航空学报 > 2015, Vol. 36 Issue (5): 1367-1384   doi: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2015.0036

颤振飞行试验的边界预测方法回顾与展望

张伟伟1, 钟华寿1, 肖华2, 叶正寅1   

  1. 1. 西北工业大学 航空学院, 西安 710072;
    2. 中国飞行试验研究院 飞行仿真航空科技重点实验室, 西安 710089
  • 收稿日期:2014-12-02 修回日期:2015-01-30 出版日期:2015-05-15 发布日期:2015-02-10
  • 通讯作者: 张伟伟Tel.: 029-88491342 E-mail: aeroelastic@nwpu.edu.cn E-mail:aeroelastic@nwpu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:张伟伟 男, 博士, 教授, 博士生导师。主要研究方向: 气动弹性力学、非定常空气动力学、复杂流动的分析、设计与控制。 Tel: 029-88491342 E-mail: aeroelastic@nwpu.edu.cn;钟华寿 男, 硕士研究生。主要研究方向: 气动弹性力学。 E-mail: zhonghuashou259@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    陕西省"青年科技新星"计划 (2014KJXX-36); 航空科学基金(20141330001)

Review and prospect of flutter boundary prediction methods for flight flutter testing

ZHANG Weiwei1, ZHONG Huashou1, XIAO Hua2, YE Zhengyin1   

  1. 1. School of Aeronautics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an 710072, China;
    2. Flight Simulation Laboratory, Chinese Flight Test Establishment, Xi'an 710089, China
  • Received:2014-12-02 Revised:2015-01-30 Online:2015-05-15 Published:2015-02-10
  • Supported by:

    Youth Science and Technology Star Plan of Shanxi Province (2014KJXX-36); Aeronautical Science Foundation of China(20141330001)

摘要:

颤振飞行试验是新型机种定型必不可少的环节,其目的是要确定颤振边界。由于颤振飞行试验的风险大、耗费高并且周期长,研究者一直在追求安全、准确和高效的颤振边界预测方法。鉴于此,在总结前人研究的基础上,从传统的颤振边界预测方法及其改进和新的颤振边界预测方法两个层面展开,对常用的和近年发展的颤振边界预测方法较为全面而相对简洁的论述,着重介绍了各种颤振边界预测方法的基本原理、适用性及其推广和改进。针对各种方法的原理和特点,将其归纳为构造稳定性参数的方法和基于流固耦合分析模型的方法,并对两类方法进行了对比和总结。最后,对目前颤振边界预测存在的一些技术难点及其发展趋势进行了初步的探讨。

关键词: 颤振飞行试验, 颤振边界预测, 气动弹性, 基本原理, 技术难点

Abstract:

Flight flutter testing, whose objective is to identify the flutter boundary, is an indispensible course for new aircraft to finalize. Because of the extremely great risk, high consumption and long period, researchers have been always pursuing a more secure, accurate and efficient flutter boundary prediction method. Based on the summary and analysis of the previous research, from the aspects of conventional flutter boundary prediction methods and new methods for flight flutter testing, this paper makes a more comprehensive and relatively concise introduction of many kinds of flutter prediction methods, and it highlights the basic principles, merits and demerits as well as the development of these methods. According to the fundamental principles and characteristics of various methods, they are divided into two categories, namely, introducing stability parameters methods and considering a coupled fluid-structure system method. Then, the two kinds of methods are compared and summarized. Finally, technical difficulties encountered at present and the development trend in the field of flight flutter testing are preliminary discussed.

Key words: flight flutter testing, flutter boundary prediction, aeroelasticity, basic principles, technical difficulties

中图分类号: