民机驾驶舱显示触控系统人机工效综合评价

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2020.24053

Abstract

Abstract: Touch control technology will be extensively applied in civil aircraft cockpits in the future; however, no ergonomic evaluation system and evaluation method for the display touch system of civil aircraft cockpits exist currently. Aiming at this problem, we first sort out the current standards and norms related to the touch control system of civil aircraft cockpit displays, and propose the man-machine ergonomic evaluation index system of civil aircraft cockpit display touch control systems in combination with the human factor investigation items in airworthiness regulations. Secondly, considering the fuzziness and grayness of the evaluation indexes, we improve the traditional fuzzy hierarchy comprehensive evaluation algorithm from two directions of data aggregation processing and index weight determination based on the gray correlation analysis. The expert reliability coefficient modified rank matrix is constructed to realize the quantitative description of expert cognitive characteristics, and the man-machine ergonomic comprehensive evaluation model of civil aircraft cockpit display touch control systems is established. Finally, combined with the ergonomic evaluation test cases of civil aircraft cockpit displays and touch systems under the project ACROSS, the influence of the configuration strategy of cockpit displays and touch systems on the ergonomic efficiency of the system is analyzed, and the applicability and rationality of the evaluation system and evaluation method are verified.

Key words: touchscreen, ergonomics, civil cockpits, fuzzy hierarchy comprehensive evaluation, gray correlation

CLC Number:

V243.6

DONG Lei, XIANG Chenyang, ZHAO Changxiao, DANG Xiangjun, SHI Chunlei. Comprehensive evaluation of ergonomics of civil aircraft cockpit display touch control system[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(6): 624053-624053.

References

[1] VAN ZON N C M, BORST C, POOL D M, et al. Touchscreens for aircraft navigation tasks:Comparing accuracy and throughput of three flight deck interfaces using fitts' law[J]. Human Factors, 2020, 62(6):897-908.
[2] COUTTS L V, PLANT K L, SMITH M, et al. Future technology on the flight deck:assessing the use of touchscreens in vibration environments[J]. Ergonomics, 2019, 62(2):286-304.
[3] AVSAR H, FISCHER J E, RODDEN T. Mixed method approach in designing flight decks with touch screens:a framework[C]//2016 IEEE/AIAA 35th Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Piscataway:IEEE Press, 2016:1-10.
[4] ROUWHORST W, VERHOEVEN R, SUIJKERBUIJK M, et al. Use of touch screen display applications for aircraft flight control[C]//2017 IEEE/AIAA 36th Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Piscataway:IEEE Press, 2017:1-10.
[5] AVSAR H, FISCHER J, RODDEN T. Target size guidelines for interactive displays on the flight deck[C]//2015 IEEE/AIAA 34th Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Piscataway:IEEE Press, 2015:3C4-1-3C4-15.
[6] ORPHANIDES A K, NAM C S. Touchscreen interfaces in context:A systematic review of research into touchscreens across settings, populations, and implementations[J]. Applied Ergonomics, 2017, 61:116-143.
[7] SAE. Touch interactive display systems:Human factors considerations, system design and performance gui-delines:SAE ARP60494[S]. Warrendale:SAE Inter-national, 2019.
[8] KAMINANI S. Human computer interaction issues with touch screen interfaces in the flight deck[C]//2011 IEEE/AIAA 30th Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Piscataway:IEEE Press, 2011:6B4-1-6B4-7.
[9] COCKBURN A, AHLSTRÖM D, GUTWIN C. Understanding performance in touch selections:Tap, drag and radial pointing drag with finger, stylus and mouse[J]. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 2012, 70(3):218-233.
[10] GAUCI J. Design and evaluation of a touch screen concept for pilot interaction with avionic systems[C]//2015 IEEE/AIAA 34th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC). Piscataway:IEEE Press, 2015:1-32.
[11] FAA. Advisory Circular:Controls for flight deck systems:AC 20-175[S]. Washington, D.C.:Federal Aviation Administration, 2011.
[12] FAA. Advisory circular:Installed systems and equipment for use by the flightcrew document information:AC 25.13021[S]. Washington, D.C.:Federal Aviation Administration, 2013.
[13] CHO J, LEE J. Development of a new technology product evaluation model for assessing commercialization opportunities using Delphi method and fuzzy AHP approach[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2013, 40(13):5314-5330.
[14] 夏春艳. 核电厂主控室人机界面评价方法研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工程大学, 2010. XIA C Y. Study on human-machine interface evaluation method for main control room of nuclear power plant[D]. Harbin:Harbin Engineering University, 2010(in Chinese).
[15] WANG X L, ZHANG J, ZENG R, et al. Analysis of the application of touch screen in civil aircraft cockpit[M]//Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering. Singapore:Springer Singapore, 2019:2439-2451.
[16] 董大勇, 俞金海, 李宝峰, 等. 民机驾驶舱人为因素适航符合性验证技术[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(1):310-316. DONG D Y, YU J H, LI B F, et al. Airworthiness compliance certification technology of civil aircraft flight deck human factor[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(1):310-316(in Chinese).
[17] SAE. Minimum performance standard for airborne multipurpose electronic displays:SAE AS8034C[S]. Warrendale:SAE International, 2018.
[18] STROUD K, PICKETT L, TILLMAN B. NASA human integration design handbook (HIDH):Revitalization of space-related human factors, environmental, and habit-ability data and design guidance[R]. Houston:NASA Johnson Space Center, 2008.
[19] WATKINS C B, NILSON C, TAYLOR S, et al. Development of touchscreen displays for the gulfstream g500 and g600 symmetry^TM flight deck[C]//2018 IEEE/AIAA 37th Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Piscataway:IEEE Press, 2018:1-10.
[20] AHLSTROM V. Human factors design standard:DOT/FAA/HF-STD-001B[S]. Washington, D.C.:Federal Aviation Administration,2016.
[21] FAA. Advisory Circular:electronic flight displays document information:AC 25-11B[S]. Washington, D.C.:Federal Aviation Administration, 2014.
[22] SAE. Electronic displays:SAE ARP4102/7[S]. Warr-endale:SAE International, 2007.
[23] SAE. Flight deck panels, controls, and displays:SAE ARP4102[S]. Warrendale:SAE International, 2007.
[24] RTCA. DO-160G Change 1, Environmental conditions and test procedures for airborne equipment[S]. Washington, D.C.:Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics, 2014.
[25] FAA. Airborne multipurpose electronic displays:TSO-C113a[S]. Washington, D.C.:Federal Aviation Administration, 2012.
[26] DOD M S. Design criteria standard human engineering MIL-STD-1472G[S]. Washington, D.C.:Department of Defense, 2012.
[27] FAA. Advisory Circular:Guidelines for the certification, airworthiness, and operational use of electronic flight bags:AC 120-76D[S]. Washington, D.C.:Federal Aviation Administration, 2017.
[28] YEH M, JO Y J, DONOVAN C, et al. Human factors considerations in the design and evaluation of flight deck displays and controls:No. DOT-VNTSC-FAA-13-09[R]. Cambridge:John A. Volpe National Transpo-rtation Systems Center (US), 2013.
[29] ISO. Ergonomics of human-system interaction-Part 910:Framework for tactile and haptic interaction:ISO 9241-910[S]. Geneva:International Organization for Stand-ardization, 2011.
[30] ISO. Ergonomics of human-system Interaction-Part 920:Guidance on tactile and haptic interactions:ISO 9241-920[S]. Geneva:International Organization for Standardization, 2009.
[31] RTCA. Software considerations in airborne systems and equipment certification:DO-178C[S]. Washington, D.C.:Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics, 2012.
[32] RTCA. Design assurance guidance for airbo-rne electronic hardware:DO-254[S]. Washington, D.C.:Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics, 2000.
[33] 王黎静, 向维, 何雪丽, 等. 机组工作负荷评价新方法及其应用[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2012, 38(7):915-919,940. WANG L J, XIANG W, HE X L, et al. New method to evaluate crew workload and application[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2012, 38(7):915-919,940(in Chinese).
[34] 李银霞, 袁修干, 杨春信, 等. 歼击机座舱工效学综合评价指标体系的建立[J]. 航空学报, 2005, 26(2):148-152. LI Y X, YUAN X G, YANG C X, et al. Building of the index system for fighter cockpit ergonomics comprehensive evaluation[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2005, 26(2):148-152(in Chinese).
[35] 邓丽, 余隋怀. 基于Fuzzy AHP的司钻控制房人机界面评价[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2014, 50(4):231-235. DENG L, YU S H. Human-machine interface evaluation of driller control room based on fuzzy AHP[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2014, 50(4):231-235(in Chinese).
[36] LIMA F R Jr, OSIRO L, CARPINETTI L C R. A comparison between fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2014, 21:194-209.
[37] 刘昕, 余隋怀, 王淑侠, 等. 基于Delphi排序改进的AHP-Fuzzy人机布局虚拟评价[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2015, 51(3):24-30. LIU X, YU S H, WANG S X, et al. Virtual assessment of ergonomic layout based on AHP-fuzzy improved by Delphi sequence[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2015, 51(3):24-30(in Chinese).
[38] 刘启越. 民用飞机驾驶舱人机工效评价方法研究[D]. 南京:南京航空航天大学, 2013. LIU Q Y. Research on evaluation method of the cockpit ergonomics for civil aircraft[D]. Nanjing:Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2013(in Chinese).

Comprehensive evaluation of ergonomics of civil aircraft cockpit display touch control system

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 4

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	ZHU Chao, KONG Xu, HU Chengwei, TANG Zixin, LI Delun, WANG Youyu, WANG Kang. Maintainability system design and evaluation system construction for space manipulators [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(1): 524002-524002.
[2]	ZENG Qing-xin;ZHUANG Da-min;MA Yin-xiang. Mental Workload and Target Identification [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2007, 28(增): 76-80.
[3]	LI Yin-xia;YUAN Xiu-gan;YANG Chun-xin;WANG Li-jing;DU Jun-min. Weight Factors Determination of the Evaluation Indexes of Cockpit Ergonomics [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2006, 27(3): 370-373.
[4]	LI Yin-xia;YUAN Xiu-gan;YANG Chun-xin;WANG Li-jing;DU Jun-min. Building of the Index System for Fighter Cockpit Ergonomics Comprehensive Evaluation [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2005, 26(2): 148-152.