飞机推出和跑道掉头滑行行为计算方法

ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA ›› 2012, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (12): 2183-2191.

Previous Articles Next Articles

Aircraft Behavior Simulation Investigation During Pushback and U-turn Maneuvers

DONG Jiankang¹, WANG Jiening¹, WANG Anguo¹, JIANG Gaoyang²

1. College of Air Traffic Management, China Civil Aviation University, Tianjin, 300300, China;
2. Tianjin Key Laboratory of Operation Programming and Safety Technology of Air Traffic Management, Tianjin 300300, China

Received:2012-08-14 Revised:2012-09-24 Online:2012-12-25 Published:2012-12-24
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (60832011); Tianjin Natural Science Foundation (10JCYBJC00800)

Abstract

Abstract:

Aircraft pushback and U-turn maneuvers belong to the special ground taxiing behaviors, and these behaviors are not accurately demonstrated in the current visual simulation system. In this paper, we study the position and attitude computational problems during aircraft pushback and U-turn maneuvers. From the perspective of airport tower control simulation, aircraft movement calculation methods constrained by nonholonomic kinematics are proposed to accurately describe aircraft pushback and U-turn maneuvers. The aircraft pushback motion algorithm suitable for simulation-driven calculation is designed according to aircraft actual movement and nonholonomic path following model. In addition, under the open-loop control, aircraft U-turn maneuver algorithm constrained by runway geometry and steering angle variation is designed to completely describe aircraft behaviors during runway U-turn. Compared with dynamics model, the methods we have proposed have the advantages of being easier to calculate and more suitable for visual simulation. The validity of these methods is verified by numerical simulation using aircraft geometry data.

Key words: pushback, U-turn, taxiing, nonholonomic constraints, visual simulation

CLC Number:

DONG Jiankang, WANG Jiening, WANG Anguo, JIANG Gaoyang. Aircraft Behavior Simulation Investigation During Pushback and U-turn Maneuvers[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2012, 33(12): 2183-2191.

References

[1] Coetzee E B, Krauskopf B, Lowenberg M H. Analysis of medium-speed runway exit manoeuvres. AIAA-2010-1553, 2010.

[2] Michalek M. Tracking control strategy for the standard N-trailer mobil robot-geometrically motivated approach. Robot Motion and Control 2011, Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, 2012, 422: 39-51.

[3] Lee J H, Chung W J, Kim M, et al. A passive multiple trailer system with off-axle hitching. International Journal of Control Automation and Systems, 2004, 2(3): 289-297.

[4] Jean F. The car with N trailers: characterization of the singular configurations control optimization and calculus of variations. ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations, 1996, 1: 241-266.

[5] Bullo F, Murray R M. Experimental comparison of trajectory trackers for a car with trailers. San Francisco: IFAC World Conference, 1996: 407-412.

[6] Tanner H G, Loizou S G, Kostas J, et al. Nonholonomic navigation and control of cooperating mobile manipulators. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 2003, 19(1): 53-64.

[7] Bushnell L G, Tilbury D M, Sastry S S. Steering three-input chained form nonholonomic systems using sinusoids: the fire truck example. Groningen: Proceedings of the European Control Conference, 1993: 1-23.

[8] Wang Y C, Jing X J. Steering and control of nonholonomic wheeled mobile robots using artificial fields. Acta Automatica Sinica, 2002, 28(5): 777-783.(in Chinese) 王越超,景兴建. 非完整约束轮式移动机器人人工场导向控制研究. 自动化学报, 2002, 28(5): 777-783.

[9] Chai S, Mason W. Landing gear integration in aircraft conceptual design. AIAA-1996-4038, 1996.

[10] Coetzee E, Krauskopf B, Lowenberg M. Application of bifurcation methods to the prediction of low-speed air craft ground performance. Journal of Aircraft, 2010, 47(4):1248-1255.

[11] Murray R M, Sastry S S. Steering nonholonomic systems in chained form. Proceedings of the 30th Conference on Decision and Control, 1991: 1121-1126.

[12] Duleba I, Khefifi W. A lie algebraic method of motion planning for driftless nonholonomic systems. Fifth International Workshop on Robot Motion and Control, 2005: 79-84.

[13] You L G. An exploration of orientation representation by lie algebra for robotic application, IEEE Transaction on System, Man and Cybernetics, 1990, 20(1): 243-248.

[14] International Civil Aviation Organization.Doc9157. Aerodrome design manual: part 2 taxiways, aprons and holding Bays. Montreal: International Civil Aviation Organization, 2005.

[15] Wang R, Qian X L. OpenSceneGraph 3D rendering engine design and practice. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2009: 55-65.(in Chinese) 王锐, 钱学雷. OpenSceneGraph三维渲染引擎设计与实践. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2009: 55-65.

Aircraft Behavior Simulation Investigation During Pushback and U-turn Maneuvers

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 5

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Ying ZHANG, Xiaoying LI, Jianan YIN, Xiaotong ZHOU. Flexible control of aircraft departure pushback time based on probabilistic taxiing time [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2023, 44(10): 327452-327452.
[2]	LI Yueming, LI Xiaoyun, CHAI Yijun, YANG Xiongwei. Dynamic response analysis of nose landing gear in aircraft new towing and taxiing mode [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(6): 526915-526915.
[3]	LI Yueming, LI Xiaoyun, CHAI Yijun, YANG Xiongwei. Dynamic response analysis of nose landing gear in aircraft new towing and taxiing mode [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(6): 526915-526915.
[4]	Zhang Zengchang;Zhang Jiangjan;Wang Yuchang. IDENTIFICATION OF AIRPLANE LANDING GEAR LOADS DURING TAXIING [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 1994, 15(1): 54-61.
[5]	Zhang Zengchang;Zhang Jiangjan;Wang Yuchang. IDENTIFICATION OF AIRPLANE LANDING GEAR LOADS DURING TAXIING [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 1994, 1(1): 54-61.