超声速可调进气道内流双解现象及其节流特性

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2022.27134

Abstract

Abstract:

A supersonic variable inlet with an operating Mach number ranging from 0–4 was designed to investigate its internal flow structures and throttling characteristics. All tests were conducted in the wind tunnel at a freestream Mach number of 2.9 with the aid of the high-speed schlieren and dynamic pressure data-acquisition systems. The results show that when the Internal Contraction Ratio （ICR） is 1.79， the unthrottled internal flowfield of the inlet has the dual solution of designed and undesigned flow states. In the designed flow state， the wave system in the inlet internal duct is normally established； while in the undesigned flow state， there is a complex wave system induced by local separation in the inlet internal contraction part， resulting in its overall pressure rise higher than that of the designed flow state and the presence of broadband， low-frequency small-amplitude oscillations. In addition， the inlet downstream throttling performance in the designed and undesigned flow states is comparable with critical throttling ratios of 42.4% and 41.7% and critical pressure ratios of 15.8 and 16.0， respectively. During the downstream throttling process in both types of flow states， the disturbance propagates upstream in the form of an oblique terminal shock train， and the head wave of the shock train in the critical state is located just near the throat station. However， apparent differences exist in the spatial distribution characteristics and oscillatory features of the terminal shock train of the two flow states.

Key words: supersonic variable inlet, dual-solution phenomenon, throttling characteristics, shock train, wind tunnel test

CLC Number:

V211.3

Yi JIN, Shu SUN, Yunjie GUO, Huijun TAN, Yue ZHANG. Dual solution internal flow phenomenon and throttling characteristics of a supersonic variable inlet[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(7): 127134-127134.

Figures/Tables 10

Fig. 1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig. 5

Fig.6

Table 1

Fig.7

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

References 32

1	SCHERRER R， GOWEN F E. Preliminary experimental investigation of a variable-area， variable-internal-contraction air inlet at Mach numbers between 1.42 and 2.44： NACA RM A55F23［R］. Washington， D.C.： NASA， 1955.
2	SCHERRER R， ANDERSON W E. Investigation of the performance and internal flow of a variable-area， variable-internal-contraction inlet at Mach numbers of 2.00， 2.50， and 2.92： NACA RM A58C24［R］. Washington， D.C.： NASA， 1958.
3	FALEMPIN F， WENDLING E， GOLDFELD M， et al. Experimental investigation of starting process for a variable geometry air inlet operating from Mach 2 to Mach 8［C］∥ 42nd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference & Exhibit. Reston： AIAA， 2006.
4	TAGUCHI H， YANAGI R. A study on pre-cooled turbojet-scramjet-rocket combined engines［C］∥ 34th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit. Reston： AIAA， 1998.
5	SANDERS B W， WEIR L J. Aerodynamic design of a dual-flow Mach 7 hypersonic inlet system for a turbine-based combined-cycle hypersonic propulsion system： NASA/CR-2008-215214［R］. Washington， D.C.： NASA， 2008.
6	陈兵，谷良贤，龚春林. 加速型高超飞行器变几何进气道设计分析［J］. 固体火箭技术， 2013， 36（4）： 431-436.
	CHEN B， GU L X， GONG C L. Study on variable geometry inlet of acceleration hypersonic vehicle［J］. Journal of Solid Rocket Technology， 2013， 36（4）： 431-436 （in Chinese）.
7	王德鹏，庄逸，谭慧俊，等. 一种双流路变几何涡轮基组合循环进气道的设计与仿真［J］. 航空动力学报， 2015， 30（11）： 2695-2704.
	WANG D P， ZHUANG Y， TAN H J， et al. Design and simulation of a dual-channel variable geometry turbine based combined cycle inlet［J］. Journal of Aerospace Power， 2015， 30（11）： 2695-2704 （in Chinese）.
8	李永洲，刘晓伟，张蒙正，等. 马赫数2.5~7.0的二元变几何进气道设计［J］. 火箭推进， 2015， 41（5）： 17-22.
	LI Y Z， LIU X W， ZHANG M Z， et al. Design of a two dimensional variable geometry inlet with Mach number 2.5-7.0［J］. Journal of Rocket Propulsion， 2015， 41（5）： 17-22 （in Chinese）.
9	HOHN O， GUELHAN A. Analysis of a three-dimensional， high pressure ratio scramjet inlet with variable internal contraction［C］∥ 18th AIAA/3AF International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference. Reston： AIAA， 2012.
10	李彪，魏志军，迟鸿伟，等. 进气道内压缩比对固体燃料超燃冲压发动机性能的影响［J］. 航空动力学报， 2016， 31（2）： 459-466.
	LI B， WEI Z J， CHI H W， et al. Effect of inlet internal contraction ratio on performance of solid fuel scramjet［J］. Journal of Aerospace Power， 2016， 31（2）： 459-466 （in Chinese）.
11	JIN Y， SUN S， TAN H J. Flow response hysteresis of throat regulation process of a two-dimensional mixed-compression supersonic inlet［J］. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics， 2022， 35（3）： 112-127.
12	MURTHY S N B， CURRAN E T. Scramjet Propulsion［M］. Reston： AIAA， 2001： 447⁃511.
13	VAN WIE D， KWOK F， WALSH R. Starting characteristics of supersonic inlets［C］∥ 32nd Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit. Reston： AIAA， 1996.
14	LIU Y， WANG L， QIAN Z S， et al. Numerical investigation on the assistant restarting method of variable geometry for high Mach number inlet［J］. Aerospace Science and Technology， 2018， 79： 647-657.
15	YUE L J， JIA Y N， XU X， et al. Effect of cowl shock on restart characteristics of simple ramp type hypersonic inlets with thin boundary layers［J］. Aerospace Science and Technology， 2018， 74： 72-80.
16	TAN H J， LI L G， WEN Y F， et al. Experimental investigation of the unstart process of a generic hypersonic inlet［J］. AIAA Journal， 2011， 49（2）： 279-288.
17	WAGNER J L， YUCEIL K B， VALDIVIA A， et al. Experimental investigation of unstart in an inlet/isolator model in Mach 5 flow［J］. AIAA Journal， 2009， 47（6）： 1528-1542.
18	MURAKAMI A， YANAGI R， SHINDO S， et al. Mach 3 wind tunnel test of mixed compression supersonic inlet［C］∥ 28th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit. Reston： AIAA， 1992.
19	REINARTZ B U， HERRMANN C D， BALLMANN J， et al. Aerodynamic performance analysis of a hypersonic inlet isolator using computation and experiment［J］. Journal of Propulsion and Power， 2003， 19（5）： 868-875.
20	TRAPIER S， DUVEAU P， DECK S. Experimental study of supersonic inlet buzz［J］. AIAA Journal， 2006， 44（10）： 2354-2365.
21	LEE H J， LEE B J， KIM S D， et al. Flow characteristics of small-sized supersonic inlets［J］. Journal of Propulsion and Power， 2011， 27（2）： 306-318.
22	ZHANG J S， YUAN H C， WANG Y F， et al.Experiment and numerical investigation of flow control on a supersonic inlet diffuser［J］. Aerospace Science and Technology， 2020， 106： 106182.
23	LI Z F， GAO W Z， JIANG H L， et al. Unsteady behaviors of a hypersonic inlet caused by throttling in shock tunnel［J］. AIAA Journal， 2013， 51（10）： 2485-2492.
24	王晨曦，谭慧俊，张启帆，等. 高超声速进气道低马赫数不起动和再起动试验［J］. 航空学报， 2017， 38（11）： 43-54.
	WANG C X， TAN H J， ZHANG Q F， et al. Test of low Mach number unstart and restart processes of hypersonic inlet［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2017， 38（11）： 43-54 （in Chinese）.
25	ZHUANG Y， TAN H J， HUANG H X， et al. Fractal characteristics of turbulent⁃non⁃turbulent interface in supersonic turbulent boundary layers［J］. Journal of Fluid Mechanics， 2018， 843： R2.
26	CHEN H， TAN H J， LIU Y Z， et al. External-compression supersonic inlet free from violent buzz［J］. AIAA Journal， 2019， 57（6）： 2513-2523.
27	MORLET J， ARENS G， FOURGEAU E， et al. Wave propagation and sampling theory—Part I： Complex signal and scattering in multilayered media［J］. Geophysics， 1982， 47（2）： 203-221.
28	MORLET J， ARENS G， FOURGEAU E， et al. Wave propagation and sampling theory—Part II： Sampling theory and complex waves［J］. Geophysics， 1982， 47（2）： 222-236.
29	TAN H J， SUN S， HUANG H X. Behavior of shock trains in a hypersonic inlet/isolator model with complex background waves［J］. Experiments in Fluids， 2012， 53（6）： 1647-1661.
30	XIONG B， FAN X Q， WANG Y， et al. Experimental study on self-excited and forced oscillations of an oblique shock train［J］. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets， 2018， 55（3）： 640-647.
31	LI N， CHANG J T， XU K J， et al. Oscillation of the shock train in an isolator with incident shocks［J］. Physics of Fluids， 2018， 30（11）： 116102.
32	王德鑫，褚佑彪，刘难生，等. 高背压进气道中内外流耦合作用的大涡模拟［J］. 航空学报， 2021， 42（9）： 625754.
	WANG D X， CHU Y B， LIU N S， et al. Large-eddy simulation of external and internal coupling flow in high back pressure inlet［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2021， 42（9）： 625754 （in Chinese）.

[1]	Junhong LI, Xuhong JIN, Chunfeng LIU, Wenbo MIAO, Xiaoli CHENG. Microaerodynamic experiment and computation of near space high speed vehicles [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(6): 127072-127072.
[2]	Xian’ang ZENG, Dongqiang ZHAO, Junjie LI, Zezhou YAN, Chengyu LIU. Wind tunnel test on gust alleviation control strategies of elastic wing [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(4): 226869-226869.
[3]	Shanjie XU, Hongqiang LYU, Zhongchen LIU, Yan LENG, Xuejun LIU. Data analysis of sonic boom test based on probability model [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(2): 626269-626269.
[4]	Zhongchen LIU, Zhansen QIAN, Xuefei LI, Yan LENG, Dapeng GUO. Wind tunnel test techniques for exhaust nozzle plume effects on near-field sonic boom [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(2): 626952-626952.
[5]	Jun SHU, Dongguang XU, Zhirong HAN, Si LI, Xiong HUANG. Hybrid wing design of icing wind tunnel supercooled large droplet icing test [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(1): 627182-627182.
[6]	LIU Chuanzhen, MENG Xufei, LIU Rongjian, BAI Peng. Experimental and numerical investigation of hypersonic performance of double swept waverider [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(9): 126015-126015.
[7]	LIU Jun, LUO Xinfu, WANG Xiansheng. Experiment on influence of leading-edge shape on aerodynamic characteristics of cavity model [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(7): 125235-125235.
[8]	ZHANG Zhenkai, JIA Sijia, SONG Chen, YANG Chao. Optimum design of wind tunnel test model for compliant morphing trailing edge [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(3): 226071-226071.
[9]	HOU Yingyu, LI Qi, JI Chen, LIU Ziqiang. Experimental design of aeroelastic load with supersonic low frequency and large buffeting [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(3): 626454-626454.
[10]	ZENG Kaichun, KOU Xiping, YANG Xinghua, YU Li, ZHA Jun. Optimization of active vibration damping structure for transonic wind tunnel test model [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(2): 224944-224944.
[11]	LI Qian, WANG Yankui, JIA Yuhong. Roll oscillations over wing-body configuration with strake wings: Experiment [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526008-526008.
[12]	JIANG Youxu, LI Jie, YANG Zhao. Data correction method of wind tunnel test for verification aircraft with laminar wing section [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526814-526814.
[13]	WANG Meng, LI Yujun, ZHAO Ronghuan, ZHONG Hongjie. Transition detection technique for wide speed range by means of on-line heating coating [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526820-526820.
[14]	ZHOU Zhenyao, LYU Fei, ZHOU Bin, YANG Zhao. Verification method for natural laminar flow drag reduction and layout design of test section [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526751-526751.
[15]	YI Bingli, LIU Boyu, WANG Zhengqu, ZHANG Tiejun, LU Dan, ZHAO Yan. Test technology of twin-sting supports in 1.2 m high speed wind tunnel [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526794-526794.

Dual solution internal flow phenomenon and throttling characteristics of a supersonic variable inlet

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 10

References 32

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

进气道状态	ICR	p_th/p₀	TR_C/%	p_C/p₀
设计	1.79	4.8	42.4	15.8
非设计		7.6	41.7	16.0