月球探测器加速度响应预测的时域子结构方法

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2014.0080

Abstract

Abstract:

The remarkable increase in the complexity and size of spacecraft has inflicted unprecedented difficulties and challenges on system level dynamics simulation. At present, dynamic substructure method is mainly adopted to improve the solution efficiency and protect the proprietary technologies in model sharing among different project groups. The acceleration shock response spectrum is commonly used to describe the impact dynamic environment during the soft landing phase. It is acknowledged that the effects of high order modes on acceleration responses are more significant than those on displacement responses, so under the condition of small damping, the acceleration prediction accuracy is far lower than the prediction accuracy of displacement obtained by classical substructure methods based on modal with identical cut-off frequency. To solve this problem, a recently proposed novel method called impulse based substructuring (IBS) method is applied and its reduced-order form of iterative solution format used to predict acceleration is presented. Based on the buffer load measured from the soft landing numerical experiment, the acceleration response of the lunar lander is respectively calculated through the Craig-Bampton (CB) method and the IBS method. A numerical example shows that the IBS method has higher accuracy and efficiency than CB method, and it is suitable for rapid prediction for acceleration of the lunar lander with high accuracy.

Key words: lunar lander, component modal synthesis method, dynamic substructure method, time domain, impulse response

CLC Number:

DONG Weili, LIU Li, ZHOU Sida. Acceleration response prediction for lunar lander using time-domain substructure methods[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2015, 36(3): 848-856.

References

[1] Schwarz H A. Gesammelte mathematische abhandlungen[M]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1890: 133-143.

[2] de Klerk D, Rixen D J, de Jong J. The frequency based substructuring (FBS) method reformulated according to the dual domain decomposition method[C]//24th IMAC. New York: Springer, 2006.

[3] Hurty H W. Vibration of structure systems by component mode synthesis[J]. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, 1960, 86(4): 51-70.

[4] Gladwell G M L. Branch mode analysis of vibrating systems[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1964, 1(1): 41-59.

[5] Craig R R, Bampton M C C. Coupling of substructures for dynamics analysis[J]. AIAA Journal, 1968, 6(7): 1313-1319.

[6] Hurty W C. Dynamic analysis of structural systems using comtonent modes[J]. AIAA Journal, 1965, 3(4): 678-685.

[7] Hou S N. Review of modal synthesis techniques and a new approach[J]. Shock and Vibration Bulletin, 1969, 40(4): 25-39.

[8] Macneal R H. A hybrid method of component mode synthesis[J]. Computers & Structures, 1971, 1(4): 581-601.

[9] Rubin S. Improved component-mode representation for structural dynamic analysis[J]. AIAA Journal, 1975, 13(8): 995-1006.

[10] Craig R R, Chang C J. Free-interface methods of substructure coupling for dynamic analysis[J]. AIAA Journal, 1976, 4(11): 1633-1635.

[11] Wang W L, Du Z R, Chen K Y. A short commentary for modal synthesis techniques and a novel improvement[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 1979(3): 32-51 (in Chinese). 王文亮, 杜作润, 陈康元. 模态综合技术短评和一种新的改进[J]. 航空学报, 1979(3): 32-51.

[12] Benfield A W, Hruda F R. Vibration analysis of structures by component mode[J]. AIAA Journal, 1971, 9(7): 1255-1261.

[13] Biot M A. Vibration of crankshaft-propeller systems. New method of calculation[J]. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, 1940, 7(3): 107-112.

[14] Biot M A. Coupled oscillations of aircraft engine-propeller systems[J]. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, 1940, 7(9): 376-382.

[15] Serbin H. Vibrations of composite structures[J]. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, 1945, 12(1): 108-112.

[16] Sofrin T G. The combination of dynamical systems[J]. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences, 1946, 13(6): 281-288.

[17] Bishop R E D, Johnson D C. The mechanics of vibration[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960: 17-20.

[18] Rubin S. Mechanical immittance and transmission matrix concepts[J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1967, 41(5): 1171-1179.

[19] Jetmundsen B, Bielawa R L, Flannelly W G. Generalized frequency domain substructure synthesis[J]. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 1988, 33(1): 55-64.

[20] Dong W L, Liu L, Zhou S D. Model reduction of soft landing dynamics for lunar lander with local nonlinearities[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2014, 35(5): 1319-1328 (in Chinese). 董威利, 刘莉, 周思达. 含局部非线性的月球探测器软着陆动力学降阶分析[J]. 航空学报, 2014, 35(5): 1319-1328.

[21] Rixen D J. Substructuring using impulse response functions for impact analysis[C]//28th IMAC. New York: Springer, 2010: 637-646.

[22] Rixen D J, van der Valk P L C. An impulse based substructuring approach for impact analysis and load case simulations[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2013, 332(26): 7174-7190.

[23] Laurenson R M, Melliere R A, Mcgehee J R. Analysis of legged landers for the survivable soft landing of instrument payload[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 1973, 10(3): 208-214.

[24] Zeng F M, Yang J Z, Zhu W, et al. Research on landing impact attenuation performance of lunar lander[J]. Spacecraft Engineering, 2010(5): 43-49 (in Chinese). 曾福明, 杨建中, 朱汪, 等. 月球着陆器着陆缓冲性能研究[J]. 航天器工程, 2010(5): 43-49.

[25] Farhat C, Roux F X. A method of finite element tearing and interconnecting and its parallel solution algorithm[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1991, 32(6): 1205-1227.

[26] van der Valk P L C, Rixen D J. An effective method for assembling impulse response functions to linear and non-linear finite element models[C]//30th IMAC. New York: Springer, 2012: 123-135.

[27] Rixen D J, Haghighat N. Truncating the impulse responses of substructures to speed up the impulse-based substructuring[C]//30th IMAC. New York: Springer, 2012: 137-148.

[28] van der Valk P L C, Rixen D J. Impulse based substructuring for coupling offshore structures and wind turbines in aero-elastic simulations[C]//53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference. Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc., 2012: 23-26.

[29] Otto O R, Laurenson R M, Melliere R A, et al. Analyses and limited evaluation of payload and legged landing system structures for the survivable soft landing of instrument payloads, NASA CR-111919[R]. Washington, D.C.: NASA, 1971.

[30] Hughes P C. Modal identities for elastic bodies, with application to vehicle dynamics and control[J]. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 1980, 47(1): 177-184.

[31] Lee A, Tsuha W S. Model reduction methodology for articulated, multiflexible body structures[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 1994, 17(1): 69-75.

[32] Hughes P C, Skelton R E. Modal truncation for flexible spacecraft[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 1981, 4(3): 291-297.

[33] Hughes P C, Skelton R E. Controllability and observability for flexible spacecraft[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 1980, 3(5): 452-459.

[34] Skelton R E, Gregory C Z. Measurement feedback and model reduction by modal cost analysis[C]//Proceedings of the 1979 Joint Automatic Control Conference. New York: American Institute Chememical Engineers, 1979: 211-218.

[35] Moore B C. Principal component analysis in linear systems: controllability, observability, and model reduction[J]. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 1981, 26(1): 17-32.

[36] Jin R, Chen W, Simpson T W. Comparative studies of metamodelling techniques under multiple modelling criteria[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2001, 23(1): 1-13.

Acceleration response prediction for lunar lander using time-domain substructure methods

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 11

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	WANG Zihang, LYU Hongqiang. Research on lightning electromagnetic field based on CFD high-precision algorithm [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(S1): 726366-726366.
[2]	LIU Xu, LIU Wei, CHAI Zhenxia, YANG Xiaoliang. Research progress of numerical method of dynamic stability derivatives of aircraft [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2016, 37(8): 2348-2369.
[3]	LIU Li, CHEN Shulin, ZHOU Sida, CHEN Zhaoyue. A substructure method for coupling impulse response functions with finite element models via rigid-elastic joints [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2015, 36(8): 2670-2680.
[4]	ZHOU Di, LU Zhiliang, GUO Tongqing, SHEN Ennan. Stall flutter computation of turbomachinery blade based on a CFD/CSD coupling method [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2015, 36(4): 1076-1085.
[5]	HONG Zhiliang, GAO Ge, JING Xiaodong, SUN Xiaofeng. A grid-less time domain method for plate trailing edge noise prediction [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2015, 36(11): 3501-3514.
[6]	WANG Junchao, LI Jianbo. Effects of Wing on Autogyro Longitudinal Stability [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2014, 35(1): 151-160.
[7]	Wei Dong;Zhou Zhenggan;. Finite Difference Simulation of Pulsed Ultrasonic Propagation in Solids [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2010, 31(2): 388-392.
[8]	Yang Yan;Deng Zhiquan;Zhang Qianying;Liu Zeyuan;Cao Xin. Effects of Control Strategies on Stator Vibration of Bearingless SwitchedReluctance Motors [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2010, 31(10): 2010-2017.
[9]	Zhang Junmin;Wei Juan;Xie Huabo;Cao Dashu;Yao Hongyu. Detection and Analysis of Aerospace Wire Insulation Faults Based on TDR [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2009, 30(4): 706-712.
[10]	WANG Tong;ZHANG Ling-mi. Frequency Domain Multiple Input / Output Modal Parameters Identification with Consideration of Stochastic Noise [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2004, 25(6): 560-564.
[11]	Huang Junqin;Liu Sha. A NEW DESIGN METHOD IN TIME DOMAIN FOR TWO-DIMENSIONAL RECURSIVE DIGITAL FILTERS [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 1988, 9(3): 148-155.