Shuhua ZENG, Zhongzheng JIANG, Weifang CHEN. Numerical study on high-altitude lateral jet based on nonlinear coupled constitutive relation [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 8-22.
[14]	Kai LUO, Yonghai WANG, Qiu WANG, Jiwei LI, Zheng LI, Chunsheng NIE, Zheng LI. Plasma-actuated flow control test in high enthalpy shock tunnel [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 89-96.
[15]	Xudong ZHANG, Zheng LI, Hao DONG, Siyuan GAO, Zubi JI, Kaixin LI, Guanghui BAI. Drag reduction characteristics of opposing plasma synthetic jet in hypersonic flow [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 115-123.

Rapid prediction of global hypersonic vehicle aerothermodynamics based on adaptive sampling

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 30

References 34

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments