Fluid Mechanics and Flight Mechanics

Real-time monitoring and evaluation method for aero-engine performance degradation based on performance digital twin

  • Donghuan WANG ,
  • Hai JIN ,
  • Dongkai WAN ,
  • Jun WANG ,
  • Hong XIAO
Expand
  • 1.AECC Shenyang Engine Research Institute,Shenyang 110015,China
    2.School of Power and Energy,Northwestern Polytechnical University,Xi’ an 710072,China
E-mail: xhong@nwpu.edu.cn

Received date: 2025-06-23

  Revised date: 2025-07-28

  Accepted date: 2025-09-08

  Online published: 2025-09-18

Supported by

National Level Project;Provincial or Ministerial Level Project

Abstract

To enable real-time performance monitoring and degradation assessment of aircraft engines, a digital-twin-based methodology for real-time monitoring and evaluation of engine performance degradation is proposed. A performance digital twin architecture was designed and implemented by integrating Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) recurrent neural networks with the engine’s physical structural configuration. Baseline models of the performance digital twin were established using flight parameter data from the initial operational flights of an engine. The model demonstrates high-fidelity simulation capabilities for replicating the engine’s performance across diverse flight conditions. By feeding real-time operational parameters and flight state data into the baseline model, the real-time performance metrics of a pristine (non-degraded) engine under current operating conditions are simulated. Comparative analysis between simulated outputs and actual sensor measurements enables quantitative assessment of the engine’s instantaneous performance degradation. A case study involving 185 flight cycles validated the framework: Baseline models constructed from the first three flights achieved mean absolute relative errors below 0.98%, 0.94%, and 1.89% for rotational speed, pressure, and temperature predictions, respectively, with single-point inference time under 0.14 milliseconds, confirming the reliability of real-time digital twinning. The degradation assessment results of this method align well with traditional methods, demonstrating significant feasibility and advantages.

Cite this article

Donghuan WANG , Hai JIN , Dongkai WAN , Jun WANG , Hong XIAO . Real-time monitoring and evaluation method for aero-engine performance degradation based on performance digital twin[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2026 , 47(5) : 132459 -132459 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2025.32459

References

[1] SALEM K ABU, PALAIA G, BRAVO-MOSQUERA P D, et al. A review of novel and non-conventional propulsion integrations for next-generation aircraft[J]. Designs20248(2): 20.
[2] CHEN Q, SHENG H L, LI J C, et al. Model-based improved advanced adaptive performance recovery control method for a commercial turbofan engine[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems202359(6): 7440-7454.
[3] KORDESTANI M, ORCHARD M E, KHORASANI K, et al. An overview of the state of the art in aircraft prognostic and health management strategies[J]. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement202372: 3505215.
[4] 赵洪利, 张猛. 基于随机维纳过程的航空发动机性能衰退研究[J]. 推进技术202142(3): 488-494.
  ZHAO H L, ZHANG M. Performance degradation of aeroengines based on stochastic Wiener process[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology202142(3): 488-494 (in Chinese).
[5] DE GIORGI M G, MENGA N, FICARELLA A. Exploring prognostic and diagnostic techniques for jet engine health monitoring: A review of degradation mechanisms and advanced prediction strategies[J]. Energies202316(6): 2711.
[6] CHEN Q, SHENG H L, ZHANG T H. A novel direct performance adaptive control of aero-engine using subspace-based improved model predictive control[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology2022128: 107760.
[7] 曹明, 王鹏, 左洪福, 等. 民用航空发动机故障诊断与健康管理现状、挑战与机遇Ⅱ: 地面综合诊断、寿命管理和智能维护维修决策[J]. 航空学报202243(9): 625574.
  CAO M, WANG P, ZUO H F, et al. Current status, challenges and opportunities of civil aero-engine diagnostics & health management Ⅱ: Comprehensive off-board diagnosis, life management and intelligent condition based MRO[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica202243(9): 625574 (in Chinese).
[8] FENTAYE A D, ZACCARIA V, KYPRIANIDIS K. Aircraft engine performance monitoring and diagnostics based on deep convolutional neural networks[J]. Machines20219(12): 337.
[9] RATH N, MISHRA R K, KUSHARI A. Aero engine health monitoring, diagnostics and prognostics for condition-based maintenance: An overview[J]. International Journal of Turbo & Jet-Engines202440(s1): s279-s292.
[10] 陶飞, 孙清超, 孙惠斌, 等. 航空发动机数字孪生工程: 内涵与关键技术[J]. 航空学报202445(21): 7-31, 2.
  TAO F, SUN Q C, SUN H B, et al. Aero-engine digital twin engineering: Connotation and key technologies[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica202445(21): 7-31, 2 (in Chinese).
[11] VOLPONI A J, RAJAMANI R. Hybrid models for engine health management[J]. Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery for Engineering Systems Health Management2016: 395-422.
[12] KIM S, KIM K, SON C. Transient system simulation for an aircraft engine using a data-driven model[J]. Energy2020196: 117046.
[13] 董威, 尹家录, 郑培英, 等. 航空发动机及燃气轮机整机性能仿真综述[J]. 航空发动机202349(5): 8-21.
  DONG W, YIN J L, ZHENG P Y, et al. Review: engine-level performance simulation of aeroengine and gas turbines[J]. Aeroengine202349(5): 8-21 (in Chinese).
[14] PANG S W, LI Q H, FENG H L. A hybrid onboard adaptive model for aero-engine parameter prediction[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology2020105: 105951.
[15] GONZáLEZ-MU?IZ A, DíAZ I, CUADRADO A A, et al. Health indicator for machine condition monitoring built in the latent space of a deep autoencoder[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety2022224: 108482.
[16] ZHANG X L, LIN Z L, JI R M, et al. Deep reinforcement learning based active surge control for aeroengine compressors[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics202437(7): 418-438.
[17] 马博文, 巫骁雄, 于洋. 基于机器学习方法的压气机落后角与总压损失预测代理模型[J]. 航空动力学报202338(7): 1675-1690.
  MA B W, WU X X, YU Y. Surrogate model for deviation angle and total pressure loss prediction of compressor based on machine learning methods[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power202338(7): 1675-1690 (in Chinese).
[18] 蔡舒妤, 殷航, 史涛, 等. 基于ResNet-LSTM的航空发动机性能异常检测方法[J]. 航空发动机202450(1): 135-142.
  CAI S Y, YIN H, SHI T, et al. Aero-engine performance anomaly detection method based on ResNet-LSTM[J]. Aeroengine202450(1): 135-142 (in Chinese).
[19] ZHAO K, JIA Z, JIA F, et al. Multi-scale integrated deep self-attention network for predicting remaining useful life of aero-engine[J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence2023120: 105860.
[20] ZHOU L, WANG H W, XU S S. Aero-engine prognosis strategy based on multi-scale feature fusion and multi-task parallel learning[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety2023234: 109182.
[21] DE PATER I, REIJNS A, MITICI M. Alarm-based predictive maintenance scheduling for aircraft engines with imperfect Remaining Useful Life prognostics[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety2022221(C): 108341.
[22] DE PATER I, MITICI M. Developing health indicators and RUL prognostics for systems with few failure instances and varying operating conditions using a LSTM autoencoder[J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence2023117: 105582.
[23] HUANG Y F, TAO J, SUN G, et al. A prognostic and health management framework for aero-engines based on a dynamic probability model and LSTM network[J]. Aerospace20229(6): 316.
[24] ZHANG Y, XIN Y Q, LIU Z W, et al. Health status assessment and remaining useful life prediction of aero-engine based on BiGRU and MMoE[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety2022220: 108263.
[25] DE GIORGI M G, STRAFELLA L, MENGA N, et al. Intelligent combined neural network and kernel principal component analysis tool for engine health monitoring purposes[J]. Aerospace20229(3): 118.
[26] LU F, WU J D, HUANG J Q, et al. Aircraft engine degradation prognostics based on logistic regression and novel OS-ELM algorithm[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology201984: 661-671.
[27] LI Z X, WU D Z, HU C, et al. An ensemble learning-based prognostic approach with degradation-dependent weights for remaining useful life prediction[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety2019184: 110-122.
[28] PROTOPAPADAKIS G, APOSTOLIDIS A, KALFAS A I. Explainable and interpretable AI-assisted remaining useful life estimation for aeroengines[R]. New York: ASME, 2022.
[29] HUANG Y F, TAO J, ZHAO J Y, et al. Graph structure embedded with physical constraints-based information fusion network for interpretable fault diagnosis of aero-engine[J]. Energy2023283: 129120.
[30] LI H H, GOU L F, LI H C, et al. Physics-guided neural network model for aeroengine control system sensor fault diagnosis under dynamic conditions[J]. Aerospace202310(7): 644.
[31] XIAO D S, LIN Z F, YU A Y, et al. Data-driven method embedded physical knowledge for entire lifecycle degradation monitoring in aircraft engines[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety2024247: 110100.
[32] ARIAS CHAO M, KULKARNI C, GOEBEL K, et al. Fusing physics-based and deep learning models for prognostics[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety2022217: 107961.
Outlines

/