Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (15): 331480.doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2024.31480
• Electronics and Electrical Engineering and Control • Previous Articles
Qi SONG, Jialiang ZUO(
), Ao WU, Rennong YANG, Ying WANG, Leyan LI
Received:2024-11-01
Revised:2024-12-02
Accepted:2024-12-24
Online:2025-02-06
Published:2025-01-07
Contact:
Jialiang ZUO
E-mail:hudyuan@163.com
CLC Number:
Qi SONG, Jialiang ZUO, Ao WU, Rennong YANG, Ying WANG, Leyan LI. Collaborative mission schedule management method for air battle management[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2025, 46(15): 331480.
Table 1
Methods for operational coordination relationship
| 需求 | 描述 | 模型处理方法 |
|---|---|---|
| 开始-开始 | 工作Ai 开始工作Bj 才能开始 | 将工作Ai 的所有紧前工作(Ai-1等)均添加至工作Bj 的紧前工作中 |
| 开始-结束 | 工作Ai 开始工作Bj 才能结束 | 将工作Ai 的所有紧前工作(Ai-1等)均添加至Bj+1的紧前工作中 |
| 结束-开始 | 工作Ai 结束工作Bj 才能开始 | 双代号网络计划的紧前-紧后关系 |
| 结束-结束 | 工作Ai 结束工作Bj 才能结束 | 将工作Ai 添加至Bj+1的紧前工作中,且模型将作战单元的松弛时间自动视为原地等待 |
| 任意制定计划时间 | 计划时间不等于最早或最晚时间 | 在全局开始节点S及编队开始节点之间设立带时长的虚拟工作节点 |
Table 2
Force data of scenario
| 阵营 | 装备类型 | 数量 | 挂载方案/装备性能 | 兵力统计 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 蓝军 | E-3C | 1 | 空中预警,对空探测范围648 km | 共32架飞机 |
| KC-130T | 2 | 带中心线加油软管,加油速率600 kg/min | ||
| 狂风IDS(压制) | 4 | 挂载:2×AGM-88B,射程129.64 km;2×1 500 L副油箱 | ||
| 狂风IDS(打击) | 4 | 挂载:2×MW-1反跑道布撒器,射程1.85 km;2×1 500 L副油箱 | ||
| F-15E(护航) | 8 | 挂载:6×AIM-120A,射程74.08 km;2×AIM-9M,射程18.52 km; 2×2 271 L副油箱;2×2 736.55 L副油箱 | ||
| F-15E(打击) | 4 | 挂载:4×GBU-24A,射程14.82 km;2×AIM-120A,射程74.08 km; 2×AIM-9M,射程18.52 km;2×2 271 L副油箱;2×2 736.55 L副油箱 | ||
| EC-130H | 1 | 进攻型电子干扰ECM | ||
| EF-111A | 2 | 1×AN/ALQ-131干扰吊舱 | ||
| U-2S | 1 | 机载侧视雷达/红外 | ||
| E-8A | 1 | 联合监视目标雷达攻击系统,对地探测范围370.4 km | ||
| 红军 | Mig-21 | 12 | 挂载:4×AA-8,射程9.26 km | 12架飞机 1套中远程地导 2套近程地导 2套高射炮 1个雷达 |
| 萨姆-6 | 2 | 射程:24.08 km;射高10.7 km | ||
| P-19雷达 | 1 | 对空探测范围250 km | ||
| 萨姆-5 | 1 | 射程:287.06 km;射高3.96 km | ||
| 博福斯高射炮 | 2 | 射程2.2 km |
Table 3
Equipment performance parameters of scenario
| 飞机 | 作战飞行速度/ (km·h-1) | 耗油率/ (kg·min-1) | 总油量/kg | 飞行高度/km | 盘旋飞行速度/ (km·h-1) | 耗油率/ (kg·min-1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F-15E(护航) | 1 018.60 | 107.20 | 13 972 | 7.3~10 | 648.20 | 49.00 |
| F-15E(打击) | 1 018.60 | 136.80 | 13 972 | 7.3~10 | 648.20 | 62.50 |
| 狂风IDS(压制) | 1 018.60 | 63.50 | 7 060 | 7.3~10 | 648.20 | 30.40 |
| 狂风IDS(打击) | 888.96 | 92.70 | 7 060 | 7.3~10 | 648.20 | 74.10 |
| EF-111A | 1 018.60 | 81.64 | 15 200 | 7.3~10 | 648.20 | 39.10 |
| EC-130 | 537.08 | 29.37 | 28 540 | 7.3~10 | 537.08 | 29.37 |
| KC-130T | 537.08 | 29.37 | 28 540 | 7.3~10 | 537.08 | 29.37 |
| E-8A | 592.64 | 111.05 | 73 800 | 7.3~10 | 592.64 | 111.05 |
| E-3C | 592.64 | 105.80 | 70 310 | 7.3~10 | 592.64 | 105.80 |
| U-2S | 759.32 | 16.66 | 8 935 | 25 | 759.32 | 16.66 |
Table 4
Formation task list based on Work Breakdown Structure
| 任务名称 | 任务 代号 | 任务执行单元 | 任务估计 时长/min | 时长 方差 | 任务可控性 | 最短任务 时长/min | 紧前任务 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 侦察机滑跑 | A1 | U-2S | 2.0 | 0.05 | 0 | 2.0 | START |
| 侦察机起飞 | A2 | U-2S | 0.5 | 0.02 | 0 | 0.5 | A1 |
| 侦察机飞向侦察阵位 | A3 | U-2S | 39.3 | 0 | 1 | 31.4 | A2 |
| 侦察机执行侦察任务 | A4 | U-2S | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | 50.0 | A3 |
| 侦察机返航 | A5 | U-2S | 39.3 | 0 | 1 | 31.4 | A4/J9 |
| 侦察机着陆 | A6 | U-2S | 4.0 | 0.10 | 0 | 4.0 | A5/C6 |
| 护航1编队滑跑 | B1 | F-15E(1-2) | 2.0 | 0.05 | 0 | 2.0 | START |
| 护航1编队起飞 | B2 | F-15E(1-2) | 0.5 | 0.02 | 0 | 0.5 | B1/C2 |
| 护航1编队飞向巡逻阵位 | B3 | F-15E(1-2) | 27.4 | 0 | 1 | 21.9 | B2 |
| 护航1编队进行护航 | B4 | F-15E(1-2) | 90.0 | 0 | 0 | 90.0 | B3 |
| 护航1编队返航 | B5 | F-15E(1-2) | 27.4 | 0 | 1 | 21.9 | B4/J9 |
| 护航1编队着陆 | B6 | F-15E(1-2) | 4.0 | 0.10 | 0 | 4.0 | B5 |
| 护航2编队滑跑 | C1 | F-15E(3-4) | 2.0 | 0.05 | 0 | 2.0 | START |
| 护航2编队起飞 | C2 | F-15E(3-4) | 0.5 | 0.02 | 0 | 0.5 | C1 |
| 护航2编队飞向巡逻阵位 | C3 | F-15E(3-4) | 34.8 | 0 | 1 | 27.8 | C2 |
| 护航2编队进行护航 | C4 | F-15E(3-4) | 90.0 | 0 | 0 | 90.0 | C3 |
| 护航2编队返航 | C5 | F-15E(3-4) | 34.8 | 0 | 1 | 27.8 | C4/J9 |
| 护航2编队着陆 | C6 | F-15E(3-4) | 4.0 | 0.10 | 0 | 4.0 | C5/B6 |
| 扫荡编队滑跑 | D1 | F-15E(5-8) | 2.0 | 0.05 | 0 | 2.0 | START |
| 扫荡编队起飞 | D2 | F-15E(5-8) | 0.5 | 0.02 | 0 | 0.5 | D1/B2 |
| 扫荡编队飞向集结阵位 | D3 | F-15E(5-8) | 28.9 | 0 | 1 | 23.0 | D2 |
| 扫荡编队集结 | D4 | F-15E(5-8) | 2.0 | 0.10 | 0 | 2.0 | D3/I5/J5/K5/L3 |
| 扫荡编队飞向扫荡阵位 | D5 | F-15E(5-8) | 6.1 | 0 | 1 | 4.8 | D4/I6/J6/K6/L4/A3/G3/H3 |
| 扫荡编队肃清敌方空域 | D6 | F-15E(5-8) | 20.0 | 2.00 | 1 | 15.0 | D5 |
| 扫荡编队进行护航 | D7 | F-15E(5-8) | 20.0 | 0 | 0 | 20.0 | D6 |
| 扫荡编队返航 | D8 | F-15E(5-8) | 55.0 | 0 | 0 | 35.0 | D7/J9 |
| 扫荡编队着陆 | D9 | F-15E(5-8) | 4.0 | 0.10 | 0 | 4.0 | D8/H6 |
| 1号加油机飞向加油阵位 | E1 | KC-130T(1) | 23.5 | 0 | 1 | 19.0 | START |
| 1号加油机执行授油任务 | E2 | KC-130T(1) | 50.0 | 2.00 | 0 | 50.0 | E1/I3 |
| 1号加油机返航 | E3 | KC-130T(1) | 34.2 | 0 | 1 | 27.0 | E2/I4/J4 |
| 1号加油机着陆 | E4 | KC-130T(1) | 4.0 | 0.10 | 0 | 4.0 | E3/F4 |
| 2号加油机飞向加油阵位 | F1 | KC-130T(2) | 23.5 | 0 | 1 | 19.0 | START |
| 2号加油机执行授油任务 | F2 | KC-130T(2) | 50.0 | 2.00 | 0 | 50.0 | F1/K3 |
| 2号加油机返航 | F3 | KC-130T(2) | 34.2 | 0 | 1 | 27.0 | F2/K4 |
| 2号加油机着陆 | F4 | KC-130T(2) | 4.0 | 0.10 | 0 | 4.0 | F3 |
| E-8A滑跑 | G1 | E-8A | 2.0 | 0.05 | 0 | 2.0 | START |
| E-8A起飞 | G2 | E-8A | 0.5 | 0.02 | 0 | 0.5 | G1 |
| E-8A飞向监视阵位 | G3 | E-8A | 40.0 | 0 | 1 | 32.0 | G2 |
| 任务名称 | 任务 代号 | 任务执行单元 | 任务估计 时长/min | 时长 方差 | 任务可控性 | 最短任务 时长/min | 紧前任务 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E-8A对地监视 | G4 | E-8A | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | 50.0 | G3/B3 |
| E-8A返航 | G5 | E-8A | 40.0 | 0 | 1 | 32.0 | G4/J9 |
| E-8A着陆 | G6 | E-8A | 4.0 | 0.10 | 0 | 4.0 | G5/L8 |
| EC-130滑跑 | H1 | EC-130 | 2.0 | 0.05 | 0 | 2.0 | START |
| EC-130起飞 | H2 | EC-130 | 0.5 | 0.02 | 0 | 0.5 | H1 |
| EC-130飞向干扰阵位 | H3 | EC-130 | 48.3 | 0 | 1 | 1.0 | H2 |
| EC-130远程干扰 | H4 | EC-130 | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | 50.0 | H3 |
| EC-130返航 | H5 | EC-130 | 48.3 | 0 | 1 | 38.6 | H4/J9 |
| EC-130着陆 | H6 | EC-130 | 4.0 | 0.10 | 0 | 4.0 | H5/G6 |
| 压制编队滑跑 | I1 | 狂风IDS(1-4) | 2.0 | 0.05 | 0 | 2.0 | START |
| 压制编队起飞 | I2 | 狂风IDS(1-4) | 0.5 | 0.02 | 0 | 0.5 | I1/D2 |
| 压制编队飞向加油阵位 | I3 | 狂风IDS(1-4) | 18.0 | 0 | 1 | 14.4 | I2 |
| 压制编队加油 | I4 | 狂风IDS(1-4) | 19.0 | 0.50 | 0 | 19.0 | I3/E1 |
| 压制编队飞向集结阵位 | I5 | 狂风IDS(1-4) | 10.9 | 0 | 1 | 8.7 | I4 |
| 压制编队集结 | I6 | 狂风IDS(1-4) | 2.0 | 0.10 | 0 | 2.0 | D3/I5/J5/K5/L3 |
| 压制编队飞向压制阵位 | I7 | 狂风IDS(1-4) | 6.1 | 0 | 1 | 4.8 | I6/D5 |
| 压制编队进行压制 | I8 | 狂风IDS(1-4) | 20.0 | 0 | 0 | 20.0 | I7/D6 |
| 压制编队返航 | I9 | 狂风IDS(1-4) | 35.0 | 0 | 0 | 35.0 | I8/J9 |
| 压制编队着陆 | I10 | 狂风IDS(1-4) | 4.0 | 0.10 | 0 | 4.0 | I9/A6 |
| 打击1编队滑跑 | J1 | 狂风IDS(5-8) | 2.0 | 0.05 | 0 | 2.0 | START |
| 打击1编队起飞 | J2 | 狂风IDS(5-8) | 0.5 | 0.02 | 0 | 0.5 | J1 |
| 打击1编队飞向加油阵位 | J3 | 狂风IDS(5-8) | 20.7 | 0 | 1 | 17.0 | J2 |
| 打击1编队加油 | J4 | 狂风IDS(5-8) | 32.0 | 1.00 | 0 | 32.0 | J3/I4 |
| 打击1编队飞向集结阵位 | J5 | 狂风IDS(5-8) | 12.5 | 0 | 1 | 10.0 | J4 |
| 打击1编队集结 | J6 | 狂风IDS(5-8) | 2.0 | 0.10 | 0 | 2.0 | D3/I5/J5/K5/L3 |
| 打击1编队飞向压制阵位 | J7 | 狂风IDS(5-8) | 7.0 | 0 | 1 | 5.5 | J6/D5 |
| 打击1编队飞向打击阵位 | J8 | 狂风IDS(5-8) | 13.1 | 0 | 1 | 10.5 | J7/D6 |
| 打击1编队进行打击 | J9 | 狂风IDS(5-8) | 2.0 | 0.50 | 0 | 2.0 | J8 |
| 打击1编队返航 | J10 | 狂风IDS(5-8) | 63.5 | 0 | 0 | 40.0 | J9 |
| 打击1编队着陆 | J11 | 狂风IDS(5-8) | 4.0 | 0.10 | 0 | 4.0 | J10/D9 |
| 打击2编队滑跑 | K1 | F-15E(9-12) | 2.0 | 0.05 | 0 | 2.0 | START |
| 打击2编队起飞 | K2 | F-15E(9-12) | 0.5 | 0.02 | 0 | 0.5 | K1/J2 |
| 打击2编队飞向加油阵位 | K3 | F-15E(9-12) | 18.0 | 0 | 1 | 14.4 | K2 |
| 打击2编队加油 | K4 | F-15E(9-12) | 30.0 | 1.00 | 0 | 30.0 | K3/F1 |
| 打击2编队飞向集结阵位 | K5 | F-15E(9-12) | 10.9 | 0 | 1 | 8.3 | K4 |
| 打击2编队集结 | K6 | F-15E(9-12) | 2.0 | 0.10 | 0 | 2.0 | D3/I5/J5/K5/L3 |
| 打击2编队飞向压制阵位 | K7 | F-15E(9-12) | 6.1 | 0 | 1 | 4.8 | K6/D5 |
| 打击2编队飞向打击阵位 | K8 | F-15E(9-12) | 11.4 | 0 | 1 | 9.1 | K7/D6 |
| 打击2编队进行打击 | K9 | F-15E(9-12) | 2.0 | 0.50 | 0 | 2.0 | K8 |
| 任务名称 | 任务 代号 | 任务执行单元 | 任务估计 时长/min | 时长 方差 | 任务可控性 | 最短任务 时长/min | 紧前任务 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 打击2编队返航 | K10 | F-15E(9-12) | 62.0 | 0 | 0 | 62.0 | K9/J9 |
| 打击2编队着陆 | K11 | F-15E(9-12) | 4.0 | 0.10 | 0 | 4.0 | K10/J11 |
| 干扰编队滑跑 | L1 | EF-111A | 2.0 | 0.05 | 0 | 2.0 | START |
| 干扰编队起飞 | L2 | EF-111A | 0.5 | 0.02 | 0 | 0.5 | L1 |
| 干扰编队飞向集结阵位 | L3 | EF-111A | 28.9 | 0 | 1 | 1.0 | L2 |
| 干扰编队集结 | L4 | EF-111A | 2.0 | 0.10 | 0 | 2.0 | D3/I5/J5/K5/L3 |
| 干扰编队飞向干扰阵位 | L5 | EF-111A | 6.1 | 0 | 1 | 1.0 | L4/D5 |
| 干扰编队进行干扰 | L6 | EF-111A | 20.0 | 0 | 0 | 20.0 | L5/D6 |
| 干扰编队返航 | L7 | EF-111A | 35.0 | 0 | 1 | 28.0 | L6/J9 |
| 干扰编队着陆 | L8 | EF-111A | 4.0 | 0.10 | 0 | 4.0 | L7/I10 |
| 任务完成 | Finish | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | A6/B6/C6D9/ E4/F4G6/H6/I9 J11/K11/L8 |
Table A1
Mission schedule and network parameters
| 任务名称 | 最早开始时刻/min | 最晚开始时刻/min | 最早结束时刻/min | 最晚结束时刻/min | 总时差/min | 单时差/min | 计划开始时刻/min | 计划结束时刻/min | 关键 任务 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 侦察机滑跑 | 0 | 2.0 | 47.2 | 49.2 | 12.2 | 0 | 35.0 | 37.0 | 0 |
| 侦察机起飞 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 49.2 | 49.7 | 12.2 | 0 | 37.0 | 37.5 | 0 |
| 侦察机飞向侦察阵位 | 2.5 | 41.8 | 49.7 | 89.0 | 12.2 | 0 | 37.5 | 76.8 | 0 |
| 侦察机执行侦察任务 | 41.8 | 91.8 | 113.8 | 163.8 | 37.0 | 3.4 | 76.8 | 126.8 | 0 |
| 侦察机返航 | 91.8 | 131.1 | 163.8 | 203.1 | 33.6 | 0 | 130.2 | 169.5 | 0 |
| 侦察机着陆 | 131.1 | 135.1 | 203.1 | 207.1 | 33.6 | 33.6 | 169.5 | 173.5 | 0 |
| 护航1编队滑跑 | 0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 0.5 | 0 | 2.0 | 0 |
| 护航1编队起飞 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 4.0 | 4.5 | 1.5 | 0 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 0 |
| 护航1编队飞向巡逻阵位 | 2.5 | 29.9 | 58.3 | 85.7 | 55.3 | 0 | 3.0 | 30.4 | 0 |
| 护航1编队进行护航 | 29.9 | 119.9 | 85.7 | 175.7 | 55.3 | 9.8 | 30.4 | 120.4 | 0 |
| 护航1编队返航 | 130.2 | 157.6 | 175.7 | 203.1 | 45.5 | 0 | 130.2 | 157.6 | 0 |
| 护航1编队着陆 | 157.6 | 161.6 | 203.1 | 207.1 | 45.5 | 45.5 | 157.6 | 161.6 | 0 |
| 护航2编队滑跑 | 0 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 0 | 0 | 2.0 | 0 |
| 护航2编队起飞 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 4.0 | 1.5 | 0 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 0 |
| 护航2编队飞向巡逻阵位 | 2.5 | 37.3 | 43.5 | 78.3 | 41.0 | 0 | 2.5 | 37.3 | 0 |
| 护航2编队进行护航 | 37.3 | 127.3 | 78.3 | 168.3 | 41.0 | 2.9 | 37.3 | 127.3 | 0 |
| 护航2编队返航 | 130.2 | 165.0 | 168.3 | 203.1 | 38.1 | 0 | 130.2 | 165.0 | 0 |
| 护航2编队着陆 | 165.0 | 169.0 | 203.1 | 207.1 | 38.1 | 38.1 | 165.0 | 169.0 | 0 |
| 扫荡编队滑跑 | 0 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 4.5 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 0 | 2.0 | 0 |
| 扫荡编队起飞 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 4.5 | 5.0 | 1.5 | 0 | 3.0 | 3.5 | 0 |
| 扫荡编队飞向集结阵位 | 3.0 | 31.9 | 58.1 | 87.0 | 54.6 | 54.6 | 3.5 | 32.4 | 0 |
| 扫荡编队集结 | 87.0 | 89.0 | 87.0 | 89.0 | 0 | 0 | 87.0 | 89.0 | 1 |
| 扫荡编队飞向扫荡阵位 | 89.0 | 95.1 | 89.0 | 95.1 | 0 | 0 | 89.0 | 95.1 | 1 |
| 扫荡编队肃清敌方空域 | 95.1 | 115.1 | 95.1 | 115.1 | 0 | 0 | 95.1 | 115.1 | 1 |
| 扫荡编队进行护航 | 115.1 | 135.1 | 148.1 | 168.1 | 33.0 | 0 | 115.1 | 135.1 | 0 |
| 扫荡编队返航 | 135.1 | 190.1 | 168.1 | 203.1 | 33.0 | 0 | 135.1 | 190.1 | 0 |
| 扫荡编队着陆 | 190.1 | 194.1 | 203.1 | 207.1 | 33.0 | 33.0 | 190.1 | 194.1 | 0 |
| 1号加油机飞向加油阵位 | 0 | 23.5 | 0 | 23.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23.5 | 1 |
| 1号加油机执行授油任务 | 23.5 | 73.5 | 118.9 | 168.9 | 95.4 | 1.0 | 23.5 | 73.5 | 0 |
| 1号加油机返航 | 74.5 | 108.7 | 168.9 | 203.1 | 94.4 | 0 | 74.5 | 108.7 | 0 |
| 1号加油机着陆 | 108.7 | 112.7 | 203.1 | 207.1 | 94.4 | 94.4 | 111.7 | 115.7 | 0 |
| 2号加油机飞向加油阵位 | 0 | 23.5 | 22.6 | 46.1 | 22.6 | 0 | 0 | 23.5 | 0 |
| 2号加油机执行授油任务 | 43.5 | 73.5 | 118.9 | 168.9 | 95.4 | 0 | 43.5 | 73.5 | 0 |
| 2号加油机返航 | 73.5 | 107.7 | 168.9 | 203.1 | 95.4 | 0 | 73.5 | 107.7 | 0 |
| 2号加油机着陆 | 107.7 | 111.7 | 203.1 | 207.1 | 95.4 | 95.4 | 107.7 | 111.7 | 0 |
| E-8A滑跑 | 0 | 2.0 | 46.5 | 48.5 | 12.5 | 0 | 34.0 | 36.0 | 0 |
| E-8A起飞 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 48.5 | 49.0 | 12.5 | 0 | 36.0 | 36.5 | 0 |
| E-8A飞向监视阵位 | 2.5 | 42.5 | 49.0 | 89.0 | 12.5 | 0 | 36.5 | 76.5 | 0 |
| E-8A对地监视 | 42.5 | 92.5 | 113.1 | 163.1 | 36.6 | 3.7 | 76.5 | 126.5 | 0 |
| E-8A返航 | 130.2 | 170.2 | 163.1 | 203.1 | 32.9 | 0 | 130.2 | 170.2 | 0 |
| E-8A着陆 | 170.2 | 174.2 | 203.1 | 207.1 | 32.9 | 32.9 | 181.5 | 185.5 | 0 |
| EC-130滑跑 | 0 | 2.0 | 38.2 | 40.2 | 12.2 | 0 | 26.0 | 28.0 | 0 |
| EC-130起飞 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 40.2 | 40.7 | 12.2 | 0 | 28.0 | 28.5 | 0 |
| EC-130飞向干扰阵位 | 2.5 | 50.8 | 40.7 | 89.0 | 12.2 | 0 | 28.5 | 76.8 | 0 |
| EC-130远程干扰 | 50.8 | 100.8 | 104.8 | 154.8 | 28.0 | 3.4 | 76.8 | 126.8 | 0 |
| EC-130返航 | 130.2 | 178.5 | 154.8 | 203.1 | 24.6 | 0 | 130.2 | 178.5 | 0 |
| EC-130着陆 | 178.5 | 182.5 | 203.1 | 207.1 | 24.6 | 24.6 | 185.5 | 189.5 | 0 |
| 压制编队滑跑 | 0 | 2.0 | 3.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 0 | 2.0 | 0 |
| 压制编队起飞 | 3.0 | 3.5 | 5.0 | 5.5 | 1.5 | 0 | 3.5 | 4.0 | 0 |
| 压制编队飞向加油阵位 | 3.5 | 21.5 | 5.5 | 23.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 4.0 | 22.0 | 0 |
| 压制编队加油 | 23.5 | 42.5 | 23.5 | 42.5 | 0 | 0 | 23.5 | 42.5 | 1 |
| 压制编队飞向集结阵位 | 42.5 | 53.4 | 76.1 | 87.0 | 33.6 | 33.6 | 42.5 | 53.4 | 0 |
| 压制编队集结 | 87.0 | 89.0 | 87.0 | 89.0 | 0 | 0 | 87.0 | 89.0 | 1 |
| 压制编队飞向压制阵位 | 95.1 | 101.2 | 142.0 | 148.1 | 46.9 | 13.9 | 95.1 | 101.2 | 0 |
| 压制编队进行压制 | 115.1 | 135.1 | 148.1 | 168.1 | 33.0 | 0 | 115.1 | 135.1 | 0 |
| 压制编队返航 | 135.1 | 170.1 | 168.1 | 203.1 | 33.0 | 0 | 135.1 | 170.1 | 0 |
| 压制编队着陆 | 170.1 | 174.1 | 203.1 | 207.1 | 33.0 | 33.0 | 173.5 | 177.5 | 0 |
| 打击1编队滑跑 | 0 | 2.0 | 19.3 | 21.3 | 0.3 | 0 | 19.0 | 21.0 | 0 |
| 打击1编队起飞 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 21.3 | 21.8 | 0.3 | 0 | 21.0 | 21.5 | 0 |
| 打击1编队飞向加油阵位 | 2.5 | 23.2 | 21.8 | 42.5 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 21.5 | 42.2 | 0 |
| 打击1编队加油 | 42.5 | 74.5 | 42.5 | 74.5 | 0 | 0 | 42.5 | 74.5 | 1 |
| 打击1编队飞向集结阵位 | 74.5 | 87.0 | 74.5 | 87.0 | 0 | 0 | 74.5 | 87.0 | 1 |
| 打击1编队集结 | 87.0 | 89.0 | 87.0 | 89.0 | 0 | 0 | 87.0 | 89.0 | 1 |
| 打击1编队飞向压制阵位 | 95.1 | 102.1 | 108.1 | 115.1 | 13.0 | 13.0 | 95.1 | 102.1 | 0 |
| 打击1编队飞向打击阵位 | 115.1 | 128.2 | 115.1 | 128.2 | 0 | 0 | 115.1 | 128.2 | 1 |
| 打击1编队进行打击 | 128.2 | 130.2 | 128.2 | 130.2 | 0 | 0 | 128.2 | 130.2 | 1 |
| 打击1编队返航 | 130.2 | 193.7 | 139.6 | 203.1 | 9.4 | 0 | 130.2 | 193.7 | 0 |
| 打击1编队着陆 | 193.7 | 197.7 | 203.1 | 207.1 | 9.4 | 9.4 | 194.1 | 198.1 | 0 |
| 打击2编队滑跑 | 0 | 2.0 | 25.6 | 27.6 | 2.6 | 0 | 23.0 | 25.0 | 0 |
| 打击2编队起飞 | 25.0 | 25.5 | 27.6 | 28.1 | 2.6 | 0 | 25.0 | 25.5 | 0 |
| 打击2编队飞向加油阵位 | 2.5 | 20.5 | 28.1 | 46.1 | 2.6 | 0 | 25.5 | 43.5 | 0 |
| 打击2编队加油 | 23.5 | 53.5 | 46.1 | 76.1 | 2.6 | 0 | 43.5 | 73.5 | 0 |
| 打击2编队飞向集结阵位 | 53.5 | 64.4 | 76.1 | 87.0 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 73.5 | 84.4 | 0 |
| 打击2编队集结 | 87.0 | 89.0 | 87.0 | 89.0 | 0 | 0 | 87.0 | 89.0 | 1 |
| 打击2编队飞向压制阵位 | 95.1 | 101.2 | 110.7 | 116.8 | 15.6 | 13.9 | 95.1 | 101.2 | 0 |
| 打击2编队飞向打击阵位 | 115.1 | 126.5 | 116.8 | 128.2 | 1.7 | 0 | 115.1 | 126.5 | 0 |
| 打击2编队进行打击 | 126.5 | 128.5 | 128.2 | 130.2 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 126.5 | 128.5 | 0 |
| 打击2编队返航 | 130.2 | 203.1 | 130.2 | 203.1 | 0 | 0 | 130.2 | 203.1 | 1 |
| 打击2编队着陆 | 203.1 | 207.1 | 203.1 | 207.1 | 0 | 0 | 203.1 | 207.1 | 1 |
| 干扰编队滑跑 | 0 | 2.0 | 55.6 | 57.6 | 12.6 | 0 | 43.0 | 45.0 | 0 |
| 干扰编队起飞 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 57.6 | 58.1 | 12.6 | 0 | 45.0 | 45.5 | 0 |
| 干扰编队飞向集结阵位 | 2.5 | 31.4 | 58.1 | 87.0 | 12.6 | 12.6 | 45.5 | 74.4 | 0 |
| 干扰编队集结 | 87.0 | 89.0 | 87.0 | 89.0 | 0 | 0 | 87.0 | 89.0 | 1 |
| 干扰编队飞向干扰阵位 | 95.1 | 101.2 | 142.0 | 148.1 | 46.9 | 13.9 | 95.1 | 101.2 | 0 |
| 干扰编队进行干扰 | 115.1 | 135.1 | 148.1 | 168.1 | 33.0 | 0 | 115.1 | 135.1 | 0 |
| 干扰编队返航 | 135.1 | 170.1 | 168.1 | 203.1 | 33.0 | 0 | 135.1 | 170.1 | 0 |
| 干扰编队着陆 | 170.1 | 174.1 | 203.1 | 207.1 | 33.0 | 33.0 | 177.5 | 181.5 | 0 |
| 任务完成 | 207.1 | 207.1 | 207.1 | 207.1 | 0 | 0 | 207.1 | 207.1 | 0 |
| [1] | 雷洪涛, 朱承, 王琛, 等. 联合作战行动跨域协同计划与控制关键技术[J]. 指挥与控制学报, 2023, 9(4): 361-371. |
| LEI H T, ZHU C, WANG C, et al. Key technologies of planning and control for cross-domain coordination on joint operational actions[J]. Journal of Command and Control, 2023, 9(4): 361-371 (in Chinese). | |
| [2] | 韩光松, 宋志峰, 王忠. 基于经典控制思想的联合作战指挥与控制[J]. 指挥与控制学报, 2022, 8(1): 90-94. |
| HAN G S, SONG Z F, WANG Z. Joint operation command and control via classical control thought[J]. Journal of Command and Control, 2022, 8(1): 90-94 (in Chinese). | |
| [3] | 吴傲, 李寰宇, 高杨军, 等. 面向巡逻阵位保持的空中加油管理时空协同方法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(20): 628438. |
| WU A, LI H Y, GAO Y J, et al. Time-space coordination method for air refueling management for combat air patrol position maintenance[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(20): 628438 (in Chinese). | |
| [4] | 马国丰, 陈强. 项目进度管理的研究现状及其展望[J]. 上海管理科学, 2006, 28(4): 70-74. |
| MA G F, CHEN Q. Study on project scheduling management[J]. Shanghai Management Science, 2006, 28(4): 70-74 (in Chinese). | |
| [5] | DAVIS E W. Project scheduling under resource constraints: Historical review and categorization of procedures[J]. A I I E Transactions, 1973, 5(4): 297-313. |
| [6] | LEVCHUK G M, LEVCHUK Y N, LUO J, et al. Normative design of organizations. I. mission planning[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 2002, 32(3): 346-359. |
| [7] | 薛维锐. 面向协同施工的工程项目进度管理研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2015: 1-45. |
| XUE W R. Research on project schedule management oriented to collaborative construction[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2015: 1-45 (in Chinese). | |
| [8] | 陈芳, 王珍, 田相林. 基于计划评审技术的生产进度评估方法[J]. 兵器装备工程学报, 2016, 37(8): 177-180. |
| CHEN F, WANG Z, TIAN X L. A production schedule evaluation method based on program evaluation and review technique[J]. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering, 2016, 37(8): 177-180 (in Chinese). | |
| [9] | 胡杨博, 莫蓉, 常智勇, 等. 基于工作分解结构复杂多级项目的进度监控技术研究[J]. 现代制造工程, 2008(2): 16-19. |
| HUYANG B, MO R, CHANG Z Y, et al. Research on schedule monitoring technology for the complex multilevel project based on WBS[J]. Modern Manufacturing Engineering, 2008(2): 16-19 (in Chinese). | |
| [10] | SAPUTRA P D, FANSURI M H, LAKSMI A A. Development of work breakdown structure (WBS) for rapid damage runway repair (RADARR) time planning at military airbases[J]. E3S Web of Conferences, 2024, 517: 05002. |
| [11] | 管胤, 杜晓亮. 供应链管理环境下的生产计划管理研究[J]. 现代工业经济和信息化, 2023, 13(10): 236-238, 241. |
| GUAN Y, DU X L. Research on production planning management in supply chain management environment[J]. Modern Industrial Economy and Informationization, 2023, 13(10): 236-238, 241 (in Chinese). | |
| [12] | 杨雪娟. 基于多级挣值法航天型号产品生产进度控制研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工程大学, 2015: 1-38. |
| YANG X J. Research on production schedule control of aerospace products based on multi-level earned value method[D]. Harbin: Harbin Engineering University, 2015: 1-38 (in Chinese). | |
| [13] | 张妍. 改进挣值法在道路施工项目成本控制中的应用[J]. 工程造价管理, 2024(2): 69-75. |
| ZHANG Y. Application of improved earned value method in cost control of road construction projects[J]. Engineering Cost Management, 2024(2): 69-75 (in Chinese). | |
| [14] | 李善梅, 胡锦标, 许思莹, 等. 考虑航班重分配的航班计划网络鲁棒性评估[J]. 南京航空航天大学学报, 2023, 55(6): 1044-1054. |
| LI S M, HU J B, XU S Y, et al. Evaluation of flight plan robustness based on flight redistribution[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, 2023, 55(6): 1044-1054 (in Chinese). | |
| [15] | QU J Y, WU S X, ZHANG J J. Flight delay propagation prediction based on deep learning[J]. Mathematics, 2023, 11(3): 494. |
| [16] | WEI X J, LI Y F, SHANG R R, et al. Airport cluster delay prediction based on TS-BiLSTM-attention[J]. Aerospace, 2023, 10(7): 580. |
| [17] | 董兵, 彭自琛. 资源受限条件下受扰航班恢复研究[J]. 舰船电子工程, 2024, 44(4): 51-56. |
| DONG B, PENG Z C. Irregular flight recovery under resource restriction[J]. Ship Electronic Engineering, 2024, 44(4): 51-56 (in Chinese). | |
| [18] | 王武华, 栾姗迟. 作战计划管理关键技术研究[J]. 电脑知识与技术, 2010, 6(17): 4841-4844. |
| WANG W H, LUAN S C. The crucial technology research of operational plan management[J]. Computer Knowledge and Technology, 2010, 6(17): 4841-4844 (in Chinese). | |
| [19] | 张迎新. 不确定环境下军事任务计划建模与优化方法研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科学技术大学, 2014: 1-35. |
| ZHANG Y X. Research on modeling and optimization method of military mission plan in uncertain environment[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2014: 1-35 (in Chinese). | |
| [20] | 陈行军, 齐欢, 阳东升. 含时间窗联合作战计划问题的建模与求解[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2012, 32(9): 1979-1985. |
| CHEN X J, QI H, YANG D S. Modeling and solution of joint operational plans with time windows[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2012, 32(9): 1979-1985 (in Chinese). | |
| [21] | 孙鹏, 陈冠宇, 张杰勇, 等. 基于突发事件的任务计划动态调整模型及算法[J]. 控制与决策, 2020, 35(5): 1052-1062. |
| SUN P, CHEN G Y, ZHANG J Y, et al. Dynamic task plan adjustment model and algorithm based on battlefield emergencies[J]. Control and Decision, 2020, 35(5): 1052-1062 (in Chinese). | |
| [22] | 邵天浩, 张宏军, 程恺, 等. 层次任务网络中的重新规划研究综述[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2020, 42(12): 2833-2846. |
| SHAO T H, ZHANG H J, CHENG K, et al. Review of replanning in hierarchical task network[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2020, 42(12): 2833-2846 (in Chinese). | |
| [23] | 吴瑞杰, 孙鹏, 孙昱. 分布式任务计划动态调整模型及算法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39(2): 322-328. |
| WU R J, SUN P, SUN Y. Distributed dynamic task plan adjustment model and algorithm[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2017, 39(2): 322-328 (in Chinese). | |
| [24] | 王小军, 张修社, 胡小全, 等. 跨域作战要素协同中的联合行动控制概念浅析[J]. 现代导航, 2021, 12(4): 235-241. |
| WANG X J, ZHANG X S, HU X Q, et al. Brief analysis of concept of joint actions control in synergy of cross-domain operational elements[J]. Modern Navigation, 2021, 12(4): 235-241 (in Chinese). | |
| [25] | 杨新民, 于靖, 陈杨, 等. 基于流程引擎的作战管理系统设计[J]. 指挥信息系统与技术, 2024, 15(2): 21-27. |
| YANG X M, YU J, CHEN Y, et al. Design of battle management system based on workflow engine[J]. Command Information System and Technology, 2024, 15(2): 21-27 (in Chinese). | |
| [26] | 方冰, 王政伟, 陈奡, 等. 智能化作战管理技术[J]. 指挥信息系统与技术, 2023, 14(3): 18-24, 45. |
| FANG B, WANG Z W, CHEN A, et al. Technology for intelligent battle management[J]. Command Information System and Technology, 2023, 14(3): 18-24, 45 (in Chinese). | |
| [27] | Air Force U.S.. CounterAir Operations: AFDP 3-01 [R]. Washington, DC: U.S. Air Force, 2023. |
| [28] | 王兴虎, 程家林, 郭强, 等. 防空压制任务中的智能协同作战体系研究[J]. 无人系统技术, 2020, 3(4): 10-21. |
| WANG X H, CHENG J L, GUO Q, et al. Research on intelligent cooperative combat system in air denfense suppression mission[J]. Unmanned Systems Technology, 2020, 3(4): 10-21 (in Chinese). | |
| [29] | 王硕, 曹莉敏, 尚民强, 等. 甘特图在大型软件研发项目管理中的应用[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2018, 53(): 310-315. |
| WANG S, CAO L M, SHANG M Q, et al. Gantt chart in large-scale software development management[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2018, 53(S1): 310-315 (in Chinese). | |
| [30] | 王众托,汪克夷.一种新的网络计划法——决策关键路法[J].系统工程理论与实践, 1981, 1(1): 50-61. |
| WANG Z T, WANG K Y. A new network planning method: Decision critical path method[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory and Practice, 1981,1(1):50-61 (in Chinese). | |
| [31] | 关雷, 佟士祺, 颜华琨, 等. 基于群体网络计划的应急协同决策方法[J]. 大连海事大学学报, 2012, 38(3): 73-76. |
| GUAN L, TONG S Q, YAN H K, et al. Emergency collaborative decision-making method based on group decision network planning[J]. Journal of Dalian Maritime University, 2012, 38(3): 73-76 (in Chinese). | |
| [32] | MALCOLM D G, ROSEBOOM J H, CLARK C E, et al. Application of a technique for research and development program evaluation[J]. Operations Research, 1959, 7(5): 646-669. |
| [1] | Rongzu LI, Li LIU, Dun YANG. Optimal design of hydrogen-powered UAV based on multi-source domain fusion surrogate model [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2025, 46(9): 630979-630979. |
| [2] | Weiwei CAI, Guohua WU, Hengwei LI, Qian YIN. Multi-objective scheduling optimization method for relay satellites considering user preferences [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2025, 46(8): 331074-331074. |
| [3] | Yifan WANG, Xiyun GUO, Shiyuan JIA, Gang CHEN, Mo REN. Configuration optimization method of three-branch robot for truss holding [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2025, 46(7): 431033-431033. |
| [4] | Yuxin CUI, Zhong LU, Jia ZHOU. Development assurance level assignment based on multi-objective artificial hummingbird algorithm [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2025, 46(4): 330946-330946. |
| [5] | Chengjun SHAN, Tianyu GONG, Lizhe YI, Haohui YANG, Yaosong LONG. High-efficiency and high-reliability sonic boom/aerodynamic multidisciplinary optimization method for supersonic civil aircraft [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(24): 630573-630573. |
| [6] | Hengwei LI, Qizhang LUO, Yi GU, Caizhi FAN, Guohua WU. Multi⁃objective dynamic scheduling optimization method for relay satellites based on rolling horizon strategy [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(16): 329706-329706. |
| [7] | Qian YANG, Haoran ZHENG, Xianda CHENG, Wei DONG. Optimization design method for hot air anti⁃icing system based on bleed air control [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(S2): 729285-729285. |
| [8] | Jiezhong DONG, Wuli CHU, Haoguang ZHANG, Bo LUO, Song YAN. Flow control mechanism of diffuser cascade with wavy leading⁃edge based on causal network analysis [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(19): 128336-128336. |
| [9] | Chao LIANG, Li YANG, Chengsheng PAN, Yaowen QI. Multi-QoS constraints routing algorithm based on satellite network dynamic resource graph [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(1): 326422-326422. |
| [10] | ZOU Ziyuan, CHEN Qifeng. Decision tree-based target assignment for confrontation of multiple space vehicles [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S1): 726910-726910. |
| [11] | SUN Gang, PENG Shuang, CHEN Hao, WU Jiangjiang, LI Jun. Multi-objective optimization method oriented to integrated scenario of TT & C resources and data transmission resources [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(9): 326114-326114. |
| [12] | ZHENG Shuai, WANG Zihan, ZHAO Haoran, YANG Pengtao, HONG Jun. Layout optimization method of aircraft fuel gauging sensor based on differential evolution algorithm [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(8): 125809-125809. |
| [13] | JING Tao, TIAN Xitian. Multi-objective optimization method for aircraft tolerance allocation based on Monte Carlo-adaptive differential evolution algorithm [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(3): 425278-425278. |
| [14] | LUO Qing, ZHANG Tao, SHAN Peng, ZHANG Wentao, LIU Zihao. Generating reconfiguration blueprints for IMA systems based on improved Q-learning [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(8): 525792-525792. |
| [15] | ZHANG Junfeng, YOU Lubao, YANG Chunwei, HU Rong. Arrival sequencing and scheduling based on multi-objective Imperialist competitive algorithm [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(6): 324439-324439. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
Address: No.238, Baiyan Buiding, Beisihuan Zhonglu Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China
Postal code : 100083
E-mail:hkxb@buaa.edu.cn
Total visits: 6658907 Today visits: 1341All copyright © editorial office of Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
All copyright © editorial office of Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
Total visits: 6658907 Today visits: 1341

