基于交叉熵和空间分割的全局可靠性灵敏度分析

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2017.221570

固体力学与飞行器总体设计

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

基于交叉熵和空间分割的全局可靠性灵敏度分析

赵翔, 李洪双

南京航空航天大学航空宇航学院, 南京 210016

收稿日期:2017-07-01 修回日期:2017-09-08 出版日期:2018-02-15 发布日期:2017-09-08
通讯作者: 李洪双,E-mail:154552879@qq.com E-mail:hongshuangli@nuaa.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（U1533109）；南京航空航天大学研究生创新基地（实验室）开放基金（kfjj20160113）

Global reliability sensitivity analysis using cross entropy method and space partition

ZHAO Xiang, LI Hongshuang

College of Aerospace Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China

Received:2017-07-01 Revised:2017-09-08 Online:2018-02-15 Published:2017-09-08
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1533109);Foundation of Graduate Innovation Center in NUAA (kfjj20160113)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于失效概率的全局灵敏度分析可以度量各个基本随机变量的不确定性对失效概率的影响程度，对如何降低结构的失效概率具有指导意义。基于交叉熵方法和空间分割提出一种新全局可靠性灵敏度分析方法。该方法采用交叉熵法自适应的确定重要抽样密度函数，有效地回避了传统重要抽样中设计点位置和个数求解的困难。基于评估失效概率所使用的样本，利用空间分割方法计算各个输入随机变量的全局可靠性灵敏度指标，能够提高样本的利用率和计算效率。文中利用一个数值算例和两个工程算例验证了所提方法的计算效率和精度。

关键词: 全局可靠性灵敏度, 失效概率, 交叉熵方法, 空间分割, 重要抽样法

Abstract: Failure-probability-based sensitivity analysis is capable to measure the effects of uncertainties of input variables on failure probability, and can provide guidance on how to reduce the failure probability of a structure. In this paper, a new method is proposed to estimate the global reliability sensitivity indices, based on cross entropy method and space partition. The proposed method adaptively determines the important sampling density function by cross entropy method, avoiding the issue of determining the positions and number of the design points. Based on the identical set of samples used to estimate failure probability, the global reliability sensitivity index of each input random variable is calculated by the space partition method, which significantly improves the utilization of the samples and computational efficiency. A numerical and two engineering examples are used to illustrate the accuracy and efficiency of the proposed method.

Key words: global reliability sensitivity, failure probability, cross entropy method, sample space partition, importance sampling

中图分类号:

V19
TB114.3

赵翔, 李洪双. 基于交叉熵和空间分割的全局可靠性灵敏度分析[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(2): 221570-221570.

ZHAO Xiang, LI Hongshuang. Global reliability sensitivity analysis using cross entropy method and space partition[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2018, 39(2): 221570-221570.

参考文献

[1] SALTELLI A. Sensitivity analysis for importance assessment[M]. New Dersey:Wiley, 2002:579-590.[2] 吕震宙, 宋述芳, 李洪双, 等. 结构机构可靠性及可靠性灵敏度分析[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2009:6-8. LU Z Z, SONG S F, LI H S, et al. Reliability and sensitivity analysis of structure and mechanism[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2009:6-8(in Chinese).[3] SALTELLI A. Global sensitivity analysis:The primer[M]. New Dersey:Wiley, 2004:1-42.[4] HELTON J C, DAVIS F J. Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2003, 81(1):23-69.[5] SALTELLI A, MARIVOET J. Non-parametric statistics in sensitivity analysis for model output:A comparison of selected techniques[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 1990, 28(2):229-253.[6] IMAN R L, HORA S C. A robust measure of uncertainty importance for use in fault tree system analysis[J]. Risk Analysis, 1990, 10(3):401-406.[7] SOBOL I M. Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates[J]. Mathematics & Computers in Simulation, 2001, 55(1-3):271-280.[8] BORGONOVO E. A new uncertainty importance measure[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2007, 92(6):771-784.[9] 吕震宙, 李璐祎, 宋述芳, 等. 不确定性结构系统的重要性分析理论与求解方法[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2015:1-8. LU Z Z, LI L Y, SONG S F, et al. The important analysis theory and the solution method of the uncertainty structure system[M]. Beijing:Science Press,2015:1-8(in Chinese).[10] CUI L J, LU Z Z, ZHAO X P. Moment-independent importance measure of basic random variable and its probability density evolution solution[J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2010, 53(4):1138-1145.[11] LI L, LU Z Z, FENG J, et al. Moment-independent importance measure of basic variable and its state dependent parameter solution[J]. Structural Safety, 2012, 38(38):40-47.[12] BORGONOVO E, CASTAINGS W, TARANTOLA S. Model emulation and moment-independent sensitivity analysis:An application to environmental modelling[J]. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2012, 34(8):105-115.[13] WEI P F, LU Z Z, HAO W R, et al. Efficient sampling methods for global reliability sensitivity analysis[J]. Computer Physics Communications, 2012, 183(8):1728-1743.[14] 任超, 李洪双. 基于失效概率的全局重要性测度分析的交叉熵方法[J]. 西北工业大学学报, 2017, 35(3):536-544. REN C, LI H S. Cross-entropy method for failure probability based global importance measure analysis[J]. Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2017, 35(3):536-544(in Chinese).[15] RUBINSTEIN R Y. Optimization of computer simulation models with rare events[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1997, 99(1):89-112.[16] RUBINSTEIN R Y. The cross-entropy method for combinatorial and continuous optimization[J]. Methodology & Computing in Applied Probability, 1999, 1(2):127-190.[17] ZHAI Q, YANG J, ZHAO Y. Space-partition method for the variance-based sensitivity analysis:Optimal partition scheme and comparative study[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2014, 131(6):66-82.[18] PLISCHKE E. An adaptive correlation ratio method using the cumulative sum of the reordered output[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2012, 107:149-156.[19] LI C, MAHADEVAN S. An efficient modularized sample-based method to estimate the first-order Sobol' index[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2016, 153:110-121.[20] PLISCHKE E, BORGONOVO E, SMITH C L. Global sensitivity measures from given data[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2013, 226(3):536-550.[21] 李洪双, 马远卓. 结构可靠性分析与随机优化设计的统一方法[M]. 北京:国防工业出版社, 2015:129-139. LI H S, MA Y Z. Unified methods for structure reliability analysis and stochastic optimization design[M]. Beijing:National Defense Industry Press, 2015:129-139(in Chinese).[22] ZHOU C, LU Z, YUAN X. Use of relevance vector machine in structural reliability analysis[J]. Journal of Aircraft, 2013, 50(6):1726-1733.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

基于交叉熵和空间分割的全局可靠性灵敏度分析

Global reliability sensitivity analysis using cross entropy method and space partition

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	员婉莹, 吕震宙. 参数可靠性全局灵敏度高效分析的代理模型法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(12): 227670-227670.
[2]	史朝印, 吕震宙, 李璐祎, 王燕萍. 基于自适应Kriging代理模型的交叉熵重要抽样法[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(1): 223123-223123.
[3]	李宝玉, 张磊刚, 裘群海, 余雄庆. 基于Kriging模型梯度解析解的改进一次二阶矩方法[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(5): 222629-222629.
[4]	蒋献, 王言, 孟敏. 失效概率矩独立全局灵敏度分析的高效算法[J]. 航空学报, 2019, 40(3): 222414-222414.
[5]	柳诗雨, 吕震宙, 员婉莹, 肖思男. 小失效概率情况下的全局可靠性灵敏度分析的高效方法[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(9): 2766-2774.
[6]	李岩, 张曙光, 宫綦. 一种改进的航空发动机结构概率风险评估方法[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(2): 597-608.
[7]	佟操, 孙志礼, 杨丽, 孙安邦. 一种基于Kriging和Monte Carlo的主动学习可靠度算法[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(9): 2992-3001.
[8]	朱海燕, 袁修开. 基于灵敏度的可靠性优化解耦方法[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(3): 881-888.
[9]	吕召燕, 吕震宙, 李贵杰, 唐樟春. 基于密度权重的可靠性灵敏度分析方法[J]. 航空学报, 2014, 35(1): 179-186.
[10]	刘瞻, 张建国, 王灿灿, 谭春林, 孙京. 基于优化Kriging模型和重要抽样法的结构可靠度混合算法[J]. 航空学报, 2013, 34(6): 1347-1355.
[11]	尼早;邱志平. 分布参数为模糊变量的结构体系模糊可靠性分析方法及应用[J]. 航空学报, 2009, 30(5): 872-878.
[12]	陈磊;吕震宙. 相关变量模糊可靠性灵敏度分析的线抽样方法[J]. 航空学报, 2008, 29(5): 1186-1195.
[13]	贺小帆;刘文珽. 腐蚀条件下使用寿命评定的功能失效概率控制方法[J]. 航空学报, 2007, 28(4): 858-863.
[14]	宋述芳;吕震宙. 高维小失效概率下的改进线抽样方法[J]. 航空学报, 2007, 28(3): 596-599.
[15]	吕震宙;杨子政;赵洁. 基于加权线性响应面法的神经网络可靠性分析方法[J]. 航空学报, 2006, 27(6): 1063-1067.