基于AHP-SPA方法的民机修理级别确定综合分析模型

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2017.221130

固体力学与飞行器总体设计

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

基于AHP-SPA方法的民机修理级别确定综合分析模型

贾宝惠, 于灵杰, 蔺越国, 卢翔

中国民航大学航空工程学院, 天津 300300

收稿日期:2017-01-13 修回日期:2017-04-20 出版日期:2017-11-15 发布日期:2017-04-19
通讯作者: 贾宝惠 E-mail:15510928918@163.com
基金资助:
中国民航局重大专项（MHRD20160105）

Comprehensive analysis model for determination of civil aircraft repair level based on AHP-SPA method

JIA Baohui, YU Lingjie, LIN Yueguo, LU Xiang

College of Aviation Engineering, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China

Received:2017-01-13 Revised:2017-04-20 Online:2017-11-15 Published:2017-04-19
Supported by:
Major Project Foundation of Civil Aviation Administration of China(MHRD20160105)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

民机保障性分析中的重要内容之一是修理级别分析（Level of Repair Analysis，LORA），现有的修理级别分析模型没有基于民机维修保障体制的特点综合考虑各类影响修理级别的因素。文章综合考虑修理级别分析的技术指标、经济指标和商业指标，将层次分析法（Analytical Hierarchy Process，AHP）与集对分析法（Set Pair Analysis，SPA）结合起来，建立民机修理级别分析综合评价模型，以实施经济性修理级别分析。并通过实例对AHP-SPA综合分析模型进行验证，表明了该模型的可行性，因此该文章的理论模型可为民机制造商和航空公司在修理级别确定方面提供理论参考和技术支持。

关键词: 保障性分析, 修理级别分析, 层次分析法, 集对分析法, 综合评价模型

Abstract:

One of the important contents of civil aircraft security analysis is Level of Repair Analysis (LORA).The existing level of repair analysis model is not based on the characteristics of civil aircraft maintenance safeguard system to take into consideration various factors affecting the level of repair. In this paper, the AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) is combined with SPA (Set Pair Analysis) by comprehensively considering the technical index, economic index and business index of Level of repair analysis so as to establish the comprehensive evaluation model for civil aircraft level of repair analysis, thus implementing the economic level of repair analysis. The comprehensive analysis model of AHP-SPA is verified by an example, which shows the feasibility of the model. Therefore, the theoretical model of this paper can provide civil aircraft manufacturers and airlines with theoretical reference and technical support in the determination of level of repair.

Key words: security analysis, level of repair analysis, analytical hierarchy process, set pair analysis, comprehensive evaluation model

中图分类号:

V267

贾宝惠, 于灵杰, 蔺越国, 卢翔. 基于AHP-SPA方法的民机修理级别确定综合分析模型[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(11): 221130-221130.

JIA Baohui, YU Lingjie, LIN Yueguo, LU Xiang. Comprehensive analysis model for determination of civil aircraft repair level based on AHP-SPA method[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2017, 38(11): 221130-221130.

参考文献

[1] 魏效燕, 刘晓东. 基于AHP方法的军用飞机修理级别分析[J]. 航空维修与工程,2006(2):22-24. WEI X Y,LIU X D.Military aircraft's level of repair analysis which based on AHP[J].Aviation Maintenance,2006(2):22-24(in Chinese).
[2] 吴昊. 民用飞机规划维修技术理论及应用研究[D].南京:南京航空航天大学,2009:71-75. WU H.Research on theory and application of civil aircraft maintenance planning[D].Nanjing:Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,2009:71-75(in Chinese).
[3] Aerospace and Defense Industries Association of Europe.S3000L international procedure specification logistics support analysis[S]. Brussels:Aerospace and Defense Industries Association of Europe,2010:4.
[4] SAE. AS1390:Level of repair analysis (LORA)[S].Warrendale:SAE International,2014.
[5] BARROS L L. The optimization of repair decision using life-cycle cost Parameters[J]. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics,1998,9(4):403-413.
[6] BARROS L,RILEY M. A combinatorial approach to level of repair analysis[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2001,129(2):242-251.
[7] GUTINA G,RAFIEY A,YEO A.Graph-theoretical approach to level of repair analysis[EB/OL].2004.(2017-01-12)[2017-01-13].http//www.optimization online. org/DB_FILE/2004/08/945. pdf./2007-11-28.
[8] GUTINA G,RAFIEY A,YEO A,et al. Level of repair analysis and minimum cost homomorphisms of graphs[J]. Discrete Applied Mathematics,2006,154(6):881-889.
[9] HARITHA S, KUMAR U D. Optimization of aircraft maintenance/support infrastructure using genetic algorithms-level of repair analysis[J].Annals of Operations Research,2006,143:91-106.
[10] BASTEN R J I,SCHUTTEN J M J,HEIJDEN M C. An efficient model formulation for level of repair analysis[J]. Annals of Operations Research,2009,172(1):119-142.
[11] BASTEN R J I,HEIJDEN M C,SCHUTTEN J M J. A minimum cost flow model for level of repair analysis[J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2011,133(1):233-242.
[12] BASTEN R J I,HEIJDEN M C,SCHUTTEN J M J. Practical extensions to a minimum cost flow model for level of repair analysis[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2011,211(2):333-342.
[13] BRICK E S,UCHOA E. A facility location and installation of resources model for level of repair analysis[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2007,192(2):479-486.
[14] 吴昊, 左洪福.基于改进层次分析法的民用飞机修理级别非经济性分析[J]. 飞机设计,2008,28(6):46-49. WU H,ZUO H F.Level of repair analysis non-ecomonic evaluation for aircraft maintenance based on improved AHP[J].Aircraft Design,2008,28(6):46-49(in Chinese).
[15] 吴昊, 左洪福, 孙伟.一种新的民用飞机修理级别优化模型[J]. 航空学报,2009,30(2):247-253. WU H,ZUO H F,SUN W.A new level of repair analysis optimization model for civil aircraft maintenance[J].Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica,2009,30(2):247-253(in Chinese).
[16] 李鑫, 蔡景, 左洪福, 等.基于改进FAHP的民机修理级别经济性分析研究[J]. 四川兵工学报,2014,35(6):64-67. LI X,CAI J,ZUO H F,et al.Level of repair analysis economic evaluation for aircraft maintenance based on improved FAHP[J].Journal of Sichuan Ordnance,2014,35(6):64-67(in Chinese).
[17] 李鑫, 蔡景, 左洪福, 等.两级修理模式下民机修理级别非经济性分析研究[J].火力与指挥控制,2015,40(7):8-11. LI X,CAI J,ZUO H F,et al.Research on level of repair analysis non-economic evaluation for civil aircraft maintenance based on two-level maintenance[J].Fire Control&Command Control,2015,40(7):8-11(in Chinese).
[18] 薛陶, 冯蕴雯, 薛小锋,等.一种飞机修理级别经济性分析模型[J]. 航空学报,2013,34(1):97-103. XUE T,FENG Y W,XUE X F,et al.An analysis economic evaluation model for level of repair analysis[J].Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica,2013,34(1):97-103(in Chinese).
[19] 薛陶, 冯蕴雯, 代晓明. 基于改进AHP方法的飞机修理级别经济性分析[J]. 火力与指挥控制,2013,38(3):58-61. XUE T,FENG Y W,DAI X M.Level of repair analysis economic evaluation for aircraft maintenance based on improved AHP[J].Fire Control&Command Control,2013,38(3):58-61(in Chinese).
[20] 薛陶,冯蕴雯, 薛小锋.装备修理级别与备件库存联合优化模型研究[J].机械科学与技术,2015,34(6):963-968. XUE T,FENG Y W,XUE X F.Research on joint optimizing model of equipment LORA and spare parts inventory[J].Mechanical Science and Technology for Aerospace Engineering,2015,34(6):963-968(in Chinese).
[21] 赵焕臣.层次分析法[M].北京:科学出版社,1986:85-96. ZHAO H C.Analytic hierarchy process[M].Beijing:Science Press,1986:85-96(in Chinese).
[22] 赵克勤.基于集对分析同一度的方案综合评价决策[J].决策探索,1994,2:14-15. ZHAO K Q.Comprehensive evaluation for decision of the plan based on identical degree of the set pair analysis[J].Decision to Explore,1994,2:14-15(in Chinese).
[23] 贾宝惠,周帆.基于遗传禁忌搜索混合算法的修理级别问题研究[J].机械工程与自动化,2015,6:11-16. JIA B H,ZHOU F.Study on level of repair analysis based on hybrid genetic-tabu search algorithm[J].Mechnical Engineering&Automation,2015,6:11-16(in Chinese).
[24] 中国航空综合技术研究所.GJB 2961-97修理级别分析[S]. 北京:国防科工委军标出版发行部,1997. AVIC China Aero-polytechnology Establishment.GJB 2961-97 Level of repair analysis[S].Beijing:Military Standard Publishing Department of Commission of Science Technology and Industry for National Defense, 1997(in Chinese).

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

基于AHP-SPA方法的民机修理级别确定综合分析模型

Comprehensive analysis model for determination of civil aircraft repair level based on AHP-SPA method

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 7

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	贾宝惠, 邓婉怡, 王毅强. 三层三级民机修理级别经济性分析模型的改进[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(3): 323468-323468.
[2]	李耀华, 巩子瑜. 基于改进FRAM的民机系统安全性分析[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(12): 324083-324083.
[3]	张礼学, 王中伟. 平流层飞艇环境适应性评价模型[J]. 航空学报, 2013, 34(4): 719-726.
[4]	薛陶, 冯蕴雯, 薛小锋, 冯元生. 一种飞机修理级别经济性分析模型[J]. 航空学报, 2013, 34(1): 97-103.
[5]	陈海;王新民;赵凯瑞;李俨. 基于灰关联层次分析法的无人机自修复控制策略评价[J]. 航空学报, 2010, 31(5): 1030-1037.
[6]	孟凡耀;陈新. 修理级别分析中的备件量计算[J]. 航空学报, 1996, 17(4): 511-512.
[7]	蒋正新;魏挹湘. 判断矩阵的一个恰当的校正方法[J]. 航空学报, 1989, 10(11): 559-564.