翼尖铰接组合式无人机气动建模方法及布局参数影响

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2023.29587

Abstract

Abstract:

The wingtip-hinged multi-body combined Unmanned Aerial Vehicle （UAV） represents a novel conceptual aircraft， comprising multiple individual unmanned aircraft interconnected through wingtip hinges and allowing for relative roll motion. It exhibits significant distinctions in layout parameters and flight dynamics characteristics compared to conventional aircraft， with the presence of aerodynamic coupling between individual unmanned aircraft. First， the state-space vortex lattice method is employed to derive the aerodynamic derivatives specific to this aircraft type. Then， utilizing the Newton-Euler equations， a flight dynamics model is established for trim calculation and stability analysis， elucidating its unstable compound motion flight modes dominated by relative roll motion. Lastly， an investigation is conducted on the influence of layout parameters on flight dynamics stability. The analysis shows that reducing the trim roll angle of individual unmanned aircraft and increasing the sweep angle can enhance flight stability， while an optimal distance between the wing and tail is found to improve flight stability. The research findings can provide guidance and reference for the design of wingtip-hinged multi-body combined UAVs.

Key words: flight dynamics, multi-body combined unmanned aerial vehicle, new concept aircraft, vortex lattice method, aerodynamics layout

CLC Number:

V221

Chao AN, Guixi HUO, Yang MENG, Changchuan XIE, Chao YANG. Aerodynamic modeling methods and influence of layout parameters for wingtip⁃hinged multi⁃body combined UAV[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(6): 629587-629587.

Figures/Tables 32

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Table 1

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Table 2

Results of aerodynamic derivatives

气动导数	本文方法计算结果	ZONAIR计算结果
$C L α$	4.88	4.89
$C M y α$	-1.92	-1.86
$C Y β$	0.288	0.291
$C M x β$	-0.007 5	-0.007 2
$C M z β$	0.092	0.094
$C Y p$	0.02	0.02
$C M x p$	-0.536	-0.542
$C L q$	9.526	9.619
$C M y q$	-20.25	-20.21
$C Y r$	-0.199	-0.191
$C M z r$	-0.063	-0.065

Table 2

Fig.8

Fig.9

Fig.10

Fig.11

Fig.12

Table 3

Table 4

Angular components in flight dynamics modes

模态

Δ ϕ 1

Δ ϕ 2

Δ θ 1

Δ θ 2

Δ ψ 1

Δ ψ 2

复合运动

模态1

-1

0.02

9×10^-4

复合运动

模态2

-1

0.015

8×10^-5

Table 4

Fig.13

Table 5

Angular velocity components in flight dynamics modes

模态	$Δ p 1$	$Δ p 2$	$Δ q 1$	$Δ q 2$	$Δ r 1$	$Δ r 2$
复合运动模态1	1.67	-1.67	-0.04	-0.04	-2×10^-3	-2×10^-3
复合运动模态2	-1.49	1.49	0.032	0.032	4×10^-4	4×10^-4

Table 5

Fig.14

Fig.15

Fig.16

Fig.17

Fig.18

Fig.19

Fig.20

Fig.21

Fig.22

Fig.23

Fig.24

Fig.25

Fig.26

Fig.27

References 28

1	贾永楠，田似营，李擎. 无人机集群研究进展综述［J］. 航空学报， 2020， 41（S1）： 723738.
	JIA Y N， TIAN S Y， LI Q. Recent development of unmanned aerial vehicle swarms［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2020， 41（S1）： 723738 （in Chinese）.
2	牛轶峰，肖湘江，柯冠岩. 无人机集群作战概念及关键技术分析［J］. 国防科技， 2013， 34（5）： 37-43.
	NIU Y F， XIAO X J， KE G Y. Operation concept and key techniques of unmanned aerial vehicle swarms［J］. National Defense Science & Technology， 2013， 34（5）： 37-43 （in Chinese）.
3	安朝. 大柔性飞行器结构建模方法及气动弹性分析研究［D］. 北京：北京航空航天大学， 2020： 12-15.
	AN C. Structure modeling methodology and aeroelastic analysis of large flexible aircraft［D］. Beijing： Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics， 2020： 12-15 （in Chinese）.
4	PATIL M J， HODGES D H， CESNIK C E S. Nonlinear aeroelastic analysis of complete aircraft in subsonic flow［J］. Journal of Aircraft， 2000， 37（5）： 753-760.
5	PATIL M J， HODGES D H， CESNIK C E S. Nonlinear aeroelasticity and flight dynamics of high-altitude long-endurance aircraft［J］. Journal of Aircraft， 2001， 38（1）： 88-94.
6	ANDERSON C. Dangerous experiments： Wingtip coupling at 15000 Feet［J］. Flight Journal， 2000， 5（6）： 64-72.
7	WRIGHT-PATTERSON A F B. United States Air Force museum guidebook［M］. Ohio： Air Force Museum Foundation， 1975.
8	NEELY R H. Flutter tests of a 1/25-scale model of the B-36J/RF-84F tip-coupled airplane configuration in the Langley 19-foot pressure tunnel： NACA-RM-SL56A25B ［R］. Washington， D.C.： Research Memorandum for the U.S. Air Force， 1956.
9	MAGILL S， DURHAM W. Modeling and simulation of wingtip-docked flight［C］∥ Proceedings of the AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference and Exhibit. Reston： AIAA， 2002.
10	MONTALVO C. Meta aircraft flight dynamics and controls［D］. Atlanta： Georgia Institute of Technology， 2014.
11	MONTALVO C， COSTELLO M. Meta aircraft flight dynamics［J］. Journal of Aircraft， 2015， 52（1）： 107-115.
12	TROUB B， MONTALVO C. Meta aircraft controllability［C］∥ Proceedings of the AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference. Reston： AIAA， 2016.
13	KÖTHE A， LUCKNER R. Flight mechanical modeling and analysis of multi-body aircraft［C］∥ International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics. 2015： 1-12.
14	KÖTHE A， BEHRENS A， HAMANN A. Closed-loop flight tests with an unmanned experimental multi-body aircraft［C］∥ International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics. 2017：1-15.
15	CRACAU D. The AlphaLink compound aircraft： Aviation outside the Box！［EB/OL］. （2020-10-19）［2020-12-28］. .
16	COOPER J R， ROTHHAAR P M. Dynamics and control of in-flight wingtip docking［J］. Journal of Guidance， Control， and Dynamics， 2018， 41（11）： 2327-2337.
17	AN C， XIE C C， MENG Y， et al. Flight mechanical analysis and test of unmanned multi-body aircraft［C］∥ International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics. 2019：1-17.
18	杨延平，张子健，应培，等. 集群组合式柔性无人机：创新、机遇及技术挑战［J］. 飞行力学， 2021， 39（2）： 1-9， 15.
	YANG Y P， ZHANG Z J， YING P， et al. Flexible modular swarming UAV： Innovative， opportunities， and technical challenges［J］. Flight Dynamics， 2021， 39（2）： 1-9， 15 （in Chinese）.
19	WU M J， SHI Z W， XIAO T H， et al. Effect of wingtip connection on the energy and flight endurance performance of solar aircraft［J］. Aerospace Science and Technology， 2021， 108： 106404.
20	周伟，马培洋，郭正，等. 基于翼尖链翼的组合固定翼无人机研究［J］. 航空学报， 2022， 43（9）： 325946.
	ZHOU W， MA P Y， GUO Z， et al. Research of combined fixed-wing UAV based on wingtip chained［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2022， 43（9）： 325946 （in Chinese）.
21	杜万闪，周洲，拜昱，等. 组合式飞行器多体动力学建模与飞行力学特性［J］. 兵工学报， 2023， 44（8）： 2245-2262.
	DU W S， ZHOU Z， BAI Y， et al. Study on multibody dynamics modeling and flight dynamic characteristics of combined aircraft［J］. Acta Armamentarii， 2023， 44（8）： 2245-2262 （in Chinese）.
22	杨澜. 大柔性机翼气动建模方法及气动弹性分析研究［D］. 北京：北京航空航天大学， 2021： 38-40.
	YANG L. Aerodynamics modeling methodology and aeroelastic analysis of large flexible wing［D］. Beijing： Beihang University， 2021： 38-40 （in Chinese）.
23	YANG L， XIE C C， YANG C. Geometrically exact vortex lattice and panel methods in static aeroelasticity of very flexible wing［J］. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers， Part G： Journal of Aerospace Engineering， 2020， 234（3）： 742-759.
24	WERTER N P M， DE BREUKER R， ABDALLA M M. Continuous-time state-space unsteady aerodynamic modeling for efficient loads analysis［J］. AIAA Journal， 2018， 56（3）： 905-916.
25	KATZ J， PLOTKIN A. Low-speed aerodynamics［M］. New York： McGraw-Hill Inc， 1991.
26	安朝，谢长川，孟杨，等. 多体组合式无人机飞行力学稳定性分析及增稳控制研究［J］. 工程力学， 2021， 38（11）： 248-256.
	AN C， XIE C C， MENG Y， et al. Flight dynamics and stable control analyses of multi-body aircraft［J］. Engineering Mechanics， 2021， 38（11）： 248-256 （in Chinese）.
27	JONES J R. Development of a very flexible tested aircraft for the validation of nonlinear aeroelastic codes［D］. Ann Arbor： University of Michigan， 2017： 113-115.
28	ZONA Technology， Inc. ZONAIR user’s manual ［M］. 6th ed. Scottsdale：ZONA Technology， Inc.， 2010.

设计参数	数值	设计参数	数值
机翼展长/m	3.0	机翼弦长/m	0.27
副翼展长/m	1.0	副翼弦长/m	0.09
垂尾展长/m	0.24	垂尾弦长/m	0.12
平尾展长/m	0.96	平尾弦长/m	0.12
机翼翼型	NACA0012	平尾、垂尾翼型	NACA0012

阶数	模态	特征根	特征时间/s	模态特征
1~2	短周期模态	-3.791 5±1.593i	3.94	收敛
3	滚转模态	-1.673 4	0.41	收敛
4~5	荷兰滚模态	-0.297 0±0.726i	8.65	收敛
6	复合运动模态1	1.65	0.42	发散
7	复合运动模态2	-0.332 5	2.10	收敛
8~9	长周期模态	-0.000 1±0.011i	570.9	收敛

[1]	Bowen NIE, Liangquan WANG, Zhiyin HUANG, Long HE, Shipeng YANG, Hongtao YAN, Guichuan ZHANG. Flight dynamics modeling and control scheme design of compound high-speed unmanned helicopters [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(9): 529848-529848.
[2]	Peihan WANG, Zhigang WU, Chao YANG, Xiaoxu SUN. Patch module method for flight simulation of flexible aircraft [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(6): 127038-127038.
[3]	Luofeng WANG, Renliang CHEN. Effects of slung load on heavy lift helicopter air resonance stability [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2023, 44(16): 227983-227983.
[4]	JI Honglei, SU Junjie, CHEN Renliang, KONG Weihong. Highland atmospheric turbulence model for helicopter flight simulation [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(7): 126564-126564.
[5]	SHI Yan, WAN Zhiqiang, WU Zhigang, YANG Chao. Gust response analysis and verification of elastic aircraft based on nonlinear aerodynamic reduced-order model [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(1): 125474-125474.
[6]	WANG Luofeng, CHEN Renliang. Rigid-elastic coupled flight dynamic modeling and air resonance stability analysis for heavy lift helicopter [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(12): 124634-124634.
[7]	ZHAO Yanqin, CHEN Renliang. Systematical modelling of low-altitude windshear and its qualitative threat analysis to helicopter flight safety [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2020, 41(7): 123413-123413.
[8]	YUAN Ye, CHEN Renliang, LI Pan. Flight dynamic modelling for coaxial rigid rotor helicopter using vortex-ring wake model [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2018, 39(3): 121564-121564.
[9]	JI Honglei, ZHAO Hui, CHEN Renliang, WU Wentao. Wind-over-deck envelope calculation based on simulation of helicopter shipboard operations [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2018, 39(11): 122156-122167.
[10]	YAN Xufei, CHI Cheng, CHEN Renliang, LI Pan. Analysis of low-speed height-velocity diagram of variable speed rotor helicopter in one engine inoperative situation [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2018, 39(10): 122107-122107.
[11]	CHEN Renliang, LI Pan, WU Wei, KONG Weihong. A review of mathematical modeling of helicopter flight dynamics [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2017, 38(7): 520915-520915.
[12]	WANG Kelei, ZHOU Zhou, ZHU Xiaoping. Aerodynamic design of low-Reynolds-number wing taking into account the multiple propellers induced effects [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2017, 38(6): 120813-120813.
[13]	JI Honglei, CHEN Renliang, LI Pan. Rotor-state feedback control for helicopter in atmospheric turbulence [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2017, 38(5): 120541-120541.
[14]	PEI Binbin, XU Haojun, XUE Yuan, LI Zhe, LIU Dongliang. Development of flight safety window in icing conditions based on complex dynamics simulation [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2017, 38(2): 520695-520708.
[15]	GUO Linliang, ZHU Minghong, KONG Peng, NIE Bowen, ZHONG Chengwen. Analysis of dynamic characteristics between prototype aircraft and scaled-model of virtual flight test in wind tunnel [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2016, 37(8): 2583-2593.

Aerodynamic modeling methods and influence of layout parameters for wingtip⁃hinged multi⁃body combined UAV

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 32

References 28

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments