加速退化模型及外推结果准确度的定量验证方法

doi:10.7527/S1000-6893.2018.21950

固体力学与飞行器总体设计

本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索

前一篇 | 后一篇

加速退化模型及外推结果准确度的定量验证方法

周源^1,2, 王浩伟¹, 盖炳良¹

1. 海军航空大学 3院, 烟台 264001;
2. 海军工程大学兵器工程学院, 武汉 430032

收稿日期:2017-12-29 修回日期:2018-03-26 出版日期:2018-09-15 发布日期:2018-06-09
通讯作者: 王浩伟 E-mail:13705355730@139.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（51605487）；山东省自然科学基金（ZR2016FQ03）；中国博士后科学基金（2016M592965）

Quantitative validation methods for accelerated degradation model and extrapolated results

ZHOU Yuan^1,2, WANG Haowei¹, GAI Bingliang¹

1. The Third Academy, Naval Aviation University, Yantai 264001, China;
2. Academy of Armament Engineering, Naval Engineering University, Wuhan 430032, China

Received:2017-12-29 Revised:2018-03-26 Online:2018-09-15 Published:2018-06-09
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (51605487); Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2016FQ03); China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2016M592965)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 加速退化试验本质上是牺牲可靠度评估精度换取可靠度评估效率，外推出的可靠度结果通常会与真实值存在一定的偏差，因此，验证加速退化模型与外推结果的准确度是非常必要的。根据可靠性建模的步骤设计了验证加速退化模型及外推结果的技术流程，结合Wiener-Arrhenius加速退化模型构建了验证技术框架。采用了基于假设检验的模型验证方法，利用Kolmogorov-Smirnov检验法、Anderson-Darling检验法分别验证Wiener退化模型、加速退化模型及外推的可靠度模型是否合理。提出了具有工程实用性的基于面积比的外推结果验证方法，利用蒙特卡罗仿真解决复杂可靠度函数积分问题，用于定量表征外推结果的准确度，通过面积比阈值判定是否接受外推结果。通过惯导系统伺服电路实例应用说明了技术框架的可行性与有效性，研究工作为解决加速退化试验中的验证难题做出了有益的探索，所提出的各种定量验证方法具有较好的工程应用价值。

关键词: 加速退化模型, 定量验证, 假设检验, Wiener-Arrhenius, 蒙特卡罗仿真

Abstract: The accelerated degradation test improves the efficiency of reliability assessment by sacrificing some assessment accuracy, and there are commonly deviations between extrapolated reliability results and true values. Thus, it is necessary to validate the accuracy of the accelerated degradation model and extrapolated results. The technical flow for validating the accelerated degradation model and extrapolated results are designed according to the steps of reliability modeling, and a validation technology framework is constructed with the Wiener-Arrhenius accelerated degradation model. The model validation method based on hypothesis test is adopted. The application reasonability of the Wiener degradation model, accelerated degradation model and extrapolated reliability model is validated by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Anderson-Darling tests. A practical method for validating extrapolated results based on the area ratio is proposed, which solves the integral problem of complex functions using Monte Carlo simulation. The area ratio is applied to quantitatively describe the accuracy of extrapolated results, and a threshold of area ratio is specified to determine whether to accept the extrapolated results or not. The feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed technology framework is demonstrated by a case study of the servo circuit of the inertial navigation system. The proposed quantitative validation methods show great applicability in practice.

Key words: accelerated degradation model, quantitative validation, hypothesis test, Wiener-Arrhenius, Monte Carlo simulation

中图分类号:

V260
TB114.3

周源, 王浩伟, 盖炳良. 加速退化模型及外推结果准确度的定量验证方法[J]. 航空学报, 2018, 39(9): 221950-221959.

ZHOU Yuan, WANG Haowei, GAI Bingliang. Quantitative validation methods for accelerated degradation model and extrapolated results[J]. ACTA AERONAUTICAET ASTRONAUTICA SINICA, 2018, 39(9): 221950-221959.

参考文献

[1] MEEKER W Q, ESCOBAR A. Statistical methods for reliability data[M]. Hoboken, NJ:John Wiley & Sons, 1998:630-640.
[2] WANG X, XU D. An inverse Gaussian process model for degradation data[J]. Technometrics, 2010, 52(2):188-197.
[3] YE Z S, CHEN N. The inverse Gaussian process as degradation model[J]. Technometrics, 2014, 56(3):302-311.
[4] ZIO E. Some challenges and opportunities in reliability engineering[J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2016, 65(4):1769-1782.
[5] 王浩伟, 滕克难. 基于加速退化数据的可靠度评估技术综述[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2017, 39(12):2877-2885. WANG H W, TENG K N. Review of reliability evaluation technology based on accelerated degradation data[J]. System Engineering and Electronics, 2017, 39(12):2877-2885(in Chinese).
[6] LIU L, LI X Y, ZIO E, et al. Model uncertainty in accelerated degradation testing analysis[J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2017, 66(3):603-615.
[7] 王浩伟, 徐廷学, 王伟亚. 基于退化模型的失效机理一致性检验方法[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(3):889-897. WANG H W, XU T X, WANG W Y. Test method of failure mechanism consistency based on degradation model[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2015, 36(3):889-897(in Chinese).
[8] YE Z S, CHEN L P, TANG L C, et al. Accelerated degradation test planning using the inverse Gaussian process[J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2014, 63(3):750-763.
[9] LI X Y, HU Y Q, ZIO E, et al. A Bayesian optimal design for accelerated degradation testing based on the inverse Gaussian process[J]. IEEE Access, 2017, 5:5690-5701.
[10] LING M H, TSUI K L, BALAKRISHNAN N. Accelerated degradation analysis for the quality of a system based on the Gamma process[J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2015, 64(1):463-472.
[11] TSAI C C, LIN C T. Lifetime inference for highly reliable products based on skew-normal accelerated destructive degradation test model[J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2015, 64(4):1340-1355.
[12] ZHANG J P, LI W B, CHENG G L, et al. Life prediction of OLED for constant-stress accelerated degradation tests using luminance decaying model[J]. Journal of Luminescence, 2014, 154:491-495.
[13] AO D, HU Z, MAHADEVAN S. Design of validation experiments for life prediction models[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2017, 165:22-33.
[14] YAO J, XU M, ZHONG W. Research of step-down stress accelerated degradation data assessment method of a certain type of missile tank[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2012, 25(6):917-924.
[15] WANG H W, XU T X, MI Q L. Lifetime prediction based on Gamma processes from accelerated degradation data[J]. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2015, 28(1):172-179.
[16] LING Y, MAHADEVAN S. Quantitative model validation techniques:New insights[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2013, 111:217-231.
[17] 许丹, 陈志军, 王前程, 等. 基于空间相似性和波动阈值的退化模型一致性检验方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2015, 37(2):455-459. XU D, CHEN Z J, WANG Q C, et al. Method for consistency check of degradation model based on spatial similarity and fluctuation threshold[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2015, 37(2):455-459(in Chinese).
[18] SI X S, WANG W B, CHEN M Y, et al. A degradation path-dependent approach for remaining useful life estimation with an exact and closed-form solution[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2013, 226(1):53-66.
[19] YE Z S, CHEN N, SHEN Y. A new class of Wiener process model for degradation analysis[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2015, 139:58-67.
[20] 王浩伟, 滕克难, 李军亮. 随机环境应力冲击下基于多参数相关退化的导弹部件寿命预测[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(11):3404-3412. WANG H W, TENG K N, LI J L. Lifetime prediction for missile components based on multiple parameters correlative degrading with random shocks of environmental stresses[J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(11):3404-3412(in Chinese).
[21] FRANK J, MARTIN K, BERND B. Selection of acceleration models for test planning and model usage[J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2017, 66(2):298-308.
[22] PARK C, PADGETT W J. Stochastic degradation models with several accelerating variables[J]. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 2006, 55(2):379-390.
[23] LIM H, YUM B J. Optimal design of accelerated degradation tests based on Wiener process models[J]. Journal of Applied Statistics, 2011, 38(2):309-325.
[24] WHITMORE G A, SCHENKELBERG F. Modelling accelerated degradation data using Wiener diffusion with a time scale transformation[J]. Lifetime Data Analysis, 1997, 3(1):27-45.
[25] LIAO H T, ELSAYED E A. Reliability inference for field conditions from accelerated degradation testing[J]. Naval Research Logistics, 2006, 53:576-587.
[26] WANG H W, XI W J. Acceleration factor constant principle and the application under ADT[J]. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 2016, 32(7):2591-2600.
[27] 王浩伟, 滕克难, 盖炳良. 基于加速因子不变原则的加速退化数据分析方法[J]. 电子学报, 2018, 46(3):739-747. WANG H W, TENG K N, GAI B L. The method of analyzing accelerated degradation data based on acceleration factor constant principle[J]. Acta Electronica Sinica, 2018, 46(3):739-747(in Chinese).
[28] ONAR A, PADGETT W J. Accelerated test models with the inverse Gaussian distribution[J]. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 2000, 89(1-2):119-133.
[29] PENG C Y. Inverse Gaussian processes with random effects and explanatory variables for degradation data[J]. Technometrics, 2015, 57(1):100-111.
[30] EVANS D L, DREW J H, LEEMIS L M. The distribution of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Cramer-von Mises, and Anderson-Darling test statistics for exponential populations with estimated parameters[J]. Communication in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 2008, 37(7):1396-1421.
[31] RAZALI N M, WAH Y B. Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling tests[J]. Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics, 2011, 2(1):21-33.

E-mail：hkxb@buaa.edu.cn

关于我们

期刊社服务

专业学科

封面文章

友情链接

主管单位：中国科学技术协会主办单位：中国航空学会北京航空航天大学

加速退化模型及外推结果准确度的定量验证方法

Quantitative validation methods for accelerated degradation model and extrapolated results

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	孙晓哲, 侯东, 杨建忠. 双余度机电作动器力纷争机理及敏感性[J]. 航空学报, 2023, 44(S1): 727661-727661.
[2]	伍强, 徐浩军, 裴彬彬, 魏扬, 张杨. 基于吸引域与二元极值理论的结冰飞机飞行风险量化评估[J]. 航空学报, 2022, 43(5): 125137-125137.
[3]	周亮, 李庆民, 彭英武, 李华. 串件拼修对策下K/N(G)结构系统可用度评估建模[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(4): 220319-220319.
[4]	周亮, 李庆民, 彭英武, 李华. 动态保障结构下多级多层备件配置优化建模[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(11): 220822-220822.
[5]	陈璐, 毕大平, 崔瑞, 韩佳辉. 嵌套阵列最大似然估计测向算法[J]. 航空学报, 2017, 38(11): 321212-321212.
[6]	肖永生, 周建江, 黄丽贞, 张向阳. 基于OTR和SHT的射频隐身雷达信号设计[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(6): 1931-1939.
[7]	孙殿星, 王国宏, 盛丹. 基于均值-方差联合检验的航迹欺骗干扰识别[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(4): 1292-1304.
[8]	应涛, 黄高明, 左炜, 单鸿昌, 高俊. 非合作无源探测中的假设检验弱目标检测方法[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(2): 626-636.
[9]	薛源, 徐浩军, 胡孟权. 结冰条件下人-机-环系统的飞行风险概率[J]. 航空学报, 2016, 37(11): 3328-3339.
[10]	陆中, 戎翔, 周伽, 陈康. 基于蒙特卡罗仿真的FADEC系统多故障TLD分析方法[J]. 航空学报, 2015, 36(12): 3970-3979.
[11]	吴泽民;任姝婕;刘熹. 基于拓扑序列法的航迹关联算法[J]. 航空学报, 2009, 30(10): 1937-1942.
[12]	翟坤;李顺利;杨涤. 用户星天线空间扫描策略[J]. 航空学报, 2008, 29(5): 1308-1313.
[13]	蒋荟;杨晓华;祝华远. 空中环境谱编制中的假设检验方法[J]. 航空学报, 2007, 28(6): 1359-1363.
[14]	吴存利;杨金耀;胡丙相. 统计分析和优化技术相结合对有限元模型参数修改的研究[J]. 航空学报, 1996, 17(6): 45-50.
[15]	熊峻江;高镇同. 雨流-回线法及二维疲劳载荷分布假设检验[J]. 航空学报, 1996, 17(3): 297-301.