Excellent Papers of the 2nd Aerospace Frontiers Conference/the 27th Annual Meeting of the China Association for Science and Technology

Direct numerical simulation of supersonic turbulent boundary layer with plasma actuation

  • Chen LI ,
  • Dong SUN ,
  • Pengxin LIU ,
  • Qilong GUO ,
  • Xianxu YUAN
Expand
  • State Key Laboratory of Aerodynamics,Mianyang 621000,China

Received date: 2025-04-29

  Revised date: 2025-04-30

  Accepted date: 2025-05-14

  Online published: 2025-05-19

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China(12202475);Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province(2023NSFSC0053)

Abstract

Skin friction drag is a critical component of total drag for future aerospace vehicles. Reducing the skin friction drag under turbulent flow conditions is of great significance for improving the aerodynamic performance and saving energy of the vehicles. In recent years, active flow control techniques utilizing surface arc discharge plasma actuators have achieved a series of exploratory advancements in the control of high-speed boundary layers due to their simple structure, broad frequency bandwidth, and rapid response characteristics. However, detailed quantitative research on the interaction between the plasma excitation and supersonic turbulent boundary layer, which is an essential fundamental problem, remains limited. This study addresses this gap by directly solving the Navier-Stokes equations with a plasma phenomenological model. The effects on flow structures, turbulence statistics, and wall quantities of a Mach number 2.9 supersonic turbulent boundary layer actuated by a plasma at a frequency 50 kHz were elucidated. The results indicate that the plasma actuation leads to an increase in mean temperature and a decrease in mean density within the boundary layer, with an inflection point appearing in the mean streamwise velocity profile. This triggers Kelvin-Helmholtz shear instability in the outer layer of the boundary layer. Furthermore, Reynolds stresses and turbulent kinetic energy exhibit an overall reduction trend across the boundary layer in the downstream of the plasma location. Notably, the actuation achieves a maximum drag reduction rate of approximately 28.4% in the downstream region, which mainly ascribed to the decrease in the production of turbulent kinetic energy and molecular viscous dissipation. Conversely, drag enhancement is observed near the actuation, caused by adverse pressure gradients generated by precursor blast waves within the boundary layer.

Cite this article

Chen LI , Dong SUN , Pengxin LIU , Qilong GUO , Xianxu YUAN . Direct numerical simulation of supersonic turbulent boundary layer with plasma actuation[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2025 , 46(S1) : 732187 -732187 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2025.32187

References

[1] 陈坚强, 涂国华, 张毅锋, 等. 高超声速边界层转捩研究现状与发展趋势[J]. 空气动力学学报201735(3): 311-337.
  CHEN J Q, TU G H, ZHANG Y F, et al. Hypersnonic boundary layer transition: what we know, where shall we go[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica201735(3): 311-337 (in Chinese).
[2] ZARE A, LIEU B K, JOVANOVI? M R. Turbulent drag reduction by streamwise traveling waves[C]∥ 2012 IEEE 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC). Piscataway: IEEE Press, 2012: 3122-3126.
[3] RAN W, ZARE A, JOVANOVI? M R. Model-based design of riblets for turbulent drag reduction[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics2021906: A7.
[4] ZENG F Y, QIU Y L, JIANG Z Z, et al. Direct numerical simulation of skin friction drag reduction on supersonic turbulent boundary layers with micro-blowing[J]. Physics of Fluids202436(9): 095165.
[5] 李应红, 吴云, 梁华, 等. 等离子体激励气动力学探索与展望[J]. 力学进展202252(1): 1-32.
  LI Y H, WU Y, LIANG H, et al. Exploration and outlook of plasma-actuated gas dynamics[J]. Advances in Mechanics202252(1): 1-32 (in Chinese).
[6] 陆纪椿, 史志伟, 杜海, 等. 等离子体激励器控制平板边界层转捩实验研究[J]. 航空学报201637(4): 1166-1173.
  LU J C, SHI Z W, DU H, et al. Experimental study of controlling flat transition using surface dielectric barrier discharge actuator[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica201637(4): 1166-1173 (in Chinese).
[7] 苏志, 宗豪华, 梁华, 等. 等离子体湍流摩擦减阻研究进展与展望[J]. 空气动力学学报202341(9): 1-19.
  SU Z, ZONG H H, LIANG H, et al. Progress and outlook of plasma-based turbulent skin-friction drag reduction[J]. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica202341(9): 1-19 (in Chinese).
[8] 张攀峰, 刘爱兵, 王晋军. 非定常等离子激励器诱导平板边界层的流动结构[J]. 中国科学: 技术科学201141(4): 482-492.
  ZHANG P F, LIU A B, WANG J J. Flow structure of boundary layer induced by unsteady plasma exciter on flat plate[J]. Scientia Sinica (Technologica)201141(4): 482-492 (in Chinese).
[9] ALTINTACS A, DAVIDSON L, PENG S H. Direct numerical simulation of drag reduction by spanwise oscillating dielectric barrier discharge plasma force[J]. Physics of Fluids202032(7): 075101.
[10] 唐冰亮, 郭善广, 宋国正, 等. 脉冲电弧等离子体激励控制超声速平板边界层转捩实验[J]. 物理学报202069(15): 155201.
  TANG B L, GUO S G, SONG G Z, et al. Experimental study on supersonic plate boundary layer transition under pulsed arc plasma excitation control[J]. Acta Physica Sinica202069(15): 155201 (in Chinese).
[11] GAN T. Visualization study on boundary layer transition using surface arc plasma actuators[J]. Journal of Visualization202427(1): 43-57.
[12] TANG M X, WU Y, ZONG H H, et al. Experimental investigation of supersonic boundary-layer tripping with a spanwise pulsed spark discharge array[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics2022931: A16.
[13] FENG L M, MA X G, ZHANG Y T, et al. Response characteristics of impinging shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction disturbed by arc plasma energy deposition[J]. Physics of Fluids202234(1): 015132.
[14] TANG M X, WU Y, ZONG H H, et al. Experimental investigation on compression ramp shock wave/boundary layer interaction control using plasma actuator array[J]. Physics of Fluids202133(6): 066101.
[15] YAN H, GAITONDE D. Effect of thermally induced perturbation in supersonic boundary layers[J]. Physics of Fluids201022(6): 064101.
[16] 盛佳明, 张海灯, 吴云, 等. 电弧放电等离子体激励控制超声速压气机叶栅激波/边界层干扰仿真研究[J]. 推进技术202041(10): 2228-2236.
  SHENG J M, ZHANG H D, WU Y, et al. Simulation study of arc discharge plasma actuator for supersonic compressor cascade shock wave/boundary layer interaction control[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology202041(10): 2228-2236 (in Chinese).
[17] MA X G, FAN J, WU Y K, et al. Flow control effect of pulsed arc discharge plasma actuation on impinging shock wave/boundary layer interaction[J]. Physics of Fluids202335(3): 036110.
[18] SONG G X, LI J, TANG M X. Direct numerical simulation of the pulsed arc discharge in supersonic compression ramp flow[J]. Journal of Thermal Science202029(6): 1581-1593.
[19] TANG M X, WU Y. Direct numerical simulation of compression ramp shock wave/boundary layer interaction controlled by plasma actuator array[J]. Physics of Fluids202335(12): 126118.
[20] LI C, SUN D, GUO Q L, et al. A new hybrid WENO scheme on a four-point stencil for Euler equations[J]. Journal of Scientific Computing202187(1): 18.
[21] GUO Q L, SUN D, LI C, et al. A new discontinuity indicator for hybrid WENO schemes[J]. Journal of Scientific Computing202083(2): 28.
[22] 王天, 孙东, 郭启龙, 等. 可压缩边界层的入口合成湍流生成方法[J]. 力学学报202456(1): 45-57.
  WANG T, SUN D, GUO Q L, et al. Inlet synthetic turbulence generation method for compressible boundary layer[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics202456(1): 45-57 (in Chinese).
[23] LI C, GUO Q L, SUN D, et al. Aerothermal prediction of hypersonic flow around spherical capsule model using IDDES approach[J]. International Journal of Modern Physics B202034(14-16): 20400780.
[24] CAI H Y, YU M, SUN D, et al. Wall pressure fluctuations in supersonic boundary layers over compression ramps with different turning angles[J]. Physics of Fluids202234(12): 126105.
[25] SUN D, LIU X D, LI C, et al. Analysis of the wall heat flux of the hypersonic shock wave/boundary layer interaction using a novel decomposition formula[J]. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics202438(6): 901-916.
[26] LI C, SUN D, GUO Q, et al. Direct numerical simulation of shock wave-turbulent boundary layer interaction controlled by plasma actuation[C]∥17th Asian Congress of Fluid Mechanics, 2023.
[27] SUN D, GUO Q L, LI C, et al. Direct numerical simulation of effects of a micro-ramp on a hypersonic shock wave/boundary layer interaction[J]. Physics of Fluids201931(12): 126101.
[28] BOOKEY P, WYCKHAM C, SMITS A, et al. New experimental data of STBLI at DNS/LES accessible Reynolds numbers: AIAA-2005-309[R]. Reston:AIAA, 2005.
[29] TONG F L, YU C P, TANG Z G, et al. Numerical studies of shock wave interactions with a supersonic turbulent boundary layer in compression corner: Turning angle effects[J]. Computers & Fluids2017149: 56-69.
[30] DUAN L, CHOUDHARI M M, WU M W. Numerical study of acoustic radiation due to a supersonic turbulent boundary layer[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics2014746: 165-192.
[31] SCHLATTER P, ?RLü R. Assessment of direct numerical simulation data of turbulent boundary layers[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics2010659: 116-126.
[32] PIROZZOLI S, BERNARDINI M, GRASSO F. Direct numerical simulation of transonic shock/boundary layer interaction under conditions of incipient separation[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics2010657: 361-393.
[33] RENARD N, DECK S. A theoretical decomposition of mean skin friction generation into physical phenomena across the boundary layer[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics2016790: 339-367.
[34] GUO T B, ZHANG J, ZHU Y H, et al. Wall skin friction analysis in a hypersonic turbulent boundary layer over a compression ramp[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics2024988: A23.
Outlines

/