ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA >
Computational Research on Areodynamic and Aeroacoustic Characteristics of Scissors Tail-rotor in Hover
Received date: 2012-10-15
Revised date: 2013-01-21
Online published: 2013-03-11
Supported by
Foundation of Key Laboratory (9140C400201110C4002);Project Funded by the Priority Academic Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
A comprehensive analysis method is established to predict the aerodynamic force and aeroacoustic characteristics of a scissors tail-rotor in hover based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD)/FW-H (Ffowcs Williams-Hawkings). In the present method, the CFD method is first employed to simulate the flowfield around the tail-rotor by solving the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations which are formulated at the blade-attached reference frame, and a second-order upwind scheme (Roe scheme) and an implicit LU-SGS (Lower-Upper Symmetric Gauss-Seidel) scheme are used for space and time discretization respectively. Secondly, based on the flowfield solved by the present CFD method, the FW-H equation is used to transfer acoustic disturbance to the far field. Finally, comprehensive calculations on two different configurations of scissors tail-rotor, i.e., L configuration and U configuration, are performed based on the method developed. The differences are studied between a scissors tail-rotor and a conventional tail-rotor in terms of aerodynamic force and aeroacoustic characteristics. Meanwhile, the influence is analyzed of the two important parameters of scissors angle and vertical space on the aerodynamic force and acoustic characteristics. It is demonstrated that the configuration parameters have significant effects on the aerodynamic force and aeroacoustic characteristics of the tail-rotor, and reasonable configuration parameters can decrease its acoustic level.
FAN Feng , SHI Yongjie , XU Guohua . Computational Research on Areodynamic and Aeroacoustic Characteristics of Scissors Tail-rotor in Hover[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2013 , 34(9) : 2100 -2109 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2013.0111
[1] Rozhdestensky M G. Scissors rotor concept: new results obtained. American Helicopter Society 52nd Annual Forum, 1996: 1231-1241.
[2] Sonneborn W G O, Drees J M. The scissors rotor. American Helicopter Society 30th Annual Forum, 1974: 18-27.
[3] Riley R G. Effects of uneven blade spacing on ducted tail rotor acoustics. American Helicopter Society 52nd Annual Forum, 1996: 1-12.
[4] Edwards B D. Psychoacoustic testing of modulated blade spacing for main rotor. NASA CR-2002-211651, 2002.
[5] Sullivan B M, Edwards B D, Brentner K S, et al. A subjective test of modulated blade spacing for helicopter main rotors. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 2005, 50(1): 26-32.
[6] Brentner K S, Edwards B D, Riley R, et al. Predicted noise for a main rotor with modulated blade spacing. Journal of the American Helicopter Society, 2005, 50(1): 18-25.
[7] Xu G H, Wang S C, Zhao J G. Experimental and analytical investigation on aerodynamic characteristics of helicopter scissors tail rotor. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2001, 14(4): 193-199.
[8] Xu G H, Zhao Q J, Peng Y H. Study on the induced velocity and noise characteristics of a scissors rotor. Journal of Aircraft, 2007, 44(3): 806-811.
[9] Roe P L. Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes. Journal of Computational Physics, 1981, 43(2): 357-372.
[10] Venkatakrishnan V. On the accuracy of limiters and convergence to steady state solutions. AIAA-1993-880, 1993.
[11] Luo H, Baum J D. A fast matrix-free implicit method for computing low mach number flows on unstructured grids. AIAA-1999-3315, 1999.
[12] Baldwin B, Lomax H. Thin-layer approximation and algebraic model for separated turbulent flows. AIAA-1978-257, 1978.
[13] Brentner K S. Prediction of helicopter rotor discrete frequency noise. NASA Technical Memorandum 87721, 1986.
[14] Caradonna F X, Tung C. Experimental and analytical studies of a model helicopter rotor in hover. NASA Technical Memorandum 81232, 1981.
[15] Lee S, Brentner K S, Farassat F, et al. Analytic formulation and numerical implementation of an acoustic pressure gradient prediction. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2009, 319(2009): 1200-1221.
[16] Kryter K S, Pearsons K S. Judged noisiness of a band of random noise containing an audible pure tone. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1965, 38(1): 106-112.
[17] Ewald D, Pavlovic A, Bollinger J. Noise reduction by applying modulation principle. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1971, 49(5): 1381-1385.
/
〈 | 〉 |