Ⅱ型PIO反馈与前馈抑制系统对比

流体力学与飞行力学

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

| 后一篇

Ⅱ型PIO反馈与前馈抑制系统对比

孟捷¹, 徐浩军¹, 张建康²

1. 空军工程大学工程学院2. 空军装备研究院复杂系统第四实验室

收稿日期:2009-10-29 修回日期:2010-06-07 出版日期:2010-09-25 发布日期:2010-09-25
通讯作者: 徐浩军

A Comparison of Feedback and Foreback Schemes to Prevent Category Ⅱ PIO

Meng Jie¹, Xu Haojun¹, Zhang Jiankang²

1. The Engineering Institute, Air Force Engineering University2. The Complex Systems Fourth Laboratory, Equipment Academy of Air Force

Received:2009-10-29 Revised:2010-06-07 Online:2010-09-25 Published:2010-09-25
Contact: Xu Haojun

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 当舵机速率限制饱和时会产生附加时延,恶化飞行品质,触发Ⅱ型驾驶员诱发振荡（PIO）。运用描述函数法研究速率限制反馈（RLF）和死区增稳（DASA）Ⅱ型PIO抑制系统的开环相位补偿能力,提出RLF抑制系统的参数优化选择方法,分析了DASA抑制系统中死区和滤波器参数对相位补偿能力的影响。研究了两型抑制系统对正弦与偏差输入信号的开环响应特点。建立了含速率限制器的人机系统数学模型,基于描述函数法探究了Ⅱ型PIO的产生机理,推导了抑制Ⅱ型PIO发生的公式,应用连续信号相位补偿法抑制Ⅱ型PIO的发生。对阶跃、离散和正弦3种易于诱发PIO现象的跟踪任务进行数值仿真,对比了两种抑制系统的Ⅱ型PIO抑制能力。结果表明,反馈型RLF抑制系统对Ⅱ型PIO的抑制能力强于前馈型DASA抑制系统,有效降低了Ⅱ型PIO发生的可能性。

关键词: 飞行控制系统, 驾驶员诱发振荡, 描述函数, 舵机, 速率限制

Abstract: When rate limiter is saturated, the additional time delay would occur. It could deteriorate aircraft flying quality and cause category Ⅱ pilot-induced-oscillations(PIO). The rate-limited feedback(RLF) and the dead area stability augmentation(DASA) schemes prevent the category Ⅱ PIO from occurring. The open loop phase compensation capability of two schemes is studied based on describing functions method. The parameter optimization method of RLF scheme is provided. The influence of deadzone and filter parameters on DASA scheme phase compensation capability is analyzed. The responses of two schemes to sine wave input and bias input are examined. The pilot-vehicle system model with rate limiter is developed. The generation mechanism of category Ⅱ PIO is analyzed and the expression to avoid category Ⅱ PIO is derived. The continuous signal phase compensation method is applied to preventing category Ⅱ PIO. The step, discrete and sine tracking tasks which are easy to induce PIO are simulated, and the prevention capabilities of two schemes are compared. The results demonstrate that the RLF scheme has better capability for avoiding category Ⅱ PIO and decreases the occurrence possibility of category Ⅱ PIO.

Key words: flight control systems, pilot induced oscillations, describing functions, actuators, rate-limit

中图分类号:

V212.1

孟捷;徐浩军;张建康. Ⅱ型PIO反馈与前馈抑制系统对比[J]. 航空学报, 2010, 31(9): 1701-1707.

Meng Jie;Xu Haojun;Zhang Jiankang. A Comparison of Feedback and Foreback Schemes to Prevent Category Ⅱ PIO[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2010, 31(9): 1701-1707.

参考文献

［1］Weltz G, Shweyk K, Murray D. Application of new and standard pilot-induced oscillation (PIO) analysis methods to flight test data of the C-17 transport aircraft［C］ ∥AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference.2007: 266-291. ［2］Alcala I,Gordillo F, Aracil J. Phase compensation design for prevention of PIO due to actuator rate saturation［C］ ∥Proceeding of the 2004 American Control Conference. 2004: 4678-4691. ［3］Liebst B S, Chapa M, Leggett D. Nonlinear prefilter to prevent pilot-induced oscillations due to actuator rate limiting［J］. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2002, 25(4): 740-747. ［4］Brieger O, Kerr M, Leiling D,et al. Flight testing of a rate saturation compensation scheme on the ATTAS aircraft［J］. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2009, 13(2): 92-104. ［5］Gatley S L, Turner M C, Postlethwaite I, et al. A comparison of rate-limit compensation schemes for pilot-induced-oscillation avoidance［J］. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2006, 10(1): 37-47. ［6］Katayanagi R. Pilot-induced oscillation analysis with actuator rate limiting and feedback control loop［C］ ∥AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference. 2004: 1162-1168. ［7］李建平,杨朝旭,罗欣. 作动器速率饱和时的PIO抑制方法［J］. 航空学报, 2003, 24(3): 263-265. Li Jianping, Yang Zhaoxu, Luo Xin. Method to prevent pilot-induced-oscillations due to actuator rate limiting［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2003, 24(3): 263-265. （in Chinese） ［8］Groot S, Pavel M D. New insights into pilot behaviour during hazardous rotorcraft pilot induced oscillations［C］ ∥Annual Forum - Vertical Flight: Leading Through Innovation - Proceedings. 2006: 1131-1142. ［9］孟捷, 徐浩军, 武卫. 驾驶员模型对Ⅱ型PIO预测影响研究［J］. 系统仿真学报, 2009, 21(12): 3816-3819. Meng Jie, Xu Haojun, Wu Wei. Research on prediction of category Ⅱ PIO affected by pilot model［J］. Journal of System Simulation, 2009, 21(12): 3816-3819. （in Chinese） ［10］James G. A comparison of nonlinear algorithms to prevent pilot-induced oscillations caused by actuator rate limiting［D］. Wright-Patterson AFB OH: Air Force Institute of Technology, 2003.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

[1]	刘畅, 蒋永平, 马春燕, 张涛. 基于NuSMV的AADL模型形式化验证技术[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(3): 325196-325196.
[2]	石忠佼, 朱化杰, 赵良玉, 刘志杰. 考虑舵机动力学的旋转弹自适应解耦控制[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(3): 325068-325068.
[3]	许舒婷, 谭文倩, 孙立国, 屈香菊. 主动侧杆引导下的Ⅱ型驾驶员诱发振荡抑制[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(8): 121861-121861.
[4]	史忠科. 高性能飞机发展对控制理论的挑战[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(8): 2717-2734.
[5]	朱纪洪, 和阳, 黄志毅. 舵机特征模型及其故障检测方法[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(2): 640-650.
[6]	陆宇平, 杨朝星, 刘洋洋. 空中加油系统的建模与控制技术综述[J]. 航空学报, 2014, 35(9): 2375-2389.
[7]	郭建国, 周军. 临近空间低动态飞行器控制研究综述[J]. 航空学报, 2014, 35(2): 320-331.
[8]	叶辉, 陈谋, 吴庆宪. 基于多滑模调节器切换的机动飞行边界保护控制[J]. 航空学报, 2014, 35(12): 3358-3370.
[9]	魏琼, 吴帅, 焦宗夏, 尚耀星. 高速运动舵机的气动伺服加载特性研究[J]. 航空学报, 2013, 34(8): 1778-1785.
[10]	曹启蒙, 李颖晖, 徐浩军. 基于线性矩阵不等式的电传飞机人机闭环系统稳定域[J]. 航空学报, 2013, 34(1): 19-27.
[11]	周堃, 王立新, 谭详升. 放宽静稳定电传客机纵向短周期品质评定方法[J]. 航空学报, 2012, 33(9): 1606-1615.
[12]	马纪明, 万蔚, 曾声奎. 基于浴盆曲线故障率函数的FFOP预计方法[J]. 航空学报, 2012, 33(9): 1664-1670.
[13]	陆宇平;何真. 变体飞行器控制系统综述[J]. 航空学报, 2009, 30(10): 1906-1911.
[14]	张登峰;高金源. 基于MDO技术的飞机操纵面参数/飞行控制律多目标优化设计[J]. 航空学报, 2008, 30(6): 1626-1633.
[15]	张春雨;方炜;姜长生. 基于T-S模糊系统的空天飞行器鲁棒自适应轨迹线性化控制[J]. 航空学报, 2007, 28(5): 1153-1161.

Ⅱ型PIO反馈与前馈抑制系统对比

A Comparison of Feedback and Foreback Schemes to Prevent Category Ⅱ PIO

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价