ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA >
Proportional control of jet deflection with passive secondary flow
Received date: 2014-03-31
Revised date: 2014-06-09
Online published: 2015-03-31
Supported by
Funding of Jiangsu Innovation Program for Graduate Education (CXLX13_131); Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; Project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions(PAPD)
The proportional control of jet deflection is always one of the goals of fluidic thrust vectoring (FTV) technology. A two-dimensional new fluidic thrust vectoring nozzle is designed and manufactured. Thrust vector control of the low-speed primary jet is investigated using passive secondary flow and Conada wall surfaces, which has ultra-low energy consumption. The primary jet can be continuously and proportionally vectored by changing the area of entrance of nozzle control slot. The pressure of control slots on both sides and deflection angle of the primary jet are measured; the control curve of the primary jet deflection angle versus the coefficient of pressure difference between control slots is obtained. The results show that the maximum deflection angle of the low-speed primary jet is up to 19°; the control curve is divided into sensitive zone and inert zone in the deflection range. The control curve of sensitive zone is approximately linear with steep slope, within a range of ±15°; while the inert zones are from -19° to -15° and from +15° to +19°, where the control curve slope is gentle. The experimental results demonstrate that the pressure difference between both sides of the primary jet is the direct cause of jet deflection.
CAO Yongfei , GU Yunsong , CHENG Keming , XIAO Zhongyun , CHEN Zuobin , HE Kaifeng . Proportional control of jet deflection with passive secondary flow[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2015 , 36(3) : 757 -763 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2014.0116
[1] Fang C D. Developing status of thrust vectoring control technology[J]. Aeronautical Science and Technology, 1998(2): 10-12 (in Chinese). 方昌德.飞机推力矢量技术发展综述[J]. 航空科学技术, 1998(2): 10-12.
[2] Deere K A. Summary of fluidic thrust vectoring research conducted at NASA Langley Research Center, AIAA-2003-3800[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2003.
[3] Bursey R, Dickinson R. Flight test results of the F-15 SMTD thrust vectoring/thrust reversing exhaust nozzle, AIAA-1990-1906[R]. Reston: AIAA, 1990.
[4] Hunter C A, Deere K A. Computational investigation of fluidic counterflow thrust vectoring, AIAA-1999-2669[R]. Reston: AIAA, 1999.
[5] Mason M S, Crowther W J. Fluidic thrust vectoring for low observable air vehicles, AIAA-2004-2210[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2004.
[6] Bougas L, Hornung M. Propulsion system integration and thrust vectoring aspects for scaled jet UAVs[J]. CEAS Aeronautical Journal, 2013, 4(3): 327-343.
[7] Giuliano V J, Wing D J. Static investigation of a fixed-aperture nozzle employing fluidic injection for multi axis thrust vector control, AIAA-1997-3149[R]. Reston: AIAA, 1997.
[8] Wang Z X, Wang Y N, Li Z J, et al. Experiment on fluidic thrust-vectoring nozzle based on shock control concept[J]. Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2010, 31(6): 751-756 (in Chinese). 王占学, 王玉男, 李志杰, 等. 基于激波控制的流体推力矢量喷管试验[J]. 推进技术, 2010, 31(6): 751-756.
[9] Qiao W Y, Cai Y H. A study on the two-dimensional thrust vectoring nozzle with secondary flow injection[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2001, 16(3): 273-278 (in Chinese). 乔渭阳, 蔡元虎. 基于次流喷射控制推力矢量喷管的实验及数值研究[J]. 航空动力学报, 2001, 16(3): 273-278.
[10] Zmijanovic V, Lago V, Palerm S, et al. Thrust shock vector control of an axisymmetric CD nozzle via transverse gas injection[C]//28th International Symposium on Shock Waves, 2012: 171-177.
[11] Li W Q, Song W Y, Luo F T. Experimental and numerical investigations of shock induced thrust vectoring nozzle[J]. Journal of Aerospace Power, 2012, 27(7): 1571-1578 (in Chinese). 李卫强, 宋文艳, 罗飞腾. 激波诱导控制推力矢量喷管实验及数值计算[J]. 航空动力学报, 2012, 27(7): 1571-1578.
[12] Miller D N, Yagle P J, Hamstra J W. Fluidic throat skewing for thrust vectoring in fixed geometry nozzles, AIAA-1999-0365[R]. Reston: AIAA, 1999.
[13] Strykowski P J. An experimental modeling study of jet attachment during counterflow thrust vectoring, NASA-CR-204436[R]. Washington, D.C.: NASA, 1996.
[14] van der Veer M R, Strykowski P J. Counterflow thrust vector control of subsonic jets-continuous and bistable regimes[J]. AIAA Journal, 1997, 13(3): 412-420.
[15] Jeffrey D F. Experimental study of a nozzle using fluidic counterflow for thrust vectoring, AIAA-1998-3255[R]. Reston: AIAA, 1998.
[16] Gillgrist R D, Forliti D J, Strykowski P J. On the mechanisms affecting fluidic vectoring using suction[J]. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 2007, 129(1): 91-99.
[17] Yang J J, Wang M S. Numerical research on basic flow characteristics of counterflow thrust vectoring nozzle[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2008, 29(4): 769-775 (in Chinese). 杨建军, 汪明生. 逆流推力矢量喷管基本流动特征的数值研究[J]. 航空学报, 2008, 29(4): 769-775.
[18] Heo J Y, Yoo K H. Fluidic thrust vector control of the supersonic jet using the co-flow injection, AIAA-2009-5174[R]. Reston: AIAA, 2009.
[19] Xiao Z Y, Gu Y S, Jiang X, et al. A new fluidic thrust vectoring technique based on ejecting mixing effects[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2012, 33(11): 1967-1974 (in Chinese). 肖中云, 顾蕴松, 江雄, 等. 一种基于引射效应的流体推力矢量新技术[J]. 航空学报, 2012, 33(11): 1967-1974.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
CJA