电子电气工程与控制

基于实际动力学方程的飞行器准谱轨迹优化

  • 王远卓 ,
  • 代洪华 ,
  • 岳晓奎
展开
  • 西北工业大学 航天学院,西安 710072
E-mail: hhdai@nwpu.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2025-01-03

  修回日期: 2025-03-18

  录用日期: 2025-04-27

  网络出版日期: 2025-05-08

基金资助

国家杰出青年科学基金(52425212);国家重点研发计划(2021YFA0717100);国家自然科学基金(12072270);国家自然科学基金(U2013206)

Quasi-spectral trajectory optimization for vehicle based on actual dynamic equations

  • Yuanzhuo WANG ,
  • Honghua DAI ,
  • Xiaokui YUE
Expand
  • School of Astronautics,Northwestern Polytechnical University,Xi’an 710072,China
E-mail: hhdai@nwpu.edu.cn

Received date: 2025-01-03

  Revised date: 2025-03-18

  Accepted date: 2025-04-27

  Online published: 2025-05-08

Supported by

National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of China(52425212);National Key Research and Development Program of China(2021YFA0717100);National Natural Science Foundations of China(12072270)

摘要

为实现欠驱动条件下临近空间飞行器每个终端状态的准确控制,需突破机载运算能力有限的瓶颈,发展面向计算制导的高精度、高效率轨迹优化架构。如果离散点数量不足,现有基于偏差动力学的牛顿类轨迹优化(模型预测静态规划)方法存在较大的终端控制误差。受到现有准谱牛顿法启发,提出了一种基于实际动力学的准谱优化方法。与现有方法间接更新优化系数存在本质不同,该方法直接更新优化系数。而后,证明了该方法是一种牛顿法,并明确指出在多次迭代过程中,若不引入阻尼机制存在鲁棒性差的问题。面向牛顿法存在鲁棒性差和控制精度低的问题,融合模糊控制提出了一种自适应轨迹优化方法,避免了无阻尼方法初值敏感迭代直接发散的问题,提升了鲁棒性与精度。针对动态轨迹优化问题,仿真结果说明:与现有方法相比,提出方法在相同条件下减少了计算时间。

本文引用格式

王远卓 , 代洪华 , 岳晓奎 . 基于实际动力学方程的飞行器准谱轨迹优化[J]. 航空学报, 2025 , 46(22) : 331759 -331759 . DOI: 10.7527/S1000-6893.2025.31759

Abstract

To achieve precise control of terminal states for near-space vehicles under underactuated conditions, it is necessary to overcome the limitations of onboard computational capability and develop a highly precise and efficient trajectory optimization framework in computational guidance. If the number of discretization points is too low, existing Newton-type trajectory optimization methods by deviation dynamic equations (Model Predictive Static Programming) have large terminal control errors. Motivated by current quasi-spectral Newton method, a quasi-spectral optimization method is proposed by actual dynamic equations. Unlike existing methods that update the optimization coefficient indirectly, this method updates the optimization coefficient directly. Additionally, it is proven that this method is a Newton optimization method, and it is clearly shown that when damping mechanism is not considered, this method suffers from poor robustness during multiple iterations. To address the poor robustness and low control accuracy in typical Newton methods, an adaptive trajectory optimization method is proposed with fuzzy control. This method avoids the divergence problem commonly encountered in damping-free methods with sensitive initial values, thereby enhancing both robustness and accuracy. Simulation results show that the proposed method achieves faster dynamic trajectory optimization than existing methods under identical conditions.

参考文献

[1] GAO Y, CHIEN S. Review on space robotics: Toward top-level science through space exploration[J]. Science Robotics20172(7): eaan5074.
[2] 包为民. 可重复使用运载火箭技术发展综述[J]. 航空学报202344(23): 629555.
  BAO W M. A review of reusable launch vehicle technology development[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica202344(23): 629555 (in Chinese).
[3] DING Y B, YUE X K, CHEN G S, et al. Review of control and guidance technology on hypersonic vehicle[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics202235(7): 1-18.
[4] 穆凌霞, 王新民, 谢蓉, 等. 高超音速飞行器及其制导控制技术综述[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报201951(3): 1-14.
  MU L X, WANG X M, XIE R, et al. A survey of the hypersonic flight vehicle and its guidance and control technology[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology201951(3): 1-14 (in Chinese).
[5] 李鹤宇, 王建斌, 张锐, 等. 具有时间和角度约束的欠驱动三维协同制导律[J]. 宇航学报202445(10): 1633-1644.
  LI H Y, WANG J B, ZHANG R, et al. Underactuated three-dimensional cooperative guidance law with time and angle constraints[J]. Journal of Astronautics202445(10): 1633-1644 (in Chinese).
[6] 尹秋霖, 陈琦, 王中原, 等. 考虑时空协同的滑翔制导炮弹单炮多发快速弹道规划[J]. 兵工学报202445(3): 798-809.
  YIN Q L, CHEN Q, WANG Z Y, et al. Rapid trajectory planning for glide-guided projectiles in single-Gun multi-shot scenarios considering time-spatial coordination[J]. Acta Armamentarii202445(3): 798-809 (in Chinese).
[7] 雍恩米, 陈磊, 唐国金. 飞行器轨迹优化数值方法综述[J]. 宇航学报200829(2): 397-406.
  YONG E M, CHEN L, TANG G J. A survey of numerical methods for trajectory optimization of spacecraft[J]. Journal of Astronautics200829(2): 397-406 (in Chinese).
[8] 崔平远, 龙嘉腾, 朱圣英, 等. 行星着陆轨迹优化技术研究进展[J]. 宇航学报202142(6): 677-686.
  CUI P Y, LONG J T, ZHU S Y, et al. Research progress of planetary landing trajectory optimization techniques[J]. Journal of Astronautics202142(6): 677-686 (in Chinese).
[9] 武迪, 郭祥, 蒋方华, 等. 连续小推力轨迹优化间接法研究进展综述[J]. 宇航学报202445(7): 995-1007.
  WU D, GUO X, JIANG F H, et al. Progress of indirect method for continuous low-thrust trajectory optimization[J]. Journal of Astronautics202445(7): 995-1007 (in Chinese).
[10] SHIRAZI A, CEBERIO J, LOZANO J A. Spacecraft trajectory optimization: A review of models, objectives, approaches and solutions[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences2018102: 76-98.
[11] CHAI R Q, SAVVARIS A, TSOURDOS A, et al. A review of optimization techniques in spacecraft flight trajectory design[J]. Progress in Aerospace Sciences2019109: 100543.
[12] 闫循良, 王培臣, 王舒眉, 等. 基于混沌多项式的RBCC飞行器上升段鲁棒轨迹快速优化[J]. 航空学报202344(21): 528349.
  YAN X L, WANG P C, WANG S M, et al. Rapid robust trajectory optimization for RBCC vehicle ascent based on polynomial chaos[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica202344(21): 528349 (in Chinese).
[13] WIJAYATUNGA M C, ARMELLIN R, PIROVANO L. Exploiting scaling constants to facilitate the convergence of indirect trajectory optimization methods[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics202346(5): 958-969.
[14] SARANATHAN H, GRANT M J. Incorporation of rigid body dynamics into indirect hypersonic trajectory optimization[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets202361(2): 393-406.
[15] 王有盛, 孙立国, 魏金鹏, 等. 基于改进鸡群-Gauss伪谱法的组合动力飞机爬升轨迹优化方法[J]. 航空学报202546(2): 230737.
  WANG Y S, SUN L G, WEI J P, et al. Optimization of climb trajectory of combined-cycle engine powered aircraft based on improved CSO-Gauss pseudospectral method[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica202546(2): 230737 (in Chinese).
[16] DARBY C L, HAGER W W, RAO A V. Direct trajectory optimization using a variable low-order adaptive pseudospectral method[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets201148(3): 433-445.
[17] DIEDAM H, SAGER S. Global optimal control with the direct multiple shooting method[J]. Optimal Control Applications and Methods201839(2): 449-470.
[18] PATTERSON M A, RAO A V. GPOPS-Ⅱ: A MATLAB software for solving multiple-phase optimal control problems using hp-adaptive Gaussian quadrature collocation methods and sparse nonlinear programming[J]. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS)201441(1): 1-37.
[19] ROSS I M. Enhancements to the DIDO optimal control toolbox[J]. arXiv preprint2004.13112; 2020.
[20] LU P. Introducing computational guidance and control[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics201740(2): 193.
[21] PAN B F, MA Y Y, YAN R. Newton-type methods in computational guidance[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics201842(2): 377-383.
[22] 董哲, 刘凯, 李旦伟, 等. 考虑动态控制分配的空天飞行器再入姿态复合控制设计[J]. 宇航学报202142(6): 749-756.
  DONG Z, LIU K, LI D W, et al. A dynamic control allocation approach for reentry compound attitude control design of aerospace vehicle[J]. Journal of Astronautics202142(6): 749-756 (in Chinese).
[23] MALYUTA D, REYNOLDS T P, SZMUK M, et al. Convex optimization for trajectory generation: A tutorial on generating dynamically feasible trajectories reliably and efficiently[J]. IEEE Control Systems Magazine202242(5): 40-113.
[24] MALYUTA D, YU Y, ELANGO P, et al. Advances in trajectory optimization for space vehicle control[J]. Annual Reviews in Control202152: 282-315.
[25] 刘哲, 陆浩然, 郑伟, 等. 多滑翔飞行器时间协同轨迹快速规划[J]. 航空学报202142(11): 524497.
  LIU Z, LU H R, ZHENG W, et al. Rapid time-coordination trajectory planning method for multi-glide vehicles[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica202142(11): 524497 (in Chinese).
[26] 刁尹, 张智, 彭越, 等. 火箭着陆段能量管理与轨迹优化技术[J]. 航空学报202445(15): 229634.
  DIAO Y, ZHANG Z, PENG Y, et al. Energy management and trajectory optimization technology for rocket landing[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica202445(15): 229634 (in Chinese).
[27] KUMAGAI N, OGURI K. Adaptive-mesh sequential convex programming for space trajectory optimization[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics202447(10): 2213-2220.
[28] LIU X, LI S, XIN M. Pseudospectral convex optimization based model predictive static programming for constrained guidance[J]. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems202359(3): 2232-2244.
[29] PADHI R, BANERJEE A, MATHAVARAJ S, et al. Computational guidance using model predictive static programming for challenging space missions: An introductory tutorial with example scenarios[J]. IEEE Control Systems Magazine202444(2): 55-80.
[30] MA Y Y, PAN B F. Parallel-structured Newton-type guidance by using modified Chebyshev-Picard iteration[J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets202058(3): 729-740.
[31] 陈顺毅, 徐小平, 刘双喜, 等. 面向时间协同的高超声速滑翔飞行器集群再入轨迹规划[J/OL]. 国防科技大学学报, (2025-01-01)[2025-01-03]. .
  CHEN S Y, XU X P, LIU S X, et al. Time-coordinated reentry trajectory planning of hypersonic gliding vehicle cluster[J/OL]. Journal of National University of Defense Technology, (2025-01-01)[2025-01-03]. (in Chinese).
[32] 廖腾, 刘燕斌, 陈柏屹, 等. 高超声速飞行器主动增阻的时间一致协同方法[J]. 宇航学报202445(10): 1656-1665.
  LIAO T, LIU Y B, CHEN B Y, et al. Time consensus method for active drag increment of hypersonic flight vehicle[J]. Journal of Astronautics202445(10): 1656-1665 (in Chinese).
[33] WANG Y Z, HAN Z G, LU C. Improved time-optimal static programming algorithm for hypersonic vehicle[J]. International Journal of Control202497(5): 999-1013.
[34] LU P, DOMAN D B, SCHIERMAN J D. Adaptive terminal guidance for hypervelocity impact in specified direction[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics200629(2): 269-278.
[35] WANG Y Z, DAI H H. Secure model predictive static programming with initial value generator for online computational guidance of near-space vehicles[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology2025156: 109768.
[36] WANG J W, ZHANG R. Terminal guidance for a hypersonic vehicle with impact time control[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics201841(8): 1790-1798.
[37] MONDAL S, PADHI R. Angle-constrained terminal guidance using quasi-spectral model predictive static programming[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics201741(3): 783-791.
[38] 周聪, 闫晓东, 唐硕, 等. 大气层内模型预测静态规划拦截中制导[J]. 航空学报202142(11): 524912.
  ZHOU C, YAN X D, TANG S, et al. Midcourse guidance for endo-atmospheric interception based on model predictive static programming[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica202142(11): 524912 (in Chinese).
[39] DWIVEDI P N, BHATTACHARYA A, PADHI R. Suboptimal midcourse guidance of interceptors for high-speed targets with alignment angle constraint[J]. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics201134(3): 860-877.
[40] ZHOU C, YAN X D, TANG S. Generalized quasi-spectral model predictive static programming method using Gaussian quadrature collocation[J]. Aerospace Science and Technology2020106: 106134.
[41] 马洋洋. 运载火箭数值优化自主制导方法研究[D]. 西安: 西北工业大学, 2023: 46-48.
  MA Y Y. Research on numerical optimization-based autonomous guidance method for launch vehicles[D]. Xi’an: Northwestern Polytechnical University, 2023: 46-48 (in Chinese).
[42] POLYAK B, TREMBA A. New versions of Newton method: Step-size choice, convergence domain and under-determined equations[J]. Optimization Methods and Software202035(6): 1272-1303.
[43] ZHANG F, HUANG P F. Fuzzy-based adaptive super-twisting sliding-mode control for a maneuverable tethered space net robot[J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems202129(7): 1739-1749.
[44] 张永华, 王铮, 王时雨, 等. 基于无迹模型预测静态规划的可回收火箭着陆段鲁棒制导方法[J/OL]. 北京航空航天大学学报, (2024-09-14)[2025-01-03]. .
  ZHANG Y H, WANG Z, WANG S Y, et al. Robust guidance method of recoverable rocket landing phase based on unscented model predictive static programming[J/OL]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, (2024-09-14)[2025-01-03]. (in Chinese).
[45] LAN J, LI J. Newton-Kantorovich/Radau pseudospectral solution to rigid spacecraft time-optimal three-axis reorientation[J]. Advances in Space Research202065(11): 2662-2673.
文章导航

/