基于响应面法的S280超高强度不锈钢的热变形行为

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2022.27293

Abstract

Abstract:

The thermal deformation behavior of S280 ultra-high strength stainless steel was studied at deformation temperatures of 850–1 150 ℃ and strain rates of 0.001–1 s^-1. The isothermal constant strain rate compression experiments were carried out using the Thermecmaster-Z thermal simulation tester. The flow behavior characteristics of the stainless steel was analyzed. The thermal deformation activation energy parameter and the strain rate sensitivity exponent were calculated. A response surface model was established with deformation temperature， strain rate， and strain as the input variables and thermal deformation activation energy parameter and strain rate sensitivity exponent as the response targets. The thermal processing process parameters were optimized by multi-objective visualization. The results show that the S280 ultra-high strength stainless steel is a positive strain rate and negative temperature sensitive material， and its flow stress decreases with decreasing strain rate and increasing deformation temperature. The established response surface model has high accuracy and can intuitively reflect the relationship between material parameters and thermal deformation conditions， and can be used for prediction of material-related parameters. Through multi-objective visual optimization and microstructure verification， the optimal thermal processing process parameters for S280 ultra-high strength stainless steel were obtained to be in the range of deformation temperature of 1 085–1 150 ℃ and strain rate of 0.001–0.003 s^-1.

Key words: S280 ultra-high strength stainless steel, response surface method, thermal deformation behavior, process parameter optimization, thermal deformation activation energy, strain rate sensitivity exponent

CLC Number:

V252.1

Kaiming ZHANG, Kelu WANG, Shiqiang LU, Mutong LIU, Ping ZHONG, Ye TIAN. Thermal deformation behavior of S280 ultra-high strength stainless steel based on response surface methodology[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(8): 427293-427293.

Figures/Tables 15

Table 1

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

Response surface model variance analysis of thermal deformation activation energy Q

方差来源	平方和	自由度	均方值	统计量F	概率P
模型	31 969.52	9	3 552.17	188.08	<0.000 1
T	365.93	1	365.93	19.38	0.007 0
lg $ε ˙$	1 397.24	1	1 397.24	73.98	0.000 4
ε	28 788.83	1	28 788.83	1 524.31	<0.000 1
T lg $ε ˙$	0.092	1	0.092	4.857×10^-3	0.947 1
Tε	446.64	1	446.64	23.65	0.004 6
ε lg $ε ˙$	122.60	1	122.60	6.49	0.051 4
T²	195.56	1	195.56	10.35	0.023 5
lg² $ε ˙$	469.40	1	469.40	24.85	0.004 2
ε²	306.32	1	306.32	16.22	0.010 0
残差	94.43	5	18.89
失拟项	94.43	3	31.48
纯误差	0	2	0
总和	32 063.95	14

Table 5

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Fig.9

Fig.10

References 31

1	钟平，张业勤，钟锦岩，等. 一种新型结构材料S280［J］. 科技导报， 2015， 33（11）： 59-62.
	ZHONG P， ZHANG Y Q， ZHONG J Y， et al. A new type of structural material S280［J］. Science and Technology Review， 2015， 33（11）： 59-62 （in Chinese）.
2	刘振宝，梁剑雄，苏杰，等. 高强度不锈钢的研究及发展现状［J］. 金属学报， 2020， 56（4）： 549-557.
	LIU Z B， LIANG J X， SU J， et al. Research and application progress in ultra-high strength stainless steel［J］. Acta Metallurgica Sinica， 2020， 56（4）： 549-557 （in Chinese）.
3	张睦林，朱立群，刘慧丛，等. 300M超高强度钢在模拟积水环境中的腐蚀行为［J］. 航空学报， 2013， 34（4）： 954-962.
	ZHANG M L， ZHU L Q， LIU H C， et al. Corrosion behavior of 300M ultra-high strength steel in simulated gap water environment［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2013， 34（4）： 954-962 （in Chinese）.
4	钟锦岩，张业勤，韩雅芳. S280新型超高强不锈钢中一种新析出相研究［J］. 稀有金属材料与工程， 2019， 48（1）： 116-122.
	ZHONG J Y， ZHANG Y Q， HAN Y F. New phase precipitated from the new type of ultrahigh strength stainless steel S280［J］. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering， 2019， 48（1）： 116-122 （in Chinese）.
5	ZHONG J Y， CHEN Z， YANG S L， et al. Effect of solution and aging temperatures on microstructure and mechanical properties of 10Cr13Co13Mo5Ni3W1VE （S280） steel［J］. Micromachines， 2021， 12（5）： 566-579.
6	詹中伟，孙志华，汤智慧. 化学钝化对S280超高强度不锈钢综合性能的影响［J］. 腐蚀与防护， 2015， 36（8）： 742-747， 758.
	ZHAN Z W， SUN Z H， TANG Z H. Effect of chemical passivation on properities of S280 ultra high-strength stainless steel［J］. Corrosion & Protection， 2015， 36（8）： 742-747， 758 （in Chinese）.
7	田帅，刘培根. 喷丸强化对S280新型超高强度不锈钢疲劳性能的影响［J］. 材料保护， 2013， 46（7）： 16-18， 6.
	TIAN S， LIU P G. Influence of shot peening on fatigue behavior of S280 ultrahigh strength stainless steel［J］. Materials Protection， 2013， 46（7）： 16-18， 6 （in Chinese）.
8	吴道祥，周杰，马鹏程，等. 基于响应面法的7050铝合金筋板类锻件热模锻成形工艺优化［J］. 中南大学学报（自然科学版）， 2017， 48（3）： 601-607.
	WU D X， ZHOU J， MA P C， et al. Optimization of hot die forging process parameters of 7050 aluminum alloy rib-web type components based on response surface method［J］. Journal of Central South University （Science and Technology）， 2017， 48（3）： 601-607 （in Chinese）.
9	李萍，丁永根，姚彭彭，等. 基于响应面法的TA15钛合金显微组织预报和优化［J］. 中国有色金属学报， 2016， 26（5）： 1019-1026.
	LI P， DING Y G， YAO P P， et al. Prediction and optimization of TA15 titanium alloy microstructure based on response surface methodology［J］. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals， 2016， 26（5）： 1019-1026 （in Chinese）.
10	SHEN Z N， WU R D， YUAN C L， et al. Comparative study of metamodeling methods for modeling the constitutive relationships of the TC6 titanium alloy［J］. Journal of Materials Research and Technology， 2021， 10： 188-204.
11	徐勇，尹阔，夏亮亮，等. 面向航空铝合金薄壁深腔构件的冲击液压成形工艺优化［J］. 航空学报， 2021， 42（10）： 524831.
	XU Y， YIN K， XIA L L， et al. Optimization of impact hydroforming process for aeronautical components of aluminum alloy sheets with thin wall and deep cavity［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2021， 42（10）： 524831 （in Chinese）.
12	LONG J C， XIA Q X， XIAO G F， et al. Flow characterization of magnesium alloy ZK61 during hot deformation with improved constitutive equations and using activation energy maps［J］. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences， 2021， 191： 106069.
13	BABU K A， PRITHIV T S， GUPTA A， et al. Modeling and simulation of dynamic recrystallization in super austenitic stainless steel employing combined cellular automaton， artificial neural network and finite element method［J］. Computational Materials Science， 2021， 195： 110482.
14	JIANG Y Q， LIN Y C， WANG G Q， et al. Microstructure evolution and a unified constitutive model for a Ti-55511 alloy deformed in β region［J］. Journal of Alloys and Compounds， 2021， 870： 159534.
15	XIAO Y W， LIN Y C， JIANG Y Q， et al. A dislocation density-based model and processing maps of Ti-55511 alloy with bimodal microstructures during hot compression in α+β region［J］. Materials Science and Engineering： A， 2020， 790： 139692.
16	LU C Y， WANG J， ZHANG P Z. Flow behavior analysis and flow stress modeling of Ti17 alloy in β forging process［J］. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance， 2021， 30（10）： 7668-7681.
17	尚丽梅，王春旭，韩顺，等. 基于摩擦-温度双修正的Maraging250钢热变形行为及热加工图［J］. 金属热处理， 2021， 46（5）： 111-117.
	SHANG L M， WANG C X， HAN S， et al. Hot deformation behavior and processing maps of Maraging250 steel based on friction and temperature double correction［J］. Heat Treatment of Metals， 2021， 46（5）： 111-117 （in Chinese）.
18	LI L X， WANG G， LIU J， et al. Flow softening behavior and microstructure evolution of Al-5Zn-2Mg aluminum alloy during dynamic recovery［J］. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China， 2014， 24（1）： 42-48.
19	MOON J， JO H H， HA H Y， et al. Microstructure evolution and hot deformation behavior of 25Cr-6Mn-3Ni-1Mo-3W-0.1C-0.34N lean duplex stainless steel［J］. Journal of Materials Research and Technology， 2021， 14： 186-194.
20	牛长胜，王艳丽，林均品，等. Fe₃Si基合金的动态再结晶机制［J］. 金属热处理学报， 2003， 24（1）： 28-32， 92.
	NIU C S， WANG Y L， LIN J P， et al. Dynamic recrystallization mechanism of the Fe₃Si based alloy［J］. Transactions of Metal Heat Treatment， 2003， 24（1）： 28-32， 92 （in Chinese）.
21	YU S， WAN Z P， HU L X， et al. Characterization of hot processing parameters of powder metallurgy TiAl-based alloy based on the activation energy map and processing map［J］. Materials & Design， 2015， 86： 922-932.
22	亓耀国，郭子鹏，王兆天，等. Ti-Al-Nb合金的热变形与动态再结晶行为研究［J］. 精密成形工程， 2020， 12（6）： 69-76.
	QI Y G， GUO Z P， WANG Z T， et al. Thermal deformation and dynamic recrystallization of Ti-Al-Nb alloys［J］. Journal of Netshape Forming Engineering， 2020， 12（6）： 69-76 （in Chinese）.
23	QIU Q， WANG K L， LI X， et al. Hot deformation behavior and processing parameters optimization of SP700 titanium alloy［J］. Journal of Materials Research and Technology， 2021， 15： 3078-3087.
24	曹富荣，崔建忠，丁桦，等. 不同初始组织材料超塑性m值模型与验证［J］. 哈尔滨工业大学学报， 2015， 47（10）： 50-54.
	CAO F R， CUI J Z， DING H， et al. Modeling them value and its experimental verification during superplasticity of materials with different initial microstructures［J］. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology， 2015， 47（10）： 50-54 （in Chinese）.
25	BOX G E P， WILSON K B. On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions［J］. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B： Statistical Methodology， 1951， 13（1）： 1-38.
26	陈利文，侯华，靳玉春，等. 基于响应面法的铝合金间接挤压铸造工艺研究［J］. 稀有金属材料与工程， 2018， 47（4）： 1174-1179.
	CHEN L W， HOU H， JIN Y C， et al. Indirect squeeze casting process of aluminum alloy based on response surface method［J］. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering， 2018， 47（4）： 1174-1179 （in Chinese）.
27	豆建新，熊江涛，陈丹，等. 7050铝合金回填式搅拌摩擦点焊组织与性能研究［J］. 精密成形工程， 2019， 11（6）： 81-88.
	DOU J X， XIONG J T， CHEN D， et al. Microstructures and mechanical properties of refill friction stir spot welded 7050 aluminium alloy［J］. Journal of Netshape Forming Engineering， 2019， 11（6）： 81-88 （in Chinese）.
28	WANG J M， LAN S， LI W K. Numerical simulation and process optimization of an aluminum holding furnace based on response surface methodology and uniform design［J］. Energy， 2014， 72： 521-535.
29	SHI C， MAO W， CHEN X G. Evolution of activation energy during hot deformation of AA7150 aluminum alloy［J］. Materials Science and Engineering： A， 2013， 571： 83-91.
30	XIAO Z B， WANG Q， HUANG Y C， et al. Hot deformation characteristics and processing parameter optimization of Al-6.32Zn-2.10Mg alloy using constitutive equation and processing map［J］. Metals， 2021， 11（2）： 360.
31	王兴茂，丁雨田，高钰璧，等. 一种新型Ni-Cr-Co基合金的热变形行为及其组织演变［J］. 稀有金属材料与工程， 2022， 51（1）： 249-259.
	WANG X M， DING Y T， GAO Y B， et al. Hot deformation behavior and microstructure evolution of new-type Ni-Cr-Co based alloy［J］. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering， 2022， 51（1）： 249-259 （in Chinese）.

成分	含量/wt%
C	0.08~0.15
Cr	12.0~14.0
Co	12.0~14.0
Mo	4.0~5.5
Ni	2.2~3.5
W	0.8~1.4
V	0.2~0.4
Fe	Bal.

应变速率/s^-1	热变形激活能/（kJ·mol^-1）
应变速率/s^-1	T=850 ℃	T=900 ℃	T=950 ℃	T=1 000 ℃	T=1 050 ℃	T=1 100 ℃	T=1 150 ℃
0.001	310.970 8	324.512 6	304.970 1	316.424 9	358.024 8	372.245 1	313.119 3
0.01	332.221 1	346.688 3	325.810 4	338.048 0	382.490 6	397.682 6	334.516 4
0.1	345.266 0	360.301 2	338.603 5	351.321 7	397.509 4	413.297 9	347.651 4
1	330.178 3	344.556 6	323.807 0	335.969 4	380.138 7	395.237 3	332.459 5

应变速率/s^-1	ln Z
应变速率/s^-1	T=850 ℃	T=900 ℃	T=950 ℃	T=1 000 ℃	T=1 050 ℃	T=1 100 ℃	T=1 150 ℃
0.001	26.398 8	26.367 6	23.085 3	22.989 6	25.641 6	25.702 1	19.558 6
0.01	30.977 4	30.944 1	27.437 4	27.335 2	30.168 5	30.233 1	23.669 8
0.1	34.677 2	34.642 6	30.998 2	30.891 9	33.836 5	33.903 6	27.082 6
1	35.363 8	35.330 7	31.845 6	31.743 9	34.559 8	34.624 0	28.101 1

应变速率/s^-1	m
应变速率/s^-1	T=850 ℃	T=900 ℃	T=950 ℃	T=1 000 ℃	T=1 050 ℃	T=1 100 ℃	T=1 150 ℃
0.001	-1.695 8	1.404 0	2.214 2	0.726 7	0.815 4	4.041 4	-2.238 0
0.01	-0.588 3	0.666 9	1.061 1	0.466 6	0.567 9	1.822 2	-0.654 1
0.1	-0.030 1	0.199 1	0.320 23	0.218 9	0.284 5	0.475 0	0.075 1
1	-0.021 2	0.000 3	-0.008 3	-0.016 4	-0.034 9	-0.000 1	-0.050 5

[1]	WANG Bin, WANG Haitao, WANG Yufeng, ZHANG Wenwu. Water-assisted laser scanning machining test of thermal barrier coating [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(4): 525353-525353.
[2]	XU Yong, YIN Kuo, XIA Liangliang, MEN Xiangnan, ZENG Yipan, ZHANG Shihong. Optimization of impact hydroforming process for aeronautical components of aluminum alloy sheets with thin wall and deep cavity [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(10): 524831-524831.
[3]	WANG Yan, LI Shu, XU Qiuyi, MA Jun. Optimization design and analysis of stiffened composite panels in post-buckling under shear [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2016, 37(5): 1512-1525.
[4]	FEI Chengwei, BAI Guangchen. Reliability Analysis for HPT Blade-tip Radial Running Clearance Based on DCRSM [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2013, 34(9): 2141-2149.
[5]	ZHAO Wei, WANG Wei. Application of Non-linear Partial Least Squares Regression Method to Response Surface Method with Uniform Design [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2012, (5): 839-847.
[6]	ZHANG Junhong, HAN Jinglong, WANG Xiaoqing. Flutter Optimization of Wing Structure with Random Uncertainty [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2011, 32(9): 1629-1636.
[7]	Jiang Wan;Jin Haibo;Sun Weiping. Aerodynamic Optimization for Winglets Based on Multi-level Response Surface Method [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2010, 31(9): 1746-1751.
[8]	Deng Lei;Qiao Zhide;Xiong Juntao;Yang Xudong. Multi-objective Inverse Design of Natural Laminar Flow Airfoils [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2010, 31(7): 1373-1378.
[9]	LU Zhen-zhou;YANG Zi-zheng;ZHAO Jie. An Artificial Neural Network Method for Reliability Analysis Based on Weighted Linear Response Surface [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2006, 27(6): 1063-1067.
[10]	ZHANG Ke-shi;HAN Zhong-hua;LI Wei-ji;LI Xiang. Multidisciplinary Aerodynamic/Structural Design Optimization for High Subsonic Transport Wing Using Approximation Technique [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2006, 27(5): 810-815.
[11]	XIONG Jun-tao;QIAO Zhi-de;HAN Zhong-hua. Optimum Aerodynamic Design of Transonic Wing Based on Response Surface Methodology [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2006, 27(3): 399-402.

Thermal deformation behavior of S280 ultra-high strength stainless steel based on response surface methodology

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 15

References 31

Related Articles 11

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments