基于激光烧蚀冲量耦合的空间碎片主动变轨建模与仿真

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2013.0311

Abstract

Abstract:

Orbital debris poses a great thread to human space activities and high power laser is considered to be the most feasible method to migrate its hazard. A physical model is built in this paper based on an analysis of the process of laser radiation against space debris. The orbital elements of space debris under laser radiation are studied numerically and the findings are applied to space debris collision avoidance with a satellite. A simulation example is set up to study the space debris avoiding process. In addition, numerical results of the orbital elements of space debris and their relative distance from the satellite are obtained in the circumstance of laser interaction. The simulation results show that a ground-based laser may effectively control the orbit of space debris realize the avoidance of satellite collision.

Key words: space debris, laser ablation, impulse coupling, orbit maneuver, numerical simulation

CLC Number:

V416.5
TN249

CHANG Hao, JIN Xing, HONG Yanji. Modeling and Simulation on Active Space Debris Orbit Maneuver Based on Laser Ablation Impulse Coupling[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2013, 34(10): 2325-2332.

References

[1] Payne T. First "confirmed" natural collision between two cataloged satellites. Second European Conference on Space Debris. Germany: ESA, 1997: 579-600.

[2] Kaplan M H. Survey of space debris reduction methods. AIAA-2009-6619, 2009.

[3] Klinkrad H. Space debris-model and risk analysis. Chichester, UK: Praxis Publishing Ltd, 2006.

[4] Campbell J W. Project orion: orbital debris removal using ground-based sensors and lasers. NASA Technical Memorandum, 1996, 108522: 1-352.

[5] Phipps C, Albrecht G, Friedman H, et al. Orion: clearing near-earth space debris using a 20-kW, 530-nm, earth-based, repetitively pulse laser. Laser and Particle Beams, 1996(1): 1-44.

[6] Rubenchik A, Barty C, Beach R, et al. Laser systems for space orbital debris removal. LLNL-PROC-423323, 2010.

[7] Early J, Bibeau C, Phipps C, et al. Space debris de-orbiting by vaporization impulse using short pulse laser. Proceedings of SPIE, 2004, 5448: 441-449.

[8] Esmiller B, Jacquelardb C. CLEANSPACE "small debris removal by laser illumination and complementary technologies"//Beamed energy propulsion. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2011, 1402: 347-353.

[9] Chang H, Jin X, Hong Y J, et al. Modeling and simulation on ground-based laser cleaning space debris process. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2012, 33(6): 994-1001. (in Chinese) 常浩, 金星, 洪延姬, 等. 地基激光清除空间碎片过程建模与仿真. 航空学报, 2012, 33(6): 994-1001.

[10] Jin X, Hong Y J, Li X Q. Removal processes analysis of centimeter-scale space debris using laser radiation. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2012, 24(2): 281-284. (in Chinese) 金星, 洪延姬, 李修乾. cm级空间碎片的激光清除过程分析. 强激光与粒子束, 2012, 24(2): 281-284.

[11] Wu Z N, Hu R F, Qu X, et al. Space debris reentry analysis methods and tools. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2011, 24(4): 387-395.

[12] Badhwar G D, Anz-Meador P D. Relationship of radar cross section to the geometric size of orbital debris. AIAA, NASA, and DOD, Orbital Debris Conference: Technical Issues and Future Directions, 1990.

[13] Lambour R, Rajan N, Morgan T. Assessment of orbital debris size estimation from radar cross-section measurement. Advances in Space Research, 2004, 34(5): 1013-1020.

[14] Schall W O. Laser radiation for cleaning space debris from lower earth orbits. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2002, 39(1): 81-91.

[1]	XIAHOU Tangfan, CHEN Jiangtao, SHAO Zhidong, WU Xiaojun, LIU Yu. Model validation metrics for CFD numerical simulation under aleatory and epistemic uncertainty [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(8): 25716-025716.
[2]	YANG Jiankai, GU Dongdong, GE Qing, TAN Chenchen, WEN Yu. Support layout and precise forming mechanism of aluminum alloy for laser additive manufacturing [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(4): 525331-525331.
[3]	JIANG Youxu, LI Jie, YANG Zhao. Data correction method of wind tunnel test for verification aircraft with laminar wing section [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526814-526814.
[4]	WANG Hao, ZHONG Min, HUA Jun, ZHONG Hai, YANG Tihao, WANG Meng, LEI Guodong. Simulation and experiment of natural laminar flow flight test wing glove [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(11): 526785-526785.
[5]	DUAN Junyi, TONG Fulin, LI Xinliang, LIU Hongwei. Decomposition of mean friction drag in compression-expansion turbulent boundary layer [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(1): 625915-625915.
[6]	SHEN Pengfei, LIU Pengxin, SUN Dong, YUAN Xianxu. Statistical characteristics of skin friction of shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction in hollow cylinder-flare configuration at Mach 6 [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(1): 626005-626005.
[7]	LIU Pengxin, YUAN Xianxu, LIANG Fei, LI Chen, SUN Dong. Quadrant decomposition analysis of fluctuations in high-temperature turbulent boundary layer with chemical non-equilibrium [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(S1): 726338-726338.
[8]	BAO Jun, WANG Yu, NIU Qian, ZHU Xidong, CHENG Jianjie. Influencing parameters and film flow mechanism of spray droplet impacting liquid film [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(S1): 726360-726360.
[9]	CHEN Chongpei, LIANG Jianhan, GUAN Qingdi, GAO Tianyun. Conservative compressible one-dimensional turbulence method and its application in supersonic scalar mixing layer [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(S1): 726364-726364.
[10]	LI Qing, TU Guohua, YU Zhaosheng, LIN Zhaowu, LI Tingting, YUAN Xianxu. Inertial particle transport in non-uniform accelerated flow [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(S1): 726390-726390.
[11]	LI Chengcheng, LI Fang, YANG Bin, WANG Ying. Numerical investigation of nozzle flow separation control using plasma actuation [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(7): 124547-124547.
[12]	HE Chuangxin, DENG Zhiwen, LIU Yingzheng. Turbulent flow data assimilation and its applications [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(4): 524704-524704.
[13]	LIU Zongxing, LIU Jun, LI Weina. Dynamic response and failure of typical fuselage structure under blast impact load [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(2): 224252-224252.
[14]	SUN Dong, LIU Pengxin, SHEN Pengfei, TONG Fulin, GUO Qilong. Direct numerical simulation of shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction in hollow cylinder-flare configuration at Mach number 6 [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(12): 124681-124681.
[15]	GUO Jia, PANG Zhaojun, YUE Shuai, DU Zhonghua. De-orbit strategy using Bang-Bang control for space tethered-combination [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2021, 42(12): 324738-324738.

Modeling and Simulation on Active Space Debris Orbit Maneuver Based on Laser Ablation Impulse Coupling

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments