等离子体合成射流激励器阵列破除翼前缘三维冰特性

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2023.29137

Abstract

Abstract:

Icing on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles will seriously affect their aerodynamic performance， particularly that on the wing leading edge which is more likely to occur and accumulate. In addition， the shape of icing on the wing leading edge is three-dimensional， making it urgent to develop low energy consumption and fast-response anti-icing technology to effectively remove the ice. According to the leading edge curvature of NACA0012， NACA0018 and NACA0024 airfoils， three ice shapes with different radians were fabricated. The characteristics of breaking three-dimensional ice shapes by single and array actuators were studied based on the advantages of fast response， low energy consumption and high jet strength of plasma synthetic jet actuators. The effect of outlets at 45° and 90° on the ice-breaking characteristics was analyzed， and the ice-breaking mechanism and rule of plasma synthetic jet actuators were clarified. The results show that， when the total discharge energy reaches 16.66 J， under the effect of a single actuator， for ice similar to NACA0012 with a small curvature radius on the wing leading edge， the jet impact stress is prone to concentration at the front vertex， and can produce through cracks up to 20 cm at the wing leading edge stagnation point line to realize effective ice breaking， while for ice with larger curvature radiuses， the ice breaking radius is about 5 cm； when the total discharge energy is kept constant at 16.66 J， the “single line” array arrangement near the stagnation point line of the actuator can produce through cracks for ice of three arcs to achieve ice breaking， indicating that the exciter array can effectively expand the ice breaking area with the ability to break ice in a large area with low energy consumption.The research results can provide theoretical and practical reference for UAVs with low energy consumption and large area icebreaking capability.

Key words: UAV de-icing, plasma synthetic jet actuator, actuator array, ice-breaking properties, three-dimensional ice

CLC Number:

V211.7

Pan CHENG, Xiangrong JING, Zhenbing LUO, Tianxiang GAO, Yan ZHOU, Xiong DENG, Qian SUN. Characteristics of 3D ice breaking on leading edge of wing by plasma synthetic jet actuator array[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2024, 45(12): 129137-129137.

Figures/Tables 12

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Table 1

Fig.7

Fig.8

Fig.9

Fig.10

Fig.11

References 37

1	PLUMMER D M， GÖKE S， RAUBER R M， et al. Discrimination of mixed-versus ice-phase clouds using dual-polarization radar with application to detection of aircraft icing regions［J］. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology， 2010， 49（5）： 920-936.
2	JANJUA Z A， TURNBULL B， HIBBERD S， et al. Mixed ice accretion on aircraft wings［J］. Physics of Fluids， 2018， 30（2）： 027101.
3	CEBECI T， KAFYEKE F. Aircraft icing［J］. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics， 2003， 35： 11-21.
4	LIU Y， LI L K， CHEN W L， et al. An experimental study on the aerodynamic performance degradation of a UAS propeller model induced by ice accretion process［J］. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science， 2019， 102： 101-112.
5	AOPA. Aircraft icing ［EB/OL］. （1998-03-05）［2024-03-11］. .
6	AOPA. AOPA air safety institute accident report［EB/OL］. （2023-11-16）［2024-03-11］. .
7	POTAPCZUKM G， BERKOWITZB M. Experimental investigation of multielement airfoil ice accretion and resulting performance degradation［J］. Journal of Aircraft， 1990， 27（8）： 679-691.
8	陈勇，孔维梁，刘洪. 飞机过冷大水滴结冰气象条件运行设计挑战［J］. 航空学报， 2023， 44（1）： 626973.
	CHEN Y， KONG W L， LIU H. Challenge of aircraft design under operational conditions of supercooled large water droplet icing［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2023， 44（1）： 626973 （in Chinese）.
9	CHEN B， WANG L W. Simulation and research of aircraft deicing fluids deicing process［J］. Applied Mechanics and Materials， 2011， 121-126： 4695-4699.
10	ORNITZ S E. A mixed integer nonlinear programming model to optimize the use of aircraft deicing and anti-icing fluids［D］. Boca Raton： Florida Atlantic University， 2009：12-21.
11	ALBRIGHT A. A summary of NASA’s research on the fluid ice protection system［C］∥ Proceedings of the 23rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Reston： AIAA， 1985.
12	GRIFFITHS R. Investigation of leading edge ice accretion with cyclical pneumatic boot inflation［C］∥ 31st Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Nevada： ARC， 1993.
13	SOMMERWERK H， HORST P， BANSMER S. Studies on electro impulse de-icing of a leading edge structure in an icing wind tunnel［C］∥ Proceedings of the 8th AIAA Atmospheric and Space Environments Conference. Reston： AIAA， 2016.
14	HASLIM L A， LEE R D. Electro-expulsive separation system： US4690353［P］. 1987-09-01.
15	RHEE D H， YOON P H， CHO H H. Local heat/mass transfer and flow characteristics of array impinging jets with effusion holes ejecting spent air［J］. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer， 2003， 46（6）： 1049-1061.
16	PELLISSIER M， HABASHI W， PUEYO A. Design optimization of hot-air anti-icing systems by FENSAP-ICE［C］∥ Proceedings of the 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. Reston： AIAA， 2010.
17	胡林权. 民用飞机机翼电加热防/除冰应用现状及技术难点［J］. 航空科学技术， 2016， 27（7）： 8-11.
	HU L Q. Application status and technical difficulties for civil aircraft wing electrothermal anti-/de-icing［J］. Aeronautical Science & Technology， 2016， 27（7）： 8-11 （in Chinese）.
18	PETRENKO V F， SULLIVAN C R， KOZLYUK V， et al. Pulse electro-thermal de-icer （PETD）［J］. Cold Regions Science and Technology， 2011， 65（1）： 70-78.
19	田苗，宋慧敏，梁华，等. 介质阻挡放电等离子体防除冰实验研究［J］. 化工学报， 2019， 70（11）： 4247-4256.
	TIAN M， SONG H M， LIANG H， et al. Experimental study on DBD discharge plasma for anti-icing and de-icing［J］. CIESC Journal， 2019， 70（11）： 4247-4256 （in Chinese）.
20	贾宇豪，梁华，魏彪，等. 基于介质阻挡放电的等离子体除冰实验研究［J］. 高电压技术， 2021， 47（7）： 2615-2623.
	JIA Y H， LIANG H， WEI B， et al. Experimental investigation of plasma deicing based on dielectric barrier discharge［J］. High Voltage Engineering， 2021， 47（7）： 2615-2623 （in Chinese）.
21	周岩，罗振兵，王林，等. 等离子体合成射流激励器及其流动控制技术研究进展［J］. 航空学报， 2022， 43（3）： 025027.
	ZHOU Y， LUO Z B， WANG L， et al. Plasma synthetic jet actuator for flow control： Review［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2022， 43（3）： 025027 （in Chinese）.
22	孟宣市，惠伟伟，易贤，等. AC-SDBD等离子体激励防/除冰研究现状与展望［J］. 空气动力学学报， 2022， 40（2）： 31-49.
	MENG X S， HUI W W， YI X， et al. Anti-/De-icing by AC-SDBD plasma actuators： Status and outlook［J］. Acta Aerodynamica Sinica， 2022， 40（2）： 31-49 （in Chinese）.
23	MENG X S， HU H Y， LI C， et al. Mechanism study of coupled aerodynamic and thermal effects using plasma actuation for anti-icing［J］. Physics of Fluids， 2019， 31（3）： 037103.
24	CAI J S， TIAN Y Q， MENG X S， et al. An experimental study of icing control using DBD plasma actuator［J］. Experiments in Fluids， 2017， 58（8）： 102.
25	谢理科，梁华，吴云，等. 等离子体激励与电加热式防冰性能对比［J］. 航空学报， 2023， 44（1）： 627971.
	XIE L K， LIANG H， WU Y， et al. Comparison of anti-icing performance between plasma actuation and electric heating［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2023， 44（1）： 627971 （in Chinese）.
26	WU Y， WEI B， LIANG H， et al. Flight safety oriented ice shape modulation using distributed plasma actuator units［J］. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics， 2021， 34（10）： 1-5.
27	WEI B， WU Y， LIANG H， et al. Performance and mechanism analysis of nanosecond pulsed surface dielectric barrier discharge based plasma deicer［J］. Physics of Fluids， 2019， 31（9）： 091701.
28	赵彬彬，董威，刘娟，等. 等离子体射流防冰性能实验研究I.DBD-PA参数化分析及防冰效果验证［J］. 上海交通大学学报， 2018， 52（8）： 924-929.
	ZHAO B B， DONG W， LIU J， et al. Experimental study on the anti-icing performance of plasma jet I. Parametric analysis of DBD-PA and verification on the anti-icing performance［J］. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University， 2018， 52（8）： 924-929 （in Chinese）.
29	赵彬彬，董威，张屹. 等离子体射流防冰性能实验研究Ⅱ.流向和展向布置DBD-PA防冰性能比较［J］. 上海交通大学学报， 2018， 52（11）： 1532-1536.
	ZHAO B B， DONG W， ZHANG Y. Experimental study on the anti-icing performance of plasma jet Ⅱ. Comparison of anti-icing performance using streamwise and spanwise DBD-PA［J］. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University， 2018， 52（11）： 1532-1536 （in Chinese）.
30	GROSSMAN K， BOHDAN C， VANWIE D. Sparkjet actuators for flow control［C］∥ Proceedings of the 41st Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. Reston： AIAA， 2003.
31	CYBYK B， GROSSMAN K， VAN WIE D. Computational assessment of the SparkJet flow control actuator［C］∥ Proceedings of the 33rd AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit. Reston： AIAA， 2003.
32	WANG L， XIA Z X， LUO Z B， et al. Three-electrode plasma synthetic jet actuator for high-speed flow control［J］. AIAA Journal， 2014， 52（4）： 879-882.
33	周岩，刘冰，王林，等. 串联式等离子体合成射流激励器放电及流场特性实验研究［C］∥第十届全国实验流体力学学术会议.上海：中国力学学会， 2016.
	ZHOU Y， LIU B， WANG L， et al. Experimental study on discharge and flow field characteristics of cascade plasma synthetic jet exciter ［C］∥ 10th National Conference on Experimental Fluid Mechanics. Shanghai： CSTAM， 2016 （in Chinese）.
34	ZHOU Y， XIA Z X， LUO Z B， et al. Experimental characteristics of a two-electrode plasma synthetic jet actuator array in serial［J］. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics， 2018， 31（12）： 2234-2247.
35	GAO T X， LUO Z B， ZHOU Y， et al. Novel deicing method based on plasma synthetic jet actuator［J］. AIAA Journal， 2020， 58（9）： 4181-4188.
36	GAO T X， LUO Z B， ZHOU Y， et al. Experimental investigation on ice-breaking performance of a novel plasma striker［J］. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics， 2022， 35（1）： 307-317.
37	景向嵘，程盼，罗振兵，等. 电弧放电激励器破除冰特性及裂纹扩展规律［J］. 航空学报， 2022， 43（）： 727765.
	JING X R， CHENG P， LUO Z B， et al. Characteristics of breaking ice and crack propagation law by arc discharge exciter［J］. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica， 2022， 43（S2）： 727765 （in Chinese）.

[1]	Xiangrong JING, Pan CHENG, Zhenbing LUO, Tianxiang GAO, Yan ZHOU, Xiong DENG. Ice breaking characteristics and crack propagation law of arc discharge plasma actuator [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2022, 43(S2): 204-213.
[2]	Yi Xian;Gui Yewei;Zhu Guolin. Numerical Method of a Three-dimensional Ice Accretion Model of Aircraft [J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2010, 31(11): 2152-2158.

Characteristics of 3D ice breaking on leading edge of wing by plasma synthetic jet actuator array

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 12

References 37

Related Articles 2

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

序号	弧度参考	布置方式	放电能量/J
1	NACA0012	①	16.66
2	NACA0012	②	16.66
3	NACA0012	③	16.66
4	NACA0018	①	16.66
5	NACA0018	②	16.66
6	NACA0018	③	16.66
7	NACA0024	①	16.66
8	NACA0024	②	16.66
9	NACA0024	③	16.66