高超声速有攻角锥裙直接数值模拟

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2023.28610

Abstract

Abstract:

A direct numerical simulation of a hypersonic 7°-34° cone-flare model at an angle of attack is carried out. By comparing the flow characteristics on 0°， 90° and 180° sections， we evaluate the effect of crossflow on shock wave and boundary layer interaction in terms of the distribution of wall pressure， skin friction and heat transfer， the unsteady motion of the separation bubble， and the evolution of the reattached boundary layer. It is found that the flow separation occurs near the corner， and the interaction of the shock wave and boundary layer in the crossflow and windward region leads to a significant increase in wall pressure， skin friction， and heat transfer. The ratio of heat transfer to pressure exhibits a rise in the interaction region， followed by a drop caused by the reattachment， while the Reynolds analogy is completely invalid in the separation zone. Low-frequent unsteady expansion/contraction motion of the separation bubble is revealed through spectral analysis of the bubble area fluctuation. It is closely related to the low frequency shock wave oscillation in the crossflow region； however， hysteresis occurs in the windward region while is irrelevant in the leeward region. Based on the proper orthogonal decomposition results of the velocity fluctuation field， the separation region is related to large-scale structures near the shear layer in the low-order modes. The evolution of the reattached boundary layer shows the drastic Reynolds stress increase in vicinity of the reattachment point caused by the angle of attack， with the streamwise component recovering rapidly. Meanwhile， the peak location of Reynolds stress components continues to move outward in the leeward region， and has rapidly recovered to the inner layer in the windward region and the crossflow region. In addition， the distribution of Reynolds stress anisotropy invariants further indicates that the peak value of the turbulence anisotropy in the near-wall region downstream of the interaction is weaker in the leeward region than in the windward region.

Key words: shock wave/boundary layer interaction, hypersonic, separation bubble, crossflow effect, direct numerical simulation

CLC Number:

V211.3

Jiang LAI, Zhaolin FAN, Qian WANG, Siwei DONG, Fulin TONG, Xianxu YUAN. Direct numerical simulation of hypersonic cone-flare model at angle of attack[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(2): 128610-128610.

Figures/Tables 25

Fig.1

Fig.2

Table 1

Grid resolution

θ/（°）	Δx⁺	$Δ y w +$	$Δ r θ +$ -z_ref	$Δ r θ +$ -z_c	$Δ r θ +$ -z_d
0	1.96	0.33	9.14	9.60	14.01
90	2.91	0.48	13.56	14.24	20.78
180	4.25	0.71	19.81	20.81	30.37

Table 1

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Fig.9

Fig.10

Fig.11

Fig.12

Fig.13

Fig.14

Fig.15

Fig.16

Fig.17

Fig.18

Fig.19

Fig.20

Fig.21

Fig.22

Fig.23

Fig.24

References 41

1	GREEN J E. Interactions between shock waves and turbulent boundary layers［J］. Progress in Aerospace Sciences， 1970， 11： 235-340.
2	DOLLING D S. Fifty years of shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction research： What next？［J］. AIAA Journal， 2001， 39： 1517-1531.
3	GAITONDE D V. Progress in shock wave/boundary layer interactions［J］. Progress in Aerospace Sciences， 2015， 72： 80-99.
4	LIGRANI P M， MCNABB E S， COLLOPY H， et al. Recent investigations of shock wave effects and interactions［J］. Advances in Aerodynamics， 2020， 2： 4.
5	GAITONDE D V， ADLER M C. Dynamics of three-dimensional shock-wave/boundary-layer interactions［J］. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics， 2023， 55： 291-321.
6	PIROZZOLI S， GRASSO F. Direct numerical simulation of impinging shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction at M=2.25［J］. Physics of Fluids， 2006， 18（6）： 065113.
7	PIROZZOLI S， BERNARDINI M. Direct numerical simulation database for impinging shock wave/turbulent boundary-layer interaction［J］. AIAA Journal， 2011， 49（6）： 1307-1312.
8	CLEMENS N T， NARAYANASWAMY V. Low-frequency unsteadiness of shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interactions［J］. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics， 2014， 46（1）： 469-492.
9	范孝华，唐志共，王刚，等. 激波/湍流边界层干扰低频非定常性研究评述［J］. 航空学报， 2022， 43（1）： 625917.
	FAN X H， TANG Z G， WANG G， et al. Review of low-frequency unsteadiness in shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2022， 43（1）： 625917 （in Chinese）.
10	FANG J， ZHELTOVODOV A A， YAO Y F， et al. On the turbulence amplification in shock-wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction［J］. Journal of Fluid Mechanics， 2020， 897： A32.
11	童福林，董思卫，段俊亦，等. 激波/湍流边界层干扰分离泡直接数值模拟［J］. 航空学报， 2022， 43（3）： 125437.
	TONG F L， DONG S W， DUAN J Y， et al. Direct numerical simulation of shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interference separation bubble［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2022， 43（3）： 125437 （in Chinese）.
12	HOLDEN M. Database of aerothermal measurements in hypersonic flow “building block” experiments［C］∥Proceedings of the 41st Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston： AIAA， 2003.
13	WRIGHT M J， SINHA K， OLEJNICZAK J， et al. Numerical and experimental investigation of double-cone shock interactions［J］. AIAA Journal， 2000， 38（12）： 2268-2276.
14	NOMPELIS I， CANDLER G V， HOLDEN M S. Effect of vibrational nonequilibrium on hypersonic double-cone experiments［J］. AIAA Journal， 2003， 41（11）： 2162-2169.
15	CANDLER G， NOMPELIS I， DRUGUET M C. Navier-Stokes predictions of hypersonic double-cone and cylinder-flare flow fields［C］∥Proceedings of the 39th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston： AIAA， 2001.
16	TUMUKLU O， THEOFILLS V， LEVIN D A. On the unsteadiness of shock-laminar boundary layer interactions of hypersonic flows over a double cone［J］. Physics of Fluids， 2018， 30（10）： 106111.
17	HOLDEN M. Experimental studies of quasi-two-dimensional and three-dimensional viscous interaction regions induced by skewed-shock and swept-shock boundary layer interaction［C］∥ Proceedings of the 17th Fluid Dynamics， Plasma Dynamics， and Lasers Conference. Reston： AIAA， 1984.
18	HOLDEN M， HAVENER A， LEE C. Shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction in high-reynolds-number hypersonic flows［C］∥ Proceedings of the 10th Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Reston： AIAA， 1987.
19	冈敦殿. 超声速平板突起物及双锥绕流实验研究［D］. 长沙：国防科学技术大学， 2013： 43-61.
	GANG D D. Experimental study on supersonic flat plate protrusion and double cone flow［D］.Changsha： National University of Defense Technology， 2013： 43-61. （in Chinese）
20	RUNNING C L， JULIANO T J， JEWELL J S， et al. Hypersonic shock-wave/boundary-layer interactions on a cone/flare model［C］∥Proceedings of the 2018 Fluid Dynamics Conference. Reston： AIAA， 2018.
21	RUNNING C L， JULIANO T J， JEWELL J S， et al. Hypersonic shock-wave/boundary-layer interactions on a cone/flare［J］. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science， 2019， 109： 109911.
22	RUNNING C L， JULIANO T J， BORG M P， et al. Characterization of post-shock thermal striations on a cone/flare［J］. AIAA Journal， 2020， 58（5）： 2352-2358.
23	RUNNING C L， JULIANO T J. Global measurements of hypersonic shock-wave/boundary-layer interactions with pressure-sensitive paint［J］. Experiments in Fluids， 2021， 62（5）： 91.
24	SHIPLYUK A N. Experimental investigation of stability of a hypersonic boundary layer on a cone-flare model［J］. Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics， 2001， 42（4）： 589-595.
25	BEDAREV I A， MASLOV A A， SIDORENKO A A， et al. Experimental and numerical study of a hypersonic separated flow in the vicinity of a cone-flare model［J］. Journal of Applied Mechanics and Technical Physics， 2002， 43（6）： 867-876.
26	FRAYSSINET O. Numerical analysis of a separated flow on a supersonic cone flare model［C］∥Proceedings of the 34th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference. Reston： AIAA， 2016.
27	TONG F L， DUAN J Y， LAI J， et al. Hypersonic shock wave and turbulent boundary layer interaction in a sharp cone/flare model［J］. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics， 2022， 36（3）： 80-95.
28	SIVASUBRAMANIAN J， FASEL H F. Direct numerical simulation of transition in a sharp cone boundary layer at Mach 6： fundamental breakdown［J］. Journal of Fluid Mechanics， 2015， 768： 175-218.
29	HUANG J J， DUAN L， CASPER K M， et al. Direct numerical simulation of turbulent pressure fluctuations over a cone at Mach 8［C］∥Proceedings of the AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum. Reston： AIAA， 2020.
30	PIROZZOLI S， GRASSO F， GATSKI T B. Direct numerical simulation and analysis of a spatially evolving supersonic turbulent boundary layer at M=2.25［J］. Physics of Fluids， 2004， 16（3）： 530-545.
31	MARTÍN M P， TAYLOR E M， WU M， et al. A bandwidth-optimized WENO scheme for the effective direct numerical simulation of compressible turbulence［J］. Journal of Computational Physics， 2006， 220（1）： 270-289.
32	WU M， MARTIN M P. Direct numerical simulation of supersonic turbulent boundary layer over a compression ramp［J］. AIAA Journal， 2007， 45（4）： 879-889.
33	POINSOT T J. Boundary conditions for direct simulations of compressible viscous flows［J］. Journal of Computational Physics， 1992， 101： 101-129.
34	BACK L H， CUFFEL R F. Changes in heat transfer from turbulent boundary layers interacting with shock waves and expansion waves［J］. AIAA Journal， 1970， 8（10）： 1871-1873.
35	ROY C J， BLOTTNER F G. Review and assessment of turbulence models for hypersonic flows［J］. Progress in Aerospace Sciences， 2006， 42（7-8）： 469-530.
36	MURRAY N， HILLIER R， WILLIAMS S. Experimental investigation of axisymmetric hypersonic shock-wave/turbulent-boundary-layer interactions［J］. Journal of Fluid Mechanics， 2013， 714： 152-189.
37	PRIEBE S， MARTÍN M. Turbulence in a hypersonic compression ramp flow［J］. Physical Review Fluids， 2021， 6（3）： 034601.
38	LOGINOV M S， ADAMS N A， ZHELTOVODOV A A. Large-eddy simulation of shock-wave/turbulent-boundary-layer interaction［J］. Journal of Fluid Mechanics， 2006， 565： 135.
39	A-M SCHREYER， SAHOO D， WILLIAMAS O J H， et al. Experimental investigation of two hypersonic shock/turbulent boundary-layer interactions［J］. AIAA Journal， 2018， 56（12）： 4830-4844.
40	PIROZZOLI S， BERNARDINI M， GRASSO F. Characterization of coherent vortical structures in a supersonic turbulent boundary layer［J］. Journal of Fluid Mechanics， 2008， 613： 205-231.
41	LUMLEY J L. Computational modeling of turbulent flows［M］∥Advances in Applied Mechanics. Amsterdam： Elsevier， 1979： 123-176.

[1]	Jiancheng ZHENG, Zhiguo QU, Xiansi TAN, Zhihuai LI, Gang ZHU, Lujun LI, Wei LIU. Resource management for hypersonic target detection by radar network based on responsibility area partitioning [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(8): 329022-329022.
[2]	Jinzhao DAI, Haixin CHEN. Optimization design method of three⁃dimensional wave cancellation biplane derived by shock⁃wave morphology [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(6): 628942-628942.
[3]	Xiaoyong LIU, Mingfu WANG, Jianwen LIU, Xin REN, Xuan ZHANG. Review and prospect of research on scramjet [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(5): 529878-529878.
[4]	Bo YANG, He YU, Zichen FAN. Micro-energy analysis method for time-varying error of aero-optical effects [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(4): 128703-128703.
[5]	Xueliang LI, Chuangchuang LI, Wei SU, Jie WU. Experiment of influence of distributed roughness elements on hypersonic boundary layer instability [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(2): 128627-128627.
[6]	Youde XIONG, Chuangchuang LI, Zhenhui ZHANG, Jie WU. Measurement of freestream disturbance in hypersonic wind tunnel with hot-wire anemometer [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(10): 129042-129042.
[7]	Weilin NI, Yonghai WANG, Cong XU, Fenghua CHI, Haizhao LIANG. Cooperative game guidance method for hypersonic vehicles based on reinforcement learning [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(S2): 729400-729400.
[8]	Zhefeng YU, Shichang LIANG, Weibo SHI, Deyang TIAN, Anhua SHI, Dongjun LIAO, Ying YANG. Analysis and evaluation technology for optical radiation and radar scattering characteristics of HTV⁃2⁃like vehicle [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(S2): 729465-729465.
[9]	Ping MA, Ning ZHANG, Anhua SHI, Zhefeng YU, Shichang LIANG, Jie HUANG. Transmission characteristics of typical band microwave in experiment⁃simulated plasma [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(S2): 729476-729476.
[10]	Yuemeng MA, Ming LIU, Ding YANG, Ming YANG, Mingang ZHANG, Yajie GE. Prescribed performance and anti⁃noise control of near space vehicle with thermal constraint [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(S2): 729390-729390.
[11]	Yalu FU, Xianxu YUAN, Pengxin LIU, Ming YU. Statistical properties of thermodynamic fluctuations in compressible wall⁃bounded turbulence [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(9): 127217-127217.
[12]	Haoyu CHEN, Binwen WANG, Qiaozhi SONG, Xiaodong LI. Thermal flutter ground simulation test [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(8): 227295-227295.
[13]	Siyuan CHANG, Yao XIAO, Guangli LI, Zhongwei TIAN, Kaikai ZHANG, Kai CUI. Effect of wing dihedral and anhedral angles on hypersonic aerodynamic characteristics of high-pressure capturing wing configuration [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(8): 127349-127349.
[14]	Guotao YANG, Zhenjiang YUE, Li LIU. Rapid prediction of global hypersonic vehicle aerothermodynamics based on adaptive sampling [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(6): 127391-127391.
[15]	Hongkang LIU, Jianqiang CHEN, Xinghao XIANG, Yatian ZHAO. Transition prediction for HIAD with different Reynolds numbers by improved k-ω-γtransition model [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(6): 126868-126868.

Direct numerical simulation of hypersonic cone-flare model at angle of attack

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 25

References 41

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments