ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA >
Intelligent parameter recommendation method for dual-robot drilling and riveting with knowledge-rule fusion and dynamic confidence quantification
Received date: 2025-07-24
Revised date: 2025-08-14
Accepted date: 2025-10-09
Online published: 2025-12-08
Supported by
National Key Research and Development Program of China(2022YFB4700400)
To address the challenge of intelligent decision-making in dual-robot drilling and riveting， which is often hindered by reliance on manual expertise and fragmented process knowledge， this study proposes an intelligent parameter recommendation method that integrates knowledge graphs with rule reasoning. Initially， a multi-layer knowledge graph for dual-robot drilling and riveting is constructed. This graph comprises 292 entities and 711 relationships， organized across five layers： tool， workpiece， process， feature， and instance. It enables multimodal semantic associations among material properties， process parameters， and quality indicators. Based on this knowledge graph， a two-stage reasoning framework is introduced. In the first stage， similar cases are retrieved using a weighted cosine similarity algorithm， where the weights are determined via the analytic hierarchy process. In the second stage， a priority-based rule engine enforces parameter constraints and resolves conflicts. This framework enhances both the accuracy and consistency of parameter recommendations. Furthermore， a dynamic confidence evaluation model is developed by incorporating data- and rule-based constraints， establishing a four-dimensional assessment along the axes of data scale， data quality， data distribution， and rule conflicts. This dynamic weighting mechanism enhances the interpretability of the recommendation results. Experimental validation on a dual-robot drilling and riveting workstation at COMAC Shanghai Aircraft Manufacturing Co.， Ltd. demonstrates that the proposed method achieves a comprehensive confidence level of 0.93， with the recommended parameters satisfying physical process constraints. Overall， this method provides an effective approach for capturing and reusing process knowledge while supporting intelligent decision-making in complex manufacturing scenarios.
Yong TAO , Xiaotong WANG , Yazui LIU , Haitao LIU , Yufan ZHANG , Lei XUE , Ruijun GUO , Fan REN , Hongxing WEI . Intelligent parameter recommendation method for dual-robot drilling and riveting with knowledge-rule fusion and dynamic confidence quantification[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2026 , 47(8) : 432623 -432623 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2025.32623
| [1] | MEI B， LIANG Z， XIE Y， et al. Positioning accuracy enhancement of a robotic assembly system for thin-walled aerostructure assembly ［J］. Journal of Industrial Information Integration， 2023， 35： 100518. |
| [2] | CHRISTIAN H， GUDRUN F， NIKOLAUS S， et al. Production planning optimisation for composite aerospace manufacturing ［J］. International Journal of Production Research，2018， 57（18）： 5857-5873. |
| [3] | ANDREY K， MIKHAIL T， MIKHAIL K. Multivariate manufacturing process planning for aircraft airframe production based on weighted criteria analysis ［J］. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology， 2021， 117： 2263-8. |
| [4] | KO H， WITHERELL P， LU Y， et al. Machine learning and knowledge graph based design rule construction for additive manufacturing［J］. Additive Manufacturing， 2021， 37： 101620. |
| [5] | SERGIO I， RAQUEL T L. An approach for proactive mobile recommendations based on user-defined rules ［J］. Expert Systems with Applications， 2024， 242： 122714. |
| [6] | SUBRAMANYA N， KUMAR A R S， VIKAS Y， et al. Manufacturing process planning in aerospace systems ［J］. IOP Conference Series： Materials Scienceand Engineering， 2022， 1258 （1）： 12027. |
| [7] | ZHANG C， ZHOU G， HU J， et al. Deep learning enabled intelligent process planning for digital twin manufacturing cell ［J］. Knowledge-Based Systems， 2020， 191： 105247. |
| [8] | XIA L， LIANG Y， LENG J， et al. Maintenance planning recommendation of complex industrial equipment based on knowledge graph and graph neural network ［J］. Reliability Engineering & System Safety， 2023， 232： 109068. |
| [9] | WU S， SUN F， ZHANG W， et al. Graph neural networks in recommender systems： a survey ［J］. ACM Computing Surveys， 2022， 55（5）： 1-37. |
| [10] | TIAN L， ZHOU X， WU Y， et al. Knowledge graph and knowledge reasoning： a systematic review ［J］. Journal of Electronic Science and Technology， 2022， 20（2）： 100159. |
| [11] | CHEN X， JIA S， XIANG Y. A review： knowledge reasoning over knowledge graph ［J］. Expert Systemswith Applications， 2020， 141： 122948. |
| [12] | GUO L， YAN F， LI T， et al. An automatic method for constructing machining process knowledge base from knowledge graph ［J］. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing， 2022， 73： 102222. |
| [13] | LIU M， LI X， LI J， et al. A knowledge graph-based data representation approach for IIoT-enabled cognitive manufacturing ［J］. Advanced Engineering Informatics， 2022， 51： 101515. |
| [14] | HUANG Z， GUO X， LIU Y， et al. A smart conflict resolution model using multi-layer knowledge graph for conceptual design ［J］. Advanced Engineering Informatics， 2023， 55： 108887. |
| [15] | SU C， JIANG Q， HAN Y， et al. Knowledge graph-driven decision support for manufacturing process： a graph neural network-based knowledge reasoning approach ［J］. Advanced Engineering Informatics， 2025， 64： 103098. |
| [16] | LI X， ZHANG S， HUANG R， et al. Structural modeling of heterogeneous CAM model based on process knowledge graph ［J］. Journal of Computer-Aided Design & Computer Graphics， 2018， 30（7）： 1342-1355. |
| [17] | WEN P， MA Y， WANG R. Systematic knowledge modeling and extraction methods for manufacturing process planning based on knowledge graph ［J］. Advanced Engineering Informatics， 2023， 58： 102172. |
| [18] | XIAO B， ZHAO Z， XU B， et al. A novel method for intelligent reasoning of machining step sequencesbased on deep reinforcement learning ［J］. Journal of Manufacturing Systems， 2025， 80： 626-642. |
| [19] | HU Y， ADRIANE C， WEN G， et al. What can knwledge bring to machine learning？ —a survey of low-shot learning for structured data ［J］. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology， 2022， 13（3）： 1-45. |
| [20] | LIU S， STEBNER A P， KAPPES B B， et al. Machine learning for knowledge transfer across multiple metals additive manufacturing printers ［J］. Additive Manufacturing， 2021， 39： 101877. |
| [21] | JOAO M， LUIS G T， ANDRé C R， et al. A novel jigless process applied to a robotic cell for aircraft structural assembly ［J］. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology， 2020， 109： 1177-1187. |
| [22] | GUO S， AGARWAL M， COOPER C， et al. Machine learning for metal additive manufacturing： towards a physics-informed data-driven paradigm ［J］. Journal of Manufacturing Systems， 2022， 62： 145-163. |
| [23] | 陈勇刚， 刘康妮， 王帅. 基于BiGRU-Attention改进的航空设备故障知识图谱构建 ［J］. 航空学报， 2024， 45（18）： 229916. |
| CHEN Y G， LIU K N， WANG S. Fault knowledge graph construction for aviation equipment based on BiGRU-Attention improvement ［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2024， 45（18）： 229916 （in Chinese）. | |
| [24] | 聂同攀， 曾继炎， 程玉杰， 等. 面向飞机电源系统故障诊断的知识图谱构建技术及应用 ［J］. 航空学报， 2022， 43（8）： 625499. |
| NIE T P， ZENG J Y， CHENG Y J， et al. Knowledge graph construction technology and its application in aircraft power system fault diagnosis ［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2022，43（8）： 625499 （in Chinese）. | |
| [25] | CASTRESE D M， ANDREA R， AGNESE P， et al. An interactive graph-based tool to support the designing of human-robot collaborative workplaces ［J］. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing， 2023， 18： 6255-6270. |
| [26] | 肖彪， 徐宝德， 彭仕鑫， 等. 基于知识图谱的复杂薄壁零件机械加工工艺知识建模研究 ［J］. 航空制造技术， 2024， 67（11）： 76-86. |
| XIAO B， XU B D， PENG S X， et al. Study on machining knowledge modeling of complex thin-walled parts based on knowledge graph ［J］. Aeronautical Manufacturing Technology， 2024， 67（11）： 76-86 （in Chinese）. | |
| [27] | GUO L， LI X， YAN F， et al. A method for constructing a machining knowledge graph using an improved transformer ［J］. Expert Systems with Applications， 2024， 237： 121448. |
| [28] | XIONG C， XIAO J， LI Z， et al. Knowledge graph network-driven process reasoning for laser metal additive manufacturing based on relation mining ［J］. Applied Intelligence， 2024， 54（22）： 11472-11483. |
| [29] | HUANG Z C， GUO X， CHONG J，et al. mKGMPP： a multi-layer knowledge graph integration framework and its inference method for manufacturing process planning ［J］. Advanced Engineering Informatics， 2025， 65： 103266. |
| [30] | ZHENG P， XIA L， LI C， et al. Towards self-X cognitive manufacturing network： an industrial knowledge graph-based multi-agent reinforcement learning approach ［J］. Journal of Manufacturing Systems， 2021， 61： 16-26. |
| [31] | ZHOU B， HUA B， GU X， et al. An end-to-end tabular information-oriented causality event evolutionary knowledge graph for manufacturing documents ［J］. Advanced Engineering Informatics， 2021， 50： 101441. |
| [32] | HUA Y， WANG R， WANG Z， et al. Knowledge graph with deep reinforcement learning for intelligent generation of machining process design ［J］. Journal of Engineering Design， 2024， 36（11）： 2072-2106. |
| [33] | SU C， HAN Y， JIANG Q， et al. Optimizing manufacturing process with knowledge graph-based adaptive neural network： approach to industry 5.0 consumer electronics ［J］. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics， 2025， 71（2）： 4164-4178. |
| [34] | TIWARY N， MOHD N S A， FAUZI F， et al. Max explainability score-A quantitative metric for explainability evaluation in knowledge graph-based recommendations ［J］. Computers and Electrical Engineering， 2024， 116： 109190. |
| [35] | WANG L， CHENG H， WANG R， et al. Machining scheme selection of features based on process knowledge graph and improved cosine similarity matching［J］. Machines， 2025， 13（3）： 188. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
CJA