基于改进定点二乘的重复使用助推飞行器控制分配研究

电子与自动控制

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

基于改进定点二乘的重复使用助推飞行器控制分配研究

许江涛¹, 崔乃刚², 陈阳阳¹, 吴限德¹, 韩宇²

1. 哈尔滨工程大学航天工程系, 黑龙江哈尔滨 150001;
2. 哈尔滨工业大学航天工程系, 黑龙江哈尔滨 150001

收稿日期:2011-11-27 修回日期:2012-01-05 出版日期:2012-12-25 发布日期:2012-12-24
通讯作者: 许江涛 E-mail:hit_xjt@163.com
作者简介:许江涛男, 博士, 副教授。主要研究方向: 飞行器动力学与控制, 导航、制导与控制, 系统辨识。Tel: 0451-82589025 E-mail: hit_xjt@163.com
基金资助:
中国博士后科学基金(20110491028); 中央高校基本科研业务费(重点支持研究项目)(HEUCFZ1126)

Research on Control Allocation Based on Improved Fixed-point for Reusable Boosted Vehicle

XU Jiangtao¹, CUI Naigang², CHEN Yangyang¹, WU Xiande¹, HAN Yu²

1. Department of Astronautics, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China;
2. Department of Astronautics, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China

Received:2011-11-27 Revised:2012-01-05 Online:2012-12-25 Published:2012-12-24
Supported by:
China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (20110491028); Central University Foundation of Basic Scientific Research(HEUCFZ1126)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为适应重复使用助推飞行器(RBV)控制精度和控制可靠性等要求,导致多异类执行机构数量的急剧增加,而各执行机构偏转角、偏转角速率和非连续工作方式的限制影响控制效果。为满足该类飞行器控制系统实时性和控制精度等需求,需要研究计算精度、计算效率更高的控制分配(CA)方法。根据每次迭代所需的浮点运算量,在比较基于二次规划的控制分配算法计算效率的基础上,首先,利用最小代价函数关系将传统定点(FP)二乘优化算法转化为二次规划问题,并给出传统定点二乘优化方法最优解应满足的条件;然后,针对执行机构饱和情况,提出了改进定点(IFP)二乘的控制分配算法以提高计算效率,同时给予详细的推导证明,并基于迭代常数映射的特性,以相邻时刻控制量差的范数达到相关要求给出改进算法的迭代终止条件;最后,基于多种控制分配算法,对所提出的控制分配算法进行了比较仿真,验证该算法的有效性和合理性。

关键词: 重复使用助推飞行器, 控制分配, 改进定点二乘算法, 执行机构, 飞行控制

Abstract:

To satisfy the control accuracy and reliability demands of reusable boosted vehicles (RBV), there appears a number of different kinds of redundant actuators. However, the limitations of the deflection angle, angular rate and non-continuous working mode affect their control effect. To meet the real-time demands of control systems and control precision, it is imperative to study control allocation (CA) algorithms with higher calculation accuracy and efficiency. This paper makes a comparison of the computational efficiency of control allocation algorithms based on quadratic programming by using the number of flops required at each iteration, First, the conventional fixed-point (FP) algorithm is transformed to quadratic programming, and the satisfying conditions of the optimal solutions for the conventional fixed-point method are given. Secondly, according to actuator saturation, an improved fixed-point (IFP) control allocation algorithm is proposed to improve calculation efficiency, and its detailed proof is given. Based on the characteristics of iteration constant mapping, the norm of the control variable errors between two adjacent moments must meet the related requirements before the termination conditions of the iteration are reached. Finally, simulation based on various control allocation algorithms verifies the validity and rationality of the proposed algorithm.

Key words: reusable boosted vehicle, control allocation, improved fixed-point algorithm, actuators, flight control

中图分类号:

V448.2

许江涛, 崔乃刚, 陈阳阳, 吴限德, 韩宇. 基于改进定点二乘的重复使用助推飞行器控制分配研究[J]. 航空学报, 2012, 33(12): 2268-2278.

XU Jiangtao, CUI Naigang, CHEN Yangyang, WU Xiande, HAN Yu. Research on Control Allocation Based on Improved Fixed-point for Reusable Boosted Vehicle[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2012, 33(12): 2268-2278.

参考文献

[1] Durham W C. Constrained controller allocation. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 1993, 16(4): 717-725.

[2] Arun Kishore W C, Sen S, Ray G. Dynamic control allocation for tracking time varying control demand. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2008, 31(4): 1150-1157.

[3] Johannes T, Johansed T. Adaptive control allocation. Automatica, 2008, 44(11): 2754-2765.

[4] Luca Z. Dynamic allocation for input redundant control systems. Automatica, 2009, 45(2): 1431-1438.

[5] Ning G D, Zhang S G, Fang Z P. Entry control allocation using sliding modes and state observer synthesis for reusable launch vehicl. Journal of Astronautics, 2007, 28(1): 69-76. (in Chinese) 宁国栋, 张曙光, 方振平. 可重复使用航天器基于状态估计的再入飞行滑模控制器设计研究. 宇航学报, 2007, 28(1): 69-76.

[6] Ola H. Resolving actuator redundancy-optimal control allocation. Automatica, 2005, 41(1): 137-144.

[7] Durham W C, Bordgon K A. Multiple control effectors rate limiting. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 1996, 19(1): 30-37.

[8] Buffington J, Chandler P, Pachter M. On-line system identification for aircraft with distributed control effectors. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 1995, 9(14): 1033-1049.

[9] Bodson M, Frost S A. Control allocation with load balancing. AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, 2009.

[10] Bodson M. Evaluation of optimization methods for control allocation. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2002, 25(4): 703-711.

[11] Potra F, Wright S. Interior-point methods. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 2000, 124(1): 281-302.

[12] Peterson J A M, Bodson M. Constrained quadratic programming techniques for control allocation. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2006, 14(1): 91-98.

[13] Lu P. Constrained tracking control of nonlinear systems. Systems & Control Letters, 1996, 27(3): 305-314.

[14] Fletcher R. Practical methods of optimization. 2rd ed. New York: JohenWiley & Sons, 2000: 76-83.

[15] Wang Z G, Luo S B, Wu J J. Research on reusable launch vehicle. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology Press, 2004: 5-45. (in Chinese) 王振国, 罗世彬, 吴建军. 可重复使用运载器研究进展. 长沙: 国防科技大学出版社, 2004: 5-45.

[16] Crocker A M, Andrews D G. Go horizontal: a responsible, evolvable, feasible space launch roadmap. AIAA-2004-6004, 2004.

[17] Wallace J G, Bradford J, Charania A C, et al. Concept study of an ARES hybrid-OS launch system. AIAA-2006-8057, 2006.

[18] Kauffmann J. Future European launch systems in the FLPP overview and objectives. 57th International Astronautical Congress, 2006.

[19] Tomatis C, Bouaziz L, Franck T, et al. RLV candidates for European future launchers preparatory programme. Acta Astronautica, 2009, 65(1): 40-46.

[20] Sippel M, Manfletti C, Burkhardt H. Long-term/strategic scenario for reusable booster stages. Acta Astronautica, 2006, 58(4): 209-221.

[21] Nakano M M, Willms R J. Space shuttle on-orbit flight control system. AIAA-1982-1576, 1982.

[22] Singla P. Multi-resolution methods for high fidelity modeling and control allocation in large scale dynamical systems. Ann Arbor: Department of Aerospace Engineering,Texas A&M University, 2006.

[23] Burken J J, Lu P, Wu Z, et al, Two reconfiurable flight control design methods: robust servomechanism and control allocation. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2001, 24(3): 482-493.

[24] Wang J, Longoria R G. Coordinated vehicle dynamics control with control distribution. Proceedings of the 2006 American Control Conference, 2006: 5348-5353.

[25] Mercer A M, Mercer P R. Cauchy’s interlace theorem and lower bounds for the spectral radius. Internetional Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, 2000, 23(8): 563-566.

[26] Xu J T. Research on attitude control and control allocation for reusable boosted vehicle. Harbin: School of Aeronautics, Harbin Institute of Technology, 2010. (in Chinese) 许江涛. 可重复使用助推飞行器姿态控制和控制分配研究. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学航天学院, 2010.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

基于改进定点二乘的重复使用助推飞行器控制分配研究

Research on Control Allocation Based on Improved Fixed-point for Reusable Boosted Vehicle

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王海峰. 高性能战斗机与发动机协同设计关键技术[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(5): 529978-529978.
[2]	杨卫平. 新一代飞行器导航制导与控制技术发展趋势[J]. 航空学报, 2024, 45(5): 529720-529720.
[3]	马悦萌, 刘明, 杨丁, 杨明, 张敏刚, 葛亚杰. 热约束下近空间飞行器预设性能抗噪控制[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(S2): 729390-729390.
[4]	胡润昌, 王子安, 陈永亮, 周大鹏, 杨大鹏, 龚正. 基于L1自适应推力矢量型V/STOL飞行器增稳控制[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(S1): 727642-727642.
[5]	张亮, 李丹钰, 崔乃刚, 李源. 垂直起降可重复使用运载火箭全剖面飞行预设性能控制[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(23): 628103-628103.
[6]	张新昱, 谢思宇, 陶洋, 李滚. 面向无人机空中加油紧密编队的鲁棒控制方法[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(20): 628425-628425.
[7]	胡伟, 万文章, 陈谋. 基于神经网络和干扰观测器的UAV自动着舰控制[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(S1): 726963-726963.
[8]	刘畅, 蒋永平, 马春燕, 张涛. 基于NuSMV的AADL模型形式化验证技术[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(3): 325196-325196.
[9]	张志冰, 张秀林, 王家兴, 史静平. 一种基于多操纵面控制分配的IDLC人工着舰精确控制方法[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(8): 525840-525840.
[10]	雷鹏轩, 余立, 陈德华, 吕彬彬. 飞行控制律对体自由度颤振特性影响试验[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(6): 124378-124378.
[11]	梁小辉, 胡昌华, 周志杰, 王青. 基于自适应动态规划的运载火箭智能姿态容错控制[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(4): 524915-524915.
[12]	王雨辰, 林德福, 王伟, 纪毅. 大跨域条件下的自适应滚转稳定容错控制方法[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(3): 324368-324368.
[13]	黄旭, 柳嘉润, 贾晨辉, 王昭磊, 张隽. 深度确定性策略梯度算法用于无人飞行器控制[J]. 航空学报, 2021, 42(11): 524688-524688.
[14]	程月华, 江文建, 杨浩, 薛琪, 廖鹤. 基于深度森林的卫星ACS执行机构与传感器故障识别[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(S1): 723778-723778.
[15]	岑飞, 聂博文, 刘志涛, 郭林亮, 孙海生, 李清. 面向先进战斗机研制的风洞模型飞行试验技术[J]. 航空学报, 2020, 41(6): 523444-523444.